Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Love the updated footnote in my portfolio saying “Security price is not available” considering some would have you believe “Security is liquidated, bankrupt, worthless, etc.”
Same to you fellow shareholder. Of course I wish this process was quicker but all we can do it sit on our shares. If only there was a dividend for all of us with 2 commas in our quantities!!!
Shareholders are winning the battles and soon the war.
This is correct. He would save $1,500 if single or $3,000 if married. Big savings on that investment.
I bet Sabby wishes they still had their shares, if they were real. That disgorgement should make Cassel’s nervous.
Update your pronouns and due to Canadian law they won’t be able to deny you.
Bill C16. My pronouns are windfall/in waiting. As you two know, you’re obligated to address me as such. So, please introduce yourselves and let’s get this dialogue started. I’ll go first, I’m a shareholder in BIOAQ and I’m looking forward to the share purchase and full reviews of the NDA’s.
How many do you need? I’ll tier price it so the more you pay the more I’ll surrender. $2,200 gets you 100, $5,800 gets you 200, $10,800 gets you 300. If you can’t figure the amount for what you need let me know and I’ll walk you through it. I would encourage you to swing big the first time because I’m not sure there will be a second offer. What’s it worth to have your life back? No matter how much you’re fixin to lose, remember, just because you made a bad decision doesn’t mean you’re worthless. Bankrupt only defines a person financially, I assume you have some intangibles still to offer your family. There’s a lifetime in front of you to course correct horrible decisions of the past.
Quid pro quo:
Show us your shares.
Not many Gypsy film aficionados here. Guess this is a collection of bag holders of which I am as well.
Typical shareholder mentality. Asking someone trapped in a Cassel if she wants to stay in an AirBnB! What a knucklehead.
Just had a look see and my shares are still there in 2024. Kept there by my broker and at no cost to me. Guess I’ll let them stay there so it’s no cost to me.
That’s a riot. When I get home if the wife has extras I’ll drop one in the mail too. Well played!
Woah, Kemo Sabe!!!!
It’s a bit disingenuous of you to routinely exclude 09072Q106 from your talking points. None of our accounts show 4612067 BUT they do all show the CUSIP. You know that, and your dedication to being cryptically semantic is truly impressive.
Morning shareholders. Another week of brokerage holding those share safe and sound at no cost to me.
As it pertains to 09072Q106 or as some semantically refer to it as Delaware 4612067…
In the realm of speculative investment forums, an intriguing figure emerges—a stock short seller who has devoted an unparalleled five years to dissecting the intricacies of a particular stock. This profile seeks to unravel the enigma surrounding this relentless poster, probing not only the motivations propelling their tireless engagement but also the underlying objectives that drive their unwavering commitment.
Understanding Motivation:
At the heart of this speculative analysis lies the assumption that the subject is ensnared in an intricate short position, desperately yearning for shares to cover. The motivations underlying such a scenario are multifaceted and warrant a nuanced examination. Is the individual driven by financial exigency, caught in the unforgiving clutches of a market that has turned against them? Or is it a tenacious belief in the imminent decline of the stock, compelling them to persevere despite mounting challenges?
One cannot disregard the psychological dimensions that accompany prolonged involvement in a speculative endeavor. Could this individual be grappling with cognitive biases, clinging to the hope that the stock will eventually bow to their predictions, regardless of the prevailing market sentiments? A thorough analysis must delve into the psyche of the short seller, exploring the psychological nuances that shape their unwavering commitment.
Examining Possible PwC Affiliation:
A secondary assumption surfaces—the possibility that the relentless forum poster has been strategically positioned by a reputable entity, such as PricewaterhouseCoopers (PWC). This hypothetical affiliation raises questions about the intentions behind such an orchestrated effort. Has PWC, as an overseer of “liquidation” and “subsequent transactions,” strategically deployed this individual to influence shareholders? If so, what strategic imperatives underpin such a calculated move?
To elucidate this assumption, one must explore the intricate dynamics of corporate transactions, evaluating the potential cost-saving motives that might drive a third party to intervene in the market. Does the engagement of this forum poster align with a broader strategy to coerce shareholders into relinquishing their positions, thereby facilitating a more economically viable transaction for the acquiring party?
