Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I placed a Good for 60 buy order on etrade 8/27 that's still open. We'll see if it gets filled.
It's working for me now. Probably because I reported the SEC to the FBI.
I can no longer look up GERS on the SEC website.
I posted something like this for eTrade, but it will be no buys and no sells if KK doesn't get the financials up to date by the end of September. I imagine that the rest of the brokers that allow GERS at this time will be following suit.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163913509
Got this email from eTrade today. I'm only holding one stock that this applies to.
Anyone know if this is connected?
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKzZjVtm6mJYj3yzyN7Q0Lw
The color scheme is the same for the logo on the website.
Law360 (January 27, 2021, 3:39 PM EST) -- Intellectual property firm Cantor Colburn LLP told a Georgia court that a former client waited too long to pursue legal malpractice claims related to its work on oil recovery patents that were invalidated, and it can't force the firm into arbitration.
It's been nearly a decade since the firm worked on the patents in question, Connecticut-headquartered Cantor Colburn told the Fulton County Superior Court on Tuesday, so CleanTech Corp. can't arbitrate malpractice claims related to its work on them.
The patents were invalidated after an Indiana federal court found CleanTech and its Cantor Colburn attorneys intended to deceive the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in applying for the patents by withholding information about when the product was first for sale.
Cantor Colburn says that in 2017, it denied CleanTech's request for a voluntary tolling agreement that would have extended the life of CleanTech's claims, and it wants a declaratory judgment that those efforts are barred because they should have been brought by mid-2016.
"Respondents have slept on their rights for more than eight years," the firm said.
The suit stems from a series of patents that were ruled unenforceable in various litigation beginning roughly seven years ago, according to court documents. Those patents, which CleanTech applied for between 2008 and 2012 with the help of Cantor Colburn, covered the "recovery of oil from a dry mill ethanol plant's byproduct, called thin stillage," according to court documents.
The patents were ruled invalid by an Indiana federal court in September 2016 as a part of multidistrict litigation on CleanTech's claims that companies had infringed the patents. The court determined that CleanTech and attorneys at Cantor Colburn knowingly withheld information from the USPTO.
The Federal Circuit affirmed that ruling in March 2020, saying that the lower court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the company and its lawyers intended to deceive the USPTO. The company has since asked the Supreme Court to take yet another look at the matter.
The lower court and the Federal Circuit had indicated that the patents were invalid because the company and its lawyers had violated the so-called on-sale bar, which blocks patents from being issued if the invention was on sale or in public use and "ready for patenting" more than a year before the patent filing. CleanTech had offered to install its system at another company called Agri-Energy roughly a year before filing for patents on that system, according to court documents.
Cantor Colburn and CleanTech didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.
Cantor Colburn is represented by Brian A. White, Lawrence A. Slovensky, John P. Brumbaugh, Brian A. White, Billie Pritchard and Carson W. Bennett of King & Spalding LLP.
Counsel information for CleanTech wasn't immediately available.
The case is Cantor Colburn LLP v. GS-Cleantech Corp. et al., case number 2021-cv-345046, in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia.
--Additional reporting by Tiffany Hu and Dani Kass. Editing by Adam LoBelia.
Read more at: https://www.law360.com/ip/articles/1349170/cantor-colburn-says-ex-client-slept-on-right-to-sue-over-ip?copied=1
My guess is it's a statute of limitations thing. It's common to wait until the last possible minute to sue so that you can better evaluate the extent of the damages and gather the most amount of evidence.
I thought I should also point out that GERS best customer (GPRE) is also in Omaha.
From the article I posted yesterday, it appears that the full court can take a look at it if some of the judges feel that the ruling goes against precedent.
/Edit
Nevermind, all patents are showing an active date of today.
I thought I should point out that Microsoft forgot to renew a certificate the other day and none of the C suits got sent to prison. In fact there were no investors reporting them to the SEC either.
eTrade is also a good one. Never had any problems trading GERS and eTrade recently got rid of commissions, so free trades. We should probably thank Robinhood because they've forced the hand of a lot of brokerages to move to free trades.
I still believe it's possible that the reason why Greenshift hasn't sent reports to the SEC since the 3rd quarter of 2016 is because their financial condition is very bad.
