Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=nct-wi&ql=1
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=nrz-wi&ql=1
Check them out, we're having a great day!
The pieces are trading "when-issued" now. I'm too busy to comment further but NRZ is at $6.82 and new NCT is at $4.82 so projected yields of 8.8% and 10%+.
Thanks for starting a board EI.
I guess we should mention the convertible preferred issue as well, CSBQP.
Dividend is $2.50 a year and converts into 5 shares of common.
Not a bad way to play this bank's recovery in a way. At these prices you get paid 10% a year to wait until the bank hits 1.25X BV. Highly illiquid however.
Link to prospectus:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1038773/000114420412036618/v317035_424b3.htm
-Pagz
"We continue to have a very strong capital position and our operations are generating additional capital each quarter. Accordingly, we have initiated a more active capital management plan designed to both invest in the growth of our franchise and return excess capital to shareholders. The first step in this plan was the authorization of a program to repurchase up to 5% of our outstanding common shares. We are actively evaluating other uses for our capital including but not limited to the potential reinstatement of a common stock dividend, investments in de novo branches, and strategic acquisitions. We are optimistic that our more active capital management plan will create additional value for shareholders going forward," said Mr. Yoo.
Some volume today, anyone here trading? Or, do we have any new information / filings out there? TIA.
Well what you can't make on the top end (tight NIM margins with these rates), you have to build some economies of scale to trim expenses as a % of revenue to bump up the bottom line.
Surprised there isn't more happening, or is it just me? Are recent M&A activity amounts at a normal level compared to historically?
Just put in a blockbuster of a trade as I do some reshuffling.
CommerceWest Bank Recognized as a 2013 "Super Premier" Performing Bank
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/commercewest-bank-recognized-2013-super-005400832.html
CommerceWest Bank (CWBK) was recognized as a 2013 "Super Premier" performing bank by the Findley Report. The Findley companies provides performance reporting and analysis, financial management consulting, legal representation and financial institution ratings. Banks can be recognized for "Commendable," "Premier," or "Super Premier" status based on their financial performance.
"I am very proud of our team and their dedication towards creating a complete banking experience for each of our clients. Their passion for our vision will only continue to help us further differentiate ourselves from other financial institutions," commented Ivo Tjan, Chairman and CEO. He continued, "We are humbled by the recognition and look forward to accomplishing our goals in 2013."
CommerceWest Bank is a California based commercial bank with a unique vision and culture of focusing exclusively on the business community. Founded in 2001 and headquartered at 2111 Business Center Drive in Irvine, CA, with Regional Offices in Orange County, Los Angeles County and San Diego County. We are a full service business bank and offer a wide range of commercial banking services, including concierge services, remote deposit solution, online banking, lines of credit, working capital loans, commercial real estate lending, SBA lending, and cash and treasury management services.
Hey look who's here, welcome to the (very exclusive) club man. No-brainer bargains dried up in some areas, thinking of adding more myself.
With the post-earnings price erosion back to 75% of current BV, is anyone thinking of picking up more shares prior to Q2 numbers later this month?
Tossed in a $2.78 before lunch and got filled for a whopping 100 shares.
AltaPacific Bancorp Extends Share Repurchase Program
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/altapacific-bancorp-extends-share-repurchase-150000552.html
AltaPacific Bancorp (ABNK), the parent company of AltaPacific Bank, today announced that its Board of Directors has authorized an extension of the Company’s share repurchase program for an additional $1.5 million of the Company’s common stock through April 30, 2014. The Company’s repurchase program was originally announced on May 4, 2012. Since that date, the Company has invested approximately $620,000 to repurchase and retire 94,500 shares of its common stock at an average price of $6.56 per share.
Purchases made pursuant to the program will be made in either the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time as permitted by federal securities laws and other legal requirements. The timing, manner, price and amount of any repurchase will be determined by the Company in its discretion and will be subject to economic and market conditions, stock price, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The Company has no obligation to repurchase any shares under this program and the program may be suspended or discontinued at any time.
Charles O. Hall, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, "The Board’s decision to extend the repurchase program reflects their ongoing confidence in the Company’s future prospects. Management and the Board of Directors believe the repurchase program is an attractive opportunity to enhance shareholder value, while also providing liquidity for shareholders."
About AltaPacific Bancorp and AltaPacific Bank:
AltaPacific Bancorp is the parent company for AltaPacific Bank. The Company’s stock trades over the counter under the symbol ABNK. AltaPacific Bank is an independent business bank headquartered in Santa Rosa, California and has offices in Santa Rosa, Rancho Cucamonga and Covina, California. The bank is focused on meeting the specialized needs of small to medium-sized businesses and professionals throughout California. The U.S. Small Business Administration has approved the bank as a PLP lender (Preferred Lender Program). PLP status is the highest lending designation granted by the SBA and it is only granted to its most experienced lenders. For additional information, please contact us at (707) 236-1500 or online at www.apbconnect.com.
