Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don't have PM abilities here, but I want to thank you sssneo for your message and prayers and to let you know that we will certainly have you in our prayers as well. We were under the impression that this could only "happen to other people" especially since my wife is only 41, but we were wrong. This has been definitely an eye opener and an education so the only way we've been able to get through is sometimes "one minute at a time". The only thing we can do at this point in time is to put it in God's hands and ask for his strength, love, and guidance and he gives us those things everyday. And for that, we are very grateful.
nuff said about that. GO CGAQ!!!!!!!!
Very stressed out with the wife battling cancer but we're working through it one day at a time.
Thank-you for your concern and any prayers you may have.
Thanks for posting Roberto. It's nice to see you're still amongst the living. Don't be such a stranger, even if it means just saying hi.
Take care.
I don't agree with you but thank you for sharing your opinion. I sincerely hope that you make lots of money on your investment in CGAQ someday.
125,000 @ .013 and not going anywhere anytime soon.
Your continual updates and final evaluation of the experience were greatly appreciated. I'm just struggling to understand why the 2nd winner is being so quiet unless maybe he dumped a bunch of money on the table and is embarrassed to talk about it. I hope his trip was as positive as yours. It sure would be nice to find out.
Other than that, I feel that this is primed for a nice run based on the potential of all the "irons in the fire" that CGAQ currently has. It's too bad that some continue to bring up the "Q" issue. Talk about beating a dead horse! It's unfortunate that it needs to be discussed so often and always by the same people. Of course I guess it does move us up the ladder as far as more posts which should generate more interest in this company which I guess I should be grateful for.
Thanks crookedneck for your response.
I know this has been asked before, but has anyone heard from the last winner of the trip to D. R. It seems as if every time this has been asked it's been ignored. I just can't quite understand why someone who has posted here in the past has chosen not to post any info about his trip to the casino. At this point in time I can only choose to view that as a negative. I certainly appreciate all the effort that is being put into this company to make it a winner and that's why I have so very many shares of it, but that particular item puts a little fear into me. It just don't make any sense.
Can anybody out there make sense of that issue to me????
Thank-you.
This isn't directed at you, guyinmiami, I just don't how to post a message without replying to a previous message.
Just keep the good news coming Roberto. It's greatly appreciated.
I'm sorry I'm not up to par here, but whatever is happening in your life at this time, sssneo, I certainly pray for the best for you and your family. Our family has also been going through serious health issues since the first of the year (specifically my wife)and sometimes life gets to be very confusing and frustrating. It seems that you have many many people in your life including the people on this board that are here for your support. Even if CGAQ went belly up (which it ain't gonna happen), having all these supporters on your side is something that you can always take to the bank. God Bless you and your family.
Thanks Roberto.
One other item, if and when we get into the business of building/assembling our own kiosks along with GGL, are there adequate structures to lease in the DR or are we going to need to construct our own building for manufacturing. And if we do need to build, do you feel that we will have the cash flow/revenues on hand to absorb those costs or will be looking at possibly going into debt at that time.
And again, Thanks much!!
Roberto,
Does this potential government contract involve more than one government at this time?
Thanks for your time. I appreciate all that you share as I'm sure that we all do.
This is strictly my opinion but I believe that we're going to see consolidation here between 23-27, possibly 29 for the next few (2-7) days and then as we get nearer to the anticipated pr, we will begin to see the pps raise to the 36-42 range. If there is a delay in the pr, I believe it will continue to raise or at least level off around 38-43. I think pretty much anyone wanting to make a quick buck jumped out on Friday. There may be a few stragglers on Monday, but I think there are enough longs (investors) to take up that slack. One thing that will help keep the pps stable is the continual updates that we receive from Roberto.
Please be aware that I've never been right in my entire life so don't put much into what I just wrote.
One thing is for certain, if it should get to that 23-25 range, I will be buying more.
By the way, nice find 1Millto1.
Thank you for that very plain and simple explanation of how these market makers work. I struggle trying to understand what people say sometimes but that was to the point and I for one, appreciate that.
just went back in and they gave me back "998,000" to play with again. i think i'll just cash out and go home. too confusing for me.
I went on free play and they started me out with "999,000". I played twice with the max bet of 100 and my balance is now zero. I must be the world's worst gambler or else this still just ain't quite right.
Tuesday,April 5, 2011 @ 6:45 a.m. central time.
Somebody with a bit more computer skills probably doesn't have any problems, but I'm not that guy. I'm sure I'm just missing something or pushing a wrong button, but hopefully they can eventually make it a little more "idiot" friendly. I still like the company and the potential here, but there are just some things that I feel would be better, maybe like a whole lotta revenues!!! That would probably make me forget all about this pretend poker.
