Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is this same RCCH Hype posted and at the time the web address was unlocked, and it pointed back to RCCH's web site? And then a short time later the web address was lock? Just tring to figure this out.
100 Woodbridge Ctr Dr
Woodbridge, New Jersey 07095-1162
USA
tel: +1 7324042400
IMO
Agree: one thing we all know for sure is the SEC and the DTCC have
all of Genes phone numbers. For sure
In making sure I understand you, a broker tells me that I can not buy
Shares of rcch which is a fact and not an opinion. That same broker
then tells me that i give them a call and sell my shares anytime.
My next question was this: how is it that I can not buy shares of
Rcch because this causes a settlement issue, however I can call them
at anytime and sell my shares? Would this not also cause a settlement
Issue? IMO my last question was this: who then wants to buy my shares?
How can a "Bid" and a "Ask" appear at the same time for stock that no one can purchase? Is this normal? IMO
I will agree with you on one thing; Warren Buffett may be laughing his face off looking at the short position in RCCH and the direction water and china are about to go. IMO
Some serious dealings must be going on behind closed doors. I still think that with the EPA factor, and China set to rule the water industry, Warren Buffett may be our biggest holder. IMO
Does that include the possible 700 fee you have to pay in oder
To place a trade for rcch? IMO
Are the brokers charging 700 if you buy shares, and zero if you sell?
IMO
That is what's strange to me also, I was told by a broker that if I wanted
To sell my shares just give them a call. My next question was this: if
I can't purchase because they won't settle, then if I sold how then could
My shares be able to settle? Hmmm IMO
Its IWS as we know it; EPA approval and all. Are the shorts now saying that Gene would risk stating that IWS is EPA approved while the SEC is visting them about the current on-going investigation? IMO
No need to debate your facts any longer. Its very clear to all what may be going on here. Companies dont waste money to spend 24 hours a day covering a pink stock that is trading at .0001 for no reason. After watching the post over the last few years, I sometimes wonder if we are all in for a big surprise when the SEC gets done and reveal the short in RCCH and who all is involved? There may be some big surprises before this is all over. IMO
wikipedia
Naked short selling, or naked shorting, is the practice of short-selling a financial instrument without first borrowing the security or ensuring that the security can be borrowed, as is conventionally done in a short sale. When the seller does not obtain the shares within the required time frame, the result is known as a "fail to deliver". The transaction generally remains open until the shares are acquired by the seller, or the seller's broker settles the trade.[1] Short selling is used to anticipate a price fall, but exposes the seller to the risk of a price rise. Abusive naked short selling has been illegal in the United States since 2008, as well as some other jurisdictions, as a method of driving down share prices. Failing to deliver shares is legal under certain circumstances, and naked short selling is not per se illegal.[2][3][4] In the United States, naked short selling is covered by various SEC regulations which prohibit the practice.[5] Critics, including Overstock.com's Patrick M. Byrne, have advocated for stricter regulations against naked short selling. In 2005, "Regulation SHO" was enacted, requiring that broker-dealers have grounds to believe that shares will be available for a given stock transaction, and requiring that delivery take place within a limited time period.[3][6] As part of its response to the crisis in the North American markets in 2008, the SEC issued a temporary order restricting short-selling in the shares of 19 financial firms deemed systemically important, by reinforcing the penalties for failing to deliver the shares in time.[7] Effective September 18, 2008, amid claims that aggressive short selling had played a role in the failure of financial giant Lehman Brothers, the SEC extended and expanded the rules to remove exceptions and to cover all companies, including market makers.[8][9]
Some commentators have contended that despite regulations, naked shorting is widespread and that the SEC regulations are poorly enforced. Its critics have contended that the practice is susceptible to abuse, can be damaging to targeted companies struggling to raise capital, and has led to numerous bankruptcies.[5][10] However, other commentators have said that the naked shorting issue is a "devil theory",[11] not a bona fide market issue and a waste of regulatory resources.[12]
Which one of these rcch companies build air planes?
Is that the same james brolin in the movie clip being advertised next
To the ship?
After seeing some of the bold faced lies that I wittnessed a couple of weeks ago, I do not believe anything they put on this board any more One poster stated flat out, that Hype had lied about a post he made when he copied and pasted it. I went to the same site and there it was, a clear as day, the same thing that Hype had posted word for word. wow, IMO
Great Find /
EXECUTIVE PROFILE
Ngai Keong
Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Baida Finance (Group) Co., Ltd.
