Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
As someone who has resided in Montana for the past 63 and a half years, I can definitively state that it takes a good day's drive to make it from Yaak to Alzada.....and one of the bigger blessings in making that road-trip is that you never, ever have the misfortune of having to see or read the drivel ejaculated by a pompous poser from Massachusetts. IMHO.
You have to own shares to sell shares. Those who are long aren't ignorant enough to consider selling at .53.
Dip.
Shat.
You are the epitome of a Red Sox fan.
........and on November 3, 1948, the Chicago Tribune ran a banner headline on its front page declaring "DEWEY BEATS TRUMAN". How'd that turn out??
In a post from earlier today, one of the more frequent posters on this board had this to say, "Even if there were those so called angry shareholders, I regard all of them as a bunch of spoiled/whiny cry babies......"
The inference here seems to be that if you're a shareholder (which I am), and if you're angry about the amount of the tender offer (I guess I'm not thrilled by the amount of the tender offer, because I will not be tendering my shares), then I suppose that you can count me in as one of those "spoiled/whiny cry babies.."
...and all along, here I believed that I'm in this for all the right reasons. Funny, I still believe that.
Smokey, to let you & others know, I (along with a group of family members and friends) have been invested in OCAT/ACTC for several years. I also received the back-to-back tendering offers earlier today---I deleted them as soon as I saw them. Those in my investor group are unanimous in our decision to NOT tender, or sell, even a single share of OCAT stock. If that decision turns out to be a mistake, then so be it.
Thank you for the response. I think that I understand your logic a bit more than I did earlier. In the spirit of the season, I wish you well in your future endeavors. However, that being said, I still hope that your decision to tender your shares turns out to be the worst investing decision of your investing career. LOL. Sincerely though, Happy Holidays to you and your family.
Looks like it's a perfect time to call Mr.Spock, have Scotty change the oil and air up the tires on the Starship, put the band back together, and get ready to head on out of here,.....looks like nobody's buying what you're selling.
Not much to add to what you and LASERS have espoused through this whole episode, except 'keep on keepin' the faith'. My circle of investors, all be it small in numbers, will be holding all 100% of our shares.
Trust me,art2426, you have a legion of investors who solidly stand with you.
Hey Lasers, just wanted to say 'thanks' for your many contributions to this board. I'm a far cry from being any sort of an authority on the topic of OCAT, OCAT's present and future goals & objectives, and the roller coaster fluctuations of OCAT's stock price. However, I am one of the 'silent majority' who sincerely believe in the ultimate benefits that will one day result out of the labors of OCAT researchers. Your knowledge, and your willingness to share it, means more than you may ever realize. My deepest gratitude to you.
Have been a shareholder for nearly 3 years, but haven't been as attentive to this Board as I should have over that period. I blame it on the truth that I got nauseated from seeing the very same postings of one individual day after day after day. I cannot begin to tell you how refreshing it is to see the turnabout in the PPS of ACTC--but, more importantly, the incredible turnabout in the quality of the postings on this Board. You, sir, are at the very forefront of this turnabout. Every shareholder who (even occasionally) frequents this Board owes you a serious debt of gratitude for all you have posted over the past several weeks. I know others have thanked you before now, but today I'm finally getting around to thanking you on my behalf. It's a wonderful thing you are doing.
Q: By referring to Dr. Lanza as 'a rouge scientist" are you classifying him as a sort of cross dresser? Or does this harken back to your calling for 'a hostel takeover" of ACTC? In both cases I believe that a remedial spelling class might benefit you. (I might be stretching a bit, but I'm supposing that you might mean 'rogue' and I'm fairly certain that you intended to use 'hostile' instead of 'hostel'.) A person is never too old to further their education. P.S. You're welcome.
Let me see if I have this straight: So, Wotton insisted on a clause in his employment contract with ACTC that granted him the option of acquiring 30million shares of common stock. To exercise that option he merely was required to file (with the SEC) documentation stating his intent to exercise that option. He did, indeed, exercise that option at a point in time when the price per share was at .0655. Now,if I understand what you're telling me, he very well could have taken this action when the PPS was higher---but he chose not to. Instead he waited until the PPS dropped to a point where he suspected it to be the optimal time for him to, indeed, exercise his option to acquire those 30million shares. Again if I understand what you're telling me, Wotton had a hunch that the PPS would not fall much lower than .655 and would probably begin to rise once again--thus, maximizing the value of his 30million shares. So, in a sense, by interpreting Wotton's action as a sign that the PPS probably will not fall below .655, it is a very positive time for all investors to purchase more shares. Thanks for getting me squared away.
P.S. There's a guy ahead of me in line that is waiting for you to answer one of his questions. His name is Elysse, or something very close to that.
I'm sure that he's working on his response---he just can't seem to be able to keep his cats occupied long enough to finish that response. I'm more than content to wait in line right after you. TGIF.
DdLs,
Am confused by the fact that the new CEO of Advanced Cell Technology has filed with the SEC documentation that he intends to purchase 30million shares of common stock in ACTC. Since you ,more or less, profess to be an authority on all events pertaining to ACTC, would you, perhaps, enlighten me as to what this translates to for those of us without the resources to buy 30million shares in a single pop. Is it a 'good' thing?..or is it a 'bad' thing? Should I be hoarding tins of tuna and boxes of saltine crackers? Should I be prepared to head to my root cellar until the repercussions from this transaction become clearer? Will the sun come up tomorrow? Is this the first step of the apocalypse?
Am waiting on the edge of my LazyBoy for your thoughts. On the surface, it might appear that this stock purchase resulted from an extremely optimistic view of the future for ACTC by the CEO. However, there may be a perspective that I'm not seeing. Since you alone have the ability to interpret data in a way that no other person on God's Green Earth seems capable of, what is your take on this stock purchase? ESAD.
