Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.
Hilton going public again:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-12/blackstone-s-hilton-files-for-1-25-billion-u-s-initial-offer.html
Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc., the hotel operator owned by Blackstone Group LP (BX), filed to raise $1.25 billion in a U.S. initial public offering as lodging shares trade at close to their highest level in six years.
The world’s largest hotel chain plans to use proceeds from the offering to pay down debt, according to a regulatory filing today. New York-based Blackstone, the world’s largest manager of alternative assets, will own a majority of the voting power in Hilton following the IPO, the filing shows.
Enlarge image Blackstone’s Hilton Files for $1.25 Billion U.S. Initial Offer
Net income at Hilton, which operates more than 4,000 properties worldwide, rose 39 percent to $352 million in 2012 from a year earlier, on revenue of $9.3 billion, according to today’s filing.
At $1.25 billion, the IPO would be the largest for a lodging company and would move Blackstone closer to realizing gains from its biggest single investment, with more than $6 billion of equity invested from its real estate and other funds. The offering coincides with increases in lodging revenue and income industrywide that have spurred stock gains for hoteliers such as Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. (HOT) and Marriott International Inc.
“For Blackstone, it doesn’t make sense to keep something this valuable on the books,” said Jeffrey Sica, who oversees about $1 billion as chief investment officer of Morristown, New Jersey-based Sica Wealth Management LLC. “Hilton’s business has been doing well, so it makes very good sense for them to do it now.”
The McLean, Virginia-based hotel operator didn’t say how many shares it will offer or at what price. The offering amount is a placeholder used to calculate fees and may change. Deutsche Bank AG, Goldman Sachs Group Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Morgan Stanley will arrange Hilton’s IPO, the filing shows.
$30 Billion
Hilton could be valued at about $30 billion, based on multiples of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization at comparable companies such as Starwood and Marriott, said a person with knowledge of Blackstone’s plans, who asked not to be identified because the process is private.
Christine Anderson, a spokeswoman for Blackstone, declined to comment on the potential valuation.
The chain’s origins date back to 1919, when founder Conrad Hilton purchased his first hotel (2706) in Cisco, Texas. Today the company, led by Chief Executive Officer Christopher Nassetta, offers lodging under brands including Waldorf Astoria, DoubleTree, Homewood Suites and Hampton Inn.
Net income at Hilton, which operates more than 4,000 properties worldwide, rose 39 percent to $352 million in 2012 from a year earlier, on revenue of $9.3 billion, according to today’s filing. Hilton increased the number of open rooms by 170,000, or 34 percent, over the past six years, the highest growth rate of any major lodging company, the filing shows.
Good Timing
“For any lodging company to go public right now, the timing is good,” Nikhil Bhalla, an analyst at FBR & Co. (FBRC) in Arlington, Virginia, said in a telephone interview. “We are currently in mid-cycle, so any new company that is going public, they will benefit from gains in the last two or three years and we still think there are gains to be had in the next several years.”
Hotel occupancy in the top 25 U.S. markets rose to 76.3 percent in July from 75.2 percent a year earlier, according to research firm STR. Revenue per available room rose 6.2 percent.
Blackstone’s 2007 takeover of Hilton for $26 billion, which included debt, was the largest ever of a hotel company, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The transaction took place at the height of the biggest buyout boom in history, amid a surge in commercial real estate values.
The IPO banks and JPMorgan Chase & Co. also are helping the company refinance about $13.5 billion in debt before the stock sale, a person familiar with the matter has said.
Extended Stay
Last month Blackstone hired JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley to explore a sale or IPO of its La Quinta hotel chain, which is valued at about $4.5 billion including debt, a person with knowledge of the matter said at the time. In July, it filed for IPOs of Brixmor Property Group, the second-biggest U.S. shopping-center landlord, and Extended Stay America Inc., a mid-price lodging chain.
Extended Stay, which owns and operates almost 700 hotels in the U.S. and Canada, is owned in equal parts by Blackstone, Centerbridge Partners LP and Paulson & Co. The company is valued at about $3 billion to $4 billion before debt, according to a person familiar with the process.