Well, after unsuccessfully trying several times last night to get on the roulette, I finally was able to get in tonight. Unfortunately now it tells me I have no money to play with (tried the free play). If they want this to be a hit, they really need to make it more computer friendly for illiterates like me. Some of us dummies like to gamble too.
Is anybody else having trouble getting on to CGAQ site? I was on playing roulette the past 2 nights without a problem and now tonight is toast.
Anybody got an answer?
I jumped in and out of this once last year and kinda forgot about it. Was just cruising through some of my old records the other day and this came up so I decided to check it out again. I couldn't believe it had gotten this low(sp), so I loaded up the boat. This thing has a ton of potential especially when they start running strictly off casino/gambling generated revenues. I've got to agree with some folks on here about the "free trading shares" issue but that should be either slowing down or coming to a complete halt in the not too distant future. Sometimes ya just gotta do what ya gotta do to make ends meet and to expand.
They seem to be on the verge of opening up several different areas of income producing avenues and that should bode well for the company and shareholders alike and also put an end to the "financing with shares". I like the "no debt" thing and also the fairly decent "openness" of the company. Sometimes they're a little vague, but it seems as though they are trying to change that image.
Glad to be here.
Thanks. I figured it out. I needed to install adobe flash. Been playing ever since. I like!!!!
I would sure love to follow along, but every time I try to log on, it tells me that "due to issues with my internet connection, they are unable to deliver....". I followed the directions that were given to cats yesterday, but it just won't work. Is anyone else having that problem? I get to the "play now" button, click on it, and that's the response I get.
Any help would be appreciated.
I guess what I was trying to say is that I'm not fond of 500/1, but it's the lesser of 2 evils at this point.
As I try to understand and take into consideration everyone's point of view on this, the one question in my mind is if an R/S is not approved, what happens then? Whether or not the capital that will be generated from the "after the split" share increase is for the purchase of CMex or some other deal in the works, it seems to me that they are short of cash and are stuck at this time. I liked the idea that Mr. Long brought up of selling assets (discards I presume) to produce capital, but I'm wondering if the number of discards used in his calculations to take us to 100 pps was overstated. There may not be enough there to generate the amount of money needed for Matt's vision of expansion and growth.
So I guess what I'm saying is that if this doesn't happen, I guess we'll just flounder around this .004 range or less until they just fade away cuz they sure aren't going to have any capital to have any growth. As Mr. Long has stated, he seems to feel that there just isn't enough money in the anuity end of this business to give us what we need for expansion.
I'm for this only because it's obvious to me that without working capital they will not be able to expand or have a chance to become cash flow positive and without doing that they are toast. So either I go along with this and take that chance or I don't and watch my investment slowly dwindle down to nothing. Kinda like "Do I want a car accident or do I want cancer?" Either way it ain't pretty.
This is not a direct reply to your post mofnc, but I'm not really familiar with how this works.
I just wanted to say that I read this board daily and am holding a nice batch of shares in CBAI. I wanted to thank all of you for all that you share. It's pretty incredible the amount of knowledge that is gathered here on this board.
So thank-you very much and I hope that all of you have a very Merry Christmas.
I never post here but that was such an excellent post I just had to say great job huggyman!!
Thank-you.
Even though I don't agree, I must say great job on the acronym!!
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that.
You may be correct in all that you say, but there are still only three options available. Buy, sell, or hold. The company has 2 options, make it or not. Your idea of using past history to determine what you do and what the company does in the future is fine, but it is no guarantee as to what will eventually happen.
Look around this country of ours. Do ya think anybody learns from the past?? Great idea, but never seems to work.
I also want Behl to be successful, but the only guarantees I ever seem to get is death and taxes. One's already here and the other's coming. Guaranteed!!
thank you.
you must be really serious about your dd if you spent 40 bucks to find that out. seriously sir, i commend you.
i live in a small town with a population of less than 2500 people. we have 4 banks in this community and i work in one of them. i happen to have 2 sets of customers where the husband and wife's names are the same. and no, not everybody that lives here is named johnson or smith. just what are the chances of that in california??
how can you run his credit report without his ssn??
and i'm assuming that you are absolutely sure that these involve the same dennis fisher that runs behl. you have matched up the ssn's and found that these are one and the same person. of course, california is pretty small. i'm sure there's only one df in that state.