Chevy, my previous post can't be right.
http://www.missionoaksbank.com/site/press_releases.html#Jan1713
The Company reported a net profit of $23,000, or $0.002 per share, for the quarter that ended December 31, 2012. This compares to a loss of $993,000, or $0.09 per share in the same quarter of the previous year. This was the company’s first profitable quarter since 2008.
So thinly traded and sometimes a wide bid/ask spread...makes investing at ideal prices a little tough. No position currently.
Now that it has been determined that the Merger is not going forward, in order to comply with the capital requirements of the Consent Order, the Bank will need to complete a new capital offering or find another solution which improves its capital ratios, such as finding a new merger partner, arranging for the possible sale of the Bank or a transfer of control of the Bank, or taking steps to decrease the asset size of the Bank until the ratios are in compliance with the Consent Order. The Bank presently intends to commence a common stock offering, subject to regulatory approval, by the end of the first quarter of 2013 to effect compliance with the capital ratios. The Bank believes that its improved condition in 2012 compared to 2011 will allow the Bank to raise sufficient capital to resolve the requirements of the Consent Order.
Did I need the money? Nah, but just cashing in on a few shares with a near triple. Any chance to pocket a few bucks doesn't seem like a bad trade to me. I'll be back in looking to pick up some more on a healthy pullback if it happens, otherwise the ones I have left can feel free to float ever hire as the bank continues to improve.
We had some numbers analysis buried in here somewhere I believe amongst the market chatter.
-Pagz
PS: BNCC sitting at 75% of BV, can't wait for those Q1 numbers
I sold half of my position today, raising some dry powder and playing with house money now. I hope they went into your hands Hank!
-Pagz
Are you saying there's no point to a RS? Like was said before, certain institutions simply can't buy shares at these levels due to their governing rules.
This opens the door to a whole different set of investors, which brings positive price realization for under-valued securities.
Price is what you pay for, value is what you get. As long as the valuation doesn't change, the price is irrelevant. Having those new investors is a positive with no downside.
For what it's worth, here's a write-up I found from Friday. I'm on about a double on the warrants but haven't sold any yet.
http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/03/15/roic-reduces-warrant-overhang-boosts-huge-potentia/?source=esadlfhlnal0001&lidx=0
ROIC Reduces Warrant Overhang, Boosts Huge Potential Stock Gains
This morning, little-known West Coast shopping center REIT Retail Opportunity Investments ("ROIC") announced what investors have been waiting for: substantial action on the outstanding warrants to buy shares of stock at $12.
When ROIC formed as a special purpose acquisition corporation (SPAC) with an IPO 2007, the SPAC practice was to issue stock, warrants, and units -- a combination of stock and warrants. At the IPO and later when ROIC announced its move to a REIT model in late 2009, it had issued 49.4 million warrants, including8 million to the SPAC founders. At the end of 2012, only 1,000 warrants had been exercised for cash.
Today, the company announced that 57.3% of the warrants have been exercised for cash by investors for $12 a share or $162 million and on a cashless basis by the SPAC founders. From 1,000 to this is, ahem, news. Exercise of the remaining would bring in about $253 million. However, the company purchased 7.8 of the warrants themselves at $1.38, an 18% premium to yesterday's $1.17 close and implying a $13.38 stock price.
Expiring 18 months away on Oct. 23, 2014, the warrants offer both potential shareholder dilution -- included in diluted EPS calculations already -- and cash for investment. However, if management invests the cash for higher returns, the dilution could be a wash -- what every executive in similar situations promises will be "accretive" but rarely is. Meanwhile, despite a steady stock rise, uncertainty over the warrant status has most likely -- and management agrees -- prevented even more gains from yesterday's $13.18 a share close.
Potential near-term gains
A possible $18 and up could well come with the warrant overhang removed based on comparables. While there are roughly 25 REITs loosely in the strip mall, shopping center and mall spaces, Regency Centers , Acadia Realty Trust , Kimco Properties , and ROIC are most similar because they specialize in grocery-anchored centers.
