Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The system guarding magic
So, a glimpse of Eternal Truth had awakened in your American mind -- and dies out at a whiff of three magical guardian words: another conspiracy theory...
The DTCC Set-Up to Take Your Money
http://www.goldandsilverexchange.info/DTCC-Set-Up.html
Let the dilution and lack of gold recovery be real, and this means that SGCP is a "POS" and "a gigantic SCAM" and the management is a bunch of egregious swindlers?? Such stuff requires a clarification, and the "IMO" is not a substitute for it. It only fortifies the opinions about the mind unsoundness of the writers of such stuff. Or their unbriddled malice and malignancy.
Doug, as a military pilot, should love such poetry (an excerpt from Pushkin's poem; cannot be translated verbatim): "so [thus,this way, like this] a heavy hammer, while crashing glass, forges a sword." Please email it to Doug along with this:
Pushkin, the greatest Russian poet. His grandfather, a black, was sold in youth for a bottle of wine to a captain of Russian military ship, and then was given as a gift to the tsar Peter de Great who named him Hannibal and virtualy befriended him and promoted into a grand magnate.
So, adversity knocked the SGCP low, but it is not a big deal to fall -- but not to rise. And we see that SGCP is in fact not dying but struggling and recovering. Instead of a SGCP demise, I see but a senseless faint-heartedness or determined, hellish malignancy of the oracles of demise. In difficult times, such people are prominent... but they are real conundrum to me..
What is the point? What math must be understood here? The whole Universe was thousands trillions times smaller than any atom prior to the big bang, and look at it now.
Now, SGCP is RESTRICTED at TD Ameritrade. "No trades are being accepted on this symbol at this time". Absolutely ANY trades, via broker also.
<<Etrade has no restrictions on trading SGCP either. Other than placing the order by phone and the broker assisted trades are not charged.>>
Well, this is a restriction, though meaning only that there is a red flag and the broker wants the ordering investor to be extra careful. I wish I would know more. Does Etrade treats any pink in such a manner?
'pulsecrusher':
On the other hand, you appear to be a honest person": you are not masking your sinister state of mind.
"Positive posts", whatever they may be, are not malicious and malignant, and they are not aiming at crushing the company and swindling its shareholders. See difference??
<<Short interest here = 0>>
Where had you obtained such information on this pink stock??
Oh, I forgot... you said you will not respond anymore.. and one should really not waste time of so elusive "altruists".
But they MAY BE such an excusive reason. About 12 years ago, I closely witnessed a crush of FIBR caused just by one poster. The company then sued him.
'pulsecrusher':
You posted it to create a confusion and crush the investors pulse?
Any legal notice MUST, first of all, be provided to the affected parties. This one was not.
According to my information, the DTCC is infested by stock manipulating swindlers, and this your internet notice may be just a fabrication.
I just tried to put on line a sell order also, and there was no any problem with it. I called then to Ameritrade again and demanded to speak to their high-ups.. who told me then that there is no any change at all in Ameritrade's hahdling SGCP -- NONE -- and the Ameritrade knows nothing about any DTCC action toward SGCP.
DTAmeritrade just reiterated to me that they have no any restriction on any SGCP trading and never had, and know nothing about any DTCC notice. So, you are here obviously to confuse.
How come had you chosen to come here with this stuff instead attempting to resolve it directly with TDAmeritrade?? And it is your first post here, right??
MARKUP [Black's Law Dictionary]:
An amount originally added to cost. Usually as a percentage of selling price. Also refers to an increase above an originally-established retail price.
GTGP is quite high to make a good short, and there is a way for the shorters to determine the status of the test, and there is no hint of any shorting activities... except a few past patently stupid posts.
12thman,
this would be, I guess, the worst that you could do: discharging your energy and intent into the void. But -- take some time, think about this.... if you are serious, why not to write a book on the matter? I know you could if.... The work on the book would make you a real -- real -- and unique -- expert on the matter. And its impact would be certain.
Thanks for such your outlook. It is time to stand up in outrage against the crooks and their crooked laws..
I hope the VMS Ventures has better chance in Canada with this their new, legal venture, but I doubt that they would have any chance in US with it. Here, the speaker is immune if the speech is in public and to public, and -- in his/her believes -- for a public interest [SLAPP defense].
See also conditionally privileged communication. Black's Law Dictionary: "One made in good faith [lol] on any subject matter in which the person publishing has an interest… If made to a person having a corresponding interest… even though it contains matters that otherwise would be actionable. ....."
Atilla: a poster with some business interest in SL and relation to Doug, John. Here are some of his posts:
## 64789, 90;
65002, 05, 06, 53, 58, 59;
65934, 56;
66137, 44, 48, 49, 63;
66310, 314, 317, 520, 530, 531, 540, 541, 548, 549.
