Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Good question, I guess we never really got any color on the talks that had been going on behind the scenes. I'm referring to after the hedge funds had written those letters in favor of a sale.
Enough for me to buy him a few beers if he ever stops in Philly, that's for sure.
Then my old hometown Hilton too:
$22.2 MM / 341 = $65K per room
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/06/harrisburg_hilton_sold_to_gree.html
An affiliate of Harristown Enterprises Inc. has sold the Hilton Harrisburg hotel to a Denver-based hotel investment group. Harrisburg Hotel Corp. sold the 341-room Hilton to Greenwood Hospitality Group LLC.
Although executives from both companies wouldn't share a sale price, a realty transfer tax statement from the Dauphin County Recorder of Deeds office indicates that Greenwood paid $22.2 million for the property, which is close to its listed fair market value of $23.8 million.
Hilton Harrisburg 20th AnniversaryView full sizeChris Knight, The Patriot-NewsACharity Grilling Party benefiting Easter Seals during the Hilton Harrisburg's 20th anniversary celebration in 2010.
Greenwood Principal Thomas W. Conran said the hotel will remain a Hilton and the company will retain the existing 400 employees during a 2:30 p.m. press conference held to announce the sale in City Hall.
Mayor Linda Thompson said the sale retired $17 million worth of city debt, what Harrisburg had guaranteed for the hotel.
Greenwood, which specializes in repositioning hotels, plans to invest roughly $5 million in hotel upgrades. Improvements will include new carpeting, guestroom upgrades and other refinements that will be noticeable to guests, said Conran.
The sale includes Bricco Restuarant at Third and Chestnut streets. Bill Kohl, Hilton Harrisburg president and CEO, becomes a principal with Greenwood.
Greenwood also will take over management of the Hilton Garden Inn Hershey, which was operated by Harrisburg Hotel Corp.
Brad Jones, vice president of Community Development for Harristown, said financial problems did not force Harrisburg Hotel Corp. to sell the hotel.
Harristown never intended to own and operate the Hilton for so long, Jones said. “It’s a good opportunity to reinvest in other projects,” he said.
The affiliate of Harristown owned and operated the hotel that helped spark a redevelopment wave in Harrisburg since 1990, when it opened.
Hilton sale in North Carolina:
$16.5 MM / 249 = $66K per room
A joint venture between a Florida hospitality management firm and a New York private equity firm has bought the 249-room Hilton Raleigh-Durham Airport at Research Triangle Park.
Driftwood Hospitality Management and Apollo Global Management acquired the property from GE Capital Real Estate, a unit of General Electric. The purchase price was $16.5 million, according to Durham County property records.
The deal was the third hotel acquired by the joint venture. The other two properties are in Wilmington and Columbus, Ohio.
The Durham hotel is near the intersection of Page Road and Interstate 40, about three miles from RDU. It includes 3,200 square feet of meeting space.
The hotel industry suffered steep declines in occupancy during the recession, which forced owners to offer significant discounts and concessions to get people into rooms. After bottoming out in 2009, the industry has been making a gradual recovery.
The hotel occupancy rate in the Triangle last year was 60.7 percent, up 4.6 percent compared with 2010, according to Smith Travel Research, a Tennessee company that tracks the lodging industry. Revenue per available room, a key industry statistic, has also been increasing in the Triangle, though it remains about 10 percent below where it was four years ago.
Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2012/04/04/1980816/hilton-hotel-near-rdu-sold-for.html#storylink=cpy
Seattle Hilton sold last week:
http://www.costar.com/News/Article/Seattle-Hilton-Hotel-Sold-for-$63M/142492
AEW Capital Management of Boston acquired the 250-room Seattle Hilton Hotel at 1301 6th Ave. in Seattle, WA from RC. HeDreen Co. for $63 million, which included approximately $5.8 million in furniture, fixtures and equipment. This equates to a price per room of approximately $229,000.
The 24-story, 332,210-square-foot hotel was built in 1969 on almost half an acre in Seattle's central business district. The Hilton-branded hotel sold with an average occupancy of 84 percent and an average room rate ranging from $199 to $250 per night.
Chris Burdett of CBRE represented the seller.
Please see CoStar COMPS #2553827 for more information regarding this transaction.
Marriot Sales:
http://www.review.net/section/detail/three-marriott-hotels-sell-for-33.7m/
BUYER: Suncoast Parkway Hotel Holdings LLC (MIG Real Estate LLC), Newport Beach, Calif.
SELLER: Northpointe Hoteliers LLC
PROPERTY: 2101 Northpointe Parkway, Lutz
PRICE: $13.5 million
PREVIOUS PRICE: $1 million, November 2006
Related Headlines:
Sarasota investors Cotner, Alogna buy two Longboat villa buildings Gecko’s Hospitality Group buys Bee Ridge gas station Tampa Developers building $20M Orlando hotel Atlanta’s Pollack Shores starts Tampa NOHO Flats
BUYER: Tampa Road Hotel Holdings II LLC (MIG Real Estate LLC), Newport Beach, Calif.