SeaWorld, Pinnacle
At least two Blackstone-backed companies have gone public in the past year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. SeaWorld Entertainment Inc. (SEAS) raised $807.3 million in April, including an overallotment option. Pinnacle Foods Inc. (PF), the maker of Hungry-Man dinners, raised $667 million in an IPO in March. Before today, SeaWorld had gained more than 6 percent since its IPO, while Pinnacle had risen about 35 percent.
IPOs have accelerated this year in the U.S. as the broader stock market has rallied. There have been 124 initial offerings in the U.S. so far this year, more in number than the comparable period of any year since 2007, data compiled by Bloomberg show. U.S. IPOs this year have raised $30.2 billion, the data show.
Well even at 50% of BV, a company can still issue shares and dilute common. So the 50% of BV one buys at can become 100% of new BV, just thinking about that as I saw this:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/929545/000119312513354146/d566563ds11a.htm
And so here we are with a 50% off price tag to book value. What do we get? An active micro and macro turnaround methinks.
Macro in the sense that the hotel industry has had a nice recovery overall and micro in that the company is taking the necessary steps to set themselves up for the future.
The next question that remains is how long until AFFO and EBITDA begin to recover?
In a situation like this, leveraged and with such a small market cap, we have an option-like possible recovery. When the turn comes operationally, and investors realize a steep BV discount baked in a liquidation that would not occur, shares will rise. When will that happen?
We might be getting closer each day...
For any of you holding out there, wild unexpected deal today buying up media on the cheap. Taking out real estate, purchase price was only 2.5X 2013 EBITDA
In their presentation, NCT is talking about another spin-off of this new company.
http://ir.newcastleinv.com/Cache/1001178508.PDF?Y=&O=PDF&D=&FID=1001178508&T=&IID=4040318
This is fun and fascinating for those of us who have held for a while.
Low unemployment = good for banks.
Look at how a few ND places pop up on this list.
http://www.bls.gov/web/metro/laummtrk.htm
SEC filing from Greystone today:
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1088413/000107261313000370/form12b-25_17564.htm
Greystone’s sales and gross profit is expected to be approximately $24,103,000 and $5,275,000, respectively, for the year ended May 31, 2013, compared to $24,157,590 and $4,929,851, respectively, for the year ended May 31, 2012. The increase in gross profit is primarily attributable to the product mix in sales.
The net income for the year ended May 31, 2013, is expected to be approximately $2,811,000 compared to $2,491,650 for the year ended May 31, 2012.
The net income available to common shareholders for the year ended May 31, 2013, is expected to be approximately $2,283,000, or $0.09 per share, compared to $2,103,268, or $0.08 per share, for the year ended May 31, 2012.
Post Unavailable
Additional Information
Toss another year onto this one Chevy :p
One at a time, until I'm your age!
Sher with another settlement, this time picking up a few dollars from SS&C:
http://dm.epiq11.com/TMI/Document/GetDocument/2413122
Guys,
Via another investor who also has been in contact with Kruger, his response was that they are finishing their audit and the annual report should be filed on time by month's end. Calendar-wise we could see it later this week then.
-Pagz
July MOR out:
$29,960,532 of assets / 300K notes = $99.87 per note
http://dm.epiq11.com/TMI/Document/GetDocument/2411382
Anxious to see quarterly results, if previous timeline is followed they should be this week.
Can I ask how you are running your valuation to say it is fully valued?
I posted this before:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=89246332
Friday fun with numbers:
- $800 MM in assets
- median ROA% for North Dakota Q1 2013 = 1.03%
source: http://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/stateprofile/Kansascity/ND/ND.pdf
800MM * 1.03% = $10.4 MM
10X earnings multiple = $104 MM or ~ $31.50 per share potential
They just have to keep on performing.
