Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
i thought the YOY return was based on a return from a period of time people like me buying at 60 cents per share
Your thoughts?
nonexistent disgorgement doesn't require any evidence? lmao!!!!
got a link for that?
the holes in this case are so big you can drive a p2o fuel truck through them
250,000 in 50 years from now? lmao!!!!
bullshit. domk never even traded at 3.79 per share. the florida sec ultimately cleared the same valuation method jbi used. ding dong the witch is dead. lmao!!!
bullshit. heres thousands of examples of sec cases dropped. they happen all the time in mass numbers:
http://tinyurl.com/7rynggx
http://tinyurl.com/84vqa83
http://tinyurl.com/6ror6ww
http://tinyurl.com/6mrbns5
http://tinyurl.com/7ej7nb9
quote---
Domark’s CEO and “the consultant” stated that the SEC commented on the media credits on Domark’s or Sports Quest’s SEC filings and the valuation of $10 million, which was ultimately cleared with the SEC
interesting how severely the tables have turned when reality comes out but even a blind man could see the reality coming hence my buying at 60 cents per share im already staring at a DOUBLE RETURN on my investment.
http://plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases-master/2012/01/04/jbi-inc-responds-to-sec-lawsuit
90 percent success rate also means 10 percent failure rate. sounds like a pretty shitty failure rate to me considering most other cases are rather cut and dry with the defendant not even fighting it and just settling for whatever. is a 10 percent sec fail rate something good? lmao!!!! i honestly thought it was much higher than that. wow. i wonder what the failure rate for the sec is in cases where their star witness sides with the defendant on another regional office cleared the exact same transaction.
your thoughts?
Sales of diesel or fuel oil to a steel mill
http://apps.leg.wa.gov/wac/default.aspx?cite=458-20-113
bullshit. jbi is the first and only company EVER in north america to get a permit to make liquid fuel from plastic. others doing it for decades? lmao!!! only if you mean in china while spewing toxic gas that is obviously illegal here in ontario. nobody else can do what jbi can do.
please provide for us a link to the control runs done at exxons refineries without a catalyst. surely that information is available online. thank you.
lmao!!!!
since we were told somebody needed to invent a near-diesel engine or there would never be even an ounce of fuel sold they have sold how much fuel to how many fortune 100 companies with plastic we were told would never be free delivered for free by how many fortune 100 companies?
your thoughts?
complete bullshit. one phone call to islechem confirms the total opposite of this nonsense. same results as something else? puleaze. got a link to this fictional competing process that has the same results as the cost? the chinese version makes a cottage cheese oil with 40 percent yield.
makes it rather tough for the case to proceed with jbi merely copying what the sec themselves 'ultimately cleared' - fraud? lmao!!!! stick a fork in it. this case is done!
yeah I'm sure the plan was acquire media credits nobody cares about to get people to invest in turning trash into cash successfully. yeah. That's it. lmao!!!
think a jury would buy that nonsensical theory? me neither.
nonsense. sec correspondence from secs accountants are typical for clarity with ALL companies. there was nothing unusual IR alarming about jbis and the sec was apparently satisfied with all answers and minor corrections while jbi ships rail cars fuel of delicious fuel.
you are referring to a conversation John had with the 'star witness' that under oath sided with john. Interesting.
actually jbi's directors & officers insurance pays. that's what it's there for.
so now not only is the case absolutely dead but the legal defense is insured. why do you think baldwin has the same lawyer. small world? lmao!!! try its paid for by their insurance company.
That's all fine and dandy in theory. where the theory falls apart is when you add that the Florida regional sec disagreed with all that and already approved the valuation method jbi used. Oops!
Since the Florida sec seems to side with jbi, maybe the Boise sec should make the final American idol vote?
what a joke. Jbi, JB, and the environment wins.
the Florida sec office seems to disagree with that theory since they approved of that valuation method. no winder more than 97% of these never see a trial. looks like the crusification of Jbi ended on the eve of good Friday and this baby will be risen from the dead in 3 days
jbi's new investor relations person is a great person to contact with questions. i notice nobody has complained about him. he must be doing a wonderful job. plus hes cute.
im pretty sure we already established that john never forged anything. thats just the usual stock message board fiction.
you got a link proving he didn't get a reward?
what does american banking rules have to do with canada?
and? nowhere in the published link does it make such a claim.
http://luigibenetton.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Technologist_inventor.pdf
only in the unpublished link like i already stated. so i say again -- an unpublished version of the article containing a mistake proves what exactly? the actual published article doesn't say john got an honorary degree from MIT. the only evidence of that is from an rough draft unpublished version that was obviously corrected before publication and now we're parading that around as evidence?
seriously? that's it? that's the smoking gun? lmao!!!
an unpublished version of the article containing a mistake proves what exactly? the actual published article doesn't say john got an honorary degree from MIT. the only evidence of that is from an rough draft unpublished version that was obviously corrected before publication and now we're parading that around as evidence?
seriously? that's it? thats the smoking gun? lmao!!!
boilerplate.
looks like the financial statements were BLESSED by their auditor to such a high degree it is second only to their fuel oil number 6
im thinking there will be one less 'we' when jbi reports 500k or more sales in a single quarter
your thoughts?
yes the auditors BLESSED the financials. going concern is what just about every unprofitable company gets even if they are on the n.y. stock exchange and is boilerplate but you probably knew that.
stretch? lmao! the auditors signed off and said the financials were correct and represented the financial condition of the company. going concern is something all not yet profitable companies get and is meaningless toward their BLESSING of the financials.
as im certain you're aware, that's not the press release which doesn't mention a thing about it as obviously it was meant to be a supporting side note.
that problem is with the auditor and not with jbi. see the sec press release. they dont mention that at all. only message boards mention it. lmao!
yes, as a shareholder i'm tired of the lies. not from the company though. *wink*
he didn't lie to anybody. he told us all what he paid for the media credits when he bought them and nobody cared 3 years ago about them just as nobody cares about them now. nobody invested over media credits and nobody cares about a technicality on how to technically book them on a balance sheet even after he publicly told everybody he paid for them with 1 million shares. lied to us? lmao! this is all straw grasping in the fact of an exploding successful new technology that's a threat.
i hear the 'story' gets cut off for some at 500k fuel sales in a quarter.....
your thoughts?
i prefer getting rich. recall that i bought shares at 60 cents per share. how am i doin so far?
your thoughts?