SIVBQ

SVB Financial Group

USOTC

Add Alert

SIVBQ

SVB Financial Group

USOTC

Add Alert

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Live Updating

Older

LowFloatLopes Free

01/11/24 11:49 AM

Post #881

100% gains in 24h

LowFloatLopes Free

01/10/24 10:50 AM

Post #880

Wow

hando

07/07/23 9:03 PM

Post #879

FRCB Is running on earnings 12th july at 75 pennies

CLK

06/16/23 10:14 AM

Post #878

Re: #877: @Penny chatter - There's no company

With the stock doubling on large volume, why no comments on this board to at least speculate on why?

Penny chatter Free

05/12/23 4:32 PM

Post #877

Re: #874: @Cubanwinner - Expecting at least $100.00 after business is reestablished

There's no company

BottomBounce Free

05/11/23 8:48 AM

Post #876

Re: #873: @SmellMyFinger - Eager for lawsuit's end. Tired of news alerts!

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=171885981 $SIVB

Minitruckin Free

04/26/23 3:48 PM

Post #875

Re: #874: @Cubanwinner - Expecting at least $100.00 after business is reestablished

Yea I am with you

Cubanwinner Free

04/26/23 9:26 AM

Post #874

Expecting at least $100.00 after business is reestablished

SmellMyFinger Free

04/25/23 9:19 AM

Post #873

Eager for lawsuit's end. Tired of news alerts!

Agoura Guy Free

04/23/23 1:08 PM

Post #872

BAGHOLDERS ARE SCREWED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Bearish

Agoura Guy Free

04/20/23 11:58 PM

Post #871

FOOLS TRYING TO RESUSCITATE THIS CORPSE!!!!!!!!

SVB IS ***DEAD***!!!!!!!!!

Bearish

PAUL_MARKOWITZ Free

04/19/23 10:30 PM

Post #870

Re: #869: @Minitruckin - Glad I loaded my bag dollars in bound

What made it run towards close today

Minitruckin Free

04/19/23 5:32 PM

Post #869

Glad I loaded my bag dollars in bound

UpTickMeA$AP Free

04/19/23 3:47 PM

Post #868

Re: #867: @TheFinalCD - $SIVBQ 55-91

Nice little run. Not like .20-1.40, But nice.

TheFinalCD PremiumMember

04/19/23 1:24 PM

Post #867

Re: #861: @UpTickMeA$AP - $SIVBQ and $SBNY are very interesting. I don't

$SIVBQ 55-91

Minitruckin Free

04/18/23 12:05 PM

Post #866

To the moon we go

Minitruckin Free

04/13/23 2:33 PM

Post #865

Going back up

TimeFades

04/10/23 4:18 PM

Post #864

Re: #863: @RAlbert - Once they submit documents for chapter 11, then

Hmmmm

RAlbert

04/10/23 3:48 PM

Post #863

Re: #862: @TimeFades - WhTs the latest here folks ?

Once they submit documents for chapter 11, then rescuers come forward to grab the assets and liquidate shareholders value.??

TimeFades

04/10/23 12:01 PM

Post #862

WhTs the latest here folks ?

UpTickMeA$AP Free

04/10/23 11:44 AM

Post #861

$SIVBQ and $SBNY are very interesting. I don't see any real catalyst for $SIVBQ, to pop it huge again. $SBNY has a hidden Gem, I think on news, with make it rocket up. Both could still churn out huge gains though.

The hidden Gem for $SBNY is it's Blockchain platform, SIGNET. Nobody's really talking about it.

An executive at a mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory firm, who agreed to speak under the condition of anonymity, said Signature’s crypto-related business, including its digital payments platform, Signet, is crucially important to the sector and will be “very valuable” to the right acquirer.

“I suspect that the crypto portion of the business will find a buyer,” they said. “We see this as a crucial test for the industry.”

https://blockworks.co/news/fdic-sells-signature-bank

It's a sleeping giant.

tw0122

04/09/23 8:41 AM

Post #860

100% failure absolutely ZERO buyers for SVB bank assets. Now, what has emerged in the last couple of weeks is that, contrary to what some have argued — which is that SVB should have been bailed out because it was some sort of a “good bank,” that it was investing in the “cutting edge” of American industry and investing in production — in reality what we’ve discovered is that SVB’s banks assets are of much more dubious value. That the federal agency charged with selling and dissolving it cannot find buyers, either for the whole of the bank, or banking assets.

