Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
qlt:
Many cognizant posters have previously said the best is yet to come and they are correct.
qlt:
Nice day?
sputnik:
Is it true the best part of you ran down the sheep's leg?
Sputnik:
I'm sorry but that photo looks like your sister.
nysepick:
Sorry sir, but the only way to go is with matched, his & hers, 7 series Beamers. The 5 series can be used as a tender to get to the 7 series.
Will you allow "it" to wash and wax them?
ROTFLM$$$$AO
Vancop:
One poster's opinion only; somewhere between $6.00 and $8.50 per share by year's end.
obywan:
Together we'll laugh at them.
obywoan:
Two points if I may: First, I do not consider ITKG shares worthless by any stretch of the imagination. If you don't believe then maybe you can say that.
Second, the reason insiders are not selling is the most important thing about the past few weeks of a declining price per share: they're not selling because they're not worried as they know what the future holds.
qlt:
I'm having a ball and anticipate a very bright future for those who believe. For those who don’t believe all I can say is “too bad so sad.”
As far as it is concerned I've been told I can't mention the 7 or 8 aliases it has used to deceive posters on 4 or 5 boards: unfortunately I can't elaborate.
Hang on for the possible ride of the century.
qlt:
In part you said, "What gives you reason for optimism?"
My belief in the products and a few things I've recently heard. I'm also playing with "their" money as my original investment plus a large chunk more is no longer "on paper profits" but is folding money in my pocket, so to speak.
Oh yes, there is the vicarious satisfaction I will receive when I post it’s real name, real address, real email address, and of course it’s cell and home telephone numbers in a half a dozen stock chat room. Please note my last sentence should not be construed as a threat but as an absolute statement of fact.
One should never get mad as it is not good for one’s blood pressure, but getting even is a wonderful thing. Since all the information was gained by legal means, since all of the information was in the public domain, there is no invasion of privacy issues.
Releasing that information now would most likely cause me to lose posting privileges, as it would violate the TOS of several of the chat rooms. I’m not ready to give up that privilege quite yet, but the future is very bright on many levels and that post may come sooner than later.
Now aren’t you sorry you asked?
qlt:
I continue to see the glass as half full rather than half empty: that doesn't translate that I'm overjoyed with the price per share the past few weeks.
Dr. Bill:
I’m not suppose to say this so please don’t read any further, but with all due respect, responding to “it” affords “it” more credibility than “it” is worth or deserves.
I suggest everyone place “it” on ignore and “it” will eventually leave out of “it’s” ego not being satiated.
Thank you for not reading the previous post.
On another matter I find this a most opportune time to purchase additional shares of Integral Technologies, ITKG, at these ridiculously low prices.
I bought more shares today.
2 X 2:
I assure you, and everyone else reading this message, I never, ever considered you one of those trying to save me from myself: you sir are a friend.
To name those I am referring to will give them more credibility than I think they’re worth. As I previously said I can not name those I have on ignore, but I can a guarantee you never have been nor ever will be on my ignore list.
I'm just watching the price per share and waiting for an appropriate point to buy a "few" more shares: I continue to be long ITKG. Doesn’t mean I can’t make a bunch of money along the way: I have and will continue to do so,
2 X 2:
And a report out of The Harvard University Medical School says drinking lots of red wine may help overweight people stave off numerous diseases.
Life must be taken with a grain of salt: each person must decide how large a grain they want to use.
I remain long and I will continue to buy and sell on the ups and downs.
I'm tired of people who claim they're out to help me save myself from myself.
I'm not allowed to tell you I have him/her/it on ignore so please don't read this post.
Are some suggesting since Bill Gates Sr. retired from Preston Gates & Ellis in 1998 the quality of legal representation by PGE attorneys for their clients has diminished; have become sub standard; or no longer meet standards present pre Bill Gates’ retirement?
Taking that line of reasoning one would have to assume the Macy’s Department Stores would have gone out of business after the death of Rowland Hussey Macy (1822-1877) because the quality of service and merchandise deteriorated. Or that the Sears stores that dot this country’s landscape would have had their doors locked after the deaths of Founders Richard Warren Sears and Alvah Curtis Roebuck.
Some are really grasping at straws to justify their positions.
All:
Has this board been infected by a germ who calls himself sputnik? If so might I suggest he be put on ignore as most other iHub posters have already done that.
Have a wonderful day.
nysepick:
Put 'em on ignore! EOM
glt:
Ouch! EOM
glt:
Sputnik has yet to A) predict anything related to Integral Technologies correctly, and B) when asked direct questions refuses to respond.
As far as his last post is concerned, I have not read it will not read as I have "it" on ignore. I’d rather read my first wife’s divorce filings than anything “it” posts.
There is a saying, "even a blind pig occasionally picks up an acorn:" in this case “it” is the proverbial blind pig. (Please note I am not calling "it" a pig.)
Richie
All:
Be quiet shhh it might be listening.
All:
Shh it may hear you!! Has it been posting again?
Great blog article!!!!
ins_101:
An excellent and most relevant question but Integral Technologies has not yet publicly stated who will be their supplier. In a recent Northwest Business Journal (I believe that is the name of the publication) it was suggested the supply facility would be in the Midwest.
This information, if true, is a major piece of the Integral Technology mosaic many of we Loyal Longs have been building piece by piece. It is my opinion there are very few pieces of that mosaic to be found: before what once was a puzzle becomes a reality.
All:
A number of years ago there were several discussions that Plastenna/Electriplast could replace traffic lights, as we know them today. Most local municipalities are feeling fiscal constraints as they try to balance the budgets of their various departments: Police, Fire, School, DPW, etc., etc. Could Integral Technologies help these cities and towns save money?