Commerzbank exposure to Detroit. Selling at 30% P/TBV, very cheap as EI has pointed out via articles.
http://www.valuewalk.com/2013/07/commerzbank-loaned-detroit-over-400-million/#utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ValuewalkBusiness+%28ValueWalk+%C2%BB+Business%29
Germany’s second largest lender, Commerzbank AG (OTCMKTS:CRZBY), loaned over $400 million to Detroit, according to a German daily, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.
CommerzBank
The exposure came through Commerzbank AG (OTCMKTS:CRZBY)’s subsidiary, Eurohypo, which the bank bought in 2005. Eurohypo lent over $400 million to the recently declared-insolvent city.
Detroit a small issue for CommerzBank
Jaime Becerril of J.P. Morgan Cazenove feels the Detroit exposure could be a small issue for the Germany bank. As of the first quarter of 2013, the bank had €74.2 billion exposure in its ‘public finance’ portfolio, split across fixed income securities (€23.3 billion), sovereign debt (€36.2 billion) and other securities (€14.7 billion).
Jaime feels chances of CommerzBank getting anything back from Detroit look remote now. However, the analyst feels the bank’s valuation already reflects much pain after a very weak 2013.
CommerzBank’s stock has already dropped 36 percent year-to-date, with its stock trading at some of the lowest multiples in Europe at 0.3 x P/TBV.
Jamie assigns a Neutral rating on Commerzbank AG (OTCMKTS:CRZBY) and revised the price target to €8.87 from €8.74 earlier, as the analyst feels there is some value left when the bank sells its shipping and CRE assets.
Exogenous factors may drive profitability
Matteo Ramenghi and the team at UBS Investment Research feel CommerzBank’s profitability will be largely driven by exogenous factors such as interest rates, sovereign exposures, real estate valuations and asset quality trends.
The UBS research team terms CommerzBank’s two major acquisitions since 2005 viz.: Dresdner Bank and Eurohypo, as unfortunate.
The analysts have assigned a Neutral rating for Commerzbank AG (OTCMKTS:CRZBY) with a 12-month price target pegged at €6.90. Matteo Ramenghi and team have arrived at the price target using a Gordon growth model (with CoE 10 percent and g 1 percent), cross-checked with market multiples.
Earlier, the UBS Investment Research team trimmed second-quarter operating EPS estimates of Assured Guaranty Ltd. (NYSE:AGO) by over 60 percent for its exposure to Detroit. The analysts anticipate about $130 million of losses on Assured Guaranty Ltd’s Detroit exposures. The bond insurer covers debt obligations, including variable-interest entities, which enables firms to keep certain assets off their balance sheets.
According to Dieter Hein, an analyst at Fairesearch GmbH in Kronberg, for more than five years Commerzbank AG (OTCMKTS:CRZBY) has been a restructuring case and almost every quarter there has been a writedown that strains the bank’s earnings.
June MOR out, a few extra million brought in from Wells Fargo mortgage certificates class action suit:
$30,652,675 / 300,000 notes = $102.18 per note
http://dm.epiq11.com/TMI/Document/GetDocument/2400165
Interesting little sell-off here considering earnings out soon, pull-back right to the 50-day EMA.
At current cash burn rates for legal fees that would buy us another 3-4 months. That's pretty good to finance our way towards settlements for the larger cases.
Seeking Alpha article out on BNCC, nothing new we don't already know here in our little group BUT it gets a little exposure to the casual retail investor maybe:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/1542322-bnccorp-undervalued-regional-offers-more-than-a-margin-of-safety?source=yahoo
Hope it was a good weekend for all as well, only a few more weeks until the next earnings announcement. Can't wait!
Barclays Capital Initiates Mallinckrodt at Equal-Weight on Differentiated Platform Value
In a report published Monday, Barclays Capital analyst Douglas D. Tsao initiated coverage on Mallinckrodt (NYSE: MNK [FREE Stock Trend Analysis]) with an Equal-Weight rating and $45.00 price target.
