Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Excellent. Outstanding. Very gÖÖd. Thank you Toanoman.
Scruffer
Of course, no one can definitely answer that.
>> Some think Arris will buy before trial (even possibly w/some funds from Cisco, Cable Companies, etc.)
>> Some think UOIP will license technology & obtain 1-time payment, then continued royalty payments
>> Some think no trial & cable companies will settle
>> Some think a trial (judgment/verdict) necessary for cable companies to be indemnified
>> Some think...Who knows?
Expert testimony is about underway.
Plus, still have ChanBond-Cisco appeal on some claims of 1 patent. Some think this isn't necessary & somewhat irrelevant.
(In the tab, "Parties")
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24339392/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cisco_Systems,_Inc
Basically, included those links to show float and outstanding shares. It just happened one was a 3-parter.
Lastly, it's all JMO. Everyone has their own perspective.
In memoriam of 9/11 (17th anniversary), Scruffer
pk & sf1: How do you calculate %?
Have float ~41%. Carter ~59%.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142155402
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142433239
Thanks, Scruff
Thx. U2. MMGA must awake b4 Ü--Pacer.
Let's see if we can have a green close.
Same OS = 1,614,601,069; 09/01/2018
Well, the transfer agent has the same outstanding share count.
All I know is... My shares are genuine, real, legitimate.
Had called both Schwab & TDAmeritrade many moons back.
Someone must have another broker and/or clearing house.
It appears, that rumor read about, that it is actually TRUE! Unbelievable.
"I always wondered which shareholder was the one being and getting taken".
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
Pink No Information
Delinquent SEC Reporting
Company is not current in its reporting obligations under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Caveat Emptor
Buyer Beware. There is a public interest concern associated with the company.
Transfer Agent Verified
The company’s transfer agent has verified its outstanding shares directly to OTC Markets.
100% Authentic Scruffer
May I suggest, asking this person.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=132949318
Prolong, Belong, Long UOIP.
Okay then. Quiet period. Earnings? LÖL.
Oh, and that would be PATENTS, plural.
Yes, 3 patents used and not compensated.
Once again,
“Secondary considerations” often come later (or secondary) in time, which is the source of their name.
Those who do not know the origin of the name often incorrectly believe “secondary” refers to diminished importance.
The Federal Circuit has made clear that this is not so, stating that they “may often be the most probative and cogent evidence in the record.”
Have a relaxing and fun Labor Day weekend team,
Scruff
UOIP's patent used, but not compensated.
The patent may be secondary b/c unjustly using, clearly infringing and violating the patent owner's rights.
"But the climate is changing."
"It (Secondary) puts the invention in context and provides a broader narrative than what the patent alone conveys. It also can help establish that an invention is not obvious, as the Supreme Court long ago explained that the same facts trumpeting the invention may also support nonobviousness. [Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 (1966).] These facts, which include the invention’s commercial success, satisfying a long felt but unsolved need, and the failure of others where the invention succeeds, often are referred to as “secondary considerations.” “Secondary considerations” often come later (or secondary) in time, which is the source of their name. Those who do not know the origin of the name often incorrectly believe “secondary” refers to diminished importance. [See, e.g., Truswall Sys. Corp. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc., 813 F.2d 1207, 1212 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (“That evidence [of purported commercial success] is ‘secondary’ in time does not mean that it is secondary in importance.”).] The Federal Circuit has made clear that this is not so, stating that they “may often be the most probative and cogent evidence in the record.” [Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1538 (Fed Cir. 1983).]"
https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/time-to-stop-thinking-about-secondary-considerations-as.html
(This refutes posts #52391 and #52387). Thank you.
LONG & STRONG ÜÖIP, Scruffer-Scalia
Just trying to add meaningful contributions.
We're all in this together, that is, the UOIP team, crew, longs, believers.
The big 30 dispute is gonna be cleared-up by Judge Andrews.
The shorts must be feeling the pressure intensifying.
Everyday, we march a little closer to settlement.
Thank you, Scruff
TY ALL. FYI...ARRIS launches Managed Business Networks
https://www.marketwatch.com/press-release/arris-launches-managed-business-networks-2018-08-30
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3387058-arris-launches-managed-networks-solution-set?app=1#email_link
And I hope you're right zw.
