You aren’t helping the rest of us get info when you act like a jerk. Please stop.

Nope. Trade date is what matters for US taxpayers. I believe it might be settlement date in some other countries, but I am sure trade date is what matters in the US.

nice post

You did explain it. Doesn't make it any easier to accept.

It might be worthwhile to track the soon to be issued SAVA warrants. Company will issue 4 warrants for every 10 shares held on the record date of 12/22/23. Will trade as SAVAW on the NASDAQ.

Since I expect nothing will it happen immediately?

Money, or mouth?

Not halted, but some brokers have problems with their platforms on the first day after a reverse split.

Actually, anyone with even half a brain has Ted on IGNORE.

I had no problems voting. Easy peasy.

Pre-market spreads are meaningless as there is no PM trading on the otc.

Got a symbol and link? TIA

What the hell was that for?

I would love for VDRM to show us some evidence that they actually have some manufacturing and distribution capability. So far they haven't.

I was I was joking. I have seen no evidence that VDRM actually has real production capability, let alone for volume production or scalable production.

It's probably Otiko brewing up the next batch of the product in his bathtub...

Or - he sees something coming and wants to be able to sell into that.

Either way, I don't read much into it. If I owned a significant block of restricted stock that was eligible to go off restriction I would file immediately - regardless of the price or company situation. It is ALWAYS better to have (potential) liquidity, other things equal.

Filing to remove the restriction only means that you CAN sell, not that you have to or plan to.

My opinion of the CFO would go down if he DID NOT file when eligible to do so.

Might be that it is pretty much a one man show, and there is no "staff" to review these things and offer advice. Could also be a matter of "management style", where a small staff or group of subordinates exists but they don't feel empowered to challenge or correct the boss.

Who knows. Certainly he is not alone as an OTC CEO who has promised things and failed to deliver or promised them and they took far longer than was promised (we don't know which of these is the case for AKH yet).

Don't rule out the possibility of him being both. It's a combination that's known to happen.

Ubiquitous…is not ubiquitous.

While part of my vocabulary it is a word where I could easily go years without using it or hearing it (except on this board).

I dislike trading on the Schwab website and on their mobile app, but I find the Street Smart Edge (SSE) platform that Schwab offers to be much more useful.

SSE is not as robust as TOS, but it is also far less complicated. SSE does everything I require.

“…barley any action “ — is that a hint that something may be brewing? :)

Thanks

I would prefer to see an announcement on Tuesday, not tomorrow. Lots of people off tomorrow, more eyes on it Tuesday when everyone says "ok, summer is over, now what should we buy?".

Actually, I am not counting on an announcement either day, but if I could choose, I would choose Tuesday over Friday.

Schwab is migrating customers is waves. I received a notice that ToS was coming, but no firm cutover date, just a general "BOLO" indicating the change was forthcoming.

If there is a reverse split it would also include any restricted shares.

I am pretty sure most could trade the Aus exchange but commissions would be higher than for US.

Will IPTK continue to trade at all on any US exchange?

While i hope things ultimately work out for the company, I will probably need to sell and move on. Even if I wanted to, I don' think I am allowed to hold stock in a private company in my IRA.

Thanks. Seems too good to be true unless AESO issues shares to those that owned GOLQ and RCRT.

In a nutshell, what is the connection between RCRT and AESO?

I apologize if the answer has already been posted. TIA.

You can edit your post for 15 minutes. After that, it’s locked.

Old news.

Me too - thanks Potse! keep 'em coming!

Not advocating the setup, but presumably it is to allow the company to appeal to income investors (on the dividend side) and growth investors (on the other side).

I would agree - it is a slow process and MKT Capital/Iljin have little choice but to wait out the strategic review before taking any further action. They understand that a strategic review takes time if it is done thoroughly. Initially they would be looking to identify potentially interested parties, then there would be sharing of detailed data and financials under an NDA, and only after that would one or more parties possibly enter into negotiations. We are still "early days" in this process.

If the review of strategic alternatives concludes "we ain't got none" then PG will be gone. However, I don't think MKT would have pressed for the review or that Iljin would have supported it if they did not believe that there were viable endgame alternatives out there.

Maybe we will get an update on the strategic alternatives process in the earnings call. I doubt it, but we can hope.

You actually have to observe the spelling to determine if it is right...:)

Makes sense.

Either way, I don't think it matters. If you were entitled to 99 more shares, they will eventually show up, even if you sell the original share now. Anything you do now does not impact what your position and entitlement was as of the record date.