SELLER: Menna Oldsmar Partnership LLP
PROPERTY: 4012 Tampa Road, Oldsmar
PRICE: $9.2 million
BUYER: Tampa Road Hotel Holdings I LLC (MIG Real Estate LLC), Newport Beach, Calif.
SELLER: Menna Oldsmar Partnership LLP
PROPERTY: 4014 Tampa Road, Oldsmar
PRICE: $11 million
ATTORNEY ON DEED: Aminie Mohip Esquire, Clearwater
PLANS, DESCRIPTION: MIG Real Estate LLC purchased three hotels in the Tampa Bay area from Menna Development & Management Inc. of Clearwater for a total of $33.7 million.
The price equated to $121,661 per room.
The California-based real estate investment company purchased the 99-room Courtyard by Marriott Tampa/Oldsmar for $11 million, 78-room Residence Inn by Marriott Tampa Oldsmar for $9.2 million and the 100-room Residence Inn Tampa Suncoast Parkway at NorthPointe Village for $13.5 million.
Built in 2003, the Courtyard in Oldsmar features a swimming pool, fitness center and 2,000 square feet of meeting space. The Residence Inn in Oldsmar was built in 2005 and houses two meeting rooms and a fitness center. The 4-year-old Residence Inn in Lutz features a heated swimming pool, exercise room and a sports area.
These acquisitions are MIG Real Estate’s first in Florida and increases its overall hotel portfolio to eight properties. Concord Hospitality Enterprises will operate all three properties.
The new ownership has announced plans to renovate the lobbies, guestrooms and other public areas of the two Oldsmar properties.
CBRE Hotels’ Robert Taylor in Miami and Ron Danko in New York City handled the transaction on behalf of the seller.
“There are more buyers than sellers right now in the hotels market,” Taylor says. “Capital is more widely available for buyers, and sellers are making strategic decisions to bring their assets to market in this profitable environment. Hotels are projected to continue to perform well in the next few years.”
Since mid-2009 MIG Real Estate has added nearly 5 million square feet of commercial real estate totaling more than $650 million in assets under management.
Looks like they could be.
http://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/print-edition/2012/06/29/king-of-downtown-hotels-puts-out-for.html?page=all
Atlanta’s largest hotel is for sale — and could bring up to $400 million in what would be one of this year’s biggest hotel deals.
The Marriott Marquis, which has a total of 1,663 guest rooms, has sold just once since it was built in 1985.
Its owner, Bethesda, Md.-based Host Hotels & Resorts Inc. (NYSE: HST), is making moves to sell the downtown convention hotel. Host bought the Marquis for $229.5 million in January 1998, according to Databank Inc., an Atlanta firm that tracks real estate transactions. Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. is marketing the property.
The Marquis has 1,569 rooms, 94 suites, 61 meeting rooms and more than 28,000 square feet of exhibit space, according to the Atlanta Convention & Visitors Bureau. Famed Atlanta architect John Portman designed the hotel, which is well-known for its open atrium lobby.
“The architectural design of the building makes it unmatched to any other hotel,” said Mark Vaughan, executive vice president for the Atlanta Convention & Visitors Bureau. Vaughan served as director of marketing at the hotel from 1998 to 2001.
“Host has been a great owner,” he said. “They’ve invested significantly in that property. It’s certainly a hotel we all can be proud of in Atlanta.”
Host completed an approximately $140 million renovation of the Marquis in the summer of 2008.
And, in 2009, a pedestrian bridge was constructed to connect the Marquis to the Hilton Atlanta, which also is on the market and could fetch between$220 million and $280 million in a deal.
The Marquis also links to the Hyatt Regency Atlanta by a pedestrian bridge. Both connections in essence put around 4,000 hotel rooms under one roof, making those properties very attractive for hosting conventioneers and large events.
The recent improvements make the hotel prime for a sale, say local hospitality experts.
“The Marriott Marquis for sale makes a lot of sense,” said Paul Breslin, managing partner of hotel consulting firm Panther Hospitality LLC. “They’ve renovated, repositioned and refreshed. It’s the right time.”
Also, stronger market fundamentals and a low supply of new construction are helping make 2012 a good year to take assets to market.
“You can’t reproduce a 1,600-room hotel very easily,” said hospitality consultant Linda Wilson, president of Key Advisors Inc. She added that the Marquis is “one of the biggest players in the citywide convention business,” which makes the property attractive to buyers. Group bookings are on the rise in Atlanta, she said.
