Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
nothing yet? : {
folks, megas has lawyer'd-up, no filings or pr...how many outstanding shares there were at the time of that vote matters not mainuh (for some reason i think you know that) AND even if Megas didn't consider us shareholders at that time matters not.
my opinion is this, put a securities attorney on it representing the shareholders. doesn't have to be a CAL just yet. discovery process alone would be worth the price of admission.
there are two ways to get the ball back. the opposing team scores or have a good defense.
sorry but thats my honest opinion folks. anyway, have a great day all!
2late, you could be onto something. Also, if BCIT/Megas is sitting on information that could put coin in our pockets then lets get it at this point. No filings or PR? Ample opportunity was given imo. Lets give it to a securities attorney shark and PUT A SUNDER folks.
Posted by: 2late
In reply to: glaszman who wrote msg# 90291 Date:10/13/2007 11:17:52 PM
Post #of 90299
Hypothical question
If we are real shareholders waiting the acquisition of the security we purchased. If we are real shareholder that are entitled to a dividend payment if issued by the company as Main has said requiring all funds to be on deposit somewhere. Then how could a BOD meeting take place changing the share strucure of this security by two of the minority shareholders.(Megas) Wasn't a vote required by law of the majority of shareholders(us) in order to make the 205 's currently held by the DTC legal shares as well as the 100-1 perferred shares? If there has to be a dividend on deposit for us all to force it's cover then there also has to be a vote by the majority to change the value of our shares.
I still believe that if we challenged the changes Megas did we will be found to be the majority by law which would nullify and cause the removal of the 205's issued. Thats why Megas sued us because if we are defined as real shareholders then we own more of BCIT then he does and were denied our legal rights as investors.
If we challenged it with this premise we would be returned to the original share strucuture using the 106 shares with everything needing removed until it was covered and returned to the original float of 1.3 million shares. The thing Megas doesn't like is he is only entitled to sell what he held until everyone has sold and then BCIT would need to issue shares to cover the rest placing value in the shell which he then controls.
Opinions on this please.
maybe next week em
maybe next week guys, the GF clause etc...........
nothing yet? i still say he's playin possum (asleep). it'll trade soooon lol sorry. have a good day all.
bobby E) is good 2 : ) em
nothing yet? the suspense builds lol what camp do you belong? A) Megas gets the filings done and we get to trade. : )
B) Megas gets the filings done and we do not trade. : (
C) Megas doesn't do filings and we do not trade. : (
D) Megas does filings and we trade at some point. : /
i'll say A (i think he's playin possum).
harbecu
last week.
Posted by: harbecu
In reply to: molson_ice1 who wrote msg# 90047 Date:10/8/2007 6:16:45 PM
Post #of 90053
I wonder what the last date was when they talked to those folks?
maybe these stealth filings will shed some light on our path. ok maybe not : )
i have no choice but to agree with your assumptions bobby.
"However what it will do, is let the brokers off the hook on our contract to honer his IOU's.
And unless Megas has issued 205 certs to the TA we will be getting worthless 106 certs.(if indeed we get anything)IMO"
.......
after much back and forth with etrade the last couple of weeks, they've concluded (not some smuck) that BCIT has NO Transfer Agent, period.
i understand Tom's argument. i can not except it however minus his full discloser at this point.
we stumble in the dark even in our own house.
if this does go the CAL route, we'll be able to get ALL the information. might be another RICO civil suit (was posted last night) in the works lol. alot of rats in this wood pile.
with 75% of the posts on rb being short related and one of the principals of this crime posting here, i believe it's safe to say that the boat is still afloat. however, if this 10q comes out without showing progress in the form of a potential r/m and/or "a new way forward" then our wait has just begun imho lol.
who knows? i/we have no information on the filings and the hold-up there of. would someone please share this Alexandrian mystery with me. tia
interesting read today on the old BCIT board. legaltx has a good point in regards to TM's information flow (or lack there of). last week i sent him something (will not get into what was sent) and have recieved zero response, zippo. with that said, im still giving TM until oct. 16 for a pr/filings/email/phone call/telegraph/post card/carrier pigeon/morse code etc... third party emails posted on the board wrapped in a veil of riddles NO! lol.
