Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Medify shareholder's pass time: sit and wait.
Favorite game: guessing game.
Level of religion: pray and pray everyday.
Yep, we got enough pilots, now it's time to fly.
The contracts and revenues are the key words.
Everything else is secondary.
Captain, totally agree with you and holding long.
Good morning AND MORE NEWS:
Dear .....,
Thank you for your question.
Very practically, here is what is going to happen to your stocks:
1. Sometime before end of June, MFYS is going to announce the date of the extraordinary shareholders dividend. On that day, every share you own in the company will allow you to own 2 new shares. While still having your 1 share in MFYS, you will own 1 new share in a new company called Medify International Limited and 1 new share of a third company to be announced.
2.Medify International Limited will be listed on the AIM. The name and the stock exchange for the third company have not yet been announced.
3.You will be granted those new shares based upon the number of shares of MFYS you own that day at the closing of the market. The same as would be applied to a dividend payment.
4.The exact date for this extraordinary dividend is not yet public. The management will release it in due time.
5.A direct example: Say you own 80’000 shares of MFYS on the date of the extraordinary dividend. The day after, you own your 80’000 shares of MFYS, you own 80’000 shares of Medify International Limited and you own 80’000 shares of the third company.
6.Tell everyone around you (who might own MFYS shares) about this extraordinary dividend. And don’t forget to tell everyone who is “selling” MFYS stock, that they are committing an error.
Best regards,
Sean Kelly
President
Email sean.kelly@stocktargets.com
Web www.stocktargets.com
36, boulevard Helvétique
1207 Geneva, Switzerland
Mob +41 79 203 7124
Tel +41 22 700 7648
Fax +41 22 700 7362
Skype sean.kelly
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
De : Jonathan Bryant [mailto:jonathanbryant@btconnect.com]
Envoyé : Saturday, May 13, 2006 2:14 PM
À : Sean Kelly
Objet : Fw: Latest news
HI,
As the lead PR man for our operations, can you word a sutibale reply as the positive news of the dividend will be circulated by this shareholder as per the norm.
Speak Monday.
Jonathan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: ...
Sent: 12 May 2006 20:36
To: tbone@medifysolutions.com
Subject: Latest news
Trevor,
please explain why dividing Medify and PPS at this point would be beneficial to shareholders?
Regards,
......
I was buying from Feb.24, 2005, many times told myself to stop, but still adding. My main investment by now.
Go ahead.
As G is my witness I love you all. We have a very nice group of people here even if occasionally we do or say some s..ty staff. We also have one common goal here, so let's be friends. And lets give Medify the benefit of the doubt and wish them GOOD LUCK!
I copied exactly what I got.
NEWS FROM JONATHAN:
Dear,
......
Thanks for the message and sorry for the slight delay in getting back to you.
I have instructed our PR team to contact you direcyly but in the meantime:
We are not splitting the company, we are creating business units so that we
can effectively manage our business in each country where we are operatingw
without financial burden on the company nor the subsidiary.
This move will not split the pps as all shareholders in the parent company,
Medify Solutions Limited (US), will recieve equivalent shares, at no cost, in
the floated subsidiaries. You will recieve formal notification, as will all
share holders, in relation to this for the imminent Medify Interantional
float. This is definitley added value and service to our shareholders with
immediate return.
The above actions will now allow the parent company to actively pursue the
American Market whilst ensuring our exsiting business and contracts are
effectively managed.
This moves will also help our position to move up through the boards, ensuring
sustainability and achieving the objecitves I have set. Revenue, efficiency
and reward in delivery a valued service to the healthcare market. The actioned
plan will simply accelerate the process.
There wil be a series of anouncements concerning the developemnts we have made
as a company and any and all individuals who hold stock in the Medify
Solutions Limietd (US) will be given free stock in the subsidiaries, which I
believe is be good news for all.
The positive moves we have made, and the current position of the company, is
evidenced by the announcement that Ian O'Reilly is joining the team and I
think his CV speaks for itslef.
I am sure when the announcments hit and the float is finalised the plan will
be more clear to all. But I state, this is extremley good news to secure the
future of the company in all areas inclduing corporate activity and the
delivery of success which will positvely inpact on all shares held across the
board.
Please do not hesitate to contact me and I will endeavour to respond as
quickly as possible.
Yours,
Jonathan.
Exceutive Chariman,
Medify Solutins Limited (US)
Dudes, the fastest thing I know is changing in PPS of MFYS.
You look at this and it's 25% down( somebody just sold 100shares)and you are ready to buy on Dips, but than is 25% up already(somebody just bought 100 shares). Than you are thinking about selling as VL does, but it's down again 25% on 100 shares. Some people still manage to make 75K on it.
One thing is for shure: how come company which doesn't issue many PRs have to rush with statement, follow up with corrections,
and it still calls for speculations and many questions???
Sorry for my clumsy English.
Than they would say it, but they just said separate division.
As far as value in int'l I heard about most of countries 1st time today and nothing about contracts or revenues. From the company's history of doing pilots 1st and delaying all the times I don't know how long it may all take.
Dips, Sharks have been overplayed in all 4 games IMHO.
But it is still wide open from now on. So, I still have hope
in both Sharks and Medify.
Distant, I can tell you why it will never happen: there is not
value in Medify of what I know about. Look at PPS which is still probably to high. If int'l division will have a separate entity it won't leave any value for the rest of the company.
This is how I see it.
Just e-mailed to Trevor:
Trevor,
please explain why dividing Medify and PPS at this point would be beneficial to shareholders?
Regards,
If any response I'll let you know.
GOOD NEWS!!!
I just got 4 tickets for this Sunday's Sharks playoff game!!!
GO SHARKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now it's all clear:
they got a guy from Mars to run Medify. We can use any help we can.
