Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
eSignatureGuarantee works for US citizens only. I'm asking for someone who's not. And does not have banks that do medallions.
Do you mean eSignatureGuarantee?
My question was about when the medallion can not be obtained to start with, not available at all. Anyone found any other way to finish the procedure without medallion?
Anyone failed to get the medallion, both bank and online, and found a way to get through that issue to continue the procedure without it and get the money?
Check the DocuSign form itself.
LAHO has non-US shareholders and eSignatureGuarantee currently works for US citizens only so some shareholders are still waiting for a solution.
Medallion via esignatureguarantee.com is available for US citizens only. If this is a problem to you, I recommend contacting LAHO and Vstock for a solution.
As per LAHO, you can get a medallion from https://esignatureguarantee.com
No, Vstock does not accept bank notary stamps. Better wait as LAHO is currently working on this issue as they discovered that some shareholders have that problem. However, you better contact LAHO and let them know your situation so they know how common that case is.
As I understand it, it's a warning the some fees could be deducted form your payment before transferring it to you and you have to consider that while taking your decision while to participate or not. So no you do not send money to them.
Very good. Thank you. How much did it cost you? And did you need to stamp only Vstock's form (one paper) or other documents like stock broker statement?
There's a problem with one of the steps which is obtaining the medallion guarantee stamp and I'm trying to find an alternative. Has anyone tried obtaining it from https://esignatureguarantee.com ?
Done but they didn't reply (yet). I'm trying to find a solution from other shareholders' experience.
No, only notary stamp. Is there a solution from Vstock's side?
Anyone found they can not get the medallion guarantee stamp for any reason and found an alternative or solution for that?
Yes required. Check if your bank can provide it.
This is not a bag of potatoes to measure by the kilogram or pound. There are a lot of factors in software development that can affect the final product size up or down like refactoring, code optimization, architecture change, compiler settings, compiler version, changing graphics files number or sizes, ...etc. Different operating systems may need different languages, compilers, and codebase. So the final program can differ form platform to another. The user's business is to use the app not to weigh it by the megabyte.
One of the board admins add this PR and well as all the previous ones to the info box and sticky them.
https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/05/07/2225546/0/en/HUMBL-Announces-Binding-Term-Sheet-to-Acquire-Monster-Creative.html
One of the board admins add this to the info box and sticky it.
If you had a million shares of $HMBL before the 4:1 RS, you should have 250,000 after it, not 10,000.
CDEL has been almost always on the ask for months, always selling, shares never dry up as if they are created from thin air. Most of the time when the ask is almost bought new shares show up to keep resisting going up. For months a lot of investors on different venues have been buying and accumulating and still shares never dryp up on the ask. I can not be sure of the underling reason but naked shorting seems more likely. This can not be normal retail trading, the stock is clearly controlled. However, hopefully the news below is the beginning of eliminating this farce and letting $HMBL price reflect its true value:
"The chairman also plans to express concern about the size and power of market maker Citadel Securities, Robinhood’s largest source of revenue, given that it executes 47% of all retail trades in U.S.-listed equities and options."
https://www.marketwatch.com/amp/story/secs-gensler-hints-at-new-rules-aimed-at-robinhood-citadel-following-gamestop-saga-11620244198
No that's not the reason. Preferred shares would not cause a sudden big drop in price with big volume in the first couple of minutes of market open almost each and every trading day taking the price to a lower level than the day before then fixing it there. Preferred shares would not cause shares to trade just below the ask at 3/4/5 digits to avoid taking out the ask and getting price higher, those are not retail trades who can trader only at 2 digits as far as I know. This farce has been going way before the preferred shares or even the RS were known. Preferred shares have not even been converted and sold. The price has been dropping for months due to manipulation or shorting, this is the reason. The good thing about this is the huge interest in $HMBL that has been resisting this downward pressure admirably for months evident by the sudden rise every now and then each time that pressure is decreased. Without that resistance/interest, that huge pressure was capable of taking the price back to double or even triple zeros. When I play the same scenario in my head taking in the huge buying interest that has been going on for months and removing the huge manipulation/shorting downward pressure, the only price level that seems reasonable to me by now is $20+. I don't think that pressure can go on for long. HUMBL is building up internal pressure as a result to it's ongoing business developments that could one day blow up and take the price to where it really belongs imo.
Who mentioned anything about protection? HUMBL Financial is an investment/trading tool and it goes without saying that it bears risk and is subject to losses. The disclaimers are just stating the known fact. But with such risk comes better expected returns. Whoever wants protection is in the wrong place to start with.
Open the page and search for "walmart".
Exchange, not exchange, reporting, non-reporting, all that is not important. You've already shown that HUMBL has done more than most of the other OTC companies in this area and that it deserves credibility and trust imo, that's what's imporant. Investors here know they are not on the Nasdaq and know what to expect from a similar company and they have got more than they'd hope for imo. Good job, thank you.
It's early to discuss share price now. The price was under heavy attack for months, whether it shorting , manipulation, or both, it wasn't normal trading imo (check my earlier posts about this for more details). Despite that, the price has resisted admirably while falling. If you do a little digging, you'll find that this wasn't about $TSNP/$TSNPD/$HMBL only, the same pattern repeated with other stocks too at the same time in a suspicious way which gives more weight to that theory. If true, then the price is not down because this is it's true worth but because it's been manipulated and there's a gap between the price reflecting the real value and the current share price so the price should be higher to meet the actual value. I'd say that if that pressure didn't exist over the past couple of month, the share price would be around $20 easy.