Rather than having their Highway or Traffic employees constantly changing the bulbs on the many stop lights in their jurisdiction, what if those bulbs were replace by a device made of Electriplast or Plastenna.
Since all the bulbs are white or clear, it is the lenses that are colored red, yellow, and green there would be no need to color the Electriplast or Plastenna. From my understanding Electriplast and/or Plastenna draw far less voltage than a light bulb thus saving the municipalities on their respective electric bill.
Has anyone heard anything further on this concept?
nysepick:
You have to be kidding, aren't you? For you to step aside as the Assistant Moderator would be a travesty of justice: the only honorable solution would be for sputnik to be above board as to his intentions on this venue.
gktignol:
Please don't post that stuff about him or he may begin to think we both like and respect him.
nysepick:
Zero comment required; I said it, and I stand behind it. I too have the poster on ignore and a stench has disappeared.
nysepick:
I’ll probably get in trouble for this post, but what the heck, life is for living, so let me live a bit.
I understand the reason behind your last post and while I commend you for it, you didn’t have to extend your apology to many of us who know the poster you referred to: and no I speak only for myself but am aware of the views of many Loyal Longs regarding the poster in question. GK did what had to be done, and although I can’t speak for GK, I betcha it was not really what he/she wanted to do.
The poster I believe you were referring to has changed his/her screen name at least a half dozen times. Another stock chat-room appears to have removed his/her posting rights under many of those screen names: unfortunately he/she resurfaces with yet another moniker, makes nice and tries to mingle, then reverts back to his/her constant bashing of Integral Technologies.
[b[Simply put, this board is intended to be a place where Integral's Loyal Longs and those interested in learning more can chat about the current and future prospects of this company.
We desire to maintain a professional, courteous and non-defensive atmosphere. The members of this site would like to keep the style of this community upbeat, proactive, educated and mostly functional. Many who post here used to frequent RB, but left because it just became too toxic. If you are a day trader, basher, have a personal "axe to grind" with Integral or enjoy arguments, please frequent RB -- it may be more to your liking.
After reading iHub’s rules of the road it seems obvious to me he/she does not meet the requirements to post here to wit:
1. He/she has acknowledged he/she is not, has not, and never will be a shareholder of ITKG stock so he/she can’t be considered a Loyal Long.
2. The poster has absolutely no desire to learn anything from this Board as he/she continues to bash, denigrate, post old and previously acknowledged facts no longer in play or relevant to Integral Technology’s every time a there is a positive post left. It is obvious he/she is not here to learn.
3. His/her mantra is the same, where are the contracts with major corporate entities or the constant refusal to acknowledge the Travel and Entertainment expenses incurred by Integral Technologies are for a 7-year period, not the current year he/she would have you believe. His/her posts can then be considered toxic, demeaning, contain double entendres, and numerous innuendos he/she have not and/or cannot prove.
Rest assured this post will appear on another chat-room, under his/her current screen name with derogatory comments by him/her aimed at this chat-room and me. His main ally on that other venue is a hate filled old man who owns 400-shares of ITKG and from what I’ve be told is bitter because his original ITKG investment didn’t put him in the same financial category as Warren Buffet and Bill Gates.
I don't see posts #680 & #681 either, but the air is much cleaner.
Like, wow!!!!
2 X 2:
It would be my pleasure sir!!
GK:
I took some very sage advice and put the poster in question on ignore. It was like opening a window and allowing the fresh air back in. I believe if we all did the same, in a relatively short period of time the poster in question would tire of talking to himself and disappear like a bad dream.
Halleluiah, Halleluiah, Halleluiah
All:
Relief is but a clck away: click, the Village Idiot is on ignore.
Wow, I feel like I've purged my body of a nasty cancer named Craig.
Thanks everyone!!!!
All:
Would it surprise anyone that my last post has ended up on Raging Bull and I didn't post it there!
TO: The IHub ITKG Administrators, those who believe in and are shareholders of Integral Technologies, and those whose vision is to have a non confrontational forum to discuss Integral Technologies future.
I highly recommend the Administrators of this thread immediately remove the posting privileges of the poster known as sputnik.
Over the past three or four days this poster has insulted, and antagonized more than one member. His tactics on Raging Bull, under the screen names yart, garagesale, dogmanchild, and God only knows what else, has been divisive at best. He threatens, he lies, he twists the truth, he uses ancient and outdated information, and all of this is sprinkled with his visions of how the world should work.
Yes, I have been in his face constantly, I have asked him more questions than a student gets on their SATs. He has categorically refused to answer any pointed questions aimed at him. His answers have been to put those questioning him on ignore.
This forum has been a delightfully respite from the dog and pony show on Raging Bull and I truly believe if this poster is not removed he’ll attempt to drag it to the Raging Bull level.
I personally don’t need a poster with multiple screen names, and a posting style akin to scratching one’s nails on a blackboard to save me from myself.
I’ll continue opposing his foolishness on Raging Bull, I hope you will shut him down before he blemishes this thread.
Richie
Reality check:
I believe if company A (Integral Technologies) has Non Disclosure Agreements (NDA) with let’s say 30 companies, the agreement prevents both sides from disclosing any information regarding their respective agreements.
To that end, all parties who have signed NDA’s are forbidden from making public any information about their agreements. To that end it is legally impossible for Integral Technologies to name those parties they have the NDA’s with be it Fortune 100 companies or not. To do otherwise would be corporate suicide.
obywan:
From your lips to God's ears!