Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I won't deny that a little senility might be setting in but it doesn't explain my inability to follow your mystifying tale of riches, names and time travel.
You said that you "banked $20k before the Dump"....."thanks to Leo throwing Brilicidin into the Covid fray" which happened in 2020.
The dump was in November of 2021 which coincided with your first appearance as backtoreality which led me to ask what you were calling yourself before that.
Now you're saying that you explained that before (I can't find it and you didn't link it) and that you were "previously Always Dreaming starting in spring 2017" but it turns out alwaysdreaming stopped posting in March of 2018.
That leaves the period from March of 2018 to November of 2021, during which Leo threw "Brilicidin into the Covid fray".
So the question remains: "What were you calling yourself when Leo threw Brilicidin(sp) into the Covid fray"?
Come on, help an old man out.
ps. re: "So I loaded up Ipix in the nickel range and then the price per share went up over 60 cents and sold."
The share price was up over 60 cents on ONE day during the "Covid fray".....June 23, 2020. It hasn't come close to that since and hadn't been close to it in the previous 2 years. And you picked that very day to sell?
"So I loaded up Ipix in the nickel range and then the price per share went up over 60 cents and sold.
That's thanks to Leo throwing Brilicidin into the Covid fray. "
Nifty trading. But backtoreality wasn't born until 11/15/2021, four days after the PR entitled "Innovation Pharmaceuticals Announces Topline Results from Phase 2 Clinical Trial of Brilacidin for COVID-19" was issued marking the END of B-covid.
So what were you calling yourself when Leo threw Brilicidin(sp) into the Covid fray (at the BEGINNING of B-covid)?
IPIX hasn't had a $1M trading day since November of 2021. I'll bet that's a reality you don't want to go back to.
Thanks for your continued vigilance.
These frauds need to be publicized in the same venue that offered people the opportunity to talk them up, especially since the responsible parties (in this case CEO Seth Shaw) are typically serial offenders.
Shaw issued a PR announcing his purchase of a large number of shares months after he stopped issuing SEC filings for the Company and never filed a Form 4 reporting his own purported purchase, so we don't know if he really made that purchase or if he still holds the shares.
If the SEC was as vigilant as you are people like Shaw might find it a littler more difficult to repeatedly take advantage of uninformed investors.
1:20-cr-00278-TNM-1 - BERMAN, KEITH
Jul 6, 2023
MINUTE ORDER as to KEITH BERMAN: The parties' 128 Proposed Pretrial Schedule is adopted. The Government's Expert disclosures are due by September 4, 2023. Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony and Defendant's Expert Disclosures are due by September 25, 2023. The Government's Response to Defendant's Motion to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony is due by October 10, 2023. The Government's Motion to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony is due by October 16, 2023. Defendant's Reply in Support of his Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony is due by October 16, 2023. Defendant's Response to the Government's Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony is due by October 30, 2023. The parties' Witness Lists are due by October 30, 2023. The Government's Reply in Support of its Motion to Exclude Expert Witness Testimony is due by November 6, 2023. The parties' Exhibit Disclosures, Proposed Jury Instructions, and Proposed Voir Dire Questions are due by November 6, 2023. SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Trevor N. McFadden on 7/6/2023. (lctnm1)
Sep 5, 2023 Status Conference
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0136
-0.0014 (-9.33%)
Volume: 75,608
Total Trades: 16
Back to reality:
Dollar Volume: $1,134
So what do benevolent do-gooders do then, Mack?
Do they reassure fellow investors, some of whom having lost substantial portfolio value or others considering an initial investment, that everything's fine? Do you tell them that management's achievements to date portend great things for the future in spite of the fact that those achievements have resulted in a drop in market value of over 90% and an accumulated deficit of $125,000,000?
Is that your idea of benevolence? Is baseless cheerleading to anyone's benefit?
Sometimes the truth is bad news. To withhold bad news from people isn't good for them.
Ancient Greeks proposed that truth is its own reward. Don't you agree? It's enough for me.
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.015
-0.00055 (-3.54%)
Volume: 50,246
Total Trades: 10
Dollar Volume $788
This thing's on fire!!!
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?&q=hot+hot+hot&&mid=D3ED07F5F7954057ECC7D3ED07F5F7954057ECC7&&FORM=VRDGAR
How ya feelin'?
You get the point, don't you? IF you still had $2800 in cash laying around you couldn't get much with it. Personally I think you would be better off investing in a 25 year old Chrysler that has been in 4 accidents than another 180,000 shares of IPIX. You could fix the Chrysler.