Dudes, my point exactly. Medify is getting ready for ...
Olympic games in London.
Capitain, I'm not sure it clarifies everything to me. The more they say the less I understand. This is so sad!
I hate to sound negative, but how come they run out of countries to list so soon? How about Australia or in Africa? There are many sick people in Russia...
Show me the money!!!
Mr. Bryant, for me " the strength of Medify global business" can be "illustrated" only by proven signed contracts and money made.
Interesting point:
Patient records may only be shared locally, say CfH
09 May 2006 Click to see the
9 reader comments below
Detailed electronic patient records will not be accessible outside of the local groups of organisations that created them, in direct contradiction of the government’s vision of records available “wherever and whenever you need them”, it has emerged.
An internal document produced by Connecting for Health reveals that although its proposed consent model would allow clinicians across England access to detailed care records where appropriate, it will not be ‘feasible’ to access detailed records, even from within the same cluster.
A spokesperson for CfH confirmed that the document was correct and said that the summary record provided continuity of care outside local areas. She added: " It has always been the intention that detailed care records will not be accessible outside the local area."
The document, NHS CRS consent/dissent: information sharing rules, aims to clarify how information sharing will work with both the Summary Care Record and Detailed Care Record.
It says that where a detailed care record is held by another legal organisation in the same “instance” records will be available to view. However, where the organisation is in a different “instance” -- either within the same cluster or where the organisation is in a different cluster -- it will not be feasible to view the record.
The paper defines a legal organisation as one recognised in law, such as a GP practice or trust, and an “instance” as “a database and other technologies within one of the five NHS Connecting for Health clusters where information is potentially accessible by users from all the connected local organisations within the cluster.”
It adds: “Each cluster will have one or more separate “instances”. Each instance will connect to the central NHS Connecting for Health Spine but not allow users to access data from other instances.”
The limitations on access appear to be diametrically opposed to the Department of Health’s vision that as well as allowing clinicians instant access to summary information via the spine, the NCRS would allow access to aspects of patients detailed records where necessary from anywhere in England.
This vision is spelt out on Connecting for Health’s website which says: “More in-depth details will be held locally where most care is delivered. This will include detailed personal health information such as records of conditions, medication, operations, tests, X-rays, scans and other results. Links to local information will be available from the summary record.”
Dr Paul Thornton, a GP in Warwickshire who has been campaigning against the NCRS consent model, was sent a copy of the internal CfH document.
He told EHI Primary Care: “The confidentiality concerns remain and now it looks like we no longer have the advantages of the CRS either. Previously we had the treatment with the side effects and now it looks as if we’ll be getting the side effects without the treatment.”
In response to the document Dr Thornton has written a new paper, Paradoxical access, outlining his concerns. In it he says: “Large numbers of patients who live close to the boundaries between clusters will find that their GP in one “cluster” is unable to share a detailed care record even with the patient’s consultant in the local District General Hospital if it is in the adjacent “cluster”.
GPs may even be disconnected from cross boundary district nursing teams. Patients who travel for treatment are likely to be particularly affected. For instance, London and the home counties are served by different “clusters”.
Dr Thornton says that the document confirms CfH’s strategy for recording and sharing information which he claims is “contrary to patient choice and probably unlawful.”
Dr Thornton’s main concern is that patients will not be allowed to opt out of the NCRS altogether and a lack of clarity about how care will be delivered for those who do opt out. The document appears to suggest that consent arrangements for the detailed care record and summary care record will initially be based on an opt-out model. Earlier proposals for CfH suggested that the detailed care record would be accessible only after explicit patient consent.
The CfH spokesperson also confirmed that the same consent model would apply to the summary care record and the detailed care record. She added: "The process will be the same for the summary and detailed records. Patients will be informed of their options to limit access to their patient information through local initiatives and the public information campaign."
Two weeks ago Connecting for Health announced new arrangements for the summary care record with information abridged to just medications and allergies in the first instance in a text-based summary. Further details on how this will work have also now been published in a briefing paper on the CfH website.
A full updated document outlining the clinical development of the NCRS is due to be published in July.
E-Health Insider has invited Connecting for Health to comment on the contents of NHS CRS consent/dissent: information sharing rules.
© 2006 E-HEALTH-MEDIA LTD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
My take:
1. There is no proof of any profit yet.
2. Deviding in two divisions is no news.
3. After mentioning Latin America before with no back up info
that I can remember they now talking about Asia with no
prior info on it.
4. If is any noticeable income coming why not wait after
PPS will pick up?
5. May be just smoke instead of good news.
6. European investors can already invest in Medify and we
all know how eager they are. On the other side not
attending European shows on related business topics
with opportunities at least to make some connections speaks
for itself.
7. Trevor critized me ones for my mistakes in English, but
inability to issue a clear written PR w/o following
corrections is way below any criticism.
Dips, as one Shark's fan to another I just have to admit that you are plain stupid. Have nothing more to say.
Now no news, no dividend, no nothing and no PR.
I see no good news here: 0/1=0/2=0/3=0.
And with no revenues announced yet you know what the splitting will do with PPS. I hope no RS/bs will ever happen.
Dudes, how many times I have to say that you are the best!!!
And it is coming from all my family.
GO SHARKS!!! Playing in 3rd OT!!!
O Lloyd! Thank you for making this another nice trading day again!
He will change his name again to "sellondipsandmakemoney".
Dips, I thought you said good bye to this board? Or do you still "love us"?
Yep, California is The Land of Hockey!
Bravo Lloyd, you read my mind!
Very good job RaetherEnt and very good sign!
I'm with you on this. Best chance for Sharks ever!
And ... GO SHARKS!!!
I have some of INSQ myself. Good luck and see you on other boards.
It should be buyondips who bought it @ .08 with tons of shares.