Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I was not saying it was better, just pointing out reality.
And you rant against attorneys but it is attorneys litigating that is forcing the system to learn about naked shorting. If attorneys did not litigate elevators would still be killing thousands and cars would not have bumpers or seatbelts. It is litigation that has often caused our society to improve and then to force the rest of the world to follow our lead. European elevators were terrible not all that long ago.
There may be some excesses but the reality is, if people did not have the right to seek redress using the courts, which is what “litigation” is, this would not be the fundamentallly free country that it is.. and no, the time for the trial had nothing to do with “litigation”…’or was it really the FDA delaying approval. Sounds good, but it’s just not true. It took a long time because it took a long time to get the data. And while many of us FELT it was obvious, the reality is, the scientific data is necessary to prove it to other doctors, which is not about “litigation” but about competition.
Hi Gary, the officials don’t really acknowledge naked shorting is an issue in our country. They did not halt “naked shorting” in banking stocks, they halted official shorting. Regular people and honest institutions could not short. In theory, brokerages and FI’s also could not enter any naked short positions not covered as well. A total ban on shorting tends to be more effective if people are entering short positions as though they have covered, but haven’t. But the ban was not on “naked shorting”, technically, the official position is that that does not happen except in FTD’s, where market makers fill orders and “make market” to manage price movements.
The reality is also that the government has been scared of market makers who can manufacture stock panics out of nothing and claim the cause was regulators meddling in their affairs. This is something they have implied in the past. It’s an open threat, and there is really no way to prove it is intentional.
I am pretty sure there has been a fund/ short connection to HK during key periods. Short ID’s come and go, but I had traced one short, I believe, who claimed to be in the U.S. according to other posters, to HK, a few year’s back, and to a specific fund, fund type and then his ties to US institutions. Even possibly to a specific part of HK. I believe he was just a professional manager hired to manage funds there, but was an international / or expat.
Not true. People who know about biotech, and know how to manage and buy a portfolio have likely done OK.I am still decently up here. Obviously there is always going to be a range of opportunities and people should always have a portfolio to rebalance and manage a portfolio and keep it growing.
As for our new board member, you can shirk it off as much as you would like, but it doesn’t change reality. Bluster, is BS.
And yet your stalking of investors here and this company has nothing to do with your treatment. You did not have GBM, and were never part of this trial, by your own admission. You’re only stalking us because you for whatever very odd psychological reason that may have to do with your actual diagnosis, you’re paranoid and prone to stalking people who helped you at KC and posting here gets you the attention that you apparently crave. And apparently you think going to MHRA and talking about Kings college somehow harms this company.
You are a confused individual. I feel sorry for you, but there is, in fact, nothing that can be done for you here, or likely at the MHRA or King’s College. You might try therapy.
Yes, agreed that someone shorting would probably find the circumstances now quite worrisome. Successful trial, application pending. And often shorts try to squeeze these companies before good news to cause longs to flee in fear there is something unknown. Their patterns and modus operandi are repeated over and over again, if you watch enough of these tiny companies that turn out to have something valuable.
Yes, this same attack gets used against tiny companies over and over and over again for every Form 4 where someone has sold. This is old news.
But more importantly, it's a standard practice of SHORTS to do exactly what you're doing. You dug for a Form 4 you could try to manufacture an issue about, and then you focused on really old news. You guys have nothing, but you just keep going and going and going, wasting all of our time with your nonsense and machinations.
Meanwhile, NONE of it affects the validity of DCVax-L, its value, the likelihood of it being approved, and on and on. It's distraction. Look over here at this old baloney. And it's clear you've got nothing when you have to do that.
Tax obligation. Not really a huge revelation. Discussed previously.
He could be. Very anxious personality.
But every day, you reveal more about yourself. So thanks for that.
Cenkos investigated, because of Phase Five, but nothing came of it.
They did not accuse him of wrongdoing. It is normal to suspend someone accused in that manner whose job is an analyst.
“Cenkos declined to comment but has not accused Malik of wrongdoing, the Times said, but was suspended to allow the broker time to investigate the allegations made against him.
Allegations were made against Malik in a report by Phase Five called 'Northwest Biotherapeutics house of cards is ready to collapse' on 28 October.”
Phase Five was another group of people who anonymously publish because using their names and being transparent would in fact make them the bad actors and put them under the magnifying glass. THAT is the reality.
Honestly, he should have sued them. But not everyone has resources to waste on lawsuits. And often persons like that are so destructive and beyond the reach of satisfaction that it would not bring a remedy. I would not be surprised if you were connected to Phase Five, given your focus and approach.
So like I said, thanks for the info.
Just sit there and wait.
I don’t have the power to sue you for defaming someone else who lives in the UK. I just made you aware of the law. If you want to be reckless in service of your masters, well, that’s not really a surprise, but a confirmation of who you are.
Think of it this way. The more posts you make suggesting you laugh in the face of the law, defy anyone who would sue you for defamation, the more likely the damages or punishment will be enhanced. Courts do not smile on those sorts of attitudes about the law.
People said and did the same thing about the company suing MM’s and here we are, the MM’s are in court.