“During the recession, people just cut their costs,” Wilson said. “They didn’t attend conventions.”
But, she said, “it’s coming back. The pickup is much stronger from what they originally thought.”
Breslin estimated the hotel could sell for $250,000 to $280,000 per key. That could put a price tag of nearly $400 million on the property. He said it’s most likely that the Marriott brand would remain if the hotel traded hands.
“They’d never sell it without keeping the brand and management,” Breslin said.
Based on those figures, if the Marquis sells this year, it could be one of the largest hotel transactions in the United States.
Seven hotels have sold for more than $100 million across the country in first-quarter 2012, according to data from LW Hospitality Advisors LLC. The 934-room Park Central Hotel in New York City fetched the highest price, selling for an estimated $396 million to LaSalle Hotel Properties. That’s about $424,000 per key, according to the hospitality firm.
It’s a clear indication that large transactions are occurring, Wilson said.
“Publicly traded REITs, which were the largest buyers in 2011, have become less active due to low stock valuations,” Wilson said. “That leaves private equity firms as a prime target for the sale.”
Already this year, a handful of Atlanta hotels have sold. The 521-room Renaissance Waverly Hotel & Convention Center Atlanta sold for about $96 million in March, according to hotel consulting and appraisal firm HVS, which has an Atlanta office. The hotel is attached to the Cobb Galleria Centre, a 320,000-square-foot convention center, and Cumberland Mall.
Host Hotels did not respond to a request for comment about why it’s selling the Marquis.
The company has paid off its $164 million mortgage on the property, according to Alan Wexler with Databank.
Earlier this year, in an earnings call with investors, W. Edward Walter, Host’s chief executive, president and director, shared the company’s strategy for its portfolio.
“Recognizing that there has been a directive acquisition opportunities in North America, we are moving quickly to bring selected assets to the market, as we continue to look to recycle assets and improve the quality of our already outstanding portfolio,” Walter told investors on April 25.
In first-quarter 2012, Host sold its San Francisco Airport Marriott for about $113 million to Inland American Lodging Group Inc.
“While certainly a fine property in a top market, this sale was consistent with our strategy of reducing our exposure to noncore assets located in airport markets at attractive pricing,” Walter said. “The sale also permits us to avoid investing an incremental $15 million in capital improvements over the next couple of years.”
Host’s portfolio of more than 100 properties includes several other prominent Atlanta hotels: the Grand Hyatt Atlanta, The Westin Buckhead Atlanta, Four Seasons Hotel Atlanta, The Ritz-Carlton, Buckhead, JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead, Atlanta Marriott Perimeter Center, and Atlanta Marriott
Older but data is consistent for Embassy prices.
$22.5 Million / 222 = appx. $115,000 per room
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/18/idUS202890+18-Jul-2012+BW20120718
FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (NYSE: FCH) today announced that it has agreed to sell the 222-room Embassy Suites – Anaheim-North hotel for $25.5 million. Urban Common, the purchaser, has made a $1.3 million hard money deposit toward the purchase price. The sale is expected to close in late August. FelCor will use the net proceeds to repay a portion of the $88 million balance on the CMBS loan that matures in 2013.
As part of its long-term portfolio repositioning strategy, which includes the sale of 39 non-strategic hotels, FelCor is currently marketing 10 hotels, including the hotel announced today. Including this sale, FelCor will have sold 16 of the 25 hotels that it has brought to market since December 2010.
About FelCor
FelCor, a real estate investment trust, owns 70 primarily upper-upscale, full-service hotels that are located in major and resort markets throughout 22 states. FelCor partners with leading hotel companies to operate its diversified portfolio of hotels, which are flagged under globally recognized names such as, Doubletree®, Embassy Suites®, Fairmont®, Hilton®, Marriott®, Renaissance®, Sheraton®, Westin® and Holiday Inn®, and premier independent hotels in New York. Additional information can be found on the Company's Web site at www.felcor.com.
I guess a hedge fund could be considered a credit union in a way....but with much higher fees haha just kidding bud. Have a great day.
I worked in a casino to pay for grad school and so I know how the gambling industry operates. Investing / trading is different. As a smaller investor, you can pick your battles and exploit market inefficiencies to tilt the odds in your favor...something I've seen occur on a slot machine haha.
Sure is some heavy buying for the price to be going nowhere. You guys see any news out there? I didn't catch any.
I never said any of your information was inside information, I was making a general statement.
I'm just saying it's in good faith for an investor to not trade on it, the legal circumstances notwithstanding.
