Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
IMO, might be worth a look if you have access to view PBS...about 1/2 through the series, hope you can access the earlier ones, too!
A Brief History of the Future
A Brief History of the Future is a unique six-part documentary series about our futures and how we can reimagine them. Hosted by renowned futurist Ari Wallach, the show invites viewers on a journey around the world that is filled with discovery, hope, and possibility about where we find ourselves today and what could come next.
Also, Tell Me More with Kelly Corrigan
Kelly speaks with Dr. Francis Collins, former director of the National Institutes of Health, who oversaw the prominent Human Genome Project. Dr. Collins shares how genetics are most often misunderstood, his concern about the impacts of social media on adolescents, and what scientists know makes a lasting difference when it comes to our well-being.
I am really enjoying the exposure to these subjects covered and hope you will too!
I just wanted to present these as a change of pace from a lot of what goes on here.
Well that was quite an election to watch out for in 996 years, and glad to know you have very reliable sources and data that are quite believable as horseshit! Maybe you could try getting AI to write something at all credible for you? You are truly and "bigly" DAF!
And to wash it down... How about this? I think I know the answer...
I agree, but since you've been on both sides of sentiment, I think it's more like the head swinging dick, lol...
I voted BLT all the way, but I admit to never turning down my daughter's Smashburgers when we visit...it was fun!
If you are implying some revelatory new understanding of wherever KBLB is now vs. then, just say so and lay it on us. I read it then and now and nothing pops into my brain that excites the neurons. That will happen when commercial production and deliveries result in significant recurring revenues from well known customers. Until then, YAWN...
That's just good clean fun...nice for a change of pace! Puntastic find!
Fly Boeing!
No, you are full of shit...get over that you ignorant imbecile...
Wrong, wrong, wrong! Why are you disregarding excess death statistical analysis as applied to Covid? A starter for you... https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2024/new-analysis-reveals-many-excess-deaths-attributed-to-natural-causes-are-actually-uncounted-covid-19-deaths/ ...What you'll find is the 1.2 million US deaths is likely quite an under-count. Not that hard to find if you make even a little effort. So there's that.
I like Joe too....More as a grandfather now, lol.....So if I want to just fall in line, I might do as you say I left the entire article....
Please finish your thought if you have a understandable point to make.
Many of our discussions are a little deeper than just rhetoric and pats on the back......Ive been talking with some of these people for years......Agree with them on many issues.....Know they are wrong about many to now.....
Yes, otherwise, they are not discussions. as I said, oh arbiter of truth. Sounds conceited and overly self-assured to me, only you can know as Trump can. Familiarity breeds contempt.
So unless you want to make the discussion a bit deeper, Ill add more to the over 1100 posts in my mail box that aren't read by the first 8 words alone....
You certainly know how to muddy the waters with your lack of clarity.
Not that I don't think you shouldn't express yourself, others will read it.....But I think too many have fallen in line on both sides and that's one of the biggest problems we face.........
My goodness, I need those clicks so I can sleep tonight. Yes, heaven forbid we have conviction in our opinions and beliefs.
Snide condescension is generally unbecoming.
For one, why not use some of the info in the Carville NPR post you just made.
“He’s a tenacious guy that’s had a real life. He’s a state school guy. He doesn’t have an iota of elitism. He doesn’t even know what ‘woke’ is. He’s been demonstrably the best president that Black America’s ever had, Clinton and Obama included,” he said. “You look at incomes, employment, poverty rates, access to health care. It’s not where whites are, but it’s closer than it’s ever been.”
You said..."And nothing dems have done will lead them to think things wont continue, just keep the status quo and slot of people are now sick of the status quo or there wouldn't be a trump in America of all places...... "
Dems don't want things to continue as before, where have you been? Attempts at mitigating income inequality are being made via jobs creation and re-distribution, taxation, etc. And just who is standing in the way? Performance minded Rs in Congress, okay? Maybe the few Independents will bail us out?
You seem to be on your ongoing bent of being an equal opportunity offender by phrasing things as you do...proving Shinola...you and Dems dirty words in your mind; not sure where you fall at all. Oh, just the truth enabler?
Chester is right about many things he says in the article, especially the take on Biden and who he is and what he is about. Give or take the headline colloquialism is just his Cajun cracklin' coming out of his character, nothing nefarious or ill intended there.
It seems that overt pretzel twisting, deflection, re-direction and ad-nauseam repetition does not engender or reciprocate positive and beneficial discourse. If that is what you think you are attempting to engage in, you seem to reliably lead with a poke in the eye on the way in, during and after. Rail about many on the left, then many on the right, draw ill conceived equivalences and infer that leaves you as the preferred arbiter emcee of the central and just truth and wisdom. Say it ain't so, but that is more than the central perception I get, not to mention being often unable to easily discern where any article linked content and your tweaked analysis and commentary begin and end, leading to often misconstrued intent and content.
You know this channel has the right to control participatory content, as do most on the site. Redirect your antagonistic intent to No One Is Banned or something similar where you can pursue your endeavors as the chief grass burr under the horse blanket to your heart's desire. I don't think this is the place to walk around with the shit chip on your shoulder constantly. Participate, don't overpopulate. You do need help in this regard; see last couple of hours. Take a break or enjoy the incoming, lol. You seem to be enjoying the stimulation, though.
Just my take, you obviously do you.
Geez - clearly presented factual examples of fraud! I don't care about nor can I fix your lack of understanding of the factual presentation, nor will I deconstruct your convoluted cut and paste rationale as to who is making the valuation assertions and when. The article clearly presents the facts and you do not. EOD for me, you do you.
