Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I'm not disagreeing that there is a conduit between MOPN & SA. That's obvious... well, at least to both of us.
I disagree with your term "just some supplier", as it sounds like they will be dealing with some run-of-the-mill company, or even a one-man Bedouin operation who packs up his tent every day.
The term "Commercial Group" is synonymous in that part of the world with "Engineering Services Company", and the majority of the CGs there are conglomerates that come complete with architects, engineers, real estate developers, consulting services, heavy equipment, etc.
They are hardly "just some supplier". That's where I think you are wrong. Fair enough?
DFS, you're confusing me - do you really think that the Saudi company MOPN would be receiving a contract & revenues from is Saudi Aramco?
If so, you need to read the PR again very carefully. The company MOPN would be dealing directly with is the unnamed "commercial powerhouse group".
Sammy may call them "just a supplier", but I think he's wrong.
MOPN would be the supplier to the commercial group, which is most likely a goliath engineering services company with multiple divisions that could easily be listed in the NYSE, if they were an American company.
I'm thinking something along the lines of a Kanoo Commercial Group
Got it. (EOM)
Saudis are not interested in buying out MOPN.
Info on Cassandra Kling:
Quick, get out @ 0.055 while you can! LOL!! JK.
I'm hoping for a "Thelma & Louise" moment where they both drive off a mountain! LOL!!!
I don't know what to make of this stock anymore! They could probably announce a cure for cancer, and the price would go down on expectations of higher R&D costs, and lawsuits.
I hear you, but they also should be excited (maybe even just a little) that a new source of revenue could be added as early as next year.
See, somebody just bought 100 shares at the ask! Was that you? LOL!!!
NEWS: Clear Skies Builds Infrastructure
Date : 11/03/2010 @ 10:24 AM
Clear Skies Solar, Inc. (CSS) (OTCBB:CSKH), a full-service renewable energy provider to commercial, industrial, and agricultural clients, today announced that it has signed an agreement with IEC's CEO Cassandra Kling to expand the infrastructure for Clear Skies" subsidiary Carbon 612 Corporation, the developer of the XTRAX® energy monitoring device.
Cassandra brings to CSS and Carbon 612 a decade of knowledge and experience in the commercialization of clean technologies. She is considered a national expert and pioneer in the alternative energy industry. Cassandra has career focus in creating market opportunities and successful business ventures in the clean energy field. Cassandra's background includes dynamic positions in both the public and private sectors. In Cassandra's position as the Renewable Energy Manager for the State of New Jersey, she created award winning programs and regulatory policy to bolster the renewable energy marketplace in NJ.
Ezra Green, CEO of Clear Skies, said: "We are very pleased to have Ms. Kling join us at CSS and Carbon 612. With Ms Kling's experience and expertise, we can now commercialize XTRAX® that much faster while exploring international markets ahead of our original schedule. The time has come for the incentive markets to be structured on one platform and C612 is designed just for that undertaking. XTRAX® is the backbone of a realistic, low cost comprehensive program structured to monetize and trade renewable energy credits (RECs) along with carbon credits with accuracy. XTRAX® will also be available for other incentive programs including feed-in-tariffs which generally require expensive hardware along with costly monthly charges. We designed our technology for the mass markets and will be expanding into the larger commercial sectors."
Continuing, Mr. Green noted that "CSS and C612, after having XTRAX® pass the important ANSI testing requirements at an independent testing laboratory with a high degree of accuracy, is now focusing on the US market and will be exploring international opportunities for 2011."
In addition, Mr. Green said: "Other markets are available to us such as the oil industry which holds several opportunities for us to capitalize on. Due to the comprehensive low cost advantage of XTRAX®, C612 plans on offering licensing to various other industries that require these operating parameters. XTRAX® was designed to be industry-flexible while maintaining low operating as well as manufacturing costs far below anything that we know of that is available today. Operating on the cellular network, with the potential for satellite spectrums after some further engineering changes, there are few limits that will be placed on our patented technology. With ever expanding low-cost reporting requirements on all continents, XTRAX® has solved the dilemma plaguing developers as well as financiers alike."
