Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
They put the app out there, advertise it a little bit here, a little bit there, let it grow slowly, until they initialize their big campaign. Even then it takes a bit to take hold, seeing as it's something NEW! But when it does, so many others will then rush to catch up.
lol !
He means quietly wait until after Labor Day! lol
Gettin' t h i n !!
Nope. How long did it take TSN*P's price to get to its peak? Just a few more than 4 days! lol
3000 shares... a veritable abandoning of ship!!! lol
No sellers!
Updated (Aug 19, 2022) share structure
A/S 500M
O/S 27M
Restricted 22.6M
Unrestricted 4.4M
FLOAT 5.3M
lol How many shares were "frontloaded?" Maybe 100,000 TOTAL! You just can't "frontload" this beauty without driving the price up!
So sweet to see a float locked up tighter than a drum!
Share that tweet, would you?
Baaad prediction!
This letter of intent isn't what caused this thing to pop last week, it is the R/M with Centiment Capital, which is all but completed.
Outstanding stock went up almost 3M from March to June, then went up ZERO between June and July. I'm sure it had to do with change of control. They're sure NOT living off of some horrendous dilutive efforts. When the finished and debugged and polished app comes out, this stock will go up 20X overnight, and then as it gets accepted and $$$ starts flowing in, that 20X will become 100X. And that time is fast approaching. Anybody buying at .20 is stealing shares.
Well, they said "2 months to finish app", and then 2 months later they said, "in beta," and then 2 months later said, "2 months to launch." It IS slow going, but they're keeping up with their pronouncements.
Yeah, I don't think "everybody knows" or even agrees with this opinion. In fact, I think it's in the minority! lol!
Seems nobody knows about this yet. $55M reverse merger and nobody's here! lol
Some of you guys are acting like you haven't seen the news release from Friday, which came out 5 minutes before close:
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/07/08/2476800/0/en/IL2M-International-Corp-Announces-Merger-with-Aamani-Healthcare-Group.html
Healthcare REVERSE MERGER!
"Shouldn't she" ? This is a rhetorical response to your ASSuming the only reason for nonpayment of rent is inability to pay. I have no idea why the legal proceedings, but neither do you. Can't assume lack of funds.
There's more than one reason for not paying a bill... disagreement for one. Maybe there was lot's of stuff the landlord was welching on, or let go unfixed. So she refused to pay until they were done, and the landlord took it to court... and then they met in the middle and ironed it out.
Then you maybe haven't been around that long. It happens. I've even seen a R/S approved by vote and then cancelled at a later time, more than once.
"Capping the value at...." would mean that they're assessing the shares at that value (or no greater than that value). These are NON-assessable shares.
I think perhaps you could check with your broker concerning a correct understanding of that term, "non-assessable shares"... which are... "like most other shares traded on U.S. and most other major exchanges in the world."
Non-assessable simply means the shares trade freely, based on what people are willing to pay for them, or sell them for... they are not subject to a fixed assessment value. They are... NON ASSESSABLE.
Don't think you're reading that "non-assessable" correctly. Notice the last line of the definition you provide says, ... "Stocks issued by U.S. companies and traded on U.S. exchanges (and almost all other exchanges) are generally non-assessable."
If what you interpret "non-assessable" to be, that would mean the stocks traded on US exchanges (and almost all other exchanges) can not appreciate in price either. If the shares given to SYSX can not appreciate in price, then neither can most other shares traded on US (and almost all other) exchanges.
My understanding of "non-assessable" is that, though Ostendo VALUES the shares they will bequeath to SYSX at $$X.X, this is not an "assessment" which can be changed at any time, before or after the transaaction, in order to change either the number of shares provided, or any amount of $$$$ to change hands.
These "non-assessable" shares will continue to change in value, daily, just like all other common shares traded on the US (and almost all other) exchanges.
Something's wrong all right. D-I-L-U-T-I-O-N!
Uh, no actually.
But I am sensing some rabidity.
lol
Methinks you yourself perhaps have been gronked here.
Hehe.
110% return in a little over 2 hours.
That's good, right?
lol
How much could I have made on your stock?
"Gronk never confirmed it." "Gronk denied it."
Which is it?
The idea that this is fake news is fake news! lol
Now if I'd'a known that AHEAD of time!... lol
Now if I'd'a known that AHEAD of time!... lol
Now if I'd'a known that AHEAD of time!... lol
Unfortunately, their fins will show that they have yet to produce any revs, having just come into existence this last January. It's all plans and goals, hopes and dreams.
Actually, RSAMMD is NOT the owner of TXTM. It is RSAMMDA LLC which reverse merged into TXTM.
If you think RSAMMD is the same as RSAMMDA LLC, then I would certainly recommend buying like crazy. But be aware that the ownership of RSAMMDA LLC is NOT exactly the same as the ownership of RSAMMD.
Conclusion: Buying TXTM is NOT the same as buying RSAMMD; rather, it's buying a relatively new company which to date has no actual revenue-producing business, only goals and plans (hopes and dreams).
Except in order to be a subsidiary, RSAMMDA LLC would have to be owned by RSAMMD, but that is NOT the case. Instead, it's owned by one of the principals of RSAMMD and one of the principals of Leeds Boerdery.
By definition, then, RSAMMDA LLC is definitely NOT a subsidiary of RSAMMD.
As regards all of the other "this is what is going to be done in the future" statements (liquidate, transfer, roll into, etc. etc.), it's all conjecture, and in fact is irrelevant, since it's not a subsidiary.
PS. Take a look at the number of my posts. If I'm a paid basher, I'm a damn poor one! lol
Nobody's saying RSAMMD is a scam. Nobody!
The doubters are simply relaying the fact that it's NOT RSAMMD which is reverse merging into TXTM; rather, it is RSAMMDA LLC that is reverse merging into TXTM... and RSAMMDA LLC at this time has "plans" and "goals" ONLY, and no actual ongoing business or revenue! (as far as we know)
Whether the naming of this new startup, RSAMMDA LLC, was meant to fool people into thinking it's RSAMMD doing the reverse merging is only conjecture. RSAMMDA LLC/TXTM may indeed accomplish some or even all or even more than what it plans, but TO DATE, that's all RSAMMDA LLC/TXTM has... plans and goals.
"We plan to share our near term goals and future plans with current shareholders as well as new investors interested in hearing our growth story."
So apparently they have no HISTORY to share. In other words, no business... YET!
"Nothing" but big plans! lol
#1. Subsidiary Merger... where is it stated that this is a "subsidiary merger?" The owner of RSAMMDA LLC is NOT RSAMMD, but rather is owned by two men, one of whom IS a principal of RSAMMD (the other is not), which makes RSAMMDA LLC definitely NOT a "subsidiary" of RSAMMD.
#2. "After the SUB reverse merges with TXTM, it then transfers the TXTM shell to RSAMMD." Where is this stated? Where did you even get the idea that this would happen? Is RSAMMDA LLC legally obligated to transfer the TXTM shell to RSAMMD? You make a big stretch here, treating as fact something which you only conjured up in your mind that "might" happen, but actually most likely won't, because of #1 above.
#3. "Thereafter the SUB is dissolved and liquidated." Again, where do you come up with this scenario? Perhaps I've missed it in the filings, but if you could please show me proof (perhaps even the plans for this and #2 above sketched out somewhere aside from your posts?), I would honestly love to see it.
Not trying to bash here, simply looking for evidence of what you state, somewhere other than your posts.