A non-public fact regarding the plans or condition of a publicly traded company that could provide a financial advantage when used to buy or sell shares of the company's stock. Insider information is typically gained by someone who is working within or close to a listed company. If a person uses insider information to place trades, he or she can be found guilty of insider trading. Insider trading is illegal when the material information has not been made public and has been traded on. This is because the information gives those having this knowledge an unfair advantage
Castle Union LLC has a position in EHPTP. How do I know? Take a look at their Q3 Letter to partners.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/110841832/2012-Q3-Letter-External
Eagle Hospitality Preferred
We have a stated strategy to invest in obscure securities, and we wasted no time by quickly establishing a position in the preferred stock of Eagle Hospitality. Eagle is a hotel REIT with a portfolio of 13 hotels that Apollo took private at the height of the bubble. The company’s $600 million of debt was purchased by Blackstone in May from the Federal Reserve for roughly 75 cents on the dollar. The debt came due at the beginning of September, but we never thought bankruptcy was a viable option for the parties involved given Eagle’s corporate structure, which would have required a long, complicated bankruptcy, and the bad boy guaranty given by Apollo (i.e., Apollo would be liable for any deficiency on the loan).
Indeed, bankruptcy did not come to pass as the company announced Blackstone has agreed to take a “meaningful” discount on its debt in conjunction with a sales process for Eagle’s hotels. Blackstone used a $350 million loan from J.P. Morgan and $125 million of equity to buy the Eagle loans, so even if Blackstone took a 90 cent pay off, they would make $65 million -- a fairly nice return on equity in less than a year.
Looking at comparable transactions, if Eagle is able to sell its hotels at an
8% cap rate, or a roughly $160,000/key, the preferred would recover $15/share. Our cost basis is $1.95/share.
I do want to quickly note the Wall Street cycle of life here with Eagle. Eagle was a bubble-vintage LBO lead by private equity firm Apollo with loans from Bear Stearns. As we all know, Bear failed and was taken over by J.P. Morgan. The Eagle loans were too toxic for J.P. Morgan, so they wound up at the New York Fed in the Maiden Lane portfolio. Five years later, another private equity firm, Blackstone, gets a loan from J.P. Morgan to buy the Eagle loans from the Fed, and thus the cycle of life is complete.
I would answer that with a few points.
First, we are talking about someone without any prior investment experience and I would argue that a stock with extremely high risk and low transparency like DYNV should not be their first stock. But that is after the fact.
Second, I am referring to how to value a company. The data for this should come from public filings with tweaks based on qualitative research. Not saying this is the case, but it can be a fine line between inside information and due diligence. One should always formulate their own ideas on a particular position.
Either way, DYNV is not a typical investment and should not be used as the "classic" learning tool example of one.
I believe in your case you were criticized harshly for posts that to some without "boots on the ground" could be unsubstantiated evidence. Yes the contract with ABH was canceled as you had stated but I know myself (and Chevy and others) could not simply take this for fact until we saw it in writing. Also part of the reason I always try to stay unbiased as possible.
I have to stress it goes both ways, positive and negative. It's my belief on these kind of boards as you gain experience you inherently develop a better filter to both types of investment "noise".
Don't worry Panda, it's a "pay to learn" type of game. We've all been there. I'm only a few years older than you and I learned that lesson the hard way in 2008. But you know what? The aftermath of that huge selloff was the best time to dig deeper, practicing your research to scoop up bargains out of the trash.
Just read every solid investing book, article, and authentic blog that you possibly can. Success is correlated to the time put in.
On these boards, never blindly follow people or you will get killed. Do your own research and you'll see the users who routinely offer sound, unbiased, and knowledgeable advice. Don't be afraid to ask questions...most often it will be a positive response!
And if you are 21, make a Twitter and start building a reputable network. It has helped me immensely for idea generation and instant news on the markets.
Good luck!
-Pagz
Hi gang,
As we all know there are numerous ways to unlock value. I'm thinking we could employ one idea here, that being exposure.
Having more investors is never a bad thing and puts a security more in-line with accurate valuations.
Having said that, I am curious if anyone else is a member over on the Corner of Berkshire and Fairfax board (http://www.cornerofberkshireandfairfax.ca/forum/investment-ideas/). You have to be approved of as a member by the admin. but can still read posts I believe as a visitor.
It is a group of sophisticated investors that I was invited to interact with after talking to many on Twitter. Long story short, there is currently no posting for AICPQ (not surprising due to its esoteric nature). Side note, there are professional fund managers as well, meaning bigger firepower to sock away chunks of the available shares if they agree with our recovery estimates.
I propose we put together a collaborative write-up from the more senior members of this board who would do a much better job than I describing the nuances and details of the thesis (time on this board not in life years, don't worry Chevy ;) ).
Mrholty, EI, and Chevy would you be interested in this? Mainly I don't want to put up a half-ass effort full of holes and missing important details that a board can rip apart as well as possibly taking other posters' comments out of context which we all know can happen.