Shirk it off, save face. I get it… just be aware of where you are going.
Your obsession is flattering. Thanks. But let’s face it, you’ve got a problem. You stalk people on the board under different ID’s right. That’s you? You know at some point that is going to bring law enforcement to your door?
That’s you. You project.
The people who post and tweet that I know are investors, not “agents” of the company. We disclose our positions. It is the short posters who refuse to disclose.
Swing traders and short posters always hold shares in the company. Legally it is a way to claim to be “activist shareholders” and thus not be held accountable for manipulating the stock, or at least that is what they all hope. There is no way to be vaccinated from being held accountable for violating the law.
I told you my average. I don’t need to post anything with you. I do not lie and if a regulator ever looked, guess what… they’d see I am not lying! LOL.
Shorts lie. Longs have no need to lie.
The reality is this, when a stock or company I like turns to the point where I can no longer be proud of my holding, I do not post positive posts about it, I focus my attention and monies elsewhere. I also do not waste years haranguing other shareholders or the company. There is too much opportunity in the broader markets to be so negative and destructive. Shorts do it because stealing in this manner is easier than actually investing and making money honestly.
And I buy stocks that I like that are attacked by shorts because they create oversold, undervalued opportunities. So while I hate the haters, because they are worthless, horrible people who I think should make money honestly, not through negative influencing, I recognize that their bad ancts manufacture investment opportunities that are unusual.
Dooooode… don’t be ridiculous. You just don’t have anything more to say other than garbage.
There was no “cheerleading” or “campaign” in the immediately preceding post. And the fact is, with applications and companies at this stage yes, you’re right, when shorties put the squeeze on, you do not know when it will end, but I doubt very much it will approach where I bought most of my shares ever again. The reality is, while you suggest the turnaround may not happen fora long time, and you could be right to some degree, if weeks or months is a long time. However, the reality is, current circumstances do not justify the currently oversold position and I know multiple deep pocked buyers buying, of their own accord, in recent days.
The reality is, contrary to your post, no one knows what will turn a price around when a stock is oversold but has major news pending any day that would take it from not being a commercial entity, to having a monopoly on a new standard of care for a critical disease with virtually no really good options but this one.
So yeah, you can keep shorting into it or selling, at your own risk.
No one “fleeced” Woodford and he held the stock all the way through, so that is total nonsense.
Your noise is, as always, fake flag waving and noise intended over time to deceive.
I am at a profit, so I can’t complain. Obviously I would like to see it much higher though.
Ah, apologies.
Even with big money behind it, that doesn’t reduce losses if the trial takes years. Big money might actually be more likely to increase the accumulated loss because there is less need to be frugal.
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. It's pre-revenue. They are in the last part of the marathon for approval of a drug with amazing results, in the UK. Prior to approval for marketing, the drug regulator is allowing them to manufacture and sell the drug to citizens in their country, which is something you JUST DO NOT SEE... I've never seen it, as a general rule, in the way it is being done in this situation.
And no, it's not the CEO/CFO, it's the COMPANY. It's not SHE, it's common sense and a basic business requirement for where they are at this Tim. If you don't understand that, you have no business investing in any stock on any market. And you certainly shouldn't be claiming you understand anything about microcap biotechs, no matter how much time you claim you've been posting on bulletin boards. Sounds like you just trade based on putting out nasty information and fake news and manipulating retail.
If you think your little ploy is going to keep me from rebutting your nonsense, you don't know very much.
I like the stock.
I recommend that people enjoy this movie...
I own shares I bought at much lower prices. No one pays me, I just enjoy torturing jerks who stalk investors and these small microchips I find interesting. I find it kind of therapeutic... It satisfies my desire for justice. If you notice, I mostly just address the idiocy of people who post false information and try to harangue investors out of their investments, but also my investments. I don't generally tell people to buy any particular stocks and in fact, these microcap biotechs are very stressful and risky, so most people should have a portfolio to balance all the risk out, recognizing that they can lose their entire investment with microcap biotechs, and not necessarily because the technology is bad or because the managers are bad. There are bad actors that mess with these companies for profit. No doubt it's stressful and particularly so when you have jerks swing trading them and trying to break these companies so that they can get valuable assets for cheap.
For me, I like the stock. I have money in it. I like the technology. So of course I am going to defend my investment from arsonists and delinquents who make money basically committing legalized theft and sabotage. Apparently, the regulators let mafia guys do protection rackets out in the open, in our securities markets... They mess with these companies unless they get protection in various forms.
Bullying people on bulletin boards... you think that makes you credible? Now that is about the dumbest thing I've read all day. Only someone without any real world knowledge or credibility would push their luck and fake ID so far.
You're such a mess. No one in their right mind other than scammers, scamming, post their account details on bulletin boards. It's a stupid practice and activity. And given that any "screen shot" can be manipulated, it's also BS when someone does it. It means nothing.
As for people's "success" because they are interested in this company and treatment, the reality is, this is a well regarded treatment by top doctors at top institutions. You're a nobody on a bulletin board trying to pretend you have the credibility to run the drug down and the other investors, but the reality is far, far from any reasonable truth. You're a nobody. And the drug and company have the credibility over you always.