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.01555
-0.00015 (-0.96%)
Volume: 186,080
Last Trade Time: 3:05:44 PM EDT
Total Trades: 20
Dollar Volume: $2,819
https://www.edmunds.com/gmc/envoy/2002/vin/1GKDT13S622465115/?radius=25
or for another couple of bucks:
https://www.edmunds.com/chrysler/300m/1999/vin/2C3HE66G2XH264214/?radius=25
only 4 accidents.
"Since Brilacidin was a topic (of course, as it should be) in Q1 business meetings at Basilea......."
I'd sure like to see some support for that before someone else takes it and runs with it. We were told that there was a likelihood of that occurring but to my knowledge it was never confirmed by a reliable source. Do you have one?
"Check the share price"
Okay.....here ya go:
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0157
-0.0018 (-10.29%)
Volume: 78,738
Last Trade Time: 12:55:21 PM EDT (market close early?)
Total Trades: 13
Dollar Volume: $1,223
"These compounds are under clinical development at phase 1/phase 2 for the treatment of acute bacterial infections, MRSA, and fungal infections."
"Are" is present tense.
"was a phase 2 not done???"
If they had used "were" as to acute bacterial infections and MRSA I wouldn't have disagreed with the statement. As far as fungal infections are concerned Brilacidin is not "under clinical development at phase 1/phase 2" and never has been.
As to "Who is the one lying here???" I wouldn't and didn't use the term lying. I don't know their intent but I do know they were mistaken. You're wrong all the time and I've never accused you of lying.
This isn't true:
"These compounds are under clinical development at phase 1/phase 2 for the treatment of acute bacterial infections, MRSA, and fungal infections."
That matters, doesn't it?
"Leo isn't running this show"
Of course he is. The show that he isn't running is the laser light show. The two guys running that show made sure they maintained control in the agreement. I'm sure they know his record.....they got your money and kept the control.
But of course there's something going on. For the first time ever there's a set of clinical trials going on. Alas there hasn't been an update on the scientific status of them, just a notification that a $1.5M note issuance has somehow been triggered by the trial start even though NNVC itself isn't running the trial.
There's always something going on at NNVC that inures to the benefit of Anil Diwan.
"And still a lot of nothing going on here" describing activities that might be beneficial to non-affiliate shareholders.
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0175
0.00185 (11.82%)
Volume: 293,824
Total Trades: 21
Dollar Volume: $4,767
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.01565
0.00065 (4.33%)
Volume: 199,586
Last Trade Time: 3:07:00 PM EDT
Total Trades: 15
Dollar Volume: $ 3,078
That would make TWO bets that you've lost.
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.017
0.0002 (1.19%)
Volume: 93,508
Last Trade Time: 3:00:43 PM EDT
Total Trades: 9
Dollar volume: $ 1,450
They did more business today at my local deli without the aid of any market makers or message board promoters.
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0168
-0.0001 (-0.59%)
Volume: 23,092
Day Range: 0.0162 - 0.0168
Total Trades: 10
Lotsa demand built up over the weekend.
Dollar Volume: $384
Sure.
https://www.masscourts.org/eservices/home.page.2
Superior Court
Essex County
2077CV00101
Appreciate the interest.
Edit: I figured the Cost stuff was just boilerplate but I get your point.
Thanks. But that leaves me wondering why the parties would then stipulate to the dismissal of a single count on the same day and under the same docket number.
If there's a board better suited to respond to this please advise.
I'm hoping someone can interpret some legalese involving Innovation Pharmaceuticals (IPIX).
For background: The Company rented some space and based on a clause in their lease it was automatically renewed. That's the primary issue in the case..failure to give notice of their intent to vacate.
The bench trial just started and one of the early docket entries reads this way:
In case this is behind a paywall I'll paste an excerpt or two. It's an OPINION piece from today's NY Times and the excerpts may show my own personal bias. I can post the entire piece if requested.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/11/opinion/india-medicine-safety.html
"Over the past two decades, India emerged as the “pharmacy of the developing world,” the leading manufacturer of generic drugs and medicines, producing more than 20 percent of the world’s supply. This has helped to make a range of medicines available to poor patients around the world who previously had to do without.
Today, however, India stands accused of distributing death, as its regulators fail to prevent the manufacture and export of substandard medicines. But this isn’t entirely a made-in-India problem. There is a dirty secret in global health: Rich countries get quality medicines, the poor sometimes get poison."
"Last month, a Gambian government task force recommended suing the Indian government over deadly cough syrup. Yet the administration of Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India last month pushed a bill through Parliament that features lighter punishments for manufacturing substandard medicines, highlighting why individual nations cannot be relied on to address the problem.