In the report, Barclays Capital noted, “We believe MNK offers significant value through its differentiated platform in both controlled substances and extended release products. We see MNK in evolution from an under-resourced division of COV into a standalone specialty pharmaceutical business. The company's capabilities received significant validation earlier this year with its surprise launch of generic Concerta. No longer simply a ‘bolt-on' to COV, we expect over the next 12-18 months MNK will build out its pipeline beyond what has currently been disclosed both through internal development and business development, noting MNK possesses an Irish tax structure which confers tactical advantages in M&A.”
Mallinckrodt closed on Friday at $44.23.
Read more: http://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/13/07/3734070/update-barclays-capital-initiates-mallinckrodt-at-equal-##ixzz2YSxELcQ5
May MOR out:
http://dm.epiq11.com/TMI/Document/GetDocument/2386849
$27,629,845 / 300,000 = $92.10 per note currently
Friday fun with numbers:
- $800 MM in assets
- median ROA% for North Dakota Q1 2013 = 1.03%
source: http://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/stateprofile/Kansascity/ND/ND.pdf
800MM * 1.03% = $10.4 MM
10X earnings multiple = $104 MM or ~ $31.50 per share potential
They just have to keep on performing.
What are you specifically referring to? The only stealing I want them to do is stealing market share to dominate the Bakken region.
With current assets at $800 MM and using an earnings multiple of 10X, at $4 they'd have a market cap of $13.2 MM, so earnings would have to be $1.32 MM.
Fraud aside, at $4 their ROA% would be 1.32 / 800 = .165% or extremely low.
That's without growing at all from EOQ Q1.
ABNK has been on a nice run since we took a look at it.
I think we would all agree if BNCC went back to $4 without fraud, we would be trying to buy any and all shares possible there at 25% BV and ~1X earnings. Maybe you were joking or it's a typo but what valuation technique gets you even close to there?
Here's a scenario for you. A buyer is watching and waiting, BNCC cleans up the balance sheet, no TARP, etc. The market see's this and pops it 30% to BV. Said buyer could offer 33% MORE on top of that at $20 and it would still be buying a Bakken growth presence for a bargain of 1.33X BV. $25+ sounds much better in my book...Fun times ahead I say.
Well they could buy into CASA, Mexican Restaurant Group, Inc. It's cheap on an earnings and mulitples basis but operates its burrito chains in Texas.
I won't pump it here, I know it's against the rules. I only have a few shares anyway...for now.
Picked up a few shares to track, noticed that the Banc Funds Co. holds 5.95% of the shares outstanding. Nice company to be in.
Little bit of volume today, anyone here doing the bidding for $.10?
To clarify, I meant a link to officially how the contract will be treated after the spinoff. I'm thinking about my old NCT 2014s and 2015s (although they are straightforward 1:1 ratio, no adjustment to strike) as I look at the smallish time value priced in the COV LEAPs. Liquidity in my NCT's has almost completely dried up and (as Olmstead has pointed out on Twitter) I may have to exercise at some point to unlock the full value. Just wondering if that would happen here as well.
To your other point, I can imagine such a thing! Was a doozy of a class in grad school and I think it was simply called Options and Derivatives taught by this guy:
http://www1.villanova.edu/villanova/business/facultyresearch/facultydepartment/biodetail.html?mail=david.shaffer@villanova.edu&xsl=bio_long
Did you use a version of this book back then?
http://www.amazon.com/Options-Futures-Derivatives-Derivagem-Edition/dp/0136015867/ref=sr_1_8?ie=UTF8&qid=1370885843&sr=8-8&keywords=options+trading+hall
Supposedly, it still is the gold standard and many a trader keeps one at their desk, I had to sell mine to pay some bills but wish I didn't.
Back to valuation points, I would assume in that book they still talked about doing cash flow based valuations right? Industry-relative is great for growth companies but leaves you with systemic market risk (how I feel about some tech right now).
Only reason I mention it is I think that is one rookie mistake people can make. Recently, I was explaining the difference between an asset play and an earnings play. FYI my example was SHLD. Math and financial modeling is the easy part, deciding WHICH valuation technique to use (comp based, metric based, liquidation based, M&A based, DCF, etc.) requires a little experience and nuance most (or most my age and younger out of school) don't pick up initially.
