Gartner gave up on GCDx:
https://ecorp.azcc.gov/BusinessSearch/BusinessInfo?entityNumber=21197297

but he still has a few active LLC's in Arizona:
https://ecorp.azcc.gov/EntitySearch/Index

the Aussies might still be trying to sell that patent for CIT:
https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11431

and goodness knows where Wolfie and DC went.

I can't tell if Provista is dead or not... I didn't try very hard though. They've been quiet for a couple of years....

https://www.provistadx.com/press-event

LOL the Aussies made their scam website available to Americans again!

And you can buy something!

http://www.cstamdl.com/?page_id=142

Or maybe I should say: "You can send them money." Doubtful you'd get anything in return.

cstamdl.com is still online if you use a proxy. Updated 2019.

It's still blocked in North America though. And the CSTUSA site is long gone.

the "Visit Our Labs" section is back, still using a couple of pictures from the AMDL days but showing a new picture with Chinese writing on the wall. Says the labs are in Nanjing, China.

Gartner filed his 2017 annual report and reinstated his corporation:

https://ecorp.azcc.gov/BusinessSearch/BusinessInfo?entityNumber=21197297

2018 annual report is overdue but of course nobody cares.

Anyone still here????

Gartner STILL hasn't filed his Annual Report.
http://ecorp.azcc.gov/GoodStanding/CheckStanding?corpId=+21197297

interesting though, QTXB (QuantRx) sold some IP for a million bucks and had a price spike in December. No press release -- just an 8k.

So the $50,000 that Slick Willie "stole" wasn't that big of a deal after all.

Meanwhile, we creep closer to the end of the Statute of Limitations for the Aussies. Dennis C. is getting pretty old, mid-70's I believe -- does he still have game?

Gartner forgot to file the Annual report for his new company:
http://ecorp.azcc.gov/Details/Corp?corpId=%2021197297

it was due on 8/31/2016. his website is still up:
https://www.cancerscreeningco.com/

And he appears to be still looking for funding:
https://startupcompete.co/startup-idea/internet-consumer-goods-life-sciences/cancer-screening-corporation/54679

QuantRx might still be trying to get their $50,000 back but do they really want shares of GCDx?
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=12244750

Every time I see the commercial where you can poop and send it in to get examined, I think of these guys.

Gold,

You were 100% correct about everything regarding this company.

Wolfie and DC are in hiding.

DBrown is trying to sell the CIT patent:
https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11431

but of course CIT is worthless.

The Aussies put up a USA website and were trying to sell DR70 kits for awhile on the internet (at about double the price) but they gave up. Their Hong Kong website still exists -- it's still blocked to North American ISP's but you can still get there using a proxy. They removed all references to AMDL and Tustin and their "USA laboratories" but have given no further updates about anything.

William disappeared for awhile after taking $50,000 from a little biotech in Oregon named QuantRx and neglecting to pay it back.... similar to the way he stiffed Dougie Mac. Recently, William resurfaced with another fishing expedition:

https://startupcompete.co/startup-idea/internet-consumer-goods-life-sciences/cancer-screening-corporation/54679

Here's their new website --
https://www.cancerscreeningco.com/

Cheers!

Hi guys, Thought I would stop by and see what this message board was doing. I still regret not dumpster diving when I stopped by AMDL. I bet that sign from the lobby was in there. Take care and see you next year.

Thanks for that tidbit. Unfortunately, mine are in an IRA with a broker who got tough on pennies, so doing much if anything with them other than wallpaper or a miracle is next to impossible.

Appreciate the feedback! Hope springs eternal.

sunnybank, I assume you know that you can claim the tax loss for RXPC without surrendering the shares. Then, if RXPC ever comes back to life and you sell, you'll have to report your gain as if you paid 0 for the stock. It would be a long-term gain, of course, so the tax rate would only be 15%.

I assume you know this and have already claimed the loss. I only ask because it's a tax law that most of us never have to deal with, since very few stocks delist and disappear -- most companies are ethical enough to file BK and let their shareholders sell the shares back to the broker for par value to take the loss.

You have to claim this kind of loss in the year it happened, which means if you haven't claimed the loss yet you have to file an amended 2014 return, which means you'd then have to file an amended 2015 return and 2016 return... a hassle, but if you paid a penny a share for 10 million shares, that's a nice check you'd get back from the IRS.

I tried to explain this to poor DC back in 2014 but he accused me of trying to get him to surrender his shares to his broker so I could then buy them.... even though this is strictly an IRS process and does not involve the broker in any way. SMH.

All this just goes to prove... build it and they will come. Then screw them, and some remain eternally hopeful. Maybe in 2022 my 10M shares will be worth the penny per I paid for them, lol.