The Financial Times in this story reports that the largest portion of the loan book of Silicon Valley Bank, [which] was $41.3 billion at the end of 2022, consists primarily of so-called “subscription lines” which SVB offered to private equity and venture capital funds.

Such loans are extended basically to tide over a fund between the time it buys a company, or makes an investment, and when the fund receives the money that has been promised — of which of course there are no guarantees.

So such loans are always very low-yielding; they are not even rated. And they are now considered too risky by financial institutions. That’s the bulk of [SVB’s loan book].

And then another part of SVB’s alleged investments amounted to speculation — what we may call “crony lending” — lending on a rolling basis to already rich people and their private funds to enrich them so that they can enrich themselves through dividends and management fees even when they are not making very much money.

And the repayment is postponed [until] the unlikely event that there is a successful IPO. These were the depositors that got bailed out.

So honestly the “all is well” message is definitely not very credible. In fact what we are seeing — and of course we’ve seen that [Jerome] Powell has repeated the message of Yellen — he said the banking system is sound and resilient and deposits are stable and he claimed the crisis has been stemmed by the decisive action of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury

You see that banks have been sliding over the past month and they remain quite low. They are not recovering. The investors are not assured. The public is not assured.

And in this context it’s also very interesting that the Stanford Business School is reporting that the US banking system’s market value of assets is two trillion dollars lower than suggested by their book value.

So this is — and this low level declined — they have dropped by ten percent in the last little while. So this is really quite a serious matter.

Minitruckin Free

04/08/23 10:58 AM

Post #859

Re: #858: @RAlbert - We have 60 days time from when the

High risk high reward

RAlbert

04/08/23 9:54 AM

Post #858

Re: #856: @Minitruckin - We will be back n the 100s soon,

We have 60 days time from when the bankruptcy declared. Hope they find some support to recover.

Agoura Guy Free

04/06/23 9:54 AM

Post #857

Re: #856: @Minitruckin - We will be back n the 100s soon,

FIRST CITIZENS BANK ACQUIRED SVB'S REMAINING ASSETS. SVB IS A BANKRUPT ENTITY WITH NO ASSETS!!!!!!!!!

"100s soon" .... YOU MEAN $0.01

SIVBQ IS A ZOMBIE STOCK SYMBOL TWIRLING IN THE WIND!!!!!!!!!

Bearish

Minitruckin Free

04/06/23 5:49 AM

Post #856

We will be back n the 100s soon, buy n hold

Agoura Guy Free

04/05/23 8:49 PM

Post #855

LOL, NICE TO SEE THIS STINKING POS MADE IT TO THE Q'S!!!!!!!

... ANOTHER STINKY PINKY TO DWELL AT THE BOTTOM FOR ETERNITY!!!!!!!!

ONE SICK CHART!!!!!!!

Bearish

LowFloatLopes Free

04/04/23 1:00 PM

Post #852

Re: #850: @Mojocash - The hype is over!

For a stock that was at .20 less than two weeks ago I wouldn’t say the hype is over .. I would say new traders are coming in and old ones leaving … You can hold me to it, that this will take off again

BeamMeUpScotty Free

04/04/23 12:58 PM

Post #851

Re: #564: @LowFloatLopes - Hey bud it’s been over a year I’d

Hi ya ups and downs as usual but I’m worried.

Looking forward to adding some more later in the week.

Mojocash

04/04/23 12:39 PM

Post #850

Re: #848: @RAlbert - What news? The bank is already declared chapter 11

The hype is over!

RAlbert

04/03/23 11:04 AM

Post #848

Re: #847: @tortiello - NEWS???????

What news? The bank is already declared chapter 11

tortiello

04/03/23 10:36 AM

Post #847

Re: #846: @tortiello - HISTORICAL PARABOLIC MOVE COMING SOON

NEWS???????

tortiello

04/03/23 10:25 AM

Post #846

Re: #845: @Mojocash - Looking Good!!

