Already stated otherwise, a dozen times. You made up your own rules, FINRA’s are quite different. The TA reports the numbers. But please show me there’s been no dilution? And while you’re at it, show me where I supposedly said:

“dilution happening AVG guys this not good” https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174234897

Fact is, I didn’t. You made it up. If you have documented proof from FINRA, post it with the rule number. It can’t be done since there is no such homemade rule. Again,


Section 404: Weighted Average Price/Special Pricing Formula Transactions

Q404.1: Member BD1 executes multiple trades to satisfy a customer order and then trades with the customer at a price equal to the volume-weighted average cost of the original trades plus a net difference in accordance with a net trading agreement with its customer. How should BD1 report the trade with its customer?

A404.1:
1. The original trades and the customer leg of the transaction should be reported to the tape, and the report of the customer leg should include the weighted average price (.W) modifier.

2. For example, member BD1 receives an order from a customer to buy 5,000 shares of ABCD security and accumulates the shares through five separate trades.

3. Each of these five trades is reported to the tape.

4. BD1 then sells the 5,000 shares of ABCD to its customer at its volume-weighted average cost with a net difference to reflect the compensation agreement between BD1 and its customer. BD1 should report the sale of 5,000 shares to its customer to the tape with the weighted average price

Like you 100% Falsely claim the fact force is massively shorting KEGS? I’d love to see some documented proof of that claim. The regulators say your info is wrong:

FINRA SHORT INTEREST:
https://otce.finra.org/otce/equityShortInterest

@SECGov FAILURE TO DELIVER:
https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm

“The Misleading” – Daily Short Volume
https://blog.otcmarkets.com/2018/11/13/understanding-short-sale-activity/

FYI, rms, Daily Reg SHO is meaningless, due to no separation of Riskless Principal transactions from the data. Almost all short volume is created by non ownership or physical possession of the shares in a trade transaction.

DID YOU CONTACT FINRA?

I gave you their info If you want to call it manipulation, confact FINRA, Office of the Ombudsman
Call: (888) 700-0028 or (240) 386-6270
Email: ombuds@finra.org

Theories:
All tiny pinprick sells
Looks like if whoever is selling to drive the SP down
the know to sell less than $.01worth
Why so interested in keeping the SP down?
manipulation
very telling of your position here Fact
The reason the drop is because this volume is below worthily tradable
it tanks the SP fir your liking
its a real scam you overlook

You’re just carrying on about something you wish was happening. If you have questions, contact FINRA or the SEC. I’ve provided their contacts. Report back to us when you get answers.

Thanks for the synopsis, pea. It’s not great news but not the worst, although getting a yield sign again is disappointing.

One more thing, did they just now learn of an undisclosed mortgage? How long ago was the purchase?

Subsequently, the Company learned of an undisclosed mortgage on the subject land that would have impaired the land and also discovered the inability to use as consideration its Series E Preferred Stock. Both parties on April 12, 2024 agreed to cancel the transaction.

What? That was a lot of nothingness, it’s unnecessary and silly. The company provided information, I’m not thrilled but I can deal with it.

FYI, I don’t do conspiracy theories, mx.

Nonsense. That’s why you’ve been posting like there’s no tomorrow, communicating to yourself over and over. We have info from the company now, it’s so much better than countless conspiracy theories.

LOL!!! Tesla laid off over 22,000 of their work force, think that might have something to do with it!, Bosco? SMH

Plenty not to be happy about: on KEGS:
1:1000 reverse split,
major debt
20 billion A/S
10.8 billion O/S
Borders on .0001 and lower, 12 month high .0002
CEO, Thomas Scozzafava, has a long history of reverse splits

I understand you’re trying to drive up numbers on the BOB Board. We KNOW what makes these boards active. It's the pump & dump stocks who invent naked short and short squeeze scenarios. I’m not playing the Bob game, I don’t love stock scams, bosco, and I don’t fall for their conspiracy theories.

“Uplisting the ticker?” HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!! Scozzafava said the same thing two years ago. Lolololololol!!

Then why are you comparing it to listed stocks? KEGS is a P&D, bosco.

You do know the stocks you recalled are SEC Registrants, no? KEGS IS NOT. SMH.

