Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
"Probably Tuesday" based on what? Just your guess?
So the corporate secy gave inside info to a shareholder?
Better be an 8k coming soon to comply with FD.
3 billion in bonds was given, no strings attached? Because that's the only way it goes to shareholders' equity. I wish someone would give me 3 million in bonds.....
Last post o the day for me, but I do notice a new HOD.
I don't trade pinks or bullies.
But someone told me abou tthis great stock I could buy for a buck and sell for 15. My research led me here. I elected not to purchase, because of all of the red flags.
And I am honored that your dd is about me, rather than the stock.
It's amazing how many people in early august were expecting a 10k "by monday".
Meanwhile if some sharp CPA explained how assets are not offset by liabilities unless they were gifted, then it is hidden somewhere. Like the CPA, probably in the Caymans.
Obviously, you haven't.
Go look at the balance sheet of any firm that does asset mgmt.
These are valid questions that you are all ignoring. That's ok, it's your money. But it is yet another red flag that gets ignored by the Cult Of Rufus.
orcas, to date no one has referenced the bookkeeping. You are deluding yourselves if you think that assets under management go right to equity.
Look at the balance sheet of any publicly traded asset mgmt firm to see what I mean.
Wrong, orcas.
If they are assets THERE HAS TO BE A LIABILITY. You either don't understand, or don't want to understand, but that is how accounting works. they would be listed as "deposits" or some similar. But there is NO WAY unless they were a gift that the offset would be "shareholders equity".
Perhaps you can explain how billions simply get "added" to a company with no dilution or corresponding liability entry?
pot, meet kettle.
Orcas, can you explain how assets are "added" to a company with no dilution or offsetting liability entry?
Boho, do you know how to add billions to a company with no dilution and no liability entry?
and still no one can explain how one just "adds" billions without a corresponding liability...
So, dough, you know how to add billions to the asset side without a corresponding debit?
Please, share. I'm tired of working for a living.
So, you know of a way to add billions of bonds to a company without paying for them, without having an entry in the liability column?
In that case amigo, you are wasting your time here.
...and based on this board, an alert that will be ignored by many.
les,
have you EVER read a financial report?
The ONLY way that the bonds can add to shareholder equity is if they were GIVEN to the company.
Elsewise, the asset column has to have a corresponding entry in the liability column. it is called "double-entry bookkeeping".
2 things, amigo:
Last september it was 6 1/2.
Second, when the reorg plan comes out, be careful: often the common stock gets cancelled (see Boston Market, Armstrong Holdings, and doeznes more...even in Mirant, equity holders got a fraction of a share...)
I would say he's the Delphi Oracle.
But after seeing Delphi the last few years....
and I say I talk to elvis every day....
Get Dr Mensah to say he talks to ben everyday. Mignt be easier to get ELvis to admit to talking to me everyday.
Transparent? Howbout 'translucent'?
BECAUSE THE 10K IS DONE!!!
Just ask Darryl Horton, CPA.
16:56:41 it was cancelled
looks like someone was trying to change the vwap trade from16:04:05
Code indicates it is an average price trade. (vwap)
I found this in the PR from 8 months ago announcing the JV with Brittenum Bros. Did it ever get filed?
Now that we are moving into our final posting stage for OVER THE COUNTER
BULLETIN BOARD we have hired our publicists Arnie A. Epps to build market
awareness for our company before the SB2 filings which is scheduled for
February 23, 2006. After the filing I will begin our origination process for
funding our joint venture companies," stated Ben F. Stanley, COO.
CVSU would also like to announce Mr. Arnie A. Epps as Publicist for the
Corporation. Mr. Epps is a current Director for Clear Channel Radio.
The Board Of Directors Meeting is hereby called for Thursday, February 23,
2006 at 10:00 AM. The purpose for the meeting is to sign off on the final SB-2
filing to the SEC.
OT:Is that crap necessary?
It seems to me that the DD regarding filings should start with Horton.
I'll try to contact him.
what does it have to do with CSHD? and why is it illegal in Slovenia?
Ladey,
What has ourstreet done that is illegal in Slovenia?
Question the Cult of Rufus?
Are there two havenots? Or just 1 with really good dope?
I won't bash. I think the action today was great for the holders. Hopefully some took some money off the table and now have free shares.
My opinion is this is related to Reg SHO. Wasnt Friday the end of the 13 days? Meaning FTDs had to be covered today? Or am I barking up the total wrong tree?
Reg SHO, imvho.
since 15:47, there have been 5 of them.
This could be some RegSHO covering.
Larger and more blocks today then in some time.
aren't we do for an "HOD! HOD!" about now?
I hope for a 10k also.
I don't expect one for awhile.
And the post? and anyone who questions Rufus? all bashers, right? Absolutely no reason for anyone to not take this at 100% face value, so people must be getting paid to say bad things about His Rufus Highness?
The capacity of the human mind for self-delusion, especially where greed is involved is astonishing.
I hope, semi, that you and all the others whose DD consists of "100000000 % confidence" and "you go rufus!" and HOD!HOD!, I truly hope that all you guys are right, and that I am wrong. But if you don't mind, I'll stay around until the denouement, one way or the other. (in fact, even if you do mind, I'll hang around)
Is anyone who questions the cult of Rufus, including the NYPOst, a basher?
Doesn't look like demand is high, nor that anyone is rushing to get out either. It's achieved stasis here, just a little range-bound pending news, good or bad.
Hell, I don't even think day-traders can profit off of this baby now. And it's no longer the number one thread on i-hub.
I won't give investment advice.
And if it makes you feel like a big man, call me names; such behaviour is the last refuge of internet scoundrels.
My suggestion is that no one on here should give advice. Post opinions and DD, but if the SEC really do look at this, they may look at this board. All, my humble opinion. Your mileage may vary.