Anywho, good call here EI! Prime for post-spin appreciation.
Interesting play here EI, nice. Have you valued the pieces after the spinoff?
Mallinckrodt at 10X last year's earnings would be $27.70.
Divide that 8 = $3.46 per current COV share.
Not much unlocked value being taken into account for in any of the outstanding options that's for sure.
I assume you know how the options will be treated after the spinoff. Using your $55 strike as an example, will that then equate into 100 shares of COV and 12.5 shares of Mallinckrodt per contract?
Thanks.
-V
What is with the buying today? I didn't see any releases or new reports. I kept putting off buying any in the $.30's and missed a double. Ugh.
April MOR out:
http://dm.epiq11.com/TMI/Document/GetDocument/2311864
$27,678,221 / 300,000 = $92.26 per note currently
Q1 Earnings Out:
http://boardvote.com/symbol/JAXB/communique/328675
Click the link for financial tables.
JACKSONVILLE, Fla., May 9, 2013 /PRNewswire/ -- Jacksonville Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") (NASDAQ: JAXB), holding company for The Jacksonville Bank (the "Bank"), reported net income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 of $199 thousand compared to $1.3 million of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Book value and tangible book value per common share as of March 31, 2013 were $0.32 and $0.30, respectively.
(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20020410/JAXBLOGO )
Net income for the first quarter of 2013 was driven primarily by (i) net interest income of $5.2 million, (ii) provision for loan losses of $0.2 million, (iii) noninterest income of $0.4 million, and (iv) noninterest expenses of $5.2 million. The slight decrease in net interest income when compared to the same period in the prior year was due to a decrease in interest earned on interest-earning assets, driven primarily by a decrease in average earning assets (in particular average loan balances) slightly offset by an increase in the average yield on loans.
Total interest income decreased $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012. This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in average earning assets, in particular, average loan balances which declined by $63.6 million when compared to the same period in the prior year. The decrease in average loan balances was partially offset by an increase in the average yield on loans to 6.03% for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to 5.41% for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in the loan yield was driven by an increase in accretion recognized on acquired loans of approximately $0.4 million as well as a decrease in total nonperforming loans of $29.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 when compared to the same period in 2012.
Interest expense decreased by $0.3 million to $1.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013 from $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This was primarily due to a decrease in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 1.11% for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 1.20% for the same period in 2012. This decrease reflects the ongoing reduction in interest rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities (particularly on deposits) as a result of repricing activities in the current low interest rate environment coupled with an increase in noninterest-bearing deposits to $89.9 million as of March 31, 2013 from $80.8 million as of March 31, 2012.
Noninterest income remained relatively consistent period-over-period, with $0.4 million in service charges and other income for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company sold $2.2 million of its municipal securities at a $37 thousand realized gain during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Noninterest expense increased to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $4.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This increase was mainly due to an increase in professional fees of $0.3 million and other expenses of $0.5 million, primarily loan-related expenses, while the remainder of components of noninterest expense remained relatively flat period-over-period.
There was no income tax expense recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company recorded a full valuation allowance against its deferred taxes as of December 31, 2011. This was substantially due to the fact that it was more-likely-than-not that the benefit would not be realized in future periods due to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Based on an analysis performed as of March 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, it was determined that the need for a full valuation allowance still existed.
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company adopted a new overall strategy to accelerate the disposition of substandard assets on an individual customer basis. This strategy is ongoing and supports the continued reduction of problem assets as needed. In addition, the Company has been and will continue to fine tune the current credit processes. The Company is working to reposition its loan and deposit portfolio mix to better align with our targeted market segment of professional services, wholesalers, distributors and other service industries resulting in greater diversification in our balance sheet mix. The capital received late in 2012 is being deployed into short-term investments to maximize earnings while the desired loan growth is achieved.