I think spreading rumors of illegal activity without any iota of proof falls in line here.
https://www.sec.gov/tcr
Report Suspected Securities Fraud or Wrongdoing
Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities, including things like
-Ponzi schemes
-Pyramid schemes
-High-Yield Investment Programs
Theft or misappropriation of funds or securities
Manipulation of a security's price or volume
Insider trading
False or misleading statements about a company (including false or misleading SEC reports or financial statements)
Failure to file required reports with the SEC
Bribery of, or improper payments to, foreign officials
Fraudulent conduct associated with municipal securities transactions or public pension plans
That person's job would be in jeopardy if the company's website goes down.
You're assuming that all companies have an IT Manager. There are a lot of companies that out-source their IT and a lot of times their web site is handled by a separate 3rd party.
I work in IT consulting and have to help companies with expired certificates all the time. None of them have ever expressed a fear of being investigated because of it. Most don't even realize it until it is reported to them by someone outside of the company, unless they have internal networks running on the same domain.
I've been on vacation for the last week, can someone catch me up? Has the FBI closed their case on the expired SSL certificate?
I will give you this one. If GERS releases their reports and it turns out they are now a trillion dollar company, dilution will not matter.
You've stated several times that GERS has participated in criminal activity and is represented by incompetent lawyers. If that's the case why haven't you gotten whatever you can for your shares? If I held shares in a company and I thought these things about them, I would get out as quickly as possible. It doesn't make any sense that you're still holding.
The short term performance of GERS stock is mostly determined by the pitifully-low trading volume, and that is determined by the pitifully-low amount of respect that the company executives have for the stockholders.
Since this is an ongoing topic of discussion let's get the pulse of the community on this. When should GERS file?
Filings Survey
Results
I think if ATIS does not want to be delisted, they'd pretty much have to have their filings in order.
It looks like their extended stay of suspension was granted, so you should expect their filings to show up between now and Jun 10 or they will be suspended. I'm interested to see if GERS will be able to file at or around the same time seeing as how ATIS's delay appears that it could be partly related to the partnership.
The Company intends to appeal this determination and request an extended stay of suspension of the Company's securities, which, if granted, would require that the Company become current in its filings prior to the date of the hearing with the Nasdaq Appeals Panel, which is expected to occur during the period between May 24, 2019 and June 10, 2019. In the event that the extended stay of suspension is rejected, the initial stay will last only until on or about May 9, 2019, at which time the Company's securities would be suspended from The Nasdaq Capital Market and a Form 25-NSE will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which would remove the Company's securities from the listing and registration on The Nasdaq Stock Market, unless all outstanding filings have been submitted prior to that date.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2019/04/23/1808349/0/en/Attis-Provides-an-Update-on-Status-of-Nasdaq-Listing.html
First, the GERS price does collapse, and it does so pretty often. The last time was last Friday, when it closed at only two-thirds of Thursday's closing price, as shown in this chart. Now that was a collapse !!
That said, bringing our filings current carries an immediate risk of dilution from lenders that can be expected to convert their debt into stock as soon as they can deposit, clear, and sell our shares - before the Federal Circuit’s decision, before we make progress building value again, and before buyers come to the table.
GERS will go where ever it goes.
I don't recall seeing the specific months. This from skunk:
04/02/2019 122 Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The notice of conflict with oral argument is due on or before 04/09/2019. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [597090] [JAL] [Entered: 04/02/2019 10:04 AM]
The other holding passes all of the tests necessary to be listed on the NASDAQ, and they send 10-Ks, 10-Qs, 8-Ks, and Form 4s to the SEC regularly. This pitiful excuse for a publicly-traded company doesn't.
As I see it, the investors are in two categories. Those who want to gamble on a good outcome in the Appeals Court and those who want a more immediate return on their investment.
Try reading https://www.greenshift.com/investors. It explains why there hasn't been filings or news.
We only have two practical options to prevent dilution without triggering multiple debt defaults until those agreements are signed: delay and silence. Issuance, deposit, and clearance of new shares is very difficult to accomplish if our filings aren’t current, and sales at rates which justify the effort are impossible without demand and liquidity – neither of which are viable if we’re not talking.
I'm not looking for instant gratification. I'm long on GERS, especially now that I know my investment is protected from dilution.
Hovering at the $.05-$.08 range is much better than dropping to $.0001 and triggering another RS. Thanks to KK that won't happen again. Read this for some context.
Read this. It explains it all.
Here's a good read that will explain what KK did to save the "long-suffering" shareholders from continued dilution: https://www.greenshift.com/investors