Why do you think it’s on the Bob, BoscoLives21? This astute trader looks to see which scams are under a PnD. That’s the stocks I avoid. KEGS should be #1.

It’s an amendment on the Florida SOS: https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=1812BREWING%20P150000389341&aggregateId=domp-p15000038934-8087cdd5-7534-43cf-b8e3-4a457527fc8c&searchTerm=1812%20Brewing%20&listNameOrder=1812BREWING%20P150000389341

The Amendment:
https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2024%5C0318%5C25746295.Tif&documentNumber=P15000038934

Great! The B.O.B. is where astute traders go to see which scams are under a PnD. Those are the stocks they avoid. KEGS should be #1.

I can name all of them, you’ve yet to prove anything,

As pertaining to KEGS:
Hedge funds
Counterfeit shares
Naked shorting
Sorry, but as for your bogus “shady overseas jurisdictions” - overseas has to gain access to our market through an U.S. SRO, and all SRO's report their positions. Meaning that silly claim is DOA.

It wasn’t informative, that’s what you originally said. It is misinformation, you said “even the SEC”. Did you see word “comments” in your link? The link to some nonsense by an irate trader of penny stocks who made a comment TO the SEC. Plus you have yet to prove naked shorting, counterfeit shares, nor air shares. No phantom shares, No abusive short interest, No SEC “stories”, none of the typical excuses used on OTC issues. The meaningless short volume is not proof of naked shorts either. Again, KEGS lacks significant FTDs, it has none, therefore the naked short story is nonsense, still.

I couldn’t care less about your conspiracy theories.

If you want to call it manipulation, confact FINRA, Office of the Ombudsman
Call: (888) 700-0028 or (240) 386-6270
Email: ombuds@finra.org

No it is not. the link you presented was Written TO the SEC, Not BY the SEC as you falsely claimed. Are you disputing that fact? Your quote shows you think the SEC posted it. Do you still think the SEC posted it?

Worst RS/RO of all time:

Empzd 1:80,000 R/S 3/22/2013
HCKI 1:35 R/S 6/17/2010 - Number of Spilts:10, HCKI START: 21-Dec-01
HCKE 1:50 R/S 10/27/2009
ALRN 1:10,000 01/23/2009
ALCI 1:1000 12/03/2007
HVLN name change 09/24/2007
AWYB name change 11/10/2006
AWBV 1:5000 R/S 09/12/2006
AWBD 1:10 R/S 01/21/2005
AWHB 1:300 R/S 11/23/2004
DCGX 1:100 R/S 04/12/2004
DCGR 1:25 R/S 11/18/2002
DCIH 1:200 R/S 12/21/2001
DCGR 1:30 R/S 09/11/1998

12 Reverse Splits with an 80,000 to 1 allowed by FINRA. ouch

Wrong again, Bosco. That’s a comment letter TO the SEC, NOT BY THE SEC. I’ve posted this FACT many times, yet you / RMS repeat the fake / false comments as if they’re from the SEC. They are Not.

Finra can have questions as well. After all of Scozzafava’s reverse splits, no doubt they’ll have questions.

LOL!! “Pre-dumps” is just a word made up out of thin air. Prove those “air shares” / “naked short shares”?

Why do you ASSume I didn’t know that? If you read the SEC litigation you’d know they started selling almost immediately. It’s all right there. Plus it was run on iHub by someone that Scozzafava has hired for KEGS. Wouldn’t you think he’d do proper DD on Zachary Logan, or is that the type of promoter Scozzafava wants? LOOK at all the shares issued. SMH

There is no fee to read SEC litigation releases.

Just as I know, there’s no agenda on the factcheckers side. I have seen an agenda claiming there’s “massive shorting”, but no documented proof whatsoever. Care to explain when FINRA and the SEC say absolutely not?

@FINRA SHORT INTEREST:
https://otce.finra.org/otce/equityShortInterest

@SECGov FAILURE TO DELIVER:
https://www.sec.gov/data/foiadocsfailsdatahtm

“The Misleading” – Daily Short Volume
https://blog.otcmarkets.com/2018/11/13/understanding-short-sale-activity/

Same to you and almost everyone!