Company ($ millions)
LTM AFFO*
Market Cap
Market Cap / LTM AFFO
Dividend Yield
Total Debt to Total
Assets
Tangible Book Value % of Price
ROIC
$39
$764
19.6
4.6%
43%
85%
Kimco Properties
$514
$9,000
17.5
3.8%
43%
51%
Regency Centers
$221
$4,786
21.7
3.1%
50%
29%
Acadia Realty Trust
$49
$1,486
30.5
3%
38%
41%
Sources: S&P Capital IQ and my calculations. *AFFO is adjusted funds from operations, which is the equivalent of operating cash flow minus maintenance capital expenditures, and is considered the amount available for the REIT to payout.
The case for an increased ROIC valuation has three parts. First, though its market cap-to-LTM AFFO multiple is less than all but one, and seems not exactly low, ROIC offers the highest yield by far, and all else equal should sell for more. This supports the case that "something is holding it back," in which the "something" is likely the warrant overhang.
While the debt to asset percentages are at or near the 50% we'd like ROIC not to top, and Acadia has room to grow, the clear winner for margin of safety is ROIC, selling at a whopping 85% tangible book at a percentage of share price. This indicates far higher asset protection than any of the others.
ROIC is what you buy if you want hard asset based downside protection so paying peanuts for the upside. Who doesn't? These are very good reward-to-risk odds.
Caution warranted
There are also three uncertainties regarding the warrants. So long as the stock remains above the $12 strike price, investors are more likely to exercise them, the company receive money, and shareholder count increase. But if the stock were to decline below $12 and remain there at expiration, outstanding warrants would expire worthless and without exercise -- no dilution, but also no cash from exercise. And for all sorts of reasons beyond my pay grade, the company is able to and could change the warrant strike. For all these reasons, reducing uncertainty over the warrants is good for the stock and for shareholders.
Potential multi-bagger
Whatever the outcome, investors must be patient for any stock rise after the warrant uncertainty is removed and assuming continued positive fundamentals. In the short term, we must ignore at last one expected bump in the road. The company expects to announce in its May 2 first-quarter report a guidance revision downward because of the timing of receiving the capital and investing it.
ROIC's quarterly dividend has risen steadily from $0.06 a share at inception to the most recent quarter's $0.15. The latter is a run-rate $0.60 annually and 4.6% yield on yesterday's $13.18 close. With the company's investments, low leverage, and a disciplined CEO intent on paying value prices for strong unique assets on the West Coast, now is a great time to invest with patience. First, patience for now to warrant expiration, and then a potential long-term catalyst, where multi-year patience could yield multi-bagger gains. CEO Tanz created in 1997 a similar REIT, Pan Pacific Properties, selling in a hot real estate market to Kimco in 2006 for 9 times its original value.
Meanwhile, CEO Tanz's history of purchasing shopping centers in strategic locations at discounts from distressed buyers provides a margin of safety. And at today's valuation, investors take little risk for multiple future opportunities for gains. Value investors are licking their lips.
Insiders do sell for many many different reasons, but when analyzing their buys you have to look at them independently. If an insider buys stock at $10, they think it is worth more than that and have better inside knowledge then we do...so it should be noted that there is a good chance intrinsically it is worth more. If they then buy stock at $20, they must think it is worth even more or they would never commit the personal capital on a losing investment.
Although, there is the founder's problem however as well. Where so, the individual's personal sentimental value comes into play. In that instance, their motives may not be purely quantitative, but rather emotionally driven.
You got in cheaper than the execs. Look at them buying equity in the offering at $5.15:
http://www.streetinsider.com/Equity+Offerings/UPDATE%3A+MGIC+Investment+%28MTG%29+CEO+Buys+50K+Shares+in+Recent+Equity+Raise/8166303.html
CEO Curt Culver bought 50,000 shares
VP Tim Mattke bought 10,000 shares
EVP Lawrence Pierzchal bought 25,000 shares
COO Patrick Sinks bought 30,000 shares
EVP Jeffery Lane bought 35,000 shares
CFO Jon Michael Lauer bought 50,000 shares
-Pagz
On Tuesday, Wilshire made an appearance at an investor conference. I couldn't find any presentation information but strength this week could be helped by that:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/wilshire-bancorp-participate-sandler-oneill-130000749.html
More like shoring up capital position to allow them to keep writing new profitable business that will add to book. This is a positive development that allows them to continue moving forward in an industry lacking many players other than Radian.
Offering just announced, management alluded to this on the conference call:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/mgic-investment-corporation-announces-public-211000933.html
MILWAUKEE, March 5, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- MGIC Investment Corporation (MTG) (the "Company") announced today that it has commenced a public offering of 135 million shares of its common stock and $350 million aggregate principal amount of its convertible senior notes due 2020. The convertible senior notes will be convertible into shares of the Company's common stock. The Company intends to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 15 percent of the number of shares offered and an option to purchase up to an additional $50 million aggregate principal amount of the convertible senior notes. Neither the offering of the common stock nor the offering of convertible senior notes will be contingent on the completion of the other offering.