India needs to clean up its act for its own good — its growth into a powerhouse of generic drug production has polluted its rivers with antibiotic waste, spawned dangerous superbugs and made it a global hot spot for drug-resistant tuberculosis. For the rest of the world, the main benefit of India becoming the pharmacy of the poor was to break Big Pharma’s control of lifesaving medicines. More cases involving deadly Indian-made medicines could undo that positive achievement by causing irreparable harm to the global reputation of cheap generics."
I'm sure if it was peer reviewed you would have made much of it. It was a pre-print and you made no mention of it even though the publishers themselves recognized its significance.
Papers, researchers, university labs WOOHOOOO!!
None of it adds up to be worth a Phase 3 trial...which LE has spent his entire career avoiding. I expect he has had good reasons. Just think about it.
That paper MAY be fine but they put this in bold red type at the top of the page for a reason:
This version is not peer-reviewed
As I understand it, yes. A small good thing.
Not sure why it happened but they may have agreed that to pursue it would benefit the lawyers more than the parties.
Like "Let's just skip this and move on".
Per trial docket:
"Maybe your boss has the money...."
I don't have one of those. Haven't had one since 1976.
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0169
0.0001 (0.60%)
Volume: 240,871
Day Range: 0.0168 - 0.017
Last Trade Time: 3:50:59 PM EDT
Total Trades: 24
That 10,000 shares you bought today (for less than 200 smackers) is worth what now, another buck?
Wohoooo!!!
The only way to prove the potential of something is to accomplish that potential.
This Company has never done that with any of its drugs....just ask the FDA.
"If the Phase 2 trial is not successful the drug did not prove its potential."
Who declares that a Phase 2 trial is successful? You? Leo? The FDA?
Is there a list of successful Phase 2 trials that you can point me to? Of course not.
Language IS important but this is not a word game.
An unmarketed drug has not proven its potential. A drug that hasn't made it into the health care system has not achieved the desired goal of the developer.
A Phase 2 trial is successful (in the USA) if it provides adequate bases for the procession to a Phase 3 trial. IPIX has never conducted a Phase 3 trial, much less marketed a drug.
Your continual use of the terms proven and successful is deceptive.
ps.Your source is from the Netherlands, frenchbroad....maybe they perceive things differently there.
The pot is calling the kettle black.
You quoted the poster correctly.....
"The remaining drugs have never proven their potential in human trials"
.....and the poster was perfectly correct.
If the Company itself said the following the FDA could have something to say about it and the Rosens (remember them) of the world might as well:
"Brilacidin: Successful and safe trials for 3 different human malady with 3 different administer methods. "
Completion of a Phase 2 trial should only be described as the successful completion of a Phase 2 trial, nothing more and nothing less. Neither Brilacidin nor any other IPIX drug has proven its potential in a human trial.
That poster's language was accurate and you may not have liked the import of it but it was VERY wrong of you to say this:
"Your language is poor:"
Language is important. Proven and potential are words that have meanings that are especially important when it comes to pharmaceuticals.
It's low all right.
bonne chance......
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0168
0.0016 (10.53%)
Volume: 792,235
Day Range: 0.015 - 0.017
Last Trade Time: 3:49:42 PM EDT
Total Trades: 61
"Walking away with 60%+ gains after less than a month's time doesn't happen that often"
Did you really do that? If so, during what month?
"Are you saying that he "gave" them company money for free ?"
The terms of the "gift" were made public in an SEC filing. Need a link?
Whoops! Almost forgot:
IPIX
Innovation Pharmaceuticals Inc (PK)
0.0152
0.0001 (0.66%)
Volume: 381,208
Last Trade Time: 2:58:28 PM EDT
Total Trades: 16
Consider that not everyone lives in your time zone, 007.
OR people who are willing to contribute their time and effort to assist in the enforcement of the rules on behalf of Ihub should be granted a basic membership that provides PM privileges.
Then again I guess that might be construed to be compensation which could defeat the purpose of having moderators.
Never mind :o)
Not by the person I asked, no. But it didn't need to be asked...this isn't at all confusing so I'm acting accordingly in both my posting and my moderating:
"Boards are to discuss the company/stock - not other Users and/or the message board."
If my deletions are reversed (as they have been) I guess I'll just have to grin and bear it. I wouldn't want to be demoderatored. That said I don't think we've heard the last of the issue. I hope the wording of the Handbook will conform to (or refute) the above statement at some point. Then we'll be able to perform our respective functions and move on with some clarity.