Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
why aren't you people here concentrating on the real problem - the 90% drop for no reason. that is where the crime is and if any of you really cared that would be the topic of discussion. distraction is a magicians tool and it appears to be applied on this board topically
Frivolous as in premature sand. there are no facts to back up such a case. what caused that 90% drop that day? that's where the real crime is
And i'm calling frivoulous lawsuit
damn utv that was a great wee. I just can;t keep up but I'll try Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee .05 this week and then with the right conjunctives who knows!
Obviously the origin of words. Inflamable? Flamable? You just happen to jump on to correct my conjunctiveness? Pletion and completion and for that matter creation. Bees shouldn't be
able to fly yes? You've really never heard the word pletion in over 100 yrs?
please provide proof of your allegations (which will be tendered to the proper courts of law)
next week - gather up your dry spells cause this is gonna be a long one
How do you know they aren't? Simple question
1mill - too funny-save me too
yeah grande -check out all holdings by any one named. Better yet. get an e-mail address for that counties records
Todd, educated pletion of stocks and funds does not make a criminal run.
I'm sorry, short squeeze is emminent lol altho not imminent
Man, this posting makes me think a short squeeze and cover IS in the works
And if they restore all that was stolen who should be in jail guy?
Amazing that you stumbled onto that JBG. Watch them start touting this as immaterial or a material event that should be pr'd. lol
It says "Sulja Bldg. Supplies" Can't be the same one -LMAO!!! Great find JBG.
They must have something against being long eliaman.
DWP your post reminds me of these lyrics from Jethro Tull:
Oh no no keep on giving they'll keep living in the past.
Leslie as being readily accessible for any to call is widely known but some would rather dwell in the past I guess as their doting minds can't seem to wrap their heads around progress. I know this comment will be refuted with past PR's LOL. I guess it's safer looking at the world from a single sided blinders on pessimistic perspective. That way when you're let down no big suprise cause you were expecting it. I tried living my life that way earlier but I missed many opportunities that optomists readily accepted - including wealth building opportunities like the one staring you in the face. I guess it's easier being pessimistic when you only have 1 small window to let sunlight in and freash air has to be pumped into your subterranean "clubhouse". No offense meant and I hope you all get out and enjoy the beautiful weekend! ;^)
Binzur, do you see any action except approval of motions for plaintiffs attorneys or having them as lead plaintiffs? No. You're making stuff up to suit your agenda imo, and now I'm done with this. You guys just won't apologize for being in the wrong and misinterpreting the documents.
That has no bearing on anything that happened sand and to make like it does is disingenuous. All they were stating was that no council showed to dispute the motions. Done, finito
No judgment! You guys are unreal the ways you try to twist things. Just appointing of lead attorny and lead plaintiffs - nothing more. This conversation is getting boring since no amount of facts will change your minds I'll leave you to it. But, everybody knows you're wrong on this so why don't you man up and apologize for misinterpreting the documents? Like I did yesterday. Thanks
MGB - it hasn't even been certified as a class action yet. Jumping the gun and to conclusions again. Served with notice is all. Lets drop it - you're wrong, Daddio and I are right and lets leave it at that. Agreed?
"Although for ease of management, it is likely that the official lead plaintiffs appointed by the court will be limited to 3-5 persons with large losses, it is also in the interest of the plaintiffs to file a motion for appointment of lead plaintiff on behalf of many class members, including those with a smaller loss, because the defendants will be less likely to challenge - and much less likely to succeed in challenging - the certification of the case as a class action."
I think Bell lost around $500 lol compared to dragos $66k+
Nice work Daddio5. Get it now MGB and Sand?
There was no civil suit or claims made MGB - just appointment of attorny for the plaintiffs and motion for them to be lead plaintiffs. Why is this so hard for you to understand? What response is necessary? Uhh, we argue they shouldn't have these lawyers or we argue that they shouldn't be lead plaintiffs? You're not making any sense my friend.
I'm sorry MGB, but it was specifically for the motions. Show me where they are in danger of a default judgement. You
ass u me too much. The civil suit hasn't even started yet. spinmeister lol. A waste of pacer fees if ya ask me but I don't think anyone is lol
jk: Just what I surmised yesterday. A non-event being touted as a material event when it's nothing more than the approval of the appointment of council for Drago and Bell and a passed motion for them to be lead plaintiffs in the coming civil suit.
should read get in line and wait for the facts to unfold before you all jump to conclusions about guilt or innocence.
sand, uh yeah - nothings been proved. Just another allegation in a long line of allegations so step to the back Mr Drago and company and wait in line for your turn with the lawyers. Why be concerned at all if the allegations are false? Minor detail in the scope of things. BTW, there was no civil suit there - just the appointing of a lawyer for the plaintiffs and motion carried to name them as primaries in the coming civil suit. It don't mean sheeit as my picture below says.
yep, you got that right-minor detail in a non-event
MGB - a response to what? To contest that the class action can have their lawyer appointed and that they can be lead plaintiffs? Stop making it more than it is. non-event
My last post MGB and it's to you - lucky you LOL. I think nothing is going to move forward until the OSC judgement. Class-actions won't move forward until a case is proven and unless they think their lawyer can do a better job than the OSC, they're going to have to wait just like everybody else. JMHO
Does my lawyer need to show up with me for jury duty and opposing council? NO?! same thing basically. Non-event imo
Close was what? Excuse me-Close was what?! I can't hear you guys, how much was the close? Hmmm, guess the market knows more than all the naysayers do LOL. GLT most
Yeah, we don't know what's going on behind the scenes. Since Markel is in Devries territory and his lawyer, who knows what PV and Sulja want to do - maybe distance themselves from anything Devries, who knows? Might be a smart move - time will tell.
sand: they don't have council just for this motion which the plaintiffs would have gotten anyway, even if anyone showed up to argue. Non-event! imo unless some lawyer here knows better.
MGB, I mis-read the document and apologize to the board for my misinterpretation of it. Mnnnk?
Hey at $400/hr, including meals and travel time, would you pay for him to prepare and show for a non-material event? This is all jmo
Here's my thoughts. because the whole thing is a material non-event. Why waste time, effort and money for a 5 minute court appearance that won't change anything except get the plantiffs approved as head plaintiffs in the class action. Does anybody read any more into this? To me it's a non-event not worth the Pacer fees, but thanks anyway
Again a non-event and unimportant but if it makes you feel superior and a little better about your life, sure. The now motion approved plaintiffs have a lawyer and the defendants don't. The whole matter is insignificant imo