Pemex is not going to buy MVNT. Producing equipment is not part of their business model.

How about banning multiple ids for the same person (same IP address? same contact email?)? Seems like that is just another way of spamming and deceiving people.

How about a couple rules to limit the power of mods to control the dialog on various boards?
Suggestion 1: Limit the number of public boards anyone can be a moderator for. There seem to be lots of pumpers and bashers who seize control of a board by becoming a mod. It is not uncommon to see the same posse of posters as mods on a series of boards.
Suggestion 2: Limit the number of posts a mod can make on the board they moderate. Yes, I am suggesting that the mods be limited while others are not.

That’s my point. There’s nothing special about XCPL from a shared structure standpoint. I’d much rather get one that’s among the 20% then one of the great unwashed in the 80%.

1.6 billion shares is pretty bloated. I hate the B-word when it comes to OTC share counts.

That would require them taking time to do so. It clearly is not important enough to them to warrant doing so.

I see that the pump crew is here in full force.

I am surprised that the two big trades today (800K shares and 970K shares) did not move the price in either direction.

Also seemingly poised for standstill…

If you really think so just buy some June 15 puts. You can get them for under a dime, and you would need far less collateral than that required to short an equivalent number of shares.

I got the letter today as well. Unfortunately, although it feels like I have owned CLHI forever, I am far from qualifying as a "legacy shareholder" as they are looking for holders circa 2010.

I have never owned MDWK but somehow that ticker is on one of my watch lists. I forget why.

MDWK expert to pink current today

Me too. Wish I had had a stink bid in.

The sales happened at 12:30 EDT on the dot. My bet is somebody got a margin call at the open to the effect of "you have 3 hours to cover the margin requirement in your account or we will initiate forced sales to do so". From there it was automatic - no money received, forced sales happen immediately through automated orders.

When a broker does this, they start from the bottom and work up i.e. otc stocks first.

Down sharply with big volume on no news. Either there is bad news we have not heard yet or this is unrelated to IPTK's fundamentals. One possibility is that someone got a forced buy-in on a margin call. That is my guess as to what is the most likely cause of the drop, as it looks like this was what I call "dog barf selling" (just get it out fast) with no regard for what price they got--just blowing through the bids until the shares were gone.

I took the opportunity to add to my position at .03

Memo to self - days like this are why it can be profitable to always keep a really stinky bid out there on otc stocks. Sometimes you get a dog barf sale like this and shares can fall to you (usually just after the open).

There is no such thing as a deadline when it comes to otc companies doing anything.

Years end of what year?

Why wouldn’t he? He’s let every other month slip away.

Holding companies only receive dividends if the stock they hold pays them.

There is no evidence that KRTL holds anything that pays or will pay a dividend.

A more accurate statement would be that holding companies can appreciate as the value of the companies that they hold appreciate. Very diversified holding companies are often subject to a "conglomerate discount" as they are not a pure play on anything.

I am long KRTL and would like for it to succeed but your post was simplistic.

They are Brits. Don’t know how to use their hands playing football. Leads to fumbles…

Oh God. Not that ticker again!

I haven't looked at the numbers. Did the year ago figures include large one-time items?

Still waiting on a tanker. Probably would the the S. S. Godot

When there is a buy at the ask, that does not guarantee that there is additional demand at that price. Furthermore, if there is additional demand at that price, there is no guarantee that YOUR shares will be the first to sell at that price.

Those are not mutually exclusive.

Well, it is progress and a positive step. How big is yet to be determined, but a lot more good things can happen with the CE removed than with it in effect.

The denominator is outstanding shares. Whether or not they are restricted is beside the point.

That is a possibility, given the takedown from 4.70 to 3.95 and immediate bounce back to 5.20 over the course of 5 trading days.

NDTP pink current today on OTC Marktes

You could be right.

Wouldn't they HAVE TO spin ERT off if they intend for it to be listed as a separate company?

The questions is what amount of ERT shares ILUS shareholders would get if/when such a spinoff occurs.

I think it more likely that they don't want to be tied to SVB. SVB is in deep trouble, there is no guarantee they could actually deliver funds if SAVA were to draw on that credit line.

To me, that explains why SVB is out and another lender is in. As for the larger credit line - why not?

Doubt many are jumping out of skyscrapers ether...

Precisely. A stupid character limit makes messages into gibberish.

One of the reasons I dislike twitter

I would have more confidence if they actually knew how to spell "quiet"...

"...another fatal mistake"

That's an oxymoron, as by definition you can only make one fatal mistake...

Might be a better investment than AUPH has been of late...

You are wildly mistaken if you think AUPH management can move the share price up at will.

"Time will tell" is just a proactive way of saying "Hindsight is 20/20". :)