HISTORICAL PARABOLIC MOVE COMING SOON

Mojocash

04/03/23 10:09 AM

Post #845

Re: #844: @saj - Was scary to hold over...happy now

Looking Good!!

saj

04/03/23 10:07 AM

Post #844

Was scary to hold over...happy now

LowFloatLopes Free

04/03/23 10:04 AM

Post #843

Massive buys today

DEMDOTS

04/03/23 10:01 AM

Post #842

this is fun :o) SVB

LowFloatLopes Free

04/02/23 9:59 PM

Post #840

Re: #838: @hondaboost - It’s Not SEC rules, BUT, the rules of

This is sooo incorrect bud

UpTickMeA$AP Free

04/02/23 3:26 PM

Post #839

Re: #838: @hondaboost - It’s Not SEC rules, BUT, the rules of

That is false. It's more uneducated message board misinformation. It would be wise to research claims, before making them. Institutional investors without doubt play bankruptcies, which are always placed on the OTC, if they continue to trade.

Here is a paper I read when studying the
Behavior of institutional investors who play bankruptcies. It's written by
Elena Precourt and Henry Oppenheimer, and proves your claim incorrect without doubt.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/44657336

Enjoy the read, if you care to educate yourself. I would suggest it.

hondaboost Free

04/02/23 3:08 PM

Post #838

Re: #836: @UpTickMeA$AP - They don't have them listed as a "

It’s Not SEC rules, BUT, the rules of the funds and institutions themselves: they are not allowed to buy OTCBB and Pink sheets stocks, as most of these stocks are garbages and too risky.

The funds and institutions must liquidate a stock when it files bankruptcy, this is Why so huge dumping when the bankruptcy is announced.

“ During bankruptcies”, it’s secured and unsecured equity holders who participate the hearing, NOT institutions.

UpTickMeA$AP Free

04/02/23 9:58 AM

Post #837

Re: #834: @pitacorp - definitely my bad, sorry about that..

You're a good man! Thanks!

UpTickMeA$AP Free

04/02/23 9:40 AM

Post #836

Re: #835: @hondaboost - Those were their previous holdings which they must

They don't have them listed as a " previous holding" from the December update,. Institutions get caught holding shares in bankruptcies, this isn't secret. There is no SEC rule that states they can't hold bankruptcy, or Penny stocks.

Why would a fund "speculate" on what they can't hold? That doesn't even make sense..

During bankruptcies, if you follow them, many times institutions will send representation during proceedings. This is because they hold equity, or other investments.

If you can use links as I have done in previous posts, to show validity. Nothing you state I see as true.

hondaboost Free

04/02/23 7:45 AM

Post #835

Re: #829: @hondaboost - Those were their holdings and they filed a

Those were their previous holdings which they must file(if holdings exceed 5% of O/S). Right now, they might have sold, as all funds/institutions speculate they are Not allowed to hold penny stocks, needless to say bankruptcy stock!

pitacorp

04/02/23 7:37 AM

Post #834

Re: #790: @UpTickMeA$AP - Please try and give correct information. A simple

definitely my bad, sorry about that..

pitacorp

04/02/23 7:37 AM

Post #833

Re: #790: @UpTickMeA$AP - Please try and give correct information. A simple

definitely my bad, sorry about that..

UpTickMeA$AP Free

04/01/23 9:48 AM

Post #831

Re: #829: @hondaboost - Those were their holdings and they filed a

I don't see this as a holding they previously held here.

https://www.nasdaq.com/market-activity/stocks/sivbq/institutional-holdings

Minitruckin Free

04/01/23 9:35 AM

Post #830

Monday we will r3ach the sky

hondaboost Free

04/01/23 12:49 AM

Post #829

Re: #826: @UpTickMeA$AP - That's not how it works. My post is correct.

Those were their holdings and they filed a report. Anybody who holds above 5% of O/S MUST file to the SEC.

UpTickMeA$AP Free

03/31/23 4:18 PM

Post #828

Re: #827: @papadedavid - This amount consists of: (A) 1,263,577 Shares

I can see how you came to your original conclusion. Glad you saw what you needed to, so it can be understood correctly. It's important to see things for what they are.

Gltu

papadedavid Free

03/31/23 4:13 PM

Post #827

Re: #826: @UpTickMeA$AP - That's not how it works. My post is correct.

This amount consists of: (A) 1,263,577 Shares held for the account of ECO; (B) 633,618 Shares held for the account of EMCM; (C) 887,747 Shares held for the account of ESRV; and (D) 2,664,041 Shares held for the account of EWP.

Yep...you're right sir.