During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed a $50.0 million capital raise through the private placement of 50,000 shares of the Company's Mandatorily Convertible, Noncumulative, Nonvoting, Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series A ("Series A Preferred Stock"), at a purchase price of $1,000 per share. Consideration in the private placement included cash, the one-for-one exchange of Series B preferred stock sold in the $5.0 million bridge financing completed during the third quarter of 2012 and $1.8 million in the cancellation of outstanding debt under the Company's revolving loan agreements held by certain purchasers in the private placement and/or their related interests. Net proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock in the amount of $45.1 million were used for general operating expenses, mainly for the subsidiary bank, to improve capital ratios and will be used to support the Company's business strategy going forward. On February 19, 2013, after receiving requisite shareholder approvals, all issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock automatically converted into an aggregate of 47.6 million shares of common stock and 52.4 million shares of the Company's newly authorized nonvoting common stock. Book value and tangible book value per common share as of December 31, 2012 were $2.55 and $2.34, respectively. Book value and tangible book value per common share as of December 31, 2012, adjusted for the conversion, were $0.32 and $0.31, respectively. Please refer to the Company's Non-GAAP Reconciliations for additional information related to these non-GAAP financial measures. In addition, on December 31, 2012, the Bank completed the sale of $25.1 million in assets, including non-accrual loans and other loans with a history of being past due of $24.6 million and other real estate owned ("OREO") of $0.5 million, to a real estate investment firm, for a purchase price of $11.7 million.
Total assets were $520.9 million as of March 31, 2013, compared to $585.3 million as of March 31, 2012. The decrease in total assets was largely due to the decrease in net loans as a result of the Company's execution of its overall strategy to accelerate the disposition of substandard assets as discussed above. To a lesser extent, the write-off of the Company's goodwill also decreased total assets period-over-period. Total assets decreased $44.2 million as of March 31, 2013 from December 31, 2012. This decrease in total assets was due to the Company experiencing a significant decrease in cash and cash equivalents as a result of a reduction in federal funds sold in the amount of $47.3 million due to the purchase of investment securities available-for-sale and the timing of the natural maturity of deposit accounts, particularly time deposits. In addition, there was a decrease in net loans of $4.7 million, primarily due to foreclosure activities during the three months ended March 31, 2013. These amounts were offset by an increase in securities available-for-sale of $7.3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2013.
Total deposits were $446.2 million as of March 31, 2013, a decrease of $67.3 million compared to total deposits of $513.5 million as of March 31, 2012. The decrease in total deposits during the first quarter of 2013 when compared to the first quarter of 2012 was driven primarily by a decrease in time deposits of $54.5 million due largely to a reduction in national and brokered CDs (the Company is currently not offering or renewing national or brokered CDs). This decrease was offset slightly by a $9.1 million increase in noninterest-bearing demand deposits.
As of March 31, 2013, nonperforming assets were $30.0 million, or 5.76% of total assets, compared to $56.7 million, or 9.68% of total assets, as of March 31, 2012. The decrease in nonperforming assets was driven primarily by an increase in loan charge-offs, specifically during 2012, write-downs on OREO, the disposition of OREO via sale or substandard assets via short sales, and the disposition of substandard assets via the asset sale completed late in the fourth quarter of 2012. This is consistent with the Company's overall strategy to accelerate the disposition of substandard assets.
The following table presents information concerning nonperforming assets as of the last five quarters:
For the Period Ended
(Dollars in thousands)
March 31,
2013
December 31,
2012
September 30,
2012
June 30,
2012
March 31,
2012
Nonperforming Assets
Total nonperforming loans
$
20,067
$
22,747
$
35,168
$
46,407
$
49,066
Foreclosed assets, net
9,920
6,971
4,599
7,508
7,667
Total nonperforming assets
$
29,987
$
29,718
$
39,767
$
53,915
$
56,733
Nonperforming loans and foreclosed
assets as a percent of total assets
5.76
%
5.26
%
7.21
%
9.25
%
9.68
%
Nonperforming loans as a percent of
gross loans
5.10
%
5.71
%
8.05
%
10.24
%
10.69
%
Loans past due 30-89 days, still
accruing interest
$
8,246
$
4,622
$
11,372
$
4,628
$
10,917
Total loans past due still accruing interest increased $3.6 million to $8.2 million as of March 31, 2013 from $4.6 million as of December 31, 2012. This increase was driven primarily by several larger loans in process of renewal as well as one relationship that is being orderly liquidated. Nonperforming loans decreased $2.6 million to $20.1 million as of March 31, 2013 from $22.7 million as of December 31, 2012.