It would have been nice...
to go for the Declatory (sp) Judgement, with that said TM
has the most to loose.
There's still an outside chance that TM is doing the ol' Ali Rope-A-Dope. Flushing all the shorts & crew out to jawbone over their prey. We'll see (I can not bring myself to type s o o n lol)
I requested........
just 10,000 certificates from etrade, 205 OR 106 they can
pick their poison. T-3 is long gone. I'll post their response
if/when I get one. If someone wants to go further with
discovery/what if anything WE can do to facilitate trading etc..
I'll pitch in $'s.....Have a great day all!
Well.........
Is this not new information?
Posted by: alynnb
In reply to: None Date:9/19/2007 3:41:25 PM
Post #of 88917
Okee Dokee. Megas Mail #3>>>
After this, I'm outta here. Good luck everyone.
"There are old legit shares (106) and new legit shares (205). Both would be cleared by the transfer agent if the stock was being cleared. Not a problem for the transfer agent nor the company, because, as the old cusip number certs eventually arrive at the TA, they would simply be swapped for new 205's. However, there are also fakes in the system, and they out number the legits. BCIT is not allowed to clear. You tell me why, and you get the prize."
tm
................................................................
The SEC and a good Securities Attorney can't solve this trifling issue? Why not?
Has the end game came OR went?
Tavy, that is untrue and
uncalled for.
I have to believe that those 205's (however many doesn't matter) will end up at the TA's so we can get on with it.
bobby, that makes sense...
Does anyone dispute what bobby has
posted here tonight? I find it flawless. tia
don't know?
fwiw etrade response....
this "research and resolution" team at etrade didn't know that
we have a new TA? geez
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear Mr. ####,
Thank you for your message regarding your BCIT certificate request. I apologize
for any inconvenience that you have experienced due to this situation. The information
provided in the previous message was acquired from our research and resolution team,
but may have changed very recently. Because the request can't be moved forward
to the information we currently have access to, I have escalated this case to the
research and resolution team. You should be contacted by a resolution specialist
within two business days regarding this situation. If you have any further questions
regarding this issue please contact us at any time and we will make sure that the
resolution specialist assigned to this case is informed.
I hope this information has been helpful. Please let us know if we've addressed
your questions and concerns satisfactorily by clicking the link below and taking
a 30-second survey.
As always, thank you for choosing E*TRADE FINANCIAL. If you have additional questions
or need assistance, visit our Help Center at http://www.etrade.com/helpcenter, or
give us a call at 1.800.825.5723 between 7 a.m. and midnight ET, seven days a week.
From outside the U.S., please call +1-678-624-6210. We look forward to serving your
investing, banking, and lending needs for many years to come.
Sincerely,
Mitch Winchester
M-F 6:00a.m.-2:30p.m. MST
800-355-8888, Extension 3032535
Financial Services Representative
E*TRADE FINANCIAL
I agree Lynn.....
I haven't a clue why the 205's have not been given to the
Transfer Agent by the date of September 18, 2007. Makes
no sense to me but Im not privy to the situation/process
of TM either. If anyone knows why the 205's haven't been
given to the TA, let the rest of us know. I've vented
now lol later
more clear? this water......
is so muddy the catfish are growing legs and you believe
it to be clear? please tell me (i beg you) why on earth BCIT
would not give the 205's to the TA?
Is Pacific still our TA? em
lol yeah.........
Early September has left us without even saying goodbye.
This thing ........
stuck in my craw this morning dang it. In my humble opinion,
release the 205's and put pressure on the master (brokers)
to make the servent (DTC) do as you wish.
However, I haven't a clue as to what is going on behind
the scene (if anything) so Im shadow boxing at this point.
I'll be in shape for a real boxing match before long.
I/We can do nothing....
until the company gives those 205's to the Transfer Agent.
End of story.
Have a good day all.
etrade response......
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Its time to give our Transfer Agent the 205's. Only then can we move forward. I see no reason not to. I'd like to hear the pro's & cons on this 205 hold-up. Am I missing something here (no pun intended)?
