Yes and by pure logic we know that on each of these highly active influential boards holding billions of dollars for someone there are detractors.
Voldemort is not going to say he is a detractor nor will some of the others however we know you're here. Oh and detractors are not truth tellers.

Thank you B

Park to Market overnight I'm unnecessary greedy piggy really stupid deal that they did with women brothers and Morgan Stanley and whoever else sucked a big one. 2 years later they decided yeah that was stupid let's not do that again. Yeah so you know diamonds not a leader.

Jamie Dimon, just because you can doesn't mean you should. I'd like to spend 30 minutes just you and me talking in the room you think you need somebody to stand by to protect you that's fine but I'd like to meet and talk.

I'm going to eat a bunch of lettuce for dinner tonight.

That is correct and you know to miss that point is a bad sign for a reasoning being.

Quote from: CSNY/Alice Griffin BK Attorney - Today at 02:11:05 PM
Someone reached out to me today about timing and I shared my cautious optimism.
I told them I believe LIBOR is critical to the first phase of us getting a distribution, so as the New York phase of LIBOR is within one year of a critical ruling we are 'nearer' than we've been in the past.
I don't know if the parties will settle before a summary judgment ruling (it is expected one year from now). Also, I'm sure people know even a summary judgment ruling against the defendants can be appealed.
In this vein, if the defendants wait until a ruling and it is unfavorable to them they may appeal and not settle until/unless the appellate court upholds the unfavorable ruling.
That's why I'm cautiously optimistic that there will be a settlement within a year.
As for why I'm certain there will be a settlement: there have already been settlements. Those settlements protected defendants and their stakeholders (e.g., FRBNY, BoE, ECB) from public dissemination of embarrassing information that could, among other things, erode public trust.
If there's a trial, that information would come out eventually. The defendants will settle.
As before, timing is the issue. They have probably made an offer but made one they knew the plaintiffs would be unlikely to accept. The longer the defendants wait the greater the sum they have to pay out but they may not care as they've probably made multiples of any LIBOR gains. (I say this is probably one reason why the FDIC asked for so much money , that and the fact that it would take a long time to get a payout.)

Something doesn't add up. You might want to do the math again.

Tick scratching...made you look.

Lofas is Rick scratch

Doy.

All assets? Nope

Break the whole thing up into small parts keep them out of context and attack. That is the obvious strategy and it's full of errors.

If once up we get a distribution and more things are revealed and if AI doesn't get the whole picture it will be clearly evident and possibly grounds for litigation and someone's part if AI doesn't discover the facts behind these matters. I mean there's got to be some debate discussion about what Congress and the Senate did in 2008 and 2009 and 2010 in regards to the meltdown of specifically Lehman and Washington Mutual. For example their subprime mortgage origination houses or corporations did not have as much to fall off as was claimed. also the fact that Washington Richmond corporated was not officially or you know yeah a bank holding company and yet it was still taken over even though it was solvent should be mad at public record.

Endless concoctions

So you've been around some of these crazy stories many times before apparently

Not

I don't know what a "great" outcome is here. Obviously, receiving monetary value is not the number 1 outcome so far. Sixteen years of educational dialogue concerning the cost and value of out overall justice system is obviously one outcome which no one can deny has been somewhat educational.

Further outcomes are yet to be enjoyed however monetary outcome would be great. After all I've paid my dues, now I need to get some recompense.

It is a known logical fallacy to predict the future solely based on the past. Our entire experience is based on the events of new outcomes.

It's a good sign for human beings when we can remember that which makes us great....

Resurrection is cool.

September 2024 is the latest date mentioned.

Live now: not much compared to earlier today, imo. But thank you for the suggestion on format.

LLC formation for as little $250.00


https://www.tailorbrands.com/llc-brand-states?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=736905974&utm_content=41302205467&utm_term=tailor%20brands&utm_funnel=llc&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiAxOauBhCaARIsAEbUSQTZz_wBt_4cW-R9ASITjIXgYX1J1jOYMkMNxw-Q0iiAJnIGJ2PSzd0aAov-EALw_wcB

He's getting old and cancer treatment isn't something one gets over, imo.

You don't read, you project bias.

The thing that I want to know about this document from 2019 late 2019 is, which the 3 ein's mentioned are they speaking of?

No it isn't

Ooopps... The last digit is supposed to be a five.

Using that ein reveals lots of facts buried in this meandering discourse of darkness

Yes

91-1653725

Please post the WMI EIN ID if you know it. Thank you.

Which means one can actually own wmiih which is still a going concern though rather hidden or veiled. Who owns the other you know 58?

"shareholders" if what?

You are correct and discipline I'm working on. Thank you. It's always good to know you're out there to help me out.

I'm in denial. Give up.

Funny stuff really funny stuff casting aspersions are we? You really don't have the meat and the facts you want so you're just scrambling for stuff. Fight much?

The expectation regarding retained earnings and NOLs in a bankruptcy reorganization would depend on the specific circumstances of the case, including the company's financial situation, the structure of the reorganization plan, negotiations with creditors, and applicable tax laws. It's not a given that retained earnings must be sacrificed to qualify for or utilize NOLs, but the financial restructuring could impact both.

Retained earnings represent the cumulative net income of a company that has been retained rather than distributed to shareholders as dividends. In a bankruptcy reorganization, these retained earnings might not necessarily be "sacrificed," but they could be affected by the restructuring process, including being used to pay creditors or in the reorganization of the company's capital structure.

Nope dope, oops, dude.