I'm no pumper either and do my own analysis on every idea, I am simply trying to corral our talents, abilities, and knowledge for the greater good. I would claim no credit as I followed a few of you here, albeit nearly 2 years ago.
Just my Monday Mid-Day Musings, this is my one holding that literally appears NOWHERE else online.
Have a great week!
-Pagz
Are you sure that isn't just an old PR?
From the 10-K:
Additionally, Bundled Builder provides construction management services and general contracting for residential and commercial construction for land owners throughout the United States and Native American communities. These services for Native American communities in the Southwestern United States were provided through a contract with a native owned company, Tribal Building Solutions, LLC. There is no common ownership between the Company and Tribal Building Solutions, LLC. This contract relationship began in September of 2009 and was terminated in November of 2011.
I'm curious, who here has, or still has, a position? Many of us sold out at during the previous run-up I feel.
Anybody else notice the buying floor on the shares recently? On a significant dip below $5 they immediately spring back.
There would be a third but limited way - buying shares EHPTP.
New article today:
http://www.ladowntownnews.com/news/where-meruelo-maddux-failed-evoq-hopes-to-thrive/article_cb3e692c-14cc-11e2-b18f-001a4bcf887a.html#.UHwLKuEjJvM.twitter
Where Meruelo Maddux Failed, Evoq Hopes to Thrive
DOWNTOWN LOS ANGELES - Downtown Los Angeles has been home to numerous rise and fall stories, but few drew as much attention or saw as rapid a plummet as that of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc. and its politically connected co-founder Richard Meruelo.
From the mid-1990s through the latter part of the last decade, the firm acquired an empire of Downtown development sites and industrial properties, from produce distribution complexes to apparel factories. It became the largest landowner in the Central City.
The potential seemed limitless, and after raising $400 million by going public in 2007, Meruelo, well known as a backer and friend of Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, and co-founder John Maddux turned their sights to residential development. They spent $28.6 million to build out the Union Lofts, a 92-unit adaptive reuse project at Eighth and Hill streets. Then, they began work on a $110 million, 35-story South Park apartment tower, the tallest purely residential edifice in Downtown.
They would never see the opening. By late 2008, MMPI was suffocating under a mountain of loans it had used to buy property. Facing $368 million in debt as the real estate market settled into an unprecedented paralysis, the firm filed for bankruptcy in March 2009. The tower went bankrupt too; it would later be sold to Watermarke Properties.
After a two-year court process, Meruelo and Maddux were ousted as part of a reorganization plan that allowed an outside investment group armed with $23.6 million in private equity to take a majority share of the company. New management was implemented, with Martin Caverly, who previously ran a real estate consulting firm, taking over as CEO.
Now the new team, which last year rechristened the company Evoq Properties, is tasked with turning around what’s left of MMPI. More precisely, they have to dig the company out of its debt hole. So far, their strategy has been pretty simple: Sell the non-core assets, and when the price is right, part with some of the portfolio gems too.
Caverly said the vision for the company is of a real estate entity focused strictly within the freeways that wrap around Downtown and, on the east side, the Los Angeles River. The company’s core holdings include properties in South Park, Chinatown and the Industrial and Arts districts, among them Alameda Square, the massive four-building warehouse complex at Seventh and Alameda streets that houses American Apparel.
“We’ve refocused the company on those areas,” said Caverly, “and in the process are going through a, liquidation is too strong a word because it’s not a forced sale, but strategically we’re getting rid of assets that don’t fit the core market.”
The Cash Cow
According to the company’s 2011 annual report — its most recent public filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission — Evoq trimmed its loan debt by nearly $130 million to $238.3 million by selling an array of properties in the latter half of the year.
Under the still heavy debt load, the firm posted a net loss of $60.3 million last year. So far in 2012, Evoq has sold seven more properties for a total of $54.1 million, Caverly said. They included holdings in Vernon, Sylmar and Covina.
The stark debt reality has prompted the company to part not only with geographic outliers in its portfolio, but also with some properties that would otherwise fit perfectly in the Downtown long-term vision. For example, one of Evoq’s first plays was to jack up rents at the Union Lofts, doubling its net operating income, then selling it for $34 million — $5.4 more than it owed on the building.
After pledging to renovate the Desmond Building at 11th and Hope streets and turn it into creative office space, the firm recently put the edifice two blocks from Staples Center on the market. It is being packaged with an adjacent parking lot where Meruelo had pulled permits to build a 19-story apartment tower.
Evoq is also in escrow on the sale of a parking lot at Olympic Boulevard and Hill Street. The buyer is the Hanover Company, which is in the process of securing approvals for a 281-unit apartment complex on the site.
Cash generated from those sales, Caverly said, will be more valuable invested in what the firm has identified as its top priority: a major renovation of Alameda Square.