Just not sure about this ChanBond-Cisco appeal thing. And what, if any implications on patent(s).
Although, it does appear, more & more, ARRIS (for our benefit) is backed into a corner.
Buying the patents to save their client base, as well as, doing this "Prudent and just thing" is, basically, about their only way out.
And buying back $725M in shares (vs. $400M planned) may be a way to set the stage for an offering (secondary or acquisition).
Also, just don't know what would compel cable companies to settle if must have verdict or ruling for indemnification.
Just another quagmire against/on ARRIS.
Lastly, if anyone else would like to impart their scholarly knowledge of the ChanBond-Cisco appeal, it is not too late.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143279874
Goodnight team, Scruffer-Cap... Hic, hic, hiccup.
TY GM. 1 of x LONGS (so far?)
IMHO, there must be some overhang, something, else stock would be at 0.10 RIGHT NOW.
Another question comes to mind...
>> Do the cable companies have to have a judgment or verdict ruled against them to be indemnified?
Something to consider. Haven't read, nor know the fine print of ARRIS's contractual obligation.
You're a good team player & contributor and I thank you once again,
Scruff
Once again, please comment on Cisco appeal.
>> Some think, PTAB board overturn could be complete killer
>> Some think, trial continuing regardless
>> Some think, won 2 of 3 patents so no biggy
>> Some think, Mishcon, Whitman & Carter are going for complete knock-out blow
>> Some think, even if Cisco wins, only partial victory of claims on patent
>> Some think, meaningless and already won
>> Some think, I'm crazy
Thank you team, ScrufferIvan
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143266004
Cisco appeal mentioned. Please elaborate on thinking (anyone).
I think what would help alleviate some stress is "What know or foresee" with Cisco appeal.
Maybe misinterpreting, but to me this leans toward Cisco not having much success on appeal, even though heard by the USPTO Patent Trials and Appeal Board.
From your deja vu'ish "The zombywolf Report".
...
basically saying that the 822 patent was the heart of the case, and the resolution of the appealed claims was critical to arguing alternative non infringement situations.
"and Chanbond had so much other evidence of infringement, Why are you pressing these 5 claims that is causing this problem in the first place? Whitman stammered on that one- basically saying we just want to do it. Judge kept pressing him on it- Whitman finally relented and said he would discuss it with his client. The other side agreed, if these claims were not being appealed, they were OK with that. But if ChanBond wanted to continue with the appeal, that is their basis for the stay request. (I question the ChanBond strategy for the appeal as well)." ...
>> Anyone's thinking, "feeling", foreseeing, looming with '822 appeal very much welcomed.
Lastly, w/o a doubt, it's not fun watching our UOIP balance cut in half from the high, but if fortunate to have a couple million shares, unable to get out anyway.
https://ih.advfn.com/stock-market/USOTC/unifiedonline-inc-UOIP/historical
Thank you zw & troopers, Scrufferangst
gÖÖd 1.
Bottom has to be nearing.
Even technical traders are gonna make their way back around.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=uoip
And in 1st link, Gilead won appeal.
That is, within post #52269.
From SonamKapoor: She knows her stuff...And very technical too.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142795406
Anyway, never made a new "Settlement/Award/Verdict" link with update.
My point is (was)... This is HUGE in comparison to some of these other cases.
You're most certainly welcome ytse.
Just trying to contribute my meaningful part.
Eyeing buying more.
Copy That.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5178628/chanbond-llc-v-atlantic-broadband-group-llc/?page=3
Lots of sealed and secretive stuff going on.
It's ALL indicative of only good things "In-the-works" to me.
Wow...Thank you. Fortis Fortuna juvat.
https://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=uoip
Worst 0; Win "Share" min 0.75, best dollars.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142789442
If non-disclosure agreement (NDA) reached and/or buyout, then may wake-up with money in account and shares gone.
Carter has controlling interest so whatever he decides, goes. Our shares will be gone and replaced by "Windfall".
Will have to adjust formula with known variables, but to calculate:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142532899
Anyway, I'll be able to calculate the "Total Settlement/Buyout Amount" by the number of shares owned by $ replacement.
