Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
FREE SNIPS- he'll be good
yes jannie, but I'm talking about the effort. Traveling half way across the country at not modest personal expense deserves a little more attention than any long or short that can fax or e-mail. Person to person and hoping that gets some results. How could they possibly answer 1,000's of calls and faxes anyway. Here are 2 or 3 respectable shareholders that just want a few answers to some of the promises made that haven't been kept. I don't think it's too much to ask from anybody.
luvtradin-i'm with you there, but sooner rather than later. That carrot they been dangling is looking rather unappealing. imo
luvtradin-then wtf is in charge? We'll talk to them. See, easy
Steve aught to highly respect that some shareholders took time out of their busy lives, at their own expense, to meet up with him and get some answers. If he truly is a respectable business man, and can appreciate that effort made by total strangers (long shareholders that truly believe in the company), then some answers should be forthcoming from him - if only just out of respect for their efforts.
send Steve a certified letter by a process server who delivers it to him and him only detailing shareholders sentiment and respectfully demanding a shareholders meeting in the very near future - like next week. Explain that if this letter gets no response then other courses of action can and will be looked into. Too much all at once will not help us or SLJB.
Asus-don't cut your own throat, you want us to be sub-penny by your efforts? Cause that's what'll happen and believe me, posts by you will be reported to the SEC and others. I appreciate your intent but not your means
acg-with their ties to cornell i'm glad we don't. good riddance imo
taf-it's the only explanation for a 90% drop within 1/2 hour of trading. Covering. What idiot would sell 9 cent shares, millions of them, for a penny?
Gut says YES
tafsnd-Hedge funds
tafsnd-that's ridiculous. what proof that we're in a shell that has shattered your dreams? what proof? NONE. You shattered your own dreams and I feel sorry for you
send Steve a certified letter by a process server who delivers it to him and him only detailing shareholders sentiment and respectfully demanding a shareholders meeting in the very near future - like next week. Explain that if this letter gets no response then other courses of action can be looked into. Too much all at once will not help us or SLJB.
Hockmir-great post!
yep, good post STATX e/m
one more time binzur: it's my understanding that an acquisition corp only exists for a merger acquisition. after the acqusition the acquisition corp doesn't exist by virtue of 1) it's no longer needed as the acquisition has been completed, it's function served and it defaults as a non-entity, possibly later revived for any new mergers or acquistions. Stop makin it more than it is. It's in default, no longer in use
more binzur bs, never merged and has no proof they didn't. Werent you scoop-the-poop or poop scooper at that other message board?
Anybody think hedge funds are here to bury the company?! Just read some of these idjit posts and you'll see that they probably are, and, if they aren't, we'd be doing their job for them if cooler heads don't prevail.
Hi Allinone, good to hear from you again.
I think a show of force is premature at this point. I agree letting them know our intentions of a shareholder meeting with legal counsel present at some point in the very near future is called for, maybe some time next week letting them know that. But to bring more rain down at this point with Rennie and the SEC is just detrimental to share price and everyone involved. Let them know we aren't kidding around about a taking more drastic legal steps to protect our investment - but keep it between us and them for now. A circus will only sink this and the facts might get buried by emotional demands where the only thing that matters is revenge. Public sentiment has sentenced more than one innocent person to jail. I'm in as deep or deeper than any of you so you should heed my words. Treat them respectfully but make them aware of our intentions and we just might get an agreement on a shareholders meeting in the very near future. That is in the best interest of all here imo.
Airys-letting them know our intent first with a certified letter might be the way to go. If still no response then they leave us no choice but to mobilize. I'm expecting something good tomorrow-no, don't know for sure. just a gut feeling.
Frankie: It's there. Do you have Janice on your ignore list? That might be the problem
There's nothing about Sulja in that doc, like some alluded too. It's a D/Ammerman problem.
Bob, yes, a letter of intent might work wonders in this case. If not, nothing lost except the cost of the certified mail.
If we don't see anything significant by tomorrow, I'm game for anything you guys want to do, Asus, Airys, Honobus. If I can't get there, I'll pitch in funds. Call our own damn shareholders meeting on their front porch.
You're right Airys imo. This reminds me of LFWK days. Despite all the letdowns with LFWK and SLJB they always came through - late, but through. My monies saying they will again.
Bought 100k+ more e/m
Very good post proft.
mlaw-lol, no good deed goes unpunished
prof-any indication that might make you think sooner rather than later? first i've heard anything more than they're done. i thought the translation problems had been gone over. What, is the whole thing in Arabic? thanks for the DD bud
Tuslog: read more of Rockys posts. She was a basher from the gitgo. Never had proof of her claims. Why did you bring this up?
domain-it's copied from your e-mail reply
People see in it what they want to see but I think we might all be missing the point. The reply can be taken more than one way as it stands
Domain I think this needs to be clarified: "The content of the published press release is not true and/or it could be expected, it will materialize in future."
Double-speak? "and/or it could be expected, it will materialize in future". Poor translation but it specifically doesn't state that it is totally not true - or else the sentence would have stopped there at "not true". Anybody else?
Lol Sure Marion-that's the only response I get?
1 more time: Domain: Can you explain this to me: The content of the published press release is not true and/or it could be expected, it will materialize in future.
Double-speak? "and/or it could be expected, it will materialize in future". Poor translation but it specifically doesn't state that it is totally not true - or else the sentence would have stopped there at "not true". Anybody else?
Domain: Can you explain this to me: The content of the published press release is not true and/or it could be expected, it will materialize in future.
Double-speak? "and/or it could be expected, it will materialize in future". Poor translation but it specifically doesn't state that it is totally not true - or else the sentence would have stopped there at "not true". Anybody else?
Great post stockjob, reflects my sentiments to a "T"
Besides, it would let Steve know that a lot of investors hearts are in the right place with this company. An offer of services instead of demanding answers might be a breath of fresh air for our friends in Windsor. Good thought oreo
Oreo-you should, that job might be open and not like we'd hear about the vacancy. Nothing ventured nothing gained