I wonder what dbrown thinks he can get for the CIT patent. It expires soon.

I think he has about as much chance selling that patent as Slick Willie had selling his lung cancer test on the internet. As in, zero chance.

But Slick Willie never intended to sell the test for profit... he was just looking for rubes to hand him money. He found a couple. I think the Aussies are playing that same game, trying to find rubes to hand them money... in 2022 their wishes may come true!

very cool find. . . .

. . . it does prove that the private AMDL, inc is still active, and that the patent is not owned by the voided radient . . . still, this does fit fine in my scenario, with only 4 years left to wait out the lenders . . . Charter didn't take on the liability for the chance to sell kits or CIT . . . a "plan to reorganize" in 2022 is his goal, jmo . . .

I remember the good old days when they claimed the CIT patent was worth tons, yet wrote it off as worthless in SEC filings. Good times lol.

Aussies are trying to sell the CIT patent.

https://www.patentauction.com/patent.php?nb=11431

I wonder if the Radient lenders will find this patent auction and track down Brown and ask him why he is selling the only "asset" of Radient Pharmaceuticals. Looks like dbrown197 is in the USA -- or, pretending to be.

Not that the CIT patent is worth anything anyway -- NuVax hired Chang (the inventor) to work on CIT back in 2011, and after about two weeks NuVax abandoned CIT and licensed Chang's newer technology from the University of Florida.

Nice find, Old Git!

jimtash, the problem isn't "the aussies are gone."

The problem is, Radient is gone.

notice that your link shows the aussies as "2014 and prior." 2014 is when Radient died.

The Aussies own all the IP and they are trying to make a buck off the IP but they aren't doing it as Radient. If the Aussies find a way to make a buck off the IP, RXPC shareholders won't see any of that money.

I think DC is finally accepting this. Wolfie probably realized this in 2014 like the rest of us, but he'll never admit it.

I feel sorry for the people who invested in Global Cancer Diagnostics (GDC). That money appears to have gone up in smoke. William's new corporation looks to be EXACTLY the same as his old corporation.

The only possible reason I can see for killing off the corporation named Global Cancer Diagnostics and starting a new corporation named Cancer Screening Corporation is to rip off the people who invested in Global Cancer Diagnostics. That includes QuantRx, the company that gave William $50,000.

I just hope that anyone thinking about giving money to the company named Cancer Screening Corporation, whether through Startup Compete or through any other path, does enough DD to find Global Cancer Diagnostics and see what happened to the last "Investors."

DC, I can answer your questions. You're welcome.

"1. Is their any facet of Onko-Sure that is still protected, or can anyone use both the technology and the trademark?"

No. Absolutely not.

2. Where does the old +/- 85% Radient ownership coalition fit into any of this, if at all at this point?

There never was an ownership coalition. Wolfie just made that up. Wolfie and his "wolfpack" owned a billion shares themselves -- that is 25% of the stock.

3. What about Uni and the Onko-Sure trademark- Can multiple parties lay claim to it?

Who cares about Trademarks. Trademarks only protect names, not technology. William never used the trademarked names. William made money off DR-70 by forming corporations and taking money from investors, not by selling the test.

4. One thing I have learned, with a company like this you always seem to have more questions than answers.

That is only true if you ignore the obvious answers. The Aussies and William are exactly what we said they were.

As for Wolfie implying that William's new corporation is somehow tied to Australia.... DC, have you realized yet that Wolfie is exactly what we said HE was?

Good stuff. Some never give up I guess.

thanks to jimtash for finding William:

https://startupcompete.co/startup-idea/internet-consumer-goods-life-sciences/cancer-screening-corporation/54679

this is some funny stuff!

A funny little wrinkle about the Aussie websites:

1. Go to usacst.com and you'll see this:

Slick Willie disappeared with the 50k.

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/820608/000165495417003379/qtxb10k_dec312016.htm

Poor DC. Sounds like the Aussie "caretakers" aren't taking very good care of whatever "assets" RXPC shareholders think they still have.

And as for Slick Willie G -- he took $50,000 from QuantRx and folded up his tent. $50,000 was more than he could EVER make selling DR-70. Good luck finding Slick Willie now.

AMDL Diagnostics INC. is no longer protected as a Corporation name.

https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/Ecorp/NameReserv/NameReservation.aspx

you could be right . . . i guess it depends on each individual . . . consult a tax lawyer for the answer . . .

Wouldn't it be reverse split at a ratio way worse than simply taking it as a tax loss? Especially if you figure the long shot that this would happen anyway?