About Clear Skies Solar, Inc.
Clear Skies Solar, Inc. (CSS), through its wholly-owned subsidiary, provides full-service renewable energy solutions to commercial, industrial and agricultural clients across the country. CSS was incorporated in 2003 and launched formal operations in 2005. During that time, CSS developed its proprietary systems, obtained licenses and certifications, and acquired technologies that could maximize the impact of its construction expertise in the renewable energy sector. CSS has become one of the premier solar electric installation companies in the country. For more information about CSS, please visit the Company's website at http://www.clearskiessolar.com.
The Clear Skies Solar, Inc. logo is available at http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/prs/?pkgid=7498
CONTACT: Clear Skies Solar, Inc.
Investor Relations Department
IR@ClearSkiesSolar.com
1-877-309-CSKH (2754)
They are probably looking for cheap shares to fill large orders? Let's see if we get some "T"s after the bell. They can't hold inventory, right?
Bought back yesterday's shares... it's okay to move the bid/ask up now. LOL!!!
My volumetric analysis has .10 as the first line of resistance, then the 13-week high @ .15
Speed bump @ .115/.12, then it should be clear sailing to .15
Wall @ .15-.18, it would take a while to churn through that, so my short-term target is .15
So far, it doesn't look like we will get a "BP gap" type of event...
All of the above assumes that people don't decide to hit the exit doors all at once, of course, but everybody in this stock will be sticking around until the final decision by the Saudis is made, right? Right.
Enjoy the day, folks! Don't forget to book some profits this time around.
Out @ 0.084 on daytrade. Thanks for the fish, Charlie! LOL!!! See you guys tomorrow!
Added a few shares... what the hell! (EOM)
Yeah, we covered this subject already, didn't we?
Run a "whois" on his domain, and look at the e-mail contact.
How many legitimate companies of that size issue e-mail addresses to you, unless you are a current employee with them?
(What is "zero", Alex?)
Correct.
Hurry up, though, because he's probably going to delete it now! LOL!!!
Oh... bid stacking, are we? (EOM)
LOL! [knocking on your forehead] Hellooooo... he works at Gibson. Selling MOP to them should be as easy as selling Girl Scout Cookies in your own household full of fat, diabetic siblings.
DFS, did you know that Gibson Energy already has an established facility in Edson, Alberta?
He's alluding to something like Chevron's online Supplier Registration Form:
https://chevronsupplier.aecglobal.com/Supplier/supplier_registration_checklist.aspx
The post was aimed at the board, not you specifically. I just chose yours to reply to, that's all.
Cheers!
Same here. Good night, guys! (EOM)
You can make believe that ExxonMobil is the big oil company, and it still doesn't guarantee you one single order!
Unless you have some type of "preferred vendor" status with a company that size, you are just another 2 kb of data in their vast database.
Here are some of the questions you need to ask yourself:
- Do you think that MOP would be the only sorbent product in ExxonMobil's database? How many competitors are there already in that database?
- When ExxonMobil's next sorbent need arises, who are they going to call first? The company they have a long and established relationship with, or MOPN?
- What is ExxonMobil's impetus to use MOP, as opposed to the product of the established company, who -- although they have an inferior product that costs more than MOP -- spends a lot of time, money, and energy each year catering to ExxonMobil reps' needs to keep the gravy train rolling? (up to and including kickbacks... no, I'm not kidding!)
I have already had a long and painful discussion with some friends who wanted to go "all in" after this PR came out, and I don't feel like going through it again. You guys can hammer it out.
Have a good evening!
Sure, why not? It wouldn't take long to come up with a speculative list of larger companies who could be interested in XTRAX.
If XTRAX works as advertised, C612 shouldn't have a huge problem getting a million. I would like to believe that some larger companies, like a Toshiba, would be interested enough to invest some $ for a piece of ownership prior to going public.