Conclusion:
To authentically profile this stock short seller, one must navigate the labyrinth of motivations and objectives that characterize their conspicuous presence on the speculative forum. This scholarly inquiry into the psyche of the subject, coupled with a discerning exploration of the potential affiliations with corporate entities, aims to unravel the complex tapestry woven by an individual whose online presence transcends mere speculation, embodying an intricate interplay of financial motives and strategic objectives.
Fellow shareholders - please enjoy this preview to an upcoming post with respect to shareholders and naysayers.
Scenario 1:
Shareholders who frequent this forum have done their DD, have a sunk cost as of now, and are only inspired to continue holding due to the volume of naysaying.
Naysayers are trying to shake free some shares by berating the FKA and shareholders alike. When Great-Grandma Smith and Policeman Jones passed away their estates saw holdings with no value attached and had them removed from their accounts but that didn’t add up to the target number needed. They still need more and in a sign of tremendous dedication, continue to hash it out with the same group who vowed to not relinquish their shares - day in and day out of course.
Scenario 2:
Shareholders who frequent this forum have done their DD, have a sunk cost as of now, and are only inspired to continue holding due to the volume of naysaying.
Naysayers are trying to shake free some shares by berating the FKA and shareholders alike. Only in this scenario the shares aren’t to materially improve the situation they are personally in. Rather, they are contracted by another entity to be ever-present and to present as omnipotent. There would be 2 primary shareholder targets in this scenario - I doubt those will be successful endeavors. In the face of failing their primary targets they take aim at all others. Anything they can shake free will save the 3rd party, who must be most unhappy on their ROI.
At any rate, day in and day out, one group says we will not relinquish, and the other says there’s no value in the CUSIP (to be fair they try to avoid that semantically) so we are dumb for holding.
Only time will tell and as always I’m sure thrilled to be a shareholder.
Anyone know what happened with ByronBucklesFL and Trader59 Tennessee who were so important to the editing of the BioAmber wiki page?
Come on! Bearer of bad news over here.
You mean to tell me that the evidence I have both Grok and GPT working up indicating that the shares are worth $44 isn’t going to be sufficient for my broker to add a few commas to my account value???? All the pushpins on my cork-board with red string running in every which way was all for naught?
As if that wasn’t bad enough, what are you going to say next? Something like when the shares have a value assigned those who are without them will need to buy them at the assigned value?
What a Grinch.
Good morning,
A little double-pane soundproof glass would go a long way around here. I hope all shareholders will have that discretionary spend at their disposal when the time comes.
Afternoon Koan,
As a shareholder I can do some pretty simple math and figure out what my shares are worth at various pps. From here I can subtract my cost basis and again, fairly simply, end up with what my gain can be. My math maths, as they say, partly because it’s so simple. Like others I am currently the owner of shares and a negative return on them.
I have a vested interest in following this saga because the equation n(shares) x y(pps) = $(profit). For clarity, I use $ because I was fortunate to back trucks up when shares were mere Pennies so I’m assuming a higher value resulting from the balance of the transaction.
What do you suppose the vested interest equation is for all of our non-shareholder colleagues?
It can’t be as simple as n x y =$ because they lack the n input for that equation.
I have a fun book about math equations, principles and theories. I’ll skim the appendix this evening to see if there is a theorem with respect to (borrowed). Pending the result of that search I may work on an equation that considers the hourly rate of a paralegal as well as a competent lawyer. Finding even the average of the two x 16 hours a day x 1825 days = a staggering amount of resources that certainly can’t be for no material gain.
Take good care and enjoy your evening fellow shareholder.
Mine are still there, too. Surprised we still hear so much about them given that no one has spoke up to say they were convinced to dispose of them.
Show me the Verde! A big thanks to my broker for holding these shares for another week at no cost to me.
Law of diminishing returns should mean these are the paralegals at Cassel’s at this point.