The allowance for loan losses was 5.04% of total loans as of March 31, 2013, compared to 2.85% as of March 31, 2012 and 5.07% as of December 31, 2012. Provision for loan loss expense was $217 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $72 thousand in 2012. The Company recorded net charge-offs of $595 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $14 thousand in 2012. The higher level of charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2013 was primarily due to the Company's continued disposition of distressed assets on an individual customer basis. This fits with the Company's strategy to accelerate the disposition of substandard assets as discussed above.
On a diluted per common share basis, the Company had a net loss of $0.61 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to net income of $0.22 for the same period in the prior year. The Company experienced a net loss per diluted common share due to the reduction of net income available to common shareholders in the amount of $31.5 million as a result of the noncash, implied preferred stock dividend recognized in conjunction with the mandatory conversion of the Company's Series A Preferred Stock into approximately 47.6 million shares of common stock and 52.4 million shares of a new class of nonvoting common stock (the "Conversion"), during the three months ended March 31, 2013. As adjusted to reflect earnings (loss) per common share less the impact of the noncash, implied preferred stock dividend, basic and diluted earnings per common share was $0.00 for the three months ended March 31, 2013. Please refer to the Company's Non-GAAP Reconciliations for additional information related to this non-GAAP financial measure.
Let's take a look at what we have here:
Mission Oaks Bancorp, the parent company of Mission Oaks National Bank, announced unaudited results for the first quarter of 2013. The Company reported a net profit of $220,000, or $0.02 per share, for the quarter that ended March 31, 2013. This compares to a profit of $23,000 in the prior quarter, and a loss of $1.6 million in the same quarter in 2012.
One major factor leading to the earnings turnaround from 2012 was a $400,000 negative loan loss provision taken in 2013.
http://www.missionoaksbank.com/site/press_releases.html#top
First Quarter 2013 Earnings Report
Temecula, California (April 17, 2013) - Mission Oaks Bancorp Announces Results for First Quarter of 2013.
Selected highlights at March 31, 2013:
Mission Oaks earned $220,000 for the first quarter, its most profitable quarter since 2008.
Classified assets continued to fall, and at $13.5 million were at their lowest level in five years.
Loan charge offs continued to decline with only $158,000 in net quarterly charge offs.
Other Real Estate Owned (OREO) was reduced to one property valued at $75,000.
The Company’s cost of funds dropped to 0.39 percent, down from 0.73 percent in the same period last year, and the average interest margin rose to 4.18 percent from 3.67 percent.
Mission Oaks Bancorp, the parent company of Mission Oaks National Bank, announced unaudited results for the first quarter of 2013. The Company reported a net profit of $220,000, or $0.02 per share, for the quarter that ended March 31, 2013. This compares to a profit of $23,000 in the prior quarter, and a loss of $1.6 million in the same quarter in 2012.
One major factor leading to the earnings turnaround from 2012 was a $400,000 negative loan loss provision taken in 2013. In the first quarter of 2012, the Company added $668,000 to its Allowance for Loan Losses (ALLL). The negative provision in 2013 reflects improvements in the quality of subsidiary bank’s loan portfolio and a dramatic slowdown in loan charge offs in recent quarters. In the first quarter of this year, net charge offs were $158,000 as compared to $1.1 million in the same period last year. For the last three calendar quarters, net recoveries actually exceeded charge offs by $11,000.
Even after taking the negative provision, at March 31, 2013, the bank’s Allowance for Loan Losses (ALLL) stood at$2.9 million, or 3.93% of gross loans, more than twice the average for California financial institutions.
