Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How does it feel
Lol that's not even a realistic possibility.
Careful who you trust on here, friend. This guy literally has no idea what he's talking about.
Oh sure. I'm just being middle man in projections here. Pending settlement, it won't be at .0001 forever but its gonna take a lot to get us to .05.
I mean yeah nickel is nuts but there is a potential catalyst to get us to slightly higher numbers
Riveting.
Ahh that's alright. Win some lose some
They're watching you
I act like I've acted all along. Something might happen. Something might not. This was mega dead money months ago so, at the very least, it bought me some entertainment.
I wouldnt say swindled. We all knew it was a lottery pick.
Ahh okay so its even more distant than that. I feel ya. I get your angle but it still feels like you wont get a definitive answer. And yeah, there's a little too much blind faith for my tastes
Ok so your hope with this is to backwardsly attempt to prove that because BTZO didn't file a change in their business, KK wouldn't have filed anything. Thus, the connection between BTZO and GERS gets severed (as you've been hoping for all along).
Here's the thing though, and it doesn't matter if you agree, even if you do prove what you intend, the end of this could simply be he files an 8k wherein BTZOs business information is simply updated.
However, given KK will likely structure the same deal where FCC gets the greater percentage, GERS will still only get 20% of the pie. It does KK no good to allow GERS to keep more. That said, he could also just eliminate BTZO from the picture all together to ensure FCC owns more of settlement. Still, GERS gets the 20% it gets regardless of BTZO existing or not. The future of BTZO, as has really been my contention all along will be based on how vested an interested KK has in its success. Whether it's more profitable to hide 80% in FCC or give up 16% (as noted by Dutch) and let the mega hype (because that's all that's happening there) ride.
Who knows. Invested im both.
What could the commercial real estate broker possibly tell you? That they haven't used the building in a while? What advantage would that give you? How would that impact that BTZO could still exist as a legal entity regardless of their use of a previous space?
We'll see I suppose. Im entering the next 1.5 weeks with the expectation of another stay. If a settlement is announced, ill ride that hype.
No, i dont rightly care. This is dead money to me. I have no expectations it will skyrocket and no need to get my couple Gs back. Which isn't to sound smug. I just don't invest what I can't lose. So if this explodes, great. If it doesn't, par for the course.
Gosh these folks are antsy. I'll hate to see how they will respond when another stay is announced the 14th.
And still
No news
No CEO
No business
You're relying too heavily on their business and not the bare minimum definition of a business. I suspect as business activity has stopped but what are the SEC requirements to define a business. Once again, logically speaking, KK gets no benefit from letting BTZO die. It just decreases his revenue streams. Who would do that and why?
Agreed. These projections are too lofty for the activity. I think we're due a bump but to like a dollar is in the realm of possibilities is tots cray
Valid point that keeps me believing the connection between BTZO and GERS exists. KK benefits most if the connection exists. Severing the connection only serves to give him less shares to sell if and when news hits.
Whats all the excitement about?
Shusjhhh let it crash and burn!
I don't need to wait until the last day to send on my registration renewal. I just do because I have the time. No part of having a settlement requires them to announce it when the deal is done, either.
At any rate, would be nice if we heard feb. Won't kill me if we dont. Ill hope for a major drop. Ill accumulate while I wait, just think maybe i accumulate lower.
I mean, I'm not as Gerslandy as you guys but I'm a bit more than them. Been following for a while.
While i admit youre more familiar than I, I'm not sure I totally agree with the assessment of the stay length. You might just as easily think they gave themselves extra time because they agreed they were close enough to get a deal done but, given the magnitude of the decision, wanted to ensure they had appropriate time.
We'll at least get an update feb. Unclear what that update will be.
Didn't read this. Wont ever read it.
Yawn
Yawn
I'm just praying for impatience to take hold
agreed. Good for all of us
Sure you're right. They won't just offer up the money but i bet they're already preparing budget lines to account for the probability.
I hear what you're saying. I think that's a better long term prospect for both stocks. Ensures steady cashflow
Feels like settlement to me just based on the little bits we've learned. Is it possible some settle others stay?
No need to explain it to them. Anyone who doesn't understand the potential of BTZO and GERS should find a new hobby.
Unlikely. Wait a month
Fair enough. New CEO news would be a good start but i think, being dormant so long, itll take more than that news
No real indication there's anything to make it pop though, right?
They are literally flying off the shelves, dude
More a shame for me, i had money coming in right before the run up here. Stared at 5-8 cents forever, boom, gone.
Who knows.