The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the offerings for its general corporate purposes, which may include increasing the capital of the Company's insurance subsidiary Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC) and other subsidiaries of the Company, and improving liquidity by providing funds for debt service.
Goldman, Sachs & Co. will act as sole book-running manager for both offerings.
The Company has filed a registration statement (including a prospectus and related preliminary prospectus supplements for each of the common stock and convertible senior notes offerings) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") for the offerings to which this communication relates. Before you invest, you should read the applicable preliminary prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus for more complete information about the Company and these offerings. You may obtain these documents free of charge by visiting the SEC website at www.sec.gov. Alternatively, you may obtain copies from Goldman, Sachs & Co., at 200 West Street, New York, NY 10282, Attention: Prospectus Department, by telephone at 1-866-471-2526 or by emailing prospectus-ny@ny.email.gs.com.
True for now, but what about this argument?
Book value accounts for defaults but NOT for the future stream of premiums on the book of business.
I don't mean a stock split, I mean the up-coming spinoff which will no doubt unlock value.
Just to divulge some of my trading, I bought the 2014 $10 calls for $1.15 last week. When NCT splits the market will re-price accordingly and I think in a positive way.
I'm targeting $13+ combined value if not more by expiration and they outline the valuation on yield great in the presentation. The risk/reward characteristics looked good.
Thank you pumpers and dumpers for allowing me to exit a pile of shares. You have given me some capital to use on companies that actually aren't about to go out of business.
Well when time is money (aka cash burn), 6 months is better than nothing. Also, say these are trading around $80 with 300,000 out there (I believe off-hand) that's over 10% of the current level on a per note basis.
Let's see some math:
$600K burn per month / 300K outstanding = appx. $2 a month decay
$29,185,548 cash + settlement of $3,108,624 = $32,294,172
$32.3 MM / 300K = $107.65 per note currently
Difference between cash value and market value (at $80) =
$108 - $80 = $28 = 14 months
Effectively, at this burn rate you are getting 14 months of court action for free at these levels. Still an asymmetric situation to me in a way.
Onwards and upwards.
Guys, Andrew from Underlying Value Investor blog put up a quick post regarding his BNCC buy-in. Always beneficial to see the views of others outside the message board:
http://underlyingvalueinvestor.com/2013/02/27/bnccorp-bncc-11-00-buy-2262013/
Thanks for the quick DD, interesting response. Probably will still keep an eye on it.
SPPRP has monthly dividends to boot, not a bad place to store spare cash if you can't find other immediate investable opportunities right? Not that I have that problem these days yet haha.
It is a head scratcher the more I think about it definitely. At first glance, one might think their goal was add some liquidity to the stock, but of course we know that's dumb. They themselves said about the buyback anyway:
Charles O. Hall, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “The primary role of the repurchase program is to provide a tool to assist with the management of the Company's capital position, while also providing liquidity for shareholders.” Continuing, Mr. Hall stated, “This announcement also demonstrates the Board's confidence in the Company's strategy, growth opportunities and financial strength.”
All valid points.
I guess the traditional appeal of a stock dividend as I've been taught is choice. Ex-dividend the stock will trade lower be it stock or cash, but in this case the investor isn't simply receiving cash but has the option of selling their additional shares at a future time when enterprise value may be higher.
Otherwise the investor needs to buy additional shares with their cash dividend and a DRIP program locks you into those at set prices.
Now you got me hungry EI, time to order a large supreme haha.
Since that merger was a stock-for-stock transaction I didn't know if that was taken into consideration at all or the timing of that S/O number I saw.
Haven't dug, but Bloomberg has the S/O as 3.34 MM, is that right?
If so then at $6.60 a share we have a market cap of $22 MM vs. shareholder's equity of $47.8 MM or 46%.
Enough on the surface to interest me w/ that stock dividend to boot.
Been too quiet in here, but I can tell you that for better or worse 1% of these are going nowhere as it stands right now.
"Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you"
-V
Geez Chevy, here I am trying to quietly accumulate in the low $.20's ninja-style before the next earnings announcement and you have to go blabbing. ;)
Anxious to see the haircut non-banking operations does to that FY net income. If it is about 50%, then we have a bank with net income for the year of $1.25MM against a market cap of about $4.5MM.
The question then becomes, what will normalized earnings be given the improvement in credit quality and capital ratios?
I hold shares and can't wait to find out.