Oh, the irony of your post. Let's discuss this after the RS when your holdings are nearly wiped out.

I circled the relevant definition for you and the other dullards.

Your example of F1 is irrelevant to iHub.

iHub stock discussion boards are exactly that. A place to discuss the stock and the company, both positive and negative.

This is not a fanboy board.

There are other sites that have fanboy boards. Perhaps that would be a better place for you to post and read posts that you agree with so your sensibilities are not offended.

The harping about detractors not owning shares is just bizarre.

"Yes, I think this is a scam but I own lots of shares and will keep buying."

The sheer stupidity of that logic.

People who feel this company is a scam don't own shares in the scam company. And you think that makes a point of some kind?

The stupidity here is unreal.

You are mistaken. I don't care about the money that you've lost to a scamming CEO.

And that is why you will continue to lose money to penny scamming CEOs.

Fortunately, I don't care one iota about how you feel.

Care about what exactly?

I find it entertaining how bagholders will go to great lengths to ignore the facts that they've been scammed.

I don't drink, I don't smoke and I don't gamble. So watching y'all squirm as you lose your money is a form of entertainment.

You should be angry at the people who scammed you...not at the people who are pointing out that you've been scammed.

As was stated by the new auditor, the old auditor questioned the existence of the fertilizer over a year ago.

Thiago never refuted the old auditors' findings. He found a new auditor that he hoped would let the missing asset slide.

That failed, because the new auditor reiterated concerns about the missing fertilizer that represented 97% of the company's assets.

Facts.

Thiago had plenty of time to refute the two auditing firms that he hired. The result is that his Brazilian entity got tossed from the stock exchange there.

Seems to me that setting the record straight would be a pretty high priority for someone who cared about his reputation. Thiago's failure to do so means that he is accepting the fact that he got caught in a bit fat lie.

So HMBL has a CEO who is a fraud.

That fact speaks for itself.

LOL. Y'all are so sensitive. I have a buddy who makes custom crying towels. I'll have him send one to you.

I always have time to discuss scam stocks!

iHub provides you with an ignore button. Perhaps use that so you don't see the posts that ruffle your feathers so much.

Your money is gone. At least you will have a write off.

TK, you would make a terrible mark for a conman. Asking reasonable questions and calling out the company for refusing to answer? The audacity!

You are supposed to pay attention to the shiny new object being waved in front of your face. HUMBL VENTURES IR is here to help you get there.

Why must you be so difficult?

Agree. I don't put my hard earned money into trash stocks like HMBL.

LOL. An auditor refusing to certify the company's financial statements is hardly a "little thing." The Brazilian authorities seem to agree since the company was booted off their Exchange.

People who make excuses for lying management deserve to lose every dollar they pour into these garbage tickers

Has Ybyra commented on the auditor's unwillingness to certify the financial statements that the Company prepared?

Have they said "We are working to address the concerns raised by our auditors and we expect that we will have those matters concluded by" insert date here ?

Nope. Ybyra and Moura just waved a shiny new object at shareholders and said "Ooooo...see this? This is what you should be paying attention to!"

Classic tactics of a con man.

I see what you did there. Remember NFUSZ?

https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2017/12/01/1216300/0/en/UPDATE-nFusz-CEO-Rory-Cutaia-Tells-How-He-Made-People-Millionaires-and-Will-Do-It-Again-on-iHeart-Radio.html

Asking about the fertilizer asset is a very pertinent question. Current and future investors in HUMBL have a right to know if the CEO of HUMBL is a liar. As CEO of Ybara, Thiago Moura represented that 97% of the company's assets existed in the form of a pile of fertilizer. Ybara's auditor questioned the existence and ownership of that pile of fertilizer.

To date, Moura has failed to address the auditor's concerns. That suggests tacit acceptance that the pile of fertilizer does not exist. Ergo: Moura is a liar.

Moura is attempting to direct the dialogue in a different direction with his new announcements; there are people who be led around by the nose. They do so at their own peril.

