I don't want it that badly.

I agree - this is not a business where a lot of tweets is a positive thing.

1

"Beneficial Shareholders" is a somewhat misleading term. It really is synonymous with "shareholders of record", the key being that for shares held in street name (at your broker), your broker is the shareholder of record. If you and I and MU_Redskin or anyone else here all hold shares at Schwab, then Schwab is the "shareholder of record" (or "beneficial owner") for all us.

There are substantially more than 120 holders of DBMM (would need a full NOBO report to get this number, and if there are in fact naked shorts it might not be accurate). All shareholders are entitled to vote on anything that is put to a shareholder vote.

Right. Nothing else matters, and, until he has something to say about someone buying the shell, there is nothing to say on Twitter even if he had an account.

Took a starter position in GLGI this morning at the open.

Read the form 4. He exercised warrants that were expiring 12/31/22. It's a nothing burger.

Beam me up, Scotty. There is no sign of intelligent life down here.

Well, they could look to iHub message boards for advice...

I see it the way you do. Just someone trading the spread.

I still think the impatient money has moved on as the story has moved from reverse merger (near term, step function) to operations (long term, gradual).

I think maybe it's a buy-the-rumor sell-the-news kind of thing.

For the time being, all the news is "in" APSI. The deal with Tradition has happened. Now they have to operate and grow those businesses. That takes time.

do you have a link to that analysis? TIA

MVNT blipped to Yield very briefly when a filing was late. It has since returned to Pink Current.

This was just a timing thing, not a fundamental move towards more transparency on the part of the company.

In this circumstance, it is not surprising that the move (back) to pink current from yield did not trigger a volume surge.

OK - I see it now. The warrants were going to expire on 12/31/22. He had to exercise them or lose them. He sold the employee stock options to fund that exercise.

Looks like he exercised employee stock options to buy 31K shares at .73 and immediately sold them at 7.08. That is net proceeds of $217K.

He then exercised 125,000 warrants at .98 (total cost $122K).

To me that looks like he put $95K in his pocket (before tax).

Let me rephrase my question - do you happen to know what the expiry date of the warrants is/was? This clearly was not an open market purchase. If the warrants were expiring soon it may have been a move forced by the calendar, not any change of opinion regarding corporate developments.

Do you know when those options were scheduled to expire?

I never bother to mark my posts either way.

That is what I thought - thanks for confirming.

The difference is that any lottery ticket has a fixed time horizon. ASKH, on the other hand...

Do you know if they would also get a 30 day advantage if they "sponsored" DBMM uplisting to a higher exchange?

That is a good question - why is GLED sitting on the sidelines?

I can see two possible answers. Either someone paid them to file the 211-c (or whatever) form and they really have no intention of making a market or they are waiting for some trigger event to go active. I think the former is possible but the latter more likely.

I don't know what that trigger event could be. I could see a scenario where DBMM would uplist with GLED involved somehow, but my crystal ball is murky.

By that measure, we have been close for a long time.

Silly impatient me.

Unfortunately they are tarot cards and he has no idea how to read them.

right - Edgemode and FWAV are somebody else's problems.

I actually think LWLG will meet their goal. Hope so as LWLG is my largest holding by far.

That said, I think any kind of countdown is counter-productive. It's not going to motivate anyone to buy before the ASM and it is certainly not going to motivate anyone with a sizeable short position to cover. On the other hand, on the off chance LWLG does not have an announcement by the ASM, a failed countdown provides grist for the negative posters' mill.

You can set whatever deadline you wish. To me, the ASM is not a deadline.

While I agree an agreement could drop at any time, there also is no assurance an agreement will be signed by the ASM.

Putting the ASM date out there as any kind of deadline date is misleading and counter-productive.

Sabby just filed a 13G indicating they own 9.35% of NEPT.

If he had a big gain and waited until today to sell some, he does not pay taxes on that gain until April 2024.

I agree. It only impacts the top 5 teams in the AFC - Chiefs, Bills, Bengals, Titans and Chargers. Lower wild card teams in the AFC don't count - you should not get any say about who you play as a wild card - just be glad you are in..

I agree that just cancelling the game and dealing with its impact to those 5 teams makes the most sense.

Joined the party here today with a small buy just now at .473

Even worse

Well, if they did move everything back a week, it would have one beneficial aspect. No one would watch the always-unwatchable Pro Bowl.

I think it is highly unlikely that they push everything back a week. They could do that in the case of a league-wide negative event (i.e. 9-11) but I doubt you see a league-wide postponement when only a handful of (AFC only) teams are impacted here.

APSI does fit the model of a stock that generated sudden big profits very late in the year and therefore could be subject to beginning of the year "tax gain" selling.

Are you saying that EPS is not .80 ot that the average PE is not 39 or both?

Yeah - it is amazing to me that people who get blocked on Twitter think that THEY are the victim.

Good God - I sure hope not.

That would be like throwing gasoline on to a dumpster fire.

I think your interpretation is correct. There is no way they can unilaterally impose restrictions on non-insider stock that is already free trading. No one would ever buy common stock in any company if that were permitted.