Although American Apparel occupies two buildings and 700,000 square feet of space, the other two structures in the 1.4 million-square-foot complex have long been mostly vacant. The most significant move Evoq has made so far on the property is a deal with VF Corp. The Fortune 500 clothing company plans to move the headquarters of two of its brands into a whole floor, or 80,000 square feet, of one of the empty buildings.
From a real estate perspective, the 10-year, roughly $18 million deal is crucial because, with the promise of future revenue from a second anchor tenant, it now makes financial sense to upgrade the rest of the building and ready the other floors for additional tenants.
If all goes as planned, more fashion-related creative office users will flock to the complex. It may already be working. Last month, up-and-coming garment maker Groceries, which has been compared to a young American Apparel because it manufacturers its clothes in L.A., signed a deal for 35,000 square feet at Alameda Square, Caverly said.
The ground floors will be reserved for restaurants and stores to serve the employee base, in theory converting the sprawling complex into an active mixed-use hub. It’s a five-year vision, said Caverly, and if successful it would allow Alameda Square to function as a cash cow that feeds other Evoq projects.
Broker Iqbal Hassan, a principal with Quantum Associates who specializes in the Fashion District, said building out creative office space makes sense. More and more apparel companies are interested in old buildings because of their large windows and the historic aesthetic, he said.
“If there were a stronger push to get designers or manufacturers or the creative end of the industry into those buildings, I’d be all for it,” Hassan said. “There hasn’t been that strong of a play yet for people to come into that environment.”
Downtown Dreams
It is unclear when Evoq will have the money to invest in other projects, though it has several concepts in place. One involves converting a patchwork of cold storage, parking and light industrial parcels at Center and Jackson streets in the Arts District into 88 residential units and 68,000 square feet of creative office space. The firm has partnered on the project with developer Jeff Lee. Caverly said work could begin by late 2013.
Evoq also envisions a 614-unit residential complex on a parking lot at Spring and College streets, near the southern entrance to the Los Angeles State Historic Park. The project would require a zone change of the 4.9-acre site.
Concepts and future plans, however, will remain on hold until Evoq can generate the revenue needed to launch new projects, said Surj Soni, managing member at Legendary Developments. Legendary acquired the debt on a package of MMPI properties during the bankruptcy process, including the parking lot adjacent to SCI-Arc, which the company then sold to the architectural school.
“I think they are still bleeding very heavily and there’s a limit on how long an organization can do that, but I think they’re going to find their mojo,” Soni said. “The assets that they have are game-changer assets.”
What Soni considers game-changer parcels, however, come with a downside — to realize their value, the company needs cash.
“Money is something that’s in short supply for them,” Soni said. “I don’t think they have come out of the tunnel yet.”
The firm is also not entirely free from legal matters. Evoq remains in litigation with Meruelo over terms of the bankruptcy. Caverly, who declined to comment on the case, said it will not interfere with the company moving forward with its new strategy.
Contact Ryan Vaillancourt at ryan@downtownnews.com.
©Los Angeles Downtown News.
Now that's the million-dollar question that needs answered!
Since there is a complete lack of news and activity for DYNV, thought I'd post an interesting and related article:
http://www.aei-ideas.org/2012/10/carpe-oleum-seize-the-oil-north-dakotas-exponential-oil-production-sets-more-new-records-in-august/
By the end of the year, North Dakota will be producing about 1% of total global oil production
What's a few thousand bucks between friends eh Chuck? :)
Anyone know offhand of a master completed transaction list? The more comparable sales the better.
I got a friend a job in commercial real estate private equity in the DC area, might have to drop him a line and see what all we can dig up.
FelCor sells two Embassy Suites hotels for $70 Millon, with 666 rooms in total that comes out to a little over $100,000 a room.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/felcor-agrees-sell-two-non-120000503.html
IRVING, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--
FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated (FCH) today announced that it has agreed to sell the 370-room Embassy Suites – New Orleans-Convention Center and the 296-room Embassy Suites – Nashville-Airport for an aggregate purchase price of $70 million. The purchaser has paid a $2.1 million hard money deposit toward the purchase price. The transaction is expected to close in October.
FelCor expects to use a portion of the proceeds to pay the remaining $37.7 million of accrued preferred dividends when the company pays its regular quarterly preferred dividends on October 31, 2012.
As part of FelCor’s long-term portfolio repositioning strategy, the company is selling 39 non-strategic hotels. After selling the two hotels discussed above, FelCor will have sold 18 of the 25 hotels that it has brought to market since December 2010. The company continues to make significant progress using asset sale proceeds to strengthen its balance sheet.
