Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I think we'll get a PR on this tomorrow or Monday.
Maybe that will be pr'd with the retiring of 13+ mil. shares, the Volkswagen deal and maybe more on contracts.
The next 6 months will be great.
Mark this post and remind me in 6 months...only if I'm wrong....if I'm right I don't care to gloat.
Yes. I think there is a good possibility we will have some news out before end of day Friday.
Talk to you later...have to go do some Santa chores.
I think playing favorites to a different agenda can result in higher income in other ways. jmo
cws9, check post #38604 for financials.
Mid-January for financials. As has been stated, there is a 90 day period between filing and the release of financials(this is mandated).
The filing took place mid-October so, look for financials mid-January.
On the 3rd, prior to symbol change, we closed at .09.
On the 4th, after the symbol change, we closed at .105.
That is uo 16.67%...so you are wrong the symbol change did have some effect.
Right now it is at .105/.11 so find another harp to play.
It has made a difference...and the majority of shareholders just received the change in their accounts in the past hour.
It is really quite simple...he could say he didn't know and still be telling the truth..even if he did know.
Just maybe he did have a strong suspicion as to who was selling but without actually seeing him push the button he didn't really know....just like he doesn't know how many times each of us has bought and sold shares.
This has been hashed and rehashed so many times i feel like I'm about to hurl the hash.
For Pete's sake let it rest.
RH had no control over the timing of the name change.
Once it was filed it was out of his hands...he had to wait for it just as we did.
Don't take my word for, it check out for yourself, just as I did.
Thanks TFN...it got so bad I just had to ignore three or four posters....something I really don't like to do because then I wonder what the responses are about.
But I guess it's worth it.
Actually, it was 308,000...sold/bought early today.
No problem...that was just the point I was trying to make.
I have had far more winners than losers but still have some big mistakes in my investing history...just don't really feel anyone should be questioning like that, Thanks.
I think you are crazy to try to tell someone to invest, or not invest their money in MCCY.
Seems to me that would be their choice.
It might not be what you would do but crazy?
Check some of your investments and get back to us on that crazy part.
This all sounds like the same pumping and dumping I have seen here so many times be for...and I have been in this since the day of the coup, I can't remember how long that's been.
All the so called sources have never posted anything verifiable, of substance or that was sustainable.
I don't see this being any different but I hope I'm wrong.
No, it was a comparative statement...stating that the cram, when used, will work better. Stating it's efficiency...not it's availability.
Here it is in English, it looks really good:The drivers of heavy vehicles which fall asleep at the wheel are responsible for 30% to 40% of the accidents fatal implying a truck, and of at least half of the exits of road recorded each year by this type of vehicles on the North-American roads. Cut Imprimer text To send to also consult Lisez other articles on these subjects: Accident of transport (100%) Financial services and professionals (100%) Road accident (99%) Accidents (General) (99%) Insurances (83%) NTSB (78%) Automobile insurance company of Quebec (74%) Effective Control Transport (65%) Group Robert (64%) To consult too According to studies' of the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), an independent organization which manages the safety of transport in the United States, the tiredness of the drivers, which works regularly up to 60 hours per week, weighs even heavier on the road assessment of the trucking industry than the accidents ascribable to alcohol and drugs. Even if there is not any similar study to measure the extent of the phenomenon in the north of the American border, the automobile Insurance company of Quebec (SAAQ) estimates that the data of the NTSB are "realistic", and that they could also represent the current situation of the truck-drivers from here, according to its spokesman, Gino Desrosiers. By referring to the road assessment haulage in 2006, the inappropriate sleep of the truck drivers could be in question in several hundreds of road accidents, and to be directly responsible for a score of deaths which have occurred on the roads of Quebec, only last year. This is why, in collaboration with industry, the SAAQ will reveal tomorrow in the offices of the company Groupe Robert, one of the largest conveyors in Quebec, new a video aiming at sensitizing the employers and drivers with the reality of this phenomenon which is the subject of intensive research for the development of tools of prevention. The company Groupe Robert will invite also the participants in the demonstration of a "detector of the drowsiness" developped at the point by the firm montréalaise Effective Control Transport (ECT), which uses cameras with infra-reds for "reading" tangible signs of physical tiredness on the level of the face and eyes of the drivers. According to ECT, the system can determine up to two hours in advance of the physical signs of tiredness and prevent the driver - or the company for which it works - need for taking rest. The device has been presented at the NTSB, the SAAQ, like other organizations responsible for the road safety in jurisdictions close to Quebec, in more of being the subject of an experiment in real situation in many vehicles of the Robert Group, for two years. Its recognition by the authorities of transport, in Canada or the United States, could however take time, if one trusts the efforts made since already more than 15 years