Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"It is also used in a range of pseudoscientific beliefs (quantum mysticism), where the adjective is used to imply that a paranormal event is a consequence of quantum [physics]." -Wikipedia
wlan
Did you converse with them in English by chance?
Probably because it isn't necessarily garbage.
That group is a bigger joke than this site...
Is that the new Bond movie?
Would this individual's name happen to be Afroman?
Always.. like at the peak of the dot com bubble
.08 was in early Nov 2013
Regardless, this stock is $, imo
Why would you hope they get sued?
Solid prediction..
Apparently it was the start of a joke too funny to finish
We hit 0009 briefly last Thurs
Forget about proof or specifics, it's the 'period' that really drives home your point.
True but what does that have to do with the non-scam that is WLAN?
Who are the crooks and what precisely have they done?
Agreed 100%. Especially after reading (more like laboring) through their 33 page RISE proposal..
What specifically about OTI's equipment is better?
Haha yes, indeed. In fact I expected mine to be deleted promptly, as I do this one..
But like I said, this place is so inconsistent, I could furnish the most relevant on-topic post of all time and watch it get deleted.
The rule I copied was in fact copied to me by an admin (in rude bold), regarding a perfectly valid post of mine (since deleted) on a separate board.
I told him that the site is littered with valid, friendly/neutral posts directly addressing fellow posters, and that their methods for deletion are arbitrary to an absurd degree. Of course this is no great secret. But I thought you should know the context. I happened to notice your 'bradadocious' post and thought I'd ask you if there was a magical technicality at work within its diction that proved its compliance. Alas, there isn't. The site is just a circus.
Peace
How exactly does your message comply with the following iHub rule:
Your messages need to focus on the company and the stock and should not contain comments about other people who post on the board whether specific or in general. Other posters are never the topic of the board
I ask this only because of the gross inconsistencies in regulating & administering the iHub boards, not because I have any personal issue with your particular post.
Thanks
Looks like the lawsuit is no more. I'm no attorney so this is jmo.
Check Entry #16 in the link from your post yesterday (#36989).
"Inasmuch as no response to the Board's order has been
received, judgment is hereby entered against applicant. The
opposition is accordingly sustained and registration to applicant
is refused."
My interpretation is Yahoo was the applicant and Cinnabar was the opposition. Jmo
Have you been in recent contact with Mulder and Scully?