I, too, would like to express my appreciation, gratitude, and admiration for expressing in words what many of us are feeling in our hearts and minds. Having been a shareholder for nearly three years, there have been so many peaks and valleys that, at times, it's been difficult to see any glimmer of light at the end of the tunnel. During these past years I've come to realize that I have no respect whatsoever for the handful of posters whose very life-blood seems to depend on their incessant daily babbling that no longer holds any merit in July,2014. With the old adage about 'glass half full, or is the glass half empty?' in mind, these few negative posters seem to be content on going through life with a glass that is completely empty----and what a miserable, shallow existence that must be to live on a daily basis. The light at the end of the tunnel is now there for everyone to see and I personally thank you, crawford2012, for being one of the persons who is leading the way so that all might share your vision.
Apparently, the first concept of basic elementary trading has eluded you one more time. In order for there to be a 'seller' of shares, there simultaneously needs to be a 'buyer' of shares--this, in itself, constitutes the very definition of 'stock trading'. Therefore, your quoted amount of 'shares sold' may also accurately be defined as 'shares purchased'. Comprende?
Eloquently stated and, as I'm sure you know, the very same opinion held by every reader of this board--with the exception of one. Well said!
Please feel free to lower the thermostat & turn out the lights when you leave the building.
As an investor in TAGG for well over a year, and as one of the many who missed the boat by not selling during last year's pump, and also as a TAGG investor who doesn't post very often to this board, I do feel the need to post at this point in time. In my opinion, I sincerely believe that everyone needs to temper their enthusiasm in regards to today's bounce in the share price for awhile longer. Granted, it is a huge relief to see the PPS finally make a U-turn and head in a northerly(upward) direction, but one successful day does not a successful investment make.
I, too, have communicated with RES in several e-mails during this past year and he has never failed to respond to my queries in a very short time. Through these communications I stand whole-heartedly in his corner and believe that his tenacity will eventually lead to very good things for all of us. But I say again, all of our enthusiasm ought to be tempered until that day arrives--and it's still a very long way until we're going to see the gold at the end of the rainbow.
Again, just my opinion, but I think it wise to not get expectations that are too very high yet-- just in case there is a fall-back. Our day will come, I firmly believe that, but I don't want to see any of you be disappointed if today was not the first day of another meteoric pump. Best of luck to you all.
I think what you may have heard about my ex-mother-in-law was that she LOOKS as if she might be RUNNING at the track. Coincidentally, she may be running under the name of 'BagLikeMe'.
At any rate, I like my chances with TAGG a whole lot better than her--in spite of how 2013 has gone thus far.
While it is uplifting to read your enthusiastic opinions for the future of the TAGG share-price, at the same time I believe that you'll be severely disappointed to base any of your enthusiasm on anything that stems from a SierraWorldEquity column. Sierra has almost as much credibility as my ex-mother-in-law.
Alteza, allow me be the first to thank you. I tried it--it worked!! Bless you. My advice to all others is to leap on Alteza's suggestion ASAP---you'll be glad that you did.
Alteza, allow me be the first to thank you. I tried it--it worked!! Bless you. My advice to all others is to leap on Alteza's suggestion ASAP---you'll be glad that you did.
Alteza, allow me be the first to thank you. I tried it--it worked!! Bless you. My advice to all others is to leap on Alteza's suggestion ASAP---you'll be glad that you did.
Alteza, allow me be the first to thank you. I tried it--it worked!! Bless you. My advice to all others is to leap on Alteza's suggestion ASAP---you'll be glad that you did.
Bravo to you, Bailien. My particular method in dealing with the posts of this guy is to simply skip over each one, since I'm already convinced that I read the same drivel many months ago. But, your way might be better. Thanks for the post, hopefully this guy will take it to heart.
I'm having an increasingly difficult time envisioning 'Richard Elliot-Square' as a reputable businessman maintaining an office in London, U.K.. Instead, I have a nagging hunch that 'Richard Elliot-Square' may be a 68-year-old grandmother who, when she isn't firing back a response to an email from a curious TAGG investor, does double-duty as an advisor in an internet matchmaking service. Who's to say I'm wrong??
I finally succeeded in transmitting an email to RES (Thank you, Pettus)and did receive a response in a short time. The response was the same pat answer that every response from RES seems to consist of to every email inquiry made public on this site- 'the shorts are depressing the share price', 'monetisation is necessary', 'a plan is in the works', etc. In a follow-up email I asked RES about the possibility of issuing some form of corporate news release just to buoy the spirits of all TAGG shareholders. Again he replied very promptly, but he informed me that he could not consider doing that.
While I do sincerely appreciate the prompt replies, I find skepticism growing in my mind because the replies do seem to be almost too pat---and never seem to deviate to any investor who inquires of RES. Maybe I'm old school, but I believe that the longer one goes without getting news of some kind, then the more likely it is for that 'No News' to become 'Bad News'...and still, like most of you on this board, I'll just sit and wait.
Then it's a possibility that I have a bogus e-mail address. Would you be willing to post an accurate address? Thank you in advance.
I'm just a wee bit puzzled as to why Pettus appears to be the only investor who is able to get a response from Richard Elliot-Square, and Pettus seems to acquire those responses almost immediately. I have attempted to contact Mr. Elliot-Square on several occasions and, so far, my e-mails have been returned as 'undeliverable' to that address. What's your secret, Pettus?
Just curious if there are any other investors on this site who have been successful in contacting Mr. Elliot-Square? Thanks.