by the American NTSB, to oblige the cartage contractors to equip their vehicles with these detectors. In spite of the studies carried out in the Nineties on the tiredness of the truck-drivers - whose results are recognized by about all the road authorities in North America - the NTSB made cabbage once more at the beginning of 2007 front the American Senate to oblige the conveyors to be equipped with recorders of edge. One duration maximum To Canada, a new federal payment came into effect, January 1, 2007, to limit to 2 p.m. the maximum duration of the working day of a truck-driver. Over these 14 hours, the driver of a truck can lead during a 1 p.m. maximum, over one day complete. The driver must also go away during at least eight hours, between two quarters of work. Similar payments, presenting a little different periodicities, from one jurisdiction to another, were also adopted in the majority of the Canadian provinces. To Quebec, the new payment over the hours of control, which cuts off only one hour per day at the maximum duration from the working day of a professional driver, just comes to enter fully into force, 1 last November. According to the Association of the haulage of Quebec (ACQ), the truck drivers Québécois who do lots of mileage of Maritime regularly, Ontario or the United States work, on average, between 55 and 60 hours per week. The "local" truck-drivers accumulate some generally a little less, that is to say between 45 and 50 hours per week. In a study published in 2003, the SAAQ estimated at 95% the rate of conformity of the drivers to the payment over the hours of control, on the roads of Quebec. Heavy vehicles in Quebec (in 2006) Accidents implying at least a truck 6991 Mortals 62 Severely wounded persons 142 light Casualties 1091 material Damages only 5696 Drivers with licence for truck-trailer 199 460 Drivers with licence for truck carrying 92 432 registered Trucks and road tractors 118 228 Conformity the drivers as for the number of hours worked 95% 1
Probably not...it just seems there are more of their posts when something positive or promising is posted or rumored....could just be the way I see it.
Why would he have done that? He had it before BCS and since he did not have controlling interest it would make no sense to assign it to BCS.
Besides, if there was an assignment of rights I'm sure it would have come up by now.
That would be a contract breach and a law suit would have been filed rather than an injunction.
Also, he was not an employee, he was a partner...big difference.
Oh well, there is always the IV board.
You have to look at the whole picture...Bruno Farbos is now a part of ECT management team, meaning he is free from any attachment to or hindrance from BCS and can work on new tech for ECT.
I believe this is a big step forward.
As the inventor he owns the product. BCS is just trying to make waves. Their application for a patent was turned down...because Brono already has it in the USA.
You will see this stand up as it all plays out.JMO
Is this new? In the team section Bruno Farbos is shown as Vice President R&D of ECT.
Wasn't he a consultant before?
That looks much better going forward.
Financials will not follow name change closely if name change happens before mid-January.
I seem to remeber the filings being in mid-October so, financials will be at least 90 days after that, if I recall correctly.
You got it. And I think anyone who gives it a couple of months will be very glad they did.
And you waste all this time for that. That is truly pitiful.
Thank you 2win, the same to you and all others on the board.
DWP, why do you delibrately post someting that you know is false? You know, as well as I do, MMs can and do exchange shares.
Sorry about that ...not a simple majority but more than any other single entity.
I don't just deal in pink stocks...they're just for fun...some people gamble ...
I play with pinks.
Thank you jermart, those .09 shares are looking really good in my kitty right now.
Cowpatty, I can't get it to come up...what change?
TFN, I've been through this with a company, in which I'm a majority shareholder, and we went through a delay of 47 days after we completed all the paper work.
That's first hand information on just one of many I've been connected with.
Not saying it's the same with MCCY but I know it happens.
Once the name change is initiated I don't think the company has any contol over when the authorities complete it.
And, because of that, you're right, the rumor did no good for the pps.
Well, all I can say is, the .09 shares just brought my average down to .106, so I think I'll just ride it out...unless jermart, 2win and dwp scare me out of them. Now I'm really shaking.
Man! I was hoping for a little patience...someone just bought 10,000 @ .10. And 100 @.095?
In most cases, on this board, it's not about what they believe...it's about what they want others to believe.
I, personally, don't believe either one of those two.
Let them keep agreeing with each other and not "argue about it"..which is just another way to argue about it.
No, he's not kidding.
Consider yourself marked.
There are a lot of things you are not aware of so, those things are probably a scam, too.
PwAg, enough is never enough with these people.
You could show them a million dollar sale comtract and they would want a picture of someone signing it...with three people from three different continents, dressed in Levi jeans, signing as witnesses.
I'll explain the article, since there are some here who can't seem to understand it.
The article was not meant to technically describe the product, it was to draw attention to the capabilities and the availability of a product most, in transportation businesses would be interested in.
The description of "camera" fit the article and presented what they wished to make known and that is:
THEY HAVE THE PRODUCT that will save lives and money.
Try to detract from it all you like but it's out there now.