If you haven’t ever heard of sarcasm, then I agree.
Agreed, I did share it because it is validating and it shows there is excitement forming. It is common for other researchers not to acknowledge anyone else is doing anything similar out there… though I wish the writers did do some basic dd.
Yeah, but there is an amazingly enthusiastically similar few articles every year. Not sure where this discover was but that is often a feature. Meanwhile, right in front of them… but which they cannot see because not big pharma and penny stock…
Look at this, they’ve just discovered dendritic cells might be able to immunize people as a cancer immunotherapy!!!
Isn’t that fantastic!?
And look, “Czerniecki also found that intratumoral vaccination in mice effectively reduced tumor sizes, offering another promising option for patients in the future.26 “You can actually make this stuff disappear,” he said. “
The miracles never cease to amaze!
Cancer Vaccination as a Promising New Treatment Against Tumors
Vaccination has beaten back infections for more than a century. Now, it may be the next big step in battling cancer.
https://www.the-scientist.com/cancer-vaccination-as-a-promising-new-treatment-against-tumors-71697
Adam Feuerstein is going to be so happy to hear that dendritic cells might work someday. Just needed a multiple billion dollar market cap and some payola* behind it.
No mention of DCVax or DCVax-L. I guess they haven’t heard of it.
But you know, Adam said DCVax-L was like grapefruit juice and “failed” and he speaks for all of the global regulatory agencies and is a primary source… so why mention DCVax?
The article says they had mouse tumors disappear!!! Someday!
*Payola, in the music industry, is the illegal practice of paying a commercial radio station to play a song without the station disclosing the payment.
You did not disprove what I said. Owner of shares is NOT CEO. The CEO clearly did not understand what they were doing and were researchers, not lawyers. I've explained before how Swiss Cantons and officials often say things that sound great but are total bull. I've had to parse through it directly with top swiss attorneys and international companies thinking they had something they did not have... The Swiss seem up and up, but they are used to basically being in their own little world and they do a lot of marketing to international business that is questionable about how they are basically free to do what they want in Switzerland. I say this will all due respect for Swiss people. I am close to many Swiss people. And moreover, the Swiss themselves are very regulated. It's a strange juxtaposition having such carefully self-regulated people in charge of a Wild West tax haven that likes to sometimes present itself as free with all kinds of other things.
Go to Switzerland and get that cutting edge stem cell treatment... that you can't get in your own country. That was a thing at one time.
So your notion that owning outranks management, is not a rebuttal and is certainly not true in the context of a publicly traded company on a major exchange, which is where they were. Your attempt to twist that common notion of ownership, falls not only flat, but it's naive and really beneath you. She had just taken a senior position on the board, and they thought since she was a lawyer with great experience, she could handle calls on this program. But she was not CEO and no person in her position would step on toes that way.
You said she "signed" the press release, but she is just the PR rep on it, so it lists her number. Anyone who has ever done anything with a private company like this knows that such PR's first go through the CEO and outside counsel. PR reps do not have ultimate responsibility for these releases, they just answer questions.
She was literally NOT the CEO. The PR lists in the 2nd paragraph. Granted, that my further due diligence suggests that they did have a more consequential approval initially, or thought they had one, reasonably. But Switzerland can be a bit kooky. The Swiss people that I know are quite eccentric.
I am clear. And if any regulator ever checked my accounts, they’d see I was not lying… I don’t think you can be so comfortable… since you don’t disclose a thing.
You don’t really have much to say, do you?
I don’t fall for such stupid scams but you can do so, if that’s something you like to do.
Yes, they have to hurry and get in there. Those suns can be life changing! They could be jetting around the world in a year…
Yeah, even though none of that has to do with DCVax-L, since he did not have GBM, and was never, ever enrolled in the trial. But he tried to initially perpetrate a bit of a fraud by implication, that he was … when called out, at least he was honest that he never was in the trial, because he never had GBM. His doctors were simply being careful when they found the brain tumor and ultimately narrowed it down to being a different type of tumor.
But you really don’t know what to believe with such posters. Such stories are often made up entirely.
You’re rehashing false information, old information, like more than a decade old, under a former CEO, who was not found to have intentionally misled anyone; you are smearing a very well respected analyst who has won awards for accuracy and has never been alleged to be a pumper or website poster except by you, and generally you spread nonsense that is just vaguely filled with enough old allegations and nonsense that someone might easily be misled by it if they were looking for a reason to distrust other posters who take far more effort to be accurate and detailed.
There is no indication they need more shares any time soon, and neither is there any indication of anything but great care in developing and not overspending to create the manufacturing up to now. The CDMO was and has been an excellent way to isolate costs and risks beyond the development stage and to do so parsimoniously, with the help of a local regional development authority providing funding and a promise to provide certain technological services to other small researchers and developers in return. It is innovative and symbiotic in its approach, to the community and actually quite responsible. An incredibly admirable approach.
Meanwhile NWBO owns completely the Flaskworks technology that will be used to automate manufacturing in later stages.