I was not posting here that time, but occasionally lurking.
"African revolution": Some others would call this development differently, but my English is limited. A development leading to great economic and cultural improvements, but it is not right place and time to discuss this. Time... Hmm... It is 2:41 am here now. Time to sleep.
And the first rule of stock investing is invest in enterprise founder and CEO.
But there is something else to this, and perhaps the inordinate Doug's devotion to his vision has as inordinate reason.
Atilla very-very surprised me by his fiery comment here putting SGCP in the family of Microsoft-Google. He did not want to talk further about this, and I do not believe he was even anywhere near to the subject that is on my mind, that captivated me in my study... and I should not even touch it... but yes, we are at the eve of an African revolution of immense magnitude.
Had that new equipment resulted in an immediate windfall, this board would be flooded with delight and prises to management.
So, the problem is not in wasting the funds on equipment, but in whiners' genetics I guess.
Grave reproaches should be brought to this ill corporation, DTCC, for its imperial swinishness, the outrageous modus operandi, the manner of routine issuing of their "suspensions", the "chills" and "freezes", without delineating the charges. They could be anything, from virtually nothing to catastrophes to the targeted enterprises and investors, but are uniformly causing shock and mess.
Thank you very much, Tosca. Great paper.
Come in 5 years, and you would see $1 stock growing exponentially.
Help this company now and it would grow much faster and efficient to serve humanity -- instead it is persecuted. Without that this fledgeling is abused even by the very nature!
Well... it is supposedly the greatest world evil to say the least.. Extremely heavily mob "infiltraded".. And it is blamed for the rampant markets manipulation. And majority of people never even heard about it. If I would catch it, I would beat it up.
Following your post, I called again to DT Ameritrade. They said this time that the issue appears to be of such a low prominence that the most MMs have chosen just to ignore it.. This could mean that the DTC action is generally considered as outright frivolous. Which is quite obvious.
Though DTC is following the SEC action, the DTC and SEC actions are incongruous. Just some clarification is required probably.
The TD Ameritrade is working with outside MMs and, thus, is having many of them, and is reflecting the general markets sentiment, but E-Trade is MM itself.. that is limited in this regard. But let's wait and see.
"A larger exchange" is a very far away issue, and before it would become visible, the company fundamentals would have to be GREATLY improved. Any reverse split before such improvement of fundamentals would be disastrous for SGCP, and Doug, I hope, understand this dilemma well, and would not rush for any RS, that may be suicidal.
The solution to this dilemma may be ONLY a steady growth and development and shares buybacks.
"A compensatory remedy
for fraud victims" here is liking their wounds.
The Greatest RISK is Taking One while sleeping.
Just called TD Ameritrade again. And the same: no ANY restrictions.
After my lengthy experience with shorts, I do not believe just to anything whatsoever coming from them.
Who is your broker??
TD Ameritrade is telling the same, but also that this matter will be clarified in the morning.
The guarantee here is the slow but certain ongoing improvement of the company fundamentals.
If SGCP and other companies-victims would be in any way liable here, they would be charged in the SEC suit.
There has to be much-much more to the Bronson et al swindle than what the SEC is telling to the investors.
The crooks could sell legally if their actual intent wouldn't be to knock the stocks down… and how not to short such doomed stocks! That is after all what the naked (unaccounted) shorting was invented for... and was actually legalized... by SEC. Nowadays, it is never enough just to harm a startup. It has to be shorted and destroyed. And that is what the "external influence" here was/is all about. The SGCP is worth 0.00000000001, its management is bunch of crooks, and so on.
Also, the shares were restricted, and the breach of the SEC regulation restrictions was incredibly brazen and criminal.
Now, it is outright impossible that such huge chunks of stocks were sold by the companies without restricting contracts.. which were obviously breached in the same manner... but this is a civil matter.
<<I don't understand what the upside would have been for Doug or John to have done this, unless the discount to Bronson was less than the discount given to the MM's.>>
Hi, Charlie!
This is actually a very good point. I thought about this myself.
The honey here had to be in fact so sweet that it attracted and duped up such a huge swarm of flies.. and thus, attracted the SEC also. It made all the swindle a clear liabily case for the SEC, I guess.. that is defenseless.
These short lists are to set bear raids which used to be unlawful, but now are typical shorts' modus operandi... the most digusting criminal activity.
Hmm.. complete confusion.. Are you ok? I never PM'd you. Being in strong disagreement with QtraderQ, I just only commented him that his .55 "consolidation" could be possible only if the test was a failure.
If the test was successful, there would be no any "consolidation".