Mission Oaks’ CEO Gary Deems pointed to improved asset quality and operating expense reductions as the primary contributors to the Company’s improved profitability. “Since March 31, 2012, we have reduced our nonperforming assets from $13.5 million to $5.3 million. This decline has allowed us to reduce operating expenses in a number of areas. Legal fees are down 47 percent from the first quarter of last year, and OREO related expenses declined 70 percent. We also closed our underperforming branch in Lake Elsinore in April 2012, and that contributed to a decline in the bank’s salary and benefit expenses of 24 percent and a decrease in occupancy and FFE costs of 29 percent,” stated Deems.
At March 31, 2013, Mission Oaks reported deposits of $94.6 million, gross loans of $73.6 million, and total assets of $105.2 million. These totals are up 2.2 percent, down 2.4 percent and up 2.1 percent, respectively, from the end of 2012.
“Our primary focus is on sustaining our profitability and slowly regrowing the Company,” continued Deems. “The bank and the community have had a tough few years and we’re pleased to see that our Company and our customers are doing a little better, and that loan demand is finally starting to pick up.”
For more information, please contact Gary Deems, President/ CEO, at (951) 506-8891.
About Mission Oaks Bancorp
Mission Oaks Bancorp’s only subsidiary is Mission Oaks National Bank, a federally chartered bank that opened in 2000 and currently operates branches in Temecula and Fallbrook, CA. Mission Oaks Bancorp’s common stock is traded over the counter under the stock symbol MOKB.OB.
About Mission Oaks National Bank
Mission Oaks National Bank offers banking with a personal touch. They are locally owned and operated, which allows them to quickly and efficiently make decisions to fit local needs and the local economy. Whatever you need, Mission Oaks can design a financial plan to help you reach your goals.
I would like to publicly thank EI for pointing out a while back the opportunity in the warrants (no pun intended). No-recourse leverage is a beautiful thing. They have been a 4X return for me personally now. I sold half to finance the hunt for cheap small banks. Thanks!
First quarter earnings:
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/altapacific-bancorp-reports-earnings-first-234400492.html
Follow the link for some financial tables.
AltaPacific Bancorp (ABNK), the parent company of AltaPacific Bank, today reported net income for the first quarter of 2013 totaling $159,000. Net income for the quarter on a pretax basis totaled $296,000, representing an increase of 23% over the prior quarter.
Assets totaled $221,331,000 at March 31, 2013, representing an increase of 2.3% over December 31, 2012 and an increase of 4.1% over March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, the Company’s net loans totaled $117,158,000, representing an increase of 20.6% over December 31, 2012 and an increase of 10.6% over March 31, 2012. Deposits totaled $166,239,000 at March 31, 2013 representing a 2.7% increase over December 31, 2012 and a 3.4% increase over March 31, 2012. At March 31, 2013, the Company’s Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses totaled $1,659,000, representing 1.9% of Gross Loans Originated. Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2013 totaled $132,000 and there were no other loans past due in excess of 30 days.
The Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio for AltaPacific Bank was 25.4% and the Tier 1 Leverage Ratio totaled 19.8% at March 31, 2013, respectively. These ratios substantially exceed the regulatory minimums for a well capitalized institution. Regarding the Company’s stock repurchase program, during the quarter ending March 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 12,500 shares of Company stock at an average per share price of $6.85. During the twelve month period ending March 31, 2013, the Company repurchased 94,500 shares at an average per share price of $6.56.
Charles O. Hall, President and Chief Executive Officer stated, “It has been a year since we completed the merger with Stellar Business Bank. Our growth during this past year is certainly a positive sign of what can happen when you combine the efforts of dedicated banking professionals.” Continuing, Mr. Hall stated, “Our management team also remains focused on seeking out appropriate acquisition candidates who will help us achieve our growth and expansion plans.”
Any difference in price between the current NCT and the new pieces will be arbitraged away by traders. The dividend does make things tricky.
WI = "when-issued"
There will be a grey area with how each broker treats this situation since it is pretty complicated. And if are playing this with calls like I am, it will get messier until the dust settles with how the strikes/number of shares will be split.