No decisions, simple, it's done. I (suffice to say, WE) dream of the day.
JMO, Dreamcatching-Scruff
Goodnight TEAM.
Totally agree. Defense plays their games.
Getting valuations could just be a gambit and delay tactic.
If a third party (CB Capital) was involved, then argued, not privileged or work-product.
IMHO, for what it's worth, obviously, NOTHING MAJOR HAPPENING.
This'll leak worse than The Titanic.
500K shares? What's happening = CDEL boxing.
Other than that, IMHO, not much. Football's beginning soon tho.
Tens of millions will trade, then something's happening.
If xfer brokerage accounts, be sure:
>> UOIP is a stock available to trade with new firm. Just making sure.
Also,
Once the customer account information is properly matched, and the receiving firm decides to accept the account, the delivering firm will take approximately three days to move the assets to the new firm.
The good news is...You no longer have to liquidate your positions.
May want to transfer in one move. When did, filled out a downloadable pdf (paper work) from receiving firm (the new one going to) and they did everything (pulled account from the one leaving). Must mail or fax your paperwork with signature however (if not mistaken).
I'd call customer service and they'll email pdf and/or walk through entire process. They always welcome new business.
http://www.finra.org/investors/highlights/5-things-transfer-brokerage-account
https://finance.zacks.com/transfer-stocks-one-broker-another-3976.html
https://finance.zacks.com/transfer-stock-between-brokerage-accounts-5310.html
Scruff
Thank ¥ÖÜ EB.
Whoa, Whoa, Whoa! Did I miss something?
Love the optimism of the last dozen+ posts, but agree with 003.
Isn't everyone entirely premature and speculating?
More importantly, if any hint of discussions, valuations, etc. underway, the stock would be climbing.
For all we know, the disposition of Wayne Schattenkerk could be when he was CFO of WaveDivision Holdings, LLC.
Please enlighten me otherwise.
Thank you,
Scruffer
P.S. Easy Nellie.
Entire account or only UOIP stock?
And same type of account? (individual brokerage, 401K, Roth IRA, etc.)
Lastly, full-service brokerage or self managed?
As long as no corruption, we should win.
UOIP has the:
>> Patents
>> Carter (familiar with process and not green to "Insider's Influence").
>> Mishcon (very experienced & awesome attorneys).
Kinda but not really. This is that 1 in 10,000 stock.
Newton's Third Law: For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction.
Anything can happen b/c human nature involved, HUGE amounts of money, as well as, "Reach & Connections" which may "Bypass" the law.
Very unfortunate, but it's just how it is, i.e. see the "U.S. Department of Justice" or "The history of the world".
All JMHO,
Scruffer VIII
Yes, I'm sure good news for ChanBond.
No other reason to dispose then.
Good question on if/when learn of disposed info and "What knew & when".
https://www.linkedin.com/in/wayne-schattenkerk-64a8013a
On May 22, 2017 it was announced that Wave was to be acquired by TPG Capital for $2.36 billion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_Broadband
Scruffer-Channel
Something happens every week. Ü
I made this last Tuesday b/c so slow.
It's the public MSOs and relevant stocks.
If starts to plummet, something may be in the works, especially the smaller cap stocks.
https://finance.yahoo.com/quotes/UOIP,ARRS,CMCSA,T,CHTR,CABO,ATUS,CCA.TO,WOW,CSCO/view/v1?bypass=true
It will give "Your Face" something to look at.
Good morning. It was quiet last Tuesday too!
I had never seen so few posts on open market day since informed of stock (mid-June '17) on Tuesday, August 21st.
ONLY 18 accepted posts and I was 3 of them.
They are out there.
And we're off.
LONG & STRONG ÜÖIP,
Scruffer
FYI...Chanbond filed the motion.
Thursday, August 23, 2018
300 motion Stipulation to EXTEND Time Thu 3:27 PM
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Status Report to August 27, 2018 - filed by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
299 discov Notice to Take Deposition Thu 10:59 AM
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Wayne Schattenkerk on August 24, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. filed by ChanBond, LLC.(Brauerman, Stephen)
misc Deficiency re Redacted Documents Thu 11:07 AM
REDACTION NOTICE: In accordance with section G of the Administrative Procedures Governing Filing and Service by Electronic Means, redacted versions of sealed documents shall be filed electronically within 7 days of the filing of the sealed document. The records of this case do not reflect the filing of a redacted version of DI #294 . (nms)
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/9426386/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Atlantic_Broadband_Group,_LLC
This theory of yours, just doesn't hold water.