Dear Mr. #######,
Thank you for your message regarding the status of the BCIT shares purchased in
your brokerage account. I apologize for any inconvenience that you have experienced
due to this situation. Because BCIT is a non-transferable security currently a delivery issue has been created. This issue is being
experienced by all share holders of BCIT, not just those at E*TRADE Financial.
Additionally, there is no time frame for this issue to be resolved and we have no
control over the company or any pending legal action involving the BCIT shares.
By following BCIT press releases and financial news stories, you may be able to
follow the status of pending actions involving BCIT. If you have any further questions
please contact us at any time.
I hope this information has been helpful. Please let us know if we've addressed
your questions and concerns satisfactorily by clicking the link below and taking
a 30-second survey.
As always, thank you for choosing E*TRADE FINANCIAL. If you have additional questions
or need assistance, visit our Help Center at http://www.etrade.com/helpcenter, or
give us a call at 1.800.825.5723 between 7 a.m. and midnight ET, seven days a week.
From outside the U.S., please call +1-678-624-6210. We look forward to serving your
investing, banking, and lending needs for many years to come.
Sincerely,
Mitch Winchester
M-F 6:00a.m.-2:30p.m. MST
800-355-8888, Extension 3032535
Financial Services Representative
E*TRADE FINANCIAL
I wrote a ...
scathing email this morning to etrade. In July I ordered just 10,000 certs & haven't seen hide nor hair of a cert yet. Subjects discussed were T-3, 205's etrade stated were in my account months ago & responsibility to make me whole @ .15 a share (the latest trades that brought us down to .005 were broker to broker). We'll see what they have to say for themselves.
like the beer commercial says....
BRILLIANT!!!
too lazy?....
if i was a keyboard banger for a living maybe i'd care etc..
amazing how this....
Pino guy & Pearl Asia (real name Elvira Gamboa) are both named in another suit?
Wasn't there a defendent here named Silicon Valley PearlAsia
Trust? Coincidence? lol Pearl Asian Mining (PAIM) has an interesting
poster, huh? ; )
.............
Posted by: bobbybdb
In reply to: None Date:9/10/2007 2:29:03 PM
Post #of 88298
Mario Pino DEFENDANT in another law suit, will this guy ever learn?
From: Marian Escudero <lawyerset@yahoo.com>
To: princess-bae@hotmail.com
Subject: PEARL ASIAN
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2007 3:50 PM
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP
CHRISTOPHER H. McGRATH (SB#149129)
(chrismcgrath@paulhastings.com)
DANIEL J. LICKEL (SB# 224510)
(daniellickel@paulhastings.com)
3579 Valley Centre Drive, San Diego, CA 92130
Telephone: (858) 720-2500
Facsimile: (858) 720-2555
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Black Forest International, LLC
FILED
Clerk of the Superior Court
JUN 21 2007
By: M. GARLAND, Deputy
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
NORTH COUNTY BRANCH
BLACK FOREST INTERNATIONAL. LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiffs.
v.
