Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Seriously. I suspect one or two misfits living in their mother's basements, reveling in making $100 twice a week on 1 or 2 tick trades.
The Gloom and Doomer's last hurrah this week.
That's right, and also their last 2 or 3 Q reports came out like, the 16th-19th of a month.
There will be a rise in pps before, that some will bail out on, but my hope is that the improvement in quarterly financial trend will facilitate transfer of shares into longer term investors hands for the remainder of the year.
Not so simple -- esp. when the 13's are hidden and of unknown depth, and someone keeps selling into the 12's. Probably 2 tick flippers, but who knows. Treading water.
You're not wrong; later this week perhaps. Looks like the strongest believers didn't leave themselves a lot of dry powder after we left 11's. May need some new funds to absorb the 14's.
Looks like more volume before noon than all day Thurs/Fri last week. Bound to run out of 13's at some point...
Looks like a stalemate until leadership takes us above .0014 and stays there. Some trust has been lost recently with the dumping at 13's: nobody knows how deep they are. It will take leadership from buyers to clear out the 13's, but no one is willing to overpay without proof of Q1 numbers.
Welcome, .0018-.0022; Come right in!
Yes, I saw those trades that made no sense in relation to commission prices.
I think a lot of people were dealing with post-tax season and EOM limitations last week, and I hope for a strong wave up early May, too. Caveat being, everyone has to decide whether to wait for the Q report, to limit risk, or instead risk missing a bold move...
Yep.
I disagree. The chart history shows excellent potential on low volume, the lower the better. Strong hands with longer term horizons in control. Day traders, GLWT.
Can anyone tell me why the focus is on selling the company, instead of on running it profitably for years to come?
Thanks for ideas and input.
The focus on selling the company does not trumpet a love of running it.
So, I would like to understand the advantage that selling the company supposedly represents.
$SFOR is on the launch pad!!!
Ten... Nine... Eight... Seven.... Six... Five... Four...
I let go of two 10-baggers since late March, just before each jumped, due to unrelated pressures, instead of wait patiently long enough. A similar thing last May. This tells me my instincts and analysis are not bad, but one simply has to hold the course. I chose SFOR as the vehicle to compensate in a small way for the failure to profit from the recent two cases where I bailed too soon. I hope I was not wrong. I do believe it can recover to 1 or 2 cents if not more, eventually. Very short term, if the numbers are good, --- and it seems they will be better Q2, 3, and 4 --- there is no reason the company cannot grow organically now the patent rights are well established, and regain 10 cents or more. What's the profit margin per unit at retail stores or online, and how many potential buyers? 2 million times 10, over a few months?
Why would someone write, 'Nothing they've accomplished means anything, we're only worth .0002'? They had a word for such people in Harry Potter: "Dementors".
There's a few of em on this board!
Also, that the reply has been edited to a blip with missing text (....) resulting in something incomprehensible that no CEO would have written.
Also, insulting to everyone's intelligence to pretend that the CEO would confidentially preview or tip-off any individual shareholder, about any aspect of earnings (to be announced in only days). He has stated to others that they will see the Q report at the same time as everyone else, as would be the position of any CEO.
The alleged quote has been edited to make no sense. A quote should be in quotations, unedited.
You expect post-Q price to ERASE the facts of their prevailing with MIcrosoft, to completely discount the importance of the end of dilution and the end of toxic debt conversions, and to not reflect any expansion of sales....
Doesn't sound overwhelmingly convincing....
Maybe they are just listening and quietly loading...
For years, they can't make rain.
I believe that. For sure.
Yeah, but that was the 1851 edition...
Maybe the win vs. Microsoft, and the Respect from Apple Corp., has very much heartened Mr. Kay, so that instead of becoming weary at being ripped off by everyone, he may now want to see how far this thing can fly?
No kidding!
Go, Abbas14!!!!!!!!'nnnn
Thank you. It's getting sickening, the transparent attempts to manipulate the price down. I hope they are short next week....
Tonyeight, I am just fascinated to know which was your first language? Sometimes I have difficulty understanding your posts.
Yeah, but that was the 1851 edition...
Why, whaddya meeeaaannn, Dragnet?
Re:
For what it's worth, Amazon now lists both Strikeforce products as being "In stock on May 3, 2016."
Thanks. One less issue for those trying to drive price down to misuse.
Speculatory is not even a word.
Perhaps you meant speculative.
"Rich" is a relative term. Getting there when you are not there, is always a sort of a dream. But I am confident that loyalty to SFOR may help some investors financial circumstances.
That's another thing: sometimes the broker needs to specifically code an account to trade certain types of stocks, and they don't always make that obvious to clients: international trading, margin trading, etc. Maybe penny stocks trading needs to be coded by the broker for your account.
Also, I've heard inside some retirement accounts there can be some restrictions.
Skydog526 -- I used to have issues even on desktop with 3 and 4 decimals. Talk to your broker's tech support department, give them your device details, app or platform, etc.; they are duty bound to help you solve the problem. Some brokerages are not geared to the sub-penny world.
Actually, the chart is pretty dam
Exciting.
Ha-ha! You made my day, viper666.
Tell you what... if it hits .50, I'll run down the street with you, and I'm no way young enuf to do that! Ha-ha-ha!
Go to the company website, IR.
Okay, SFOR was $130 roughly March 2014, some big bullies are their lunch and stole their candy, so they fell to $1 by October 2014. After that, was the Valentine's Day massacre of 2015, after which the post R/S 1/650 stock reset to .065. Then long time in the trenches.
NOW, they had a victory, a judge made the big bullies give back their lunch, and future adult supervision may ensure they get back some if not all of their candy. I says, things only get better from here; don't become mesmerized by trivial fluctuations while the MM's are just trying to cover their costs while the stock is treading water before the Quarterly report sometime in the next 23 days. If you let yourself become victim of these head-games, some big bullies may take your lunch and all your candy.
Call me old fashioned, but I'm not giving them my lunch for less than 5 cents. Per share. You know, 26 cents could buy a whole tank of gas in 1969-1970. And some people thought that was expensive.
But I might hold out for 26 cents/share, because protecting my identity is more important than one gallon of gas in 1969.
How are people going to feel if positive news breaks over the weekend, and they left on the table the 13's now available, and early next week breaks upward to .002+
Based on 4/30/15 high of 60 cents, and 1/21 dilution, the price equivalent would be .0287 or so. That is the post-dilution equivalent of last year's April 30 high.
And that .0287 was before the positive outcome of litigation with Microsoft was known, and before the increasing market penetration that is now obvious. So I think it is not entirely unreasonable, and maybe even is very probable, that we could recover to .03-.05 again.
Anyone posting falsehoods should be banned from the board.
Yeah, pand2015, agree, seems odd after the question was repeated and answered multiple times. Anyone can buy the shares. They may be being gobbled up by someone who plans to buy the company, but they can be bought via most all brokerages.
GREAT!!! Thank you!!!!!!