The good news is that over the past 3 trading days coinciding with the enforcement with the new shorting rule, that downward pressure seems to have ended or reaching an end. Interestingly, that happened with many other stocks at the same time too!
So give it time to see how things develop but if all goes well, the share price likely will be sufficient to satisfy Nasdaq requirements. Also someone posted some DD on Twitter that even with the current share price levels, $HMBL can uplist to Nasdaq if it meets the other requirements. So no, I don't think another RS would be required at all.
And what has end user got to do with that exactly? Seriously, what should that remark lead to? Google Play users are jealous because Apple users have more app size then them?
The end user's business is the app features, security, and stability, and reliability. App size comparison is not their business.
No it is not signification at all. Are you aware we are talking about a 5-days old app? I see it the other way around: There was a sudden surge in downloads among a certain user segment due to anticipation and the more that segment is saturated the more the app returned to it's normal level. Adaption by shareholders is great, they'd be more tolerant to any problems or lack in the application while it's getting mature. They are more willing to provide feedback, feature requests, and bug reports. Feedback may include clarification from the company via promotions and app design to show that improvement and differentiation over other apps. This this is a process that has just started and it will take time to mature. No one forced any user to download or use the app. Anyone who doesn't like it can simply uninstall it and use another one and even leave the whole board and find something better to do.
You are repeating the same thing, it was up, then moved down, then whatever, all not important. You better reread my reply here again because nothing has changed https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163326865
The download rate has fallen off over the 5 days since the app was released? And this is supposed to be an issue? While a high rank shows interest and is a plus for such a new app, a bad rank before 6 months at least is not important because this is the norm for a newly released app. And better count from actual full service operation behind the app, not app release itself.
It goes to wherever it goes, this is not important. The app ranking is a secondary trivial issue, an icing on the cake but not required in itself. In this type of apps, users do not download them because they are ranked high. This is not a game that a player would visit the store to search for the top 5 games and download one of them to play then uninstall after he's finished or bored. It's an app that users entrust with their money and finances and use for a very long time, years. They download it due to conviction based on features, coverage, reliability, advertising, word of mouth, user base, community consensus, market penetration, and many other factors. Then they visit the app store to download it. The app store here is not a starting point, it's an end point. Besides, a true meaningful rank won't be before 6 months to a year after the app features are more complete to reflect the full spectrum of current services and possible future business developments. So if it has a high rank now good. If not, not a disaster.
Wrong. This is a short-sighted answer. Go back and check the history way back than that. Strange trading and unusual movement of this stock has been going since the trips. At times it was hard for such forces to resist the strong upward movement but every time that up movement stopped, the attack on the price resumed. Check the constant daily open higher than the previous close instantly followed by a huge price drop almost each and every trading day open so each daily candle becomes red on the daily chart to scare current and potential investors and tell me where else this happens. Check the order flow and the continuous selling below ask at 3 and 4 digits so the ask keeps standing as a wall against upward movement. As far as I know, retail traders can only sell at double digits but 3/4 digits comes form non-retail traders. This is an attack on $HMBL, plain and simple.
I don't know what the management can do but there must be something that could be done to protect the shareholders from that manipulation.
Brian's interview has got nothing to do with the continuous price drop. The price has been falling way before it and behaving strangely despite positive developments as if they aren't there to start with. It's manipulation and/or shorting, plain and simple.
Check here for more details https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163032749
You know by waiting a week after payment to merchants starts and learn from other consumers' experience.
Let me correct this, this is not all trades, it's a single trade called fintech with supporting services around it to enrich the experience and add more value.
But even if it's multiple trades, and it's not, Facebook tried to be the jack of all trades, individual profiles, groups, marketplaces, reviews, text messaging, voice/video over IP, virtual reality, and has succeeded although it started from HUMBL beginnings. Any specific reason HUMBL can't do the same?
So whichever way you decide to look at it, there's nothing that says they must fail. They have a great vision and execution and so far they have been doing great.
PayPal is doing the same? I checked the link you provided and didn't see ticketing, merchant discovery, reviews, ratings. If you are sure they are there just provide a link. Also I'm expecting that other HUMBL features like NFT, financial/investing, HUMBL studios/shops, and deal days to be integrated in the near future.
Even if PayPal provides all that, and it does not, that wouldn't mean people would totally ignore HUMBL. HUMBL could very likely still work and has a market share. Look around, there are many similar products and services from many different vendors that work side by side. Otherwise, we'd find only one brand in each product or service. But again, when it comes to the above features, HUMBL provides what PayPal doesn't.
Check the answer here https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=163257345
As far as I know, HUMBL Pay users will be able to pay in crypto besides fiat money, transfer money from user to user locally or internationally, the app will provide a whole social experience including finding nearby merchants, reading and writing merchant reviews and ratings, perform contactless payment, booking tickets to events and entering in contactless way. Probably manage their ETX investments and other NFT features too either now or in the future, I'm not sure about those features yet. It's far beyond traditional plain payment processing and money transfer.
HUMBL Pay for Android: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.humbllite
For iOS: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/humbl-pay/id1548843501
or search using "HUMBL Pay".
I think merchants will also pay less payment processing fees with HUMBL.