LEGENT CLEARING LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; CAMBRIA CAPITAL, LLC, a California limited liability company, FIRST PUBLIC SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION, an Oregon limited liability company, DAVID KORMAN A.K.A. MARK PEDLEY, BRANCH VINEDRESSER, DR. TZEMACH “BEN” DAVID NETZER KOREM, PHD., an individual, GAMBOA PROPERTIES, INC., an Oregon corporation, PEARL ASIAN MINING INDUSTRIES, INC., a Wyoming corporation, E. PEARL ASIAN, A.K.A. ELVIRA GAMBOA, A.K.A. BAE KATIGUMAN, an individual, PHILIPPINES ROYAL OIL AND ALTERNATIVE ENERGY COMPANY, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS PHILIPPINES GOLD MINING CORPORATION, a Wyoming corporation, GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, RANDY LITHICUM A.K.A. RANDY SAWYER, an individual, MARIO PINO, an individual, STANDARD REGISTRAR & TRANSFER COMPANY, INC., a Utah corporation, AGN ASSOCIATES & STOCK TRANSFER SERVICES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, MOHAMAD TOUFIC NEHMEH, an individual, DEPOSITORY TRUST AND CLEARING CORPORATION, a New York corporation, ABEGAIL DORMITORIO, an individual, RANDOLF VILLANUEVA, an individual, JEFFREY ALAN BOSAW, an individual, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive
Defendants. Case No. 37-2007-00052133-CU-BC-NC
PLAINTIFF BLACK FOREST INTERNATIONAL, LLC’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
(1) BREACH OF CONTRACT
(2) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY-LEGENT & CAMBRIA;
(3) NEGLIGENCE;
(4) DECLARATORY RELIEF;
(5) SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE;
(6) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT;
(7) BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY – PAIM OFFICERS;
(8) AIDING AND ABETTING;
(9) VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE; AND
(10) CONVERSION
Complaint Filed: April 25, 2007
Plaintiff Black Forest International, LLC, (“BFI”), hereby alleges as follows:
NATURE OF THE ACTION
This First Amended Complaint seeks to unfreeze the brokerage account of Plaintiff Black Forest International, LLC, which has been frozen as a result of the Defendants wrongful conduct, including the refusal to issue a dividend that BFI is owed. BFI seeks injunctive relief releasing its brokerage account and ordering issuance of the dividend, and monetary damages caused by Defendants’ wrongful conduct.
BFI bought common stock shares in Pearl Asian Mining Industries, Inc. (“PAIM”), from Global Development Partners (“GDP”). BFI is informed and believes that GDP’s president is Randy Lithicum. BFI was introduced to GDP and Mr. Lithicum by Mario Pino. Unbeknownst to BFI at the time, Pino and Lithicum were part of a complicated network of securities scam operators intending to defraud BFI through a scheme of manipulating, first, the transfer of the purchased PAIM stock certificates and, ultimately, a dividend owed on the PAIM stock.
BFI is further informed and believes that the scheme involved the active participation of a transfer agent named David Korman, who goes by an assortment of aliases and who initially gained notoriety as a founder of a fictitious country known as the Dominion of Melchezedek. BFI is informed and believes that Elvira Pearl Asian, the namesake of PAIM and a self-represented executive of PAIM, is involved and also goes by a variety of pseudonyms and may be the wife of David Korman. BFI is further informed and believes that these individuals have been named as defendants in multiple civil complaints around the country and they are the object of investigations by federal regulating agencies.
< to be continued >
NEXT: FALSE AND MISLEADING PRESS RELEASES / INFORMATION
Truly yours,
MS. MARIAN ARROYO ESCUDERO, CPA-LLB
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last Read Replies (2) | Next 10 | Previous | Next
Add Board Mark BCIT
anyway, have a great day all! em
Yes, he just might be done here. Now don't ask for certs?
P.S. TM is in the hole here...
folks Im sure. He went balls to the wall. As the Blues singers
like to say, "Thats A Grown AZZ Man."
Suck it up!
ask for a percent of your...
certs from your brokers imo. what could that hurt exactly?
if/when BCIT starts trading 205's and your holding
105 certs, what? it would be a cert exchange, right? 105 to 205?
in full disclosure, i asked for a percent of my shares early
last month. TM might be working in concert here, who knows? lol
without motion nothing occurs.
jmho-Have a great day all!
heang, sounds like we're good to go. all systems go. thanks
lol those shorts are still
paying these cats to post? they must go to sleep
at night thinking about their short position here lol.
when TM jumps into the ring this time, he'll lay a
knock-out punch (judgement) on their chin. they
won't likes dat. ; )
harbecu, i agree 100%....
I also believe TM will ask for and get the declaratory judgement or a judgement eventually, with all the evidence TM now has? TM could just fold too, but he stands to MAKE BANK
when/if this trades. Fun little drama to break-up the day
for sure lol
Im almost positive that...
those shareholders that were able to buy more shares recently
still hold those shares in their accts.
How those trades cleared the DTC who knows? lol
Maybe Art or Bull can comment on this tomorrow? night all