You’re right, he knows he’s wrong, but just can’t stop typing. What’s so weird to me, if Mx owns it, why is he doing his best to create conflict every single day? It does nothing to help the pps increase. He only helps increase the post count.

Hmmmmm

Ahhh, you know him personally? It doesn’t say that on the financials.

Like you’re doing right now with the false conspiracy theory, as always.

LOL!! Nope, you posted to yourself, the screenshot proves it. Just another fact, gg.

That makes no sense. My questions are

Show me there’s been no dilution?

And while you’re at it, show me where I said?

“dilution happening AVG guys this not good”

as you incorrectly quoted me saying.

I didn’t say any of that, you’re just using it to cover for your false claims, again.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174234897&txt2find=Happening

You just posted to YOURSELF:

I realize that, that’s why I provided a link to the SEC litigation, nighthawk. Zachary Logan is now a KEGS "Consultant" who is paid 300,000,000 restricted shares for CONsulting services.

Additionally, the fraud was on ihub, they all began selling shares before the one-year holding period required by Rule 144 had run; Ross and Logan sold their shares before
this holding period had even begun. Then Scozzafava hires him again? Wuwt?

What agenda would that be, Rms? I highly doubt I’ll get an answer, but give it a try.

Ditto, nice try, it’s not working. You’re avoiding the questions I’ve asked you.

Show me there’s been no dilution? And while you’re at it, show me where I said

“dilution happening AVG guys this not good”

as you incorrectly quoted me saying.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174234897&txt2find=Happening

No, that’s actually you who’s stuck with the misinformation you’ve incorrectly presented, MX.

What? You just made up your own rules that no one has heard of, that’s not how it works. Dilution is real, you post it all the time when shares are added to the OS.

Quote:
Section 404: Weighted Average Price/Special Pricing Formula Transactions

Q404.1: Member BD1 executes multiple trades to satisfy a customer order and then trades with the customer at a price equal to the volume-weighted average cost of the original trades plus a net difference in accordance with a net trading agreement with its customer. How should BD1 report the trade with its customer?

A404.1:The original trades and the customer leg of the transaction should be reported to the tape, and the report of the customer leg should include the weighted average price (.W) modifier. For example, member BD1 receives an order from a customer to buy 5,000 shares of ABCD security and accumulates the shares through five separate trades. Each of these five trades is reported to the tape. BD1 then sells the 5,000 shares of ABCD to its customer at its volume-weighted average cost with a net difference to reflect the compensation agreement between BD1 and its customer. BD1 should report the sale of 5,000 shares to its customer to the tape with the weighted average price modifier.

No, you haven’t, you’ve made up your own convoluted rules, again. Here’s actual rules from a regulator:

Quote:
Section 404: Weighted Average Price/Special Pricing Formula Transactions

Q404.1: Member BD1 executes multiple trades to satisfy a customer order and then trades with the customer at a price equal to the volume-weighted average cost of the original trades plus a net difference in accordance with a net trading agreement with its customer. How should BD1 report the trade with its customer?

A404.1:The original trades and the customer leg of the transaction should be reported to the tape, and the report of the customer leg should include the weighted average price (.W) modifier. For example, member BD1 receives an order from a customer to buy 5,000 shares of ABCD security and accumulates the shares through five separate trades. Each of these five trades is reported to the tape. BD1 then sells the 5,000 shares of ABCD to its customer at its volume-weighted average cost with a net difference to reflect the compensation agreement between BD1 and its customer. BD1 should report the sale of 5,000 shares to its customer to the tape with the weighted average price modifier.

The amendment to the Articles of Incorporation at the SOS for a 1:1000 reverse split was executed by Thomas Scozzafava on March 7, 2024, and filed March 14, 2024.

https://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/ConvertTiffToPDF?storagePath=COR%5C2024%5C0318%5C25746295.Tif&documentNumber=P15000038934

Indeed, “the family” is working on self enrichment! They’ll need to change their pumper clown if they ever intend to make headway. All but 1 of the promoter clowns:🤡 gave up promoting the sham here after we exposed his plan to trick traders with his ‘Load Now’ propaganda!

“Good always triumphs over bad, no matter the odds."

lol, Scozzafava isn’t going to pay for KEGS audited financials. SMH

Wow, super info! Uh oh, that’s not a good look for KEGS!