Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
redeyes, please repost just one of your predictions that has ever come true.
i dare you
the company's biggest problems stem from the actions or inactions of its officers. that conclusion is inescapable.
GO OSC!
jake
who is frank verna?
maybe some legal eagle can tell me why shareholders cannot file a civil suit against PV and the suljas and force them to buy back the entire float at .205 (the high during the pump and dump). i believe that type of action is referred to as "specific performance".
i think that most would consider that justice served.
can someone tell me if the 7 sells at the bid today have anything to do with naked short covering?
the only thing PV and the company need protected from is their own misdeeds against shareholders. the public is what the OSC is currently defending. to suggest otherwise is ignorant (at best) and predatory (at worst)
yes i agree. january 8 will be a huge shocker for those who still have blind faith in this company.
dont worry, it should be the last one. imho
i bet he was threatened by the "naked shorts"...
i'd settle for 3 with even a single grain of truth
there you go. nice job, painters
cmon guys. you only have 22 minutes to make that $2.30 buy!!!
in business, you dont get rewarded for "potential" or "pursuing business". you get rewarded for making money.
so far sulja can only seem to demonstrate how they are incapable of doing that, except by illegally dumping unregistered shares.
do you know something the rest of us dont? feel free to be specific.
imho there is no chance at anyone getting money back. even if a shareholder lawsuit is successful, the money is long gone.
it was uncharacteristic because usually his hands are in other people's pockets.
not yet anyway
actually redeyes, if someone has done their DD on a company and comes to the logical conclusion that it is a lousy investment, wouldnt she be doing a service to prospective investors by warning them off? i consider that a very moral position.
that was not a short squeeze. that was a pump and dump with help from BS press releases from the company.
why is it that we have never heard of a real naked short squeeze on the pinkies? i suspect it is because they dont exist. there is no grand conspiracy. the naked short excuse is just a ploy by corrupt CEOS in an effort to bolster their flailing stock price so they can sell a few more shares to suckers. name one pinkie that has had any sort of a short squeeze. i dare you.
i would never report you to the SEC, redeyes.
gross ignorance isnt an offense in the eyes of the law. if it were, you and petar would be sharing a cell for several consecutive life terms
actually, this stock has taken a pounding because it is under investigation for illegal trading by officers in the company and for issuing false press releases. get your facts straight, red.
petar said in his carny blog that the audited pictures would be posted at midnight november 15...
that statement implies you have an information source close to the company. i find that difficult to believe considering no one in the company knows what is going to happen with the OSC.
based on your posts and a lack of verifiable information, I am forced to conclude from the limited information available to me that you have shares to sell. Were you given those shares by the company or did you purchase them?
red, you are missing the point. with no facts to back up your claims, you make the "unjust" attacks valid. you need to refute the negative claims with real information to the contrary or admit you have none.
hi red. thanks for the response.
In order to protect sulja from false and misleading statements, you would have to first identify which statements are false and misleading, then counter their arguments with factual information.
to date i have not seen any actual posts of fact from you. if i have missed them, please feel free to repost them. baseless opinion is an emotion or a "feeling" and has no basis in a logical discussion.
since you have not been able to provide anything but "feelings" i am forced to conclude that you have no logical reason to "support" this "investment".
good morning redski. still eagerly awaiting your response
thanks in advance
red, i would like you to honestly answer an honest question:
What information have you compiled which leads you to believe in this company or its management?
I promise to keep an open mind, but I will politely point out any information or conclusions which I believe to be erroneous.
thanks in advance
yeah but since this is a growth stock, it should be valued at 150,000 times sales, right?
um, ahem...
i hear mcdonalds in ontario are going to start using recycled sljb certs to wrap their big macs with.
unfortunately they are going to use the grease from petar's hair to cook their fries...
hehe. thanks blutarski.
10/31/2007 5:00pm
this fetid steaming load will only hit $1 after a 1 for 10000 reverse split, imho.
would you care to cite your reasons to the contrary?
sand, MGB, whistles, uknow...
thanks for the PMs. i let my "premium membership" lapse because i refuse to pay to be censored. please keep the positive reinforcement coming.
maybe we should start a SLJB comedians board...
the only info he has is forensic analysis of fallen leaves on a big mac wrapper. that tool is proof that the only requirements for getting a job in higher education in north america are a 23rd chromosome and a thesaurus
that 'tard might be more interested if kore was in the fast food industry...
oh of course. what was i thinking?
maybe i should satisfy the pseudointellectual crowd and only use sociology professors from 3rd rate community colleges as the zombie extras...
actually, i think that is crispin glover
yes, but instead of actual posters here, i am going to exercise some creative license and use symbolism to make one of the background shots filled with mindless zombies following a rodent and an arachnid into a "lobotomies-R-us" store in windsor.
the only positive thing i see here is...
petar still owns 54% of the OS through Kore. If DeVries' lawyers can help him dig out of this mess and trade again, or somehow free up the Kore shares to trade again through some paperwork shuffling then Petar has 280 million reasons to pump this turd again. This thing will be dead until those shares are free to trade, however.
As redskies stated, he is "hearing" that the Red Sea deal is "on again". Clearly the rumor mill is starting back up.
Side note: A successful CEO of a publicly traded company once told me to NEVER base an investment decision on what a CEO tells you because they all lie about their company.