At this point it's clear that the company is being run purely to put money into the pockets of the insiders. As I pointed out last week, the Lead Director of VERB is paid almost as much as the Lead Director of Apple. What kind of lunacy is that?

Rory pulled nearly $ 2 million in salary, a huge bonus, benefits and stock awards out of the company.

Market.live 2.0 is a joke. For a few days the company was posting the schedule of their upcoming TikTok livestreams (because not even Market streams on their own platform any longer) but there are no upcoming TikToks posted as of now.

Give it time.

I have a package in transit from Hong Kong...due here tomorrow. The purchase was made on eBay. It will be interesting to see what happens when it hits U.S. customs.

I can't recall the last time I saw a payphone anywhere. Maybe at the airport???

What issue did I acknowledge?

Not my money. I've never owned an OTC share in my life.

htt

Unlike iHub, there are other platforms where the moderators are free to delete any post for any reason. I follow a board on such a site where anyone expressing even the slightest regret about having purchased shares has their posts summarily deleted. Perhaps you should go there to be in a safe space.

BTW, the stock on that other board is down 99% with multiple RS along the way.

Classic stinky pinky tactic. Multiple entities with confusingly similar names. Can't wait until they start swapping shares and assets with each other.

Stay tuned for more.

And he responded to my suggestion that he not whine by whining some more.

Yesterday I listened to an episode of the Freakonomics podcast that discussed the U.S. Tax system.

The guest is a fiscal conservative economist who lays out the realities of who pays (spoiler: the bottom half of US households pay virtually nothing in federal taxes other than Social Security and Medicate) and which party creates larger federal deficits (Republicans). He economist also discussed what he feels has to be done to rescue us from the ever growing national debt (a means test to collect Social Security is a big one).

I found it disconcerting but also very enlightening.

https://freakonomics.com/podcast/ten-myths-about-the-u-s-tax-system/

As you have been told before, the job of the mods is to make sure that posts comply with the iHub rules.

Removing or not removing a post has nothing to do with the sentiment of the post.

If you believe that a post violates the rules, report it and a mod will review it. If the post stays it's because the post did not violate the iHub rules.

If a post of yours is removed you have a right to have it reviewed and it might be restored if an admin determines that the post did not violate an iHub rule.

If you are looking for a forum where all the posts are positive about the stock, there are other places for that.

If you plan to stick around then buck up and don't whine.

Have you ever been on a social media platform before?

This you, Bro?

Calls it a SCAM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163776135

Calls it a SCAM
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164089490

Calls out paid pumpers
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=164090666

STRONG BUY!
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170663845

Auditors don't just publish their findings without engaging their client in a dialogue. You can be sure that the auditors asked about the fertilizer asset repeatedly and, despite that, the company was unable to provide documentation that satisfied the auditor's concerns. If there is "limited or incomplete information" that falls solely on Ybyra.

Failure to provide proof that the fertilizer asset exists and that it is owned by the company is tacit acceptance of the auditor's findings.

Not only the existence, but the provenance. Magnesium silicate is fungible, so showing an auditor that a pile of the commodity exists means little unless there is paperwork to back up the purchase. And even then, the product could have been sold to someone else years ago and isn't even an asset of the Company any longer.

That the auditor has distrust in their client is very telling.

Let me know if you ever write a book on philosophy. I would be a customer.

Oh, Janice. Don't be so gullible:

https://www.lowes.com/n/buying-guide/difference-between-brad-and-finish-nails

I'm fine if the board wants to talk about screws as long as other fasteners can also be discussed.

Personally, I've always been partial to nails. Fun fact (that newmedman would appreciate): the common nail was invented by a guy named Brad.

Screwer? I never even metter.

Or something like that.

Can y'all take your screw discussion to a new thread?

It's the same rule that allows an entity to value a piece of property as though it has a building on it. Even though the building doesn't exist.