We're looking at $1.2B minimum or $0.75 per share if settlement.
No telling on a verdict or jury award. BILLIONS & BILLIONS!
The 13 cable companies have WILLFULLY INFRINGED and/or behaved with EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT.
Moreover, the 13 cable companies yearly gross revenues surpassed $183B last period.
I don't understand what you want us to realize. Makes little to no sense.
The MMs short these stocks b/c most are NEVER profitable, have poor management, are highly under-capitalized, lack fiduciary responsibility, periodically dilute shareholders, perform occasional R/S, devoid of demonstrated credibility, authorize outrageous number of shares, etc.
Moreover, the C-level of management lives off and plunders their shareholders.
That's the dirty little secret of the MM's game and SOP.
JMH and experienced O, ScrÜffer
Carter via Rob.
Also, U should know this as a former broker.
Moreover, what else could Rob say but, "Hang in there".
I'm sure his health was his most pressing concern.
And you're the one writing about UOIP:
>> Not being a company
>> Carter can take all money and run
>> No papers
>> Not legitimate
>> Anything possible in pinkie-land
I'm not sure what days you're coming or going.
But clearly, UOIP is a corporation.
Later, Scruff
Oh, I agree La Jolla EB.
jbbb was questioning where the float came from.
I don't think we'll see any increase in float, unless provides as incentive, gift, etc.
Carter will retain 50.1% of all stock. And it's all common.
Of course, JMHO.
Scruffer
With 6B Authorized Shares & Carter's control:
And his 90 to 99% control from Sched 13d, he must've authorized the transfer agent to make shares available.
Where else did they come from?
Of course, the MM's let it bid-up. They made the market.
Everyone was buying (or converting) what they could at the time.
How else does one explain it?
Shares just don't magically appear. Was there a tombstone...Of course not.
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/security
Scruffer
Carter released stock after 90 or 99% control.
Carter must've floated 500M+ shares for noteholders, Deirdre Leane, ChanBond (Rob & inventors: Earl Hennenhoefer, Richard Snyder and Robert Stine), investors, friends, colleagues, debts, etc.
The proceeds from the stock was extremely minimal so believe did more for noteholders. It was a year+ so ago when ~300M shares traded in one day.
Then we had many multiple of tens of millions of shares trading.
I agree with "Double-Aught Dylan":
E. The outstanding shares changed because there were noteholders that converted to common and with this happening daily for sometime the transfer agent didnt update until dilution was finished. Thats when we got the 1.6 number
JMO, Scruff
That's Jennifer Ying. Elizabeth is with Mishcon.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=143108732
She must be excellent & may know some players.
Ms. Long specializes in patent litigation. Prior to joining Mishcon, Ms. Long spent six years as a technical assistant at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Before that she was an appellate attorney at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs where she represented the Secretary of Veterans Affairs before the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Ms. Long was also an associate at the New York office of DLA Piper US LLP where she worked on product liability matters in the pharmaceutical field. She began her legal career as an associate at the New York office of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP where she worked on a variety of patent litigation matters including pharmaceuticals and automotive technology.
Ms. Long attended the University of Rochester, where she earned a B.S. in Chemical Engineering, and graduated from the George Washington University Law School. Ms. Long is admitted to the bar in New York. She is also admitted to practice before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and the United States District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.
Plus, she must be an extremely strong asset & complementary to the team,
Scruff
I believe U. Spoke w Rob twice.
All one had to do was call. He answered the phone directly and told me what he could legally.
Very doubtful will be able to contact Billy. My understanding is, he's a very private person.
Moreover, since Billy is directly involved in day-to-day decisions (sole manager), it's unlikely will be able to make contact.
You'll be screened or go to answering machine. I tried myself.
Good luck and look forward to any possible disclosed findings,
Scruffer
Gr8. Adding link for crew; Elizabeth Long
https://www.mishconnewyork.com/people/elizabeth-long