About FelCor
FelCor, a real estate investment trust, owns 69 primarily upper-upscale, full-service hotels that are located in major and resort markets throughout 22 states. FelCor partners with leading hotel companies to operate its diversified portfolio of hotels, which are flagged under globally recognized names such as Doubletree®, Embassy Suites®, Fairmont®, Hilton®, Marriott®, Renaissance®, Sheraton®, Westin® and Holiday Inn®, and premier independent hotels in New York. Additional information can be found on the Company's Web site at www.felcor.com.
With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this news release include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws that are qualified by cautionary statements herein and in FelCor’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to conform the statement to actual results or changes in our expectations.
Contact:
FelCor Lodging Trust Incorporated
Stephen A. Schafer, 972-444-4912 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting FREE 972-444-4912 end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Vice President Strategic Planning & Investor Relations
sschafer@felcor.com
Marriot International reported earnings yesterday and a few comments are pretty positive and relative to our situation here.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-03/marriott-has-profit-as-timeshare-costs-go-unrepeated.html?cmpid=yhoo
Marriott Beats Estimates as High-End Hotel Demand Climbs
...the largest publicly traded U.S. hotel chain, reported earnings that beat estimates after demand for high-end brands increased and costs from a spun-off timeshare business went unrepeated.
Net income totaled $143 million, or 44 cents a share, compared with a loss of $179 million, or 52 cents, a year earlier, the Bethesda, Maryland-based company said today in a statement. The year-earlier results included $324 million of pretax impairment costs at Marriott’s timeshare business, which was spun off in November 2011. Earnings were higher than the 40- cent average estimate of 13 analysts in a Bloomberg survey.
The results were buoyed by demand for Marriott’s high-end hotels in the U.S., including its luxury Ritz-Carlton brand, Patrick Scholes, a hospitality-industry analyst at research firm Suntrust Robinson Humphrey Inc. in New York, said before results were announced. Revenue per available room at Marriott’s full- service and luxury hotels climbed 6.8 percent in North America, more than the 6.3 percent revpar increase for all hotels in the region.
“Pricing power continued to improve in the quarter as hotel occupancy levels approached prior peaks,” Arne Sorenson, Marriott’s president and chief executive officer, said in the statement.
Comparable revpar rose 5 percent outside North America. The hotelier in July cut its growth forecast for international revpar to 5 percent to 7 percent for this year, down from an April forecast of 6 percent to 8 percent. Worldwide, revpar grew 6 percent in the third quarter.
2013 Forecast
Marriott expects worldwide revpar next year “to increase at a mid-single-digit rate despite moderate economic growth in many markets around the world,” Sorenson said in today’s statement. He said he is “particularly bullish” about North America, where revpar probably will rise 5 percent to 7 percent in 2013.
For the fourth quarter, the company today forecast earnings of 52 cents to 56 cents a share. Marriott said it expects investment spending to total $850 million and $950 million this year, including about $100 million for maintenance capital spending.
Marriott’s third-quarter revenue climbed to $2.73 billion from an adjusted $2.52 billion, which excludes results from the timeshare business.
The company said it bought back 9.6 million shares of common stock in the third quarter for $353 million.
Marriott released its results after the close of regular U.S. trading. Its shares rose 1 percent to $39 today. They have gained 34 percent this year.
Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. (HOT), owner of the luxury St. Regis and W brands, is scheduled to report its third- quarter earnings on Oct. 25.
To contact the reporter on this story: Nadja Brandt in Los Angeles at nbrandt@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Kara Wetzel at kwetzel@bloomberg.net
I always like to keep an eye on the "other" securities thrown in after bankruptcies, so looks like another case here.
Note: They opened with a trade at $1.50 and appear to be sitting at $1.70 currently.
Yeah, I just saw that posted right before getting your reply on IHUB.
On my to-do list as I catch up to you guys on the step by step recovery valuation for Eagle is a sheet including info from my email and your reply with variables to see the results. Right off the bat I can tell the dollar amount is highly sensitive to many of them with only 4 MM shares outstanding. Should be interesting that's for sure.
Side note: what's the best way to get a copy of financials if you are a shareholder? Just the number I saw before for IR? Thanks.
EI, Chuck, Chevy:
I have a quick write-up from a hedge fund posted to a paid subscription online regarding an Eagle valuation. I was wondering if I could send you guys it for your thoughts. I do have a very small starter position for some skin in the game.
Chevy I have your email of course, so I could just send you it to disseminate to the others, or you guys can just DM your email address.
Have a great weekend guys!
-Pagz
Back from Europe for work and I see that I didn't even miss a post or a price movement. Longest-drying paint ever haha. Have a great day guys!
Banging my head against the wall because I didn't get to sell any shares to these penny pumpers on that spike. Such is the life of the retail INVESTOR (not TRADER). Any of our legitimate investor group out there able to unload some? I could have actually exited having broken even at that > $.05. Ugh.
-Pagz
Thanks as usual Chevy, that was a very well written response.