If not, I'm sure they can find some accredited investors to back this. Hopefully, it would be straight equity. We'll see.
From recent filings:
LOL! Did you end up getting all your shares on Friday?
Only 8 weeks left, so we should see a PR (or two?) soon that confirms guidance numbers.
I can tell you exactly when it will come out. The second I pull a buy order thinking I can get it cheaper, it will gap up on news... gua. ran. teed.
LOL! Hey, all I know is that when I visited Bath in March, as I hit the city limits, I could hear the banjo music from "Deliverance" playing!
I pulled over to the side of the road, and stuffed some extra shirts and tube socks in my "netherlands", just in case.
(I heart NH, actually!)
Whoa, whoa... I never said that! I said: "Be careful". TA is hardly an exact science, and all these signals work perfectly... until they don't!
I just want to make sure that people have a complete picture of the weekly chart, and do plenty of homework and retrograde analysis before they throw more money in the pot, that's all.
Lots of buzz regarding the Weekly 200 SMA, I see.
Please take a good look at a weekly chart going back 9 months or so, and note that the Weekly 13/34 EMA and the Weekly 20/50 SMA were both in "golden crosses" at the time that the PPS bounced off the 200.
The dynamics have now changed, and it looks like the Weekly 13/34 EMA - which is a highly reliable signal - has gone into a "death cross" or will next week.
Be careful, folks.
My sincere best wishes to you and yours, Se7eN. Try to get as many opinions as you can, and do plenty of homework, before you go ahead with any procedure.
They don't call what doctors do a "practice" for nothing, you know! Make sure that they are not practicing on you to get it right on the next person.
Stay strong, bro!
Looks like it was a phone call, and I don't need to see a legal transcript of the conversation to figure out that Wayne and Charlie are clueless amateurs. There is no reasonable explanation for them to talk their way out of this 600-ton Israeli oil spill debacle. None. Was it done intentionally? Was it an "honest mistake"?? It no longer matters to me.
They are either incompetent fools, or they liars. There is no third option here, and I don't even care who the "lead clown" is. They use both of their names on their PRs, so they should share the blame equally. If Wayne is not fact-checking what Charlie tells him before putting his name on the PRs, then he's a fool. I don't give a rodent's backside about forward-looking statements or safe harbor provisions.
The last time I spoke to Wayne, I asked him a very simple question - this was after the "vendor status" PR came out. Exactly what type of vendor is MOPN? Is it a run-of-the-mill vendor, or a "preferred vendor", aka "top-tier vendor", "Tier 1 vendor", or whatever term the large company uses?
See, small companies receiving vendor status from Fortune 500 companies isn't as rare as they make it sound. You're just another name in a database with thousand(s) other companies. If you get one small contract per year, you are one of the lucky ones.
But, if you are a "preferred vendor", now that leads to recurring POs, contracts, and revenues. A simple answer is all I asked for, and all I got was another tap dance routine. The PR had been issued, and I didn't ask for the name of the company. There is no NDA signed, so why not give me a straight answer? It was obvious to me. That PR was pure fluff, and all the ones afterwards are even worse.
For example, anybody who believes that those "six salesmen" are putting in a solid 40 hours every week selling MOP, should cut down on their Kool-Aid consumption immediately. Most of those guys run their own successful businesses, so how much spare time can they have to peddle MOP?
If this company does get a long-term contract, it will be solely because of the product, and I will file it under "blind squirrel finds nut".
There are more red flags waving here than a political rally in China. Ignore them at your own peril, Sun. You and your husband are okay because of your overall cost basis; and I sold 90% of my holdings in June & July at a nice profit, so we have nothing to worry about, but some people here are really hurting.
Charlie and Wayne are not going to build statues to "faithful shareholders", and there is absolutely nothing noble about holding this (or any other) stock forever. Each individual should do what's in their best interest, and if they sell all their holdings, I will back them 100%.
Shareholders on iHub have not let this company down. Anybody who believes that is roughly 180 degrees out of phase!
Good luck!