-- --
BACKGROUND
Ngai Keong is the Founder of Baida Finance (Group) Co., Ltd. and also serves as its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Keong also serves as President of China Division of RCC Holdings Corp. He has 14 years of experience in various agencies in public sector. His experience extended to industry administration, transportation management, economic planning, human resources, and labor relations. Mr. Keong is known as a pioneer of the Public Relation practice in China ... and enjoyed high reputation and extensive network among entrepreneurs, social activities, and experts from investment, commerce, financial, and banking industries.
I do not agree with your statement that a "real" investor would need to see financials before investing in a company. If I recall, this is the type of moment that has made people like warren buffett the people they are today. They do their DD behind the scenes and then wait for the moment of truth. IMO If there really is a China connection we will all know soon enough. IMO
With the EPA connections for RCCH I would not doubt if old Warren Buffett has something up his sleeve;;IMO
Will the shorts say now, that the DTC dont know the difference between Inc. and Corp? IMO
I exspect global buying from china any day now. IMO
No, if they dont cover, most may wait for the departmnt of justice to step in and do what they do in matters like these. Remember, a stern warning was not given for no reason to those who shorted RCCH and many other stocks. IMO
I agree, this sounds like a warning before the next step is taken by the department of justice? IMO
I agree, the longs may need to be careful about not selling too fast. Another short may take place again. Its after that short all may break loose and the real covering begins. IMO
The Crown is very important; if it were not, there would be no need for coverage of a stock trading at .0001 at 2am in the morning. IMO
Then are you stating for a fact, that no one can sell their shares of RCCH for .0001? Its a yes or no answer. Thanks- imo
After seeing the bold faced un truths I have seen over the past 2 week, I am conviced that something good is about to happen to RCCH. This stock has been sitting with a bid for weeks now and anyone can sell anytime they want, and yet some get on the board and state for a fact that this is not true? gezzzz, IMO
While we are talking about buying, can anyone explain why the MM are not letting sells go through for .0001 if this stock is worthless like some on this board are saying? how many tens of millions of buys are stacked up on .0001s waiting to go through? Is there anyway for us to find out? IMO
Great Pic, I think it is Gene Newton too. Maybe he wants to show off some of his staff? IMO
Is there a chance they dont want us to see how many are biding at .0001 for shares? Perhaps its very very high after some of the last findings about the company? IMO
I also went to the link after seeing someone on this board state that you were trying to mislead us by copying and pasting wrong information. It was just amazing to see the out untruth that was stated. "http://www.rccholdings.com !!!" was clearly there for anyone to see as being the website for RCC holdings, INC Woodbridge NJ IMO this is starting to get really odd.
Inc. And Corp. Together at last IMO
What is the project Lakeside is possibly working on? imo
I have a feeling you are not the only one bidding at .0001 / maybe a huge order is sitting on the block? IMO
This is starting to sound like the mother of all reverse mergers coming up soon? IMO
Maybe some news is about to come out with all of the volume today? Hope so. IMO
Maybe its the little green men from Mars, they have refered to as being the culprits of the naked shorts for RCCH? I think Jim Thorp's post this weeek may have at least cleared up the whereabouts of these little green men from Mars and even a location for them. IMO
The China Man is a smart man, he even knows about reverse mergers? IMO
op9171787 Share Tuesday, June 28, 2011 2:26:17 PM
Re: Jimthorpe post# 98709 Post # of 98728
the DTCC works for the BROKERS AND BANKS' FINANCIAL INTERESTS (and themselves). The DTCC WILL KEEP ITS LOCK ON if there is any real threat of massive financial losses by brokers/mm's/banks.
IT IS A CORRUPT SYSTEM.
and the SEC will ALSO do what the DTCC recommends. They have proven that.
------------------------------------------------------------------
OP, from what I have learned watching this board I would have to agree with you, but there is one possible twist in this plot for us to maybe consider? Sometimes shorts can sit on both sides of a stock and then the question becomes this: does the DTCC cast out one MM for another MM? And if all things are equal, and the amount of money to made is clearly to the left of the norm, then what does the DTCC do in this case? Should they forgive one MM and make millions, or forgive the other MM and make billions?
IMO
great post, something to think about.
I got burned on this one years ago. wish the rest of you well, ill wait and watch this from the side lines for a minute. imo