I guess I'm just scratching my head as to why a settlement action of that nature hasn't happened yet given the time this has been dragging out. I guess you could argue it's not sizable enough for the big dogs to care, yet still out of our small investors' reach.
As it sounded like Granite was going through some hard times, I wonder why they wouldn't just shop around what they could get for the claim (as you said "pennies from heaven"), taking themselves out of our way. It wouldn't seem to make sense to let it drag out, for the reasons you already stated.
So, I guess if no one has approached them....and they haven't shopped the claim around we sit at a standstill and play the waiting game.
Hmmm $1 Million cash you say...gotta be some hedgie's out there that could use a bug in their ear. It'd be a win-win all around.
I shudder at the thought of being accused of being a Twitter penny-stock pumper about it though.
Okay, activist is the wrong word to use I suppose.
If I remember back to my investment banking class, NOL's would be worthless you're right because of there being no value to the stock.
Fair Mkt. Value stock * LT Tax Rate (about 2.5% I think)
= amt. NOL's that can be used per year by acquiring company
So nothing of use there, but the NOL's themselves also expire at some point too if a recap. is on the table in some form. Do we know how long those are good for? Of course the financials I have from Chevy are old, so I don't have much to go on.
A debt for equity swap and capital infusion down the road would be a pretty interesting thing to be a part of.
Ah yes the Chevy Volt haha not my style for a ride though.
Okay guys, see if you can fill in a few blanks for me.
Since we are in line w/ the Granite case, how can their settlement be higher than our recovery? As in, how can we decide on a value with them first without knowing what % we could get for the book of business? Do I have something backwards here?
I would think it would go like this...with $12 MM net book, sell it for .75X book and you get $9 MM, $4.5 MM then goes to Granite and $4.5 to us (Theoretical numbers of course)
Otherwise, if the Granite amount is settled, where else would the money for it come from if the book hasn't been sold yet?
I guess I'm wondering why you would wait to buy trust pfd's after the settlement if Granite is capped on what they can receive. Maybe I just answered my own question though haha.
Well if we are going to start seeing some burn, I vote we take things activist. I don't sleep much these days with work anyway, and would love any sort of financial adventure.
Sounds like we need a fund devoted to just AICPQ (hey Bill Ackman did it for Target albeit with disastrous results). How much capital are we looking at here? I'd make calls, go door-to-door, and utilize every social media outlet in the name of some action.
I wish I knew the economics of mortgage insurance to comment; I would think the turnaround in housing would be having an effect. Of course, if AIC would go that route I could go bug Radian here in Philly to buy them out.
By the way for these purposes, EI ChevHolt LLC has a nice ring to it haha.
Obviously a light-hearted post and much needed 5 minute break from the day job.
-Pagz
Days = Years
Chevy I might be your age by the time we see a payout here. :)
I am so pissed at missing this. I usually comb through SEC documents multiple times and this would definitely have stood out. Ugh.
Well, now I need some trading help. I hate selling at a bottom...but is around $.02 the bottom? Hmmmm not if we're diluted to raise cash then we crash lower. I don't know how to value DYNV right now, investors smarter than me would say sell until you can. You can't put a value on future contracts (that might not materialize) so I guess you would assume $0. But 60%+ haircuts are never fun. Hmmmm...
Well now that we have to pick up our tents and move on... do we have any information to share on this rumored "Caribbean" project?
I didn't ask the questions we have here today, but have in the past and he just kind of skirts around the issue. He really doesn't care since most of his shares were just handed to him by DYNV anyway.
Take a look:
http://i.imgur.com/Bg3d5.png
and then:
http://i.imgur.com/KUiIu.png
Timing is a little off, but you get the idea about how worthless this guy really is.
I was simply laying out an investment thesis. We all know the risks involved with what we are holding here. When I say "creatures in the trees" I am just referring to unsubstantiated comments which can be either positive or negative by anyone. I hope I have shown on this board to not make any personal attacks and I was referring to no one in general. Hell, if I start saying anything grossly out of line as a pumper feel free to ignore me. But for now I am long and I find typing out my reasons why helps my investment decision making.
I'm an easy going guy Money and I take every post I read on here at face value. Any information (even if it's negative for us) you provide that is provable and can be backed up is very welcome. I love bad news in stocks as a value investor, usually the market will overly discount (see BP).
In other news, just conversed with Stuart Fine on Twitter and he said the quarterly should be out by tomorrow. Not that I put much faith to anything he says because I bet he didn't contact DYNV first anyway, but should be interesting. Someone has to be right here...Bakken are you saying they won't file just because of bad news?
Oh and then Stuart tried pumping another stock on me....which I dug into and found that he bought at the open this morning. The guy is scum and we need to remove him in IR.
-Pagz