I would talk to my broker and follow the process they give to use those 900k shares as a tax loss applied to any gains you might have. JMHO

hold them until 2022 . . . seriously . . . if the NY plaintiffs do not refile their claims, the stock goes debt free . . . forget DR70, it's off patent and free to use for all . . . but the shell is controlled by Charter, who can round them up, RS, and reissue new shares as a shell company . . . a longshot, but enough of a chance that i wouldn't surrender the shares for a tax loss . . . jmo

I still hold 900 K of this stock

Any suggestion what I can do with them?

Could explain it lol.

This explains the tenacity of Wolfie and DC:

It's called the sunk cost fallacy.

https://youarenotsosmart.com/2011/03/25/the-sunk-cost-fallacy/

Regarding CST's "Rapid Testing:"

http://usacst.com/?page_id=49

This device is a fake. I don't know where they got the picture but there's no WAY they will ever develop any new technology. CST is not spending money on research or development.

And UNI isn't selling enough DR-70 to break even, no matter what wolfie claims. DR-70 is good for research labs but worthless for anything else.

It's 2017. Time to accept the truth. RXPC stock will never be worth anything.

Killjoy

With a new year comes new hope.

OK maybe not.

Dude, Where's my $50,000?

https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/820608/000165495416004542/0001654954-16-004542-index.htm

This is the QuantRx 10Q. the highlights:

Good stuff lol.

I assume that you understand, you understand, that if you understand that you understand, you understand, you understand.

Hey, it made sense to me and wolfie.

We're keeping it alive for entertainment only.

Unless you think we are Angel Investors speaking in codes, signalling each other "it's time to cash in and become millionaires."

Compared to Wolfie, who speaks in tongues.

Not bad if you like entertainment. Stock is long gone.

One of the funnier things I've read in awhile.

why not, when you can RS them 5B:1, and issue 4.999B new shares . . . so says the company charter . . . and we can't dismiss JT's point outright . . . someone owns 5B shares, and did not file the SEC docs . . . an easy oversight for a foreign entity . . . there is no way of knowing if UNI owns shares . . . the UNI sales figures might be lost in translation, but the revenue has nothing to do with the void Radient company . . . it's UNI's money, not RXPCs, and Charter would take anything volunteered based on the expired agreement with McC anyway . . .

Ah yes. But you do when you're the one holding the shares and seeking to take over the shell.

30,000th post, awesome! Congratulations!

a reverse merger into an RXPC shell would be epic only in the respect that it's Homerian fiction.

It's not even that -- it's more comic-book fiction.

If anyone EVER does use the RXPC shell again, current shareholders are going to be scratching their heads wondering what happened to their shares, because the new owners will just render them worthless. You don't reverse merge into a shell that has billions of shares in the hands of pre-existing shareholders.

I just read an opinion that UNI's revenues for 2016 so far have reached 150 million yuan.

That's $21.8 million USD.

That's a pile of wolfpoop, sorry. $21 million worth of DR-70 is ridiculous. There isn't enough HRP left in the world to make ANYWHERE near that much DR-70.

Oh well, the mere thought of it made DC happy. That was a nice Christmas present from Wolfie to his one remaining disciple.

yes, far fatched, yes epic, but the NY judgement has only 4+ years to go, and the CA debts are now clear . . . the voided stock shall be unburdoned by 2021, and the CEO has the right to round up outstanding shares, files, and have another go at it . . . i doubt UNI, but it is possible, and Charter knows the law . . . he controls a 5 bil shell . . . and besides, i wanted to be the 30,000th post . . .

A reverse merger into an RXPC shell would be epic.

i shall draw no conclusions . . . UNI wants to go public . . . UNI sells DR-70 . . . Charter is selling DR-70 . . . the voided RXPC shares are controlled by Charter . . . Charter owns no shares . . . a connection between Charter and UNI, other than they're both in China would go a long way to connect the dots . . .

Mac was specifically named in the Class Action, along with Radient the Company. That alone is reason enough to see the Class Action finished before dumping the company.

Wolfie and DC keep talking about Unipharma, Pharmigene, and Arima. I don't think they realize that they own no stock in those companies. They own RXPC stock and RXPC stock is worthless.

The "patents" that Wolfie hoowls about haven't even been applied for yet by Unipharma. Uni claims they are developing a second generation of DR-70 and they will protect that new formulation with patents, but I doubt that will ever happen -- Radient tried to find a replacement for HRP for years and failed.

Regardless -- anything Uni does won't benefit RXPC shareholders.

Yet the lawsuit was settled beforehand. So why would Mac see to that before dumping the company? Any compensation? Something ain't jiving here. Radient had no assets. And AMDL was a subsidiary.