Some Chinese proverb like:
He who over exerts himself produces only shame and undesired results. He who lets nature take its course delights in the destination.
Admittedly, far too much lining up showing there’s more to this than has transpired, but the ever present do-gooders solidified my maintaining my holdings.
I can’t say that rings any bells. What I like about Schwab is when I call the guy says “this is xxx in Omaha.” It makes me chuckle every time so I may call today just to thank them for not only holding them for me but also being sure to transfer them from TDA what that merger happened recently.
Another month gone by where my brokerage held my shares at no monetary or mental capital required. Guess I’ll just leave them where they are and be glad I have shares. Like so many, I of course wish I had more…or any for some.
You are aware the person attempting to match wits with you lists ‘IAM Patent 1000: The World’s Leading Patent Professionals’ as a career achievement, aren’t you? Since it’s safe to assume he was aware this was granted I’d like to extend appreciation from all shareholders who weren’t aware of this. Thank you, good Sir.
Morning fellow shareholder,
Man, I had a great 6 day weekend. Once the balance of this transaction closes I suspect I’ll be taking a few more 6 day weekends for the rest of my life. I really appreciate my brokerage holding onto my shares at no cost to me. Bated breath in celebration and not fear is a wonderful art to master. Have a great week fellow shareholders.
May the path of least resistance lead shareholders to reap rewards, as forecasted. Your shares are safe and sound in your brokerage and you don’t have to use any resources to keep it that way. Go Blue.
The path of least resistance is to check in here from time to time and let the brokerage hold onto my shares. It costs me $0 or energy for my brokerage to keep them. It would actually cost me time and energy to dispose of them. I suspect those of us who make up the vast majority of shares held by very few people will also choose the path of least resistance. Would have been nice to hear there would be some happiness from non-shareholders in the event we do get paid. To date we are out 100%. In any event, owning more than most insiders is a done deal and it will stay that way until they are removed from the accounts of all shareholders.
Psychologically speaking:
There has been a consistent discourse here for half a decade. There are us shareholders and then those with no shares but a persistent interest in the psychology of us holders reaching acceptance. So I ask this, after all these years do any of the crew seeking to bear witness to our acceptance have any feeling of hope that shareholders will prevail and receive redemption? Or do you wish we have indeed lost it all? The youngsters would say that ‘haters’ exist but I’m optimistic those who have chosen to spar with us don’t see themselves simply as stalwarts of righteousness.
Very thankful to have more shares than most insiders. My Turkey is stuffed and life has provided much more to be extra grateful for today. Happy Thanksgiving to all shareholders.
Something drastic will need to change. Even with the consistent group of a few carrying on about how massive this deal will be they seem to be only spending about $15 a day buying more shares. Those who want out will need to be absorbed by a factor of 10. Break even as the goal and dirt cheap pps means massive sustained volume will be needed.
Enjoyable experience only for shareholders.
Imagine each share in your account was in paper form, one sheet per share. The average printer ream has 500 sheets and is 2” thick. Divide your total shares by 500 to figure out how many boxes, or pallets, you would need to hold them. We all know there would be a failure to deliver if possession was requested in this fashion. Before you let that dream die think of each sheet as $1, $5, $10 or even $20 bills. As far as the 1 for 1 I’ll let your imagine guide you. Don’t go borrowing anything you can’t pay back yet because that could have catastrophic consequences. Enjoy your shares while we await the liquidity event in this transaction.
Fireball must have said something taboo. We are in the realm of personal insults being commonplace so what sort of statement could result in causing the app to crash when the post is trying to open?
Continuity of business is so, so important.
Hope all shareholders have a wonderful weekend. Can’t imagine not owning shares. Really can’t imagine how I’d be feeling if I borrowed some!
It’s got to be a boiler room, right? 8 hour shift work. Can’t leave until the person relieving you arrives and debriefs - continuity of business is remarkably important, of course. Regurgitate scripted statements and masquerade as far more accomplished than reality would support.
I would be so disappointed if I only had 60,000 shares of 09072Q06. I guess that’s way too many for some and the amount some of us might find under a couch cushion.