According to the PR's that were released back then it seems that you are correct in the fact that Mr. Fisher's main objective was to pursue the construction of PBR's with the intent of using them for the production of alternative energy. That's why I respect Mr. Fisher's vision as he was able to see that using algae for alternative fuels as a complete or even partial replacement for fossil fuels was and still is 5-10 years away from becoming reality. He understood that since he was still primarily an R&D company, that he would not be able to hold on that long without generating revenue. His system gives him the freedom to switch gears and go after other markets such as the Omega-3's and astaxanthin which, in turn, will generate more immediate, much needed revenues. In the meantime, this will allow him to still continue to pursue the alternative fuel market. Those PR's that you mentioned may still come to fruition, they may just be on the back burner right now. Look at how long it took to get the dvj deal done. I believe it had been mentioned in a PR quite some time ago and now it is becoming a reality.
To me, there's nothing wrong with changing directions as long as your system gives you that option and it moves your company forward in a positive manner to generate cash flow.
It seems to me that is just one more way that Mr. Fisher has proven to me that he cares about this company and it's shareholders.
It's kinda like how ya eat an elephant. One bite at a time. It ain't gonna work if you try to swallow the whole thing at once.
That doesn't mean that people shouldn't have that dream to be able to "change the world", but generally we have to do it one step at a time and that's what I see Mr. Fisher finally understanding.
I've been invested here for over a year and I just don't recall them ever talking about fuel being the primary objective of their business. I do however remember Mr. Fisher stating that he would prefer to go after the "low hanging fruit" and as a startup company in the tail end of R&D, I felt that he was correct to take the quickest and shortest route to revenues and eventually, income. Now I believe when Mr. Goodall came on board there may have been a slight shift from that particular goal based on Mr. Goodall's background and experience, but all in all I feel Mr. Fisher's focus has primarily been directed to the building, selling, maintaining of PBR's and also the production of nutraceuticals and health care products.
Now I agree there have been setbacks and also some change in direction at times, but those types of things happen with a startup company pretty much all the time.
Also, since they are not presently generating any revenues and they need working capital, increases in A/S have taken place. At least they are taking that money and using it to move forward with the company. I am ok with that.
I invested in BEHL because I think they have built a good quality system. I also appreciate Mr. Fisher's drive and focus.
Are there risks? Absolutely. I am willing to take that risk.
I look at where they were 12-14 months ago and where they are today, and there's no doubt in my mind based on BEHL's progress, that i've made a good investment here.
I agree with most of what you're saying here other than the examples that you used regarding Behl and the "lack of demand/potential" of their product ("Unfortunately IBM, Dell, Apple and others don't need any more widgets"). I realize what you stated was hypothetical, but it was written with a negative connotation, which unfortunately, is the case with almost all examples that are posted when making comparisons to BEHL on this forum.
I realize that there is a certain amount of risk in ANY investment that I choose to make, but the continual inference made by some posters here on this board that Mr. Fisher is a crook, the pbr doesn't work, they can NEVER grow what they say they can grow in their system, r/s coming, blah, blah, blah, and the fact that almost ALL of those types of posts are allowed to remain makes me wonder what the intent and the purpose of this site actually is.
You are correct. There is nothing wrong with looking at both sides. To me, there is no difference in "to da moon" and "fisher's a crook". They are both statements that don't belong on this forum. I don't see the "to da moon" crap anymore and I'm just wondering why I'm still seeing the "Fisher's a crook" crap?
You cannot honestly sit there and tell me that this is unbiased and therefore my questions regarding the purpose and intent of this board.
If nothing else, obviously maintaining a certain amount of integrity to this site is of little concern to those that run it.
you go a very good job it my friend. thank-you.
you are one very impressive dude, banyon. i don't know how you do it.
and this is not sarcasm.
i have no idea what the "emerald city" is supposed to mean, but, for example:
"I think that is ridiculous" let's see...if someone came into my office and said that to me would i
A put my walls down and let them keep hammering or
B maybe get a little defensive
"Are you seriously going to make shareholders wait"
very belittling statement. again up go the defenses.
"There is so much talk about Openness and Transparency.
This is not transparency, this is the opposite."
what? is he trying to pick a fight with her????
"Shareholders should not have to wait for the actions of the State of Florida to find out about BEHL. Especially considering the fact that you just held an Open House."
another challenging, in your face type comment.
yes, i think that's rude and disrespectful.
actually, i feel she handled much better than i think i would have.
Please see my post #98921.
yes, i'm sure that personally, she knew about it. but as an employee of biocentric, ms. berry is not allowed to divulge certain information to the general public.
for example, if you worked in a construction company and you were made aware that you were going to be putting up a new building on some vacant property that was cheaply priced, do you think that sharing that information with the general public would maybe get you into some serious trouble?? do you think that may hurt the companies chances for success??
just my opinion folks.