What a surprise, thanks for letting me in on the secret! Obviously (to most) multiple sets of books maintained by Trump served to increase and decrease valuations to suit the purpose intended. Presentation of a vacuous set of supporting income approach valuations that are nearly impossible to refute without sufficient access enables property valuations established during the rendition process to be quite favorable to the owner. But you know this already and had nothing to add other than the inanity under translucent cover as information. Do better; better yet, do nothing. Or, perhaps, peruse this... https://www.propublica.org/article/trump-inc-podcast-never-before-seen-trump-tax-documents-show-major-inconsistencies ...to bring you up to speed a little bit.
Thanks for the guidance, and horse shit on the poor me crap bemoaning the sky falling on me cause I just went way overboard after I got too greedy all the time. Perhaps the time is right to get after everybody else doing it beyond reason, which is the point here. Way beyond reasonable, he got greedy and got caught, just like others get caught. Shot off his mouth too often, getting it stuffed now, glad for his well deserved misery. Not a stretch at all.
Done, but the article does not address and completely misses my property tax point, so I deem it irrelevant to the point of my post, which all of these big legal minds are simply overlooking for what excuse or reason, I have no clue.
Far from no victim, how about everyone else in every taxing jurisdiction in which they achieved fraudulent valuation reductions for each and every year multiplied by the applicable tax rate. The society which they raped by paying less than what should have been their due is the victim as the public services cost burden was offloaded to everyone else. So far, he has gotten off cheaply. I care less about the loss of profits for financial institutions based on their interest rate getting a haircut, but to call it victimless is idiotic, as is your inane and flawed closing premise. WTF is everyone missing here!
Credit for spin, doctor...obviously no big deal, but it was your statement, and clearly inaccurate...my only point...more credit for stubborn...and you as well.
"Speak with the one beginning with a multiple in their post. 🤫"
Why would or should I need to since I quoted you directly from your post, that's plain to see...
"Profits start X2 of their particular price point."
I must be confused at your intent since profits start at any price point above their particular entry price point, not when it doubles. If you mean free money shares, where, if one sold 1/2 total shares when twice their purchase price point has been achieved, sure...
And a further followup to yours:
Methinks it generally very worthwhile to follow Mr. Steven Rattner on "X" for a wealth of regular and ongoing statistical updates and importantly, fact checking of all things lied about and bass-ackward "alternative facts" twisting by Republicans. If you are not familiar with him, check out his posts over the past few weeks, for example, and see if you might enjoy and appreciate the comprehensive wealth of graphically presented facts and accompanying analyses he presents. Very impressive, imo.
https://twitter.com/SteveRattner
Yes, especially like the National Space Council and the White House Coronavirus Task Force, both stellar accomplishments by Mr. Pence? He surely must be on the short list for the award for exactly what?
Adding a few of Mr. Rattner's charts as fact check confirmation...
Today on @Morning_Joe, I fact-checked three of Trump's favorite fictions — on crime, energy, and the national debt. Watch here:https://t.co/q30TZQLOBF pic.twitter.com/ciUdCJ7Gas
— Steven Rattner (@SteveRattner) March 14, 2024
My reality is you're spending way too much energy on water way downstream already. All can believe or not the disputed facts and methods during the process, but this could not be ignored. I'm hearing mostly crickets and few heads exploding in response, so just take the medicine and move on already. You're off the reservation on your bias perception and hung up on getting counsel from mentors/advisors actually being a thing. Now, I'll remove myself from your head on this thread. You can have it back. Regards...
Split decision due to it being given daylight needed; coverup of their actions led to their self inflicted wounds that is now and will affect the case in the future. Don't blame me, defense had every right and responsibility to bring the issue to light, and given the elevated status of the case, needed some sort of resolution. Caps or no, hope the 'tini was soothing!
ooohhhmmmmmm
Eh? I suppose not as I have no idea what you are referencing as it pertains to prior commentary and the common interests escape me. Sorry, but I can't read those tea leaves.
Why would I not stand by what I said? It is better to have given the not frivolous mess a full review now. Fani & Co brought it on themselves and did the country great a disservice with her sloppy work and actions that enabled the justified drops. Can't rope them all in the same boat like she tried and hope it floats without specificity to identify the many differences. I wouldn't be surprised at all if Georgia case law supplements the statutory explicit conflict requirement that results in her removal and complete case blowup. Hope not, but there is certainly a non-zero chance that happens tomorrow! No comment on the rest of your opinions noted...
Gotcha for the win...will do!
Truth sting a little? Engage brain before opening mouth on keyboard! Thanks for showing your sensitive side, lol...and I will continue to do so!
Why chase windmills; it's very easy to verify her educational background. Make an effort and find a source to your liking to query...same result. She's been vetted many times in that regard, so ignoring easily confirmed facts is not conducive to presenting a question of substance. You fail in that regard, so try redirecting your insecurities on another subject. BTW, I'm not at all a supporter of her or her ideas, but willing to chide you for your ill fated and insincere "question".
Yes, get with the program, please!
Full text of CNN article you linked...thus the change of heart re: Public Hearing
Hunter Biden’s attorney has informed House Oversight Chairman James Comer that the president’s son will not accept the committee’s invitation for him to appear at a public hearing, according to a letter obtained by CNN.
Last month, Hunter Biden spoke at a closed-door deposition before the House Oversight and Judiciary committees about his foreign business dealings as part of the Republican-controlled House’s larger interest in pursuing his father for a potential impeachment. Republicans are still planning to hold a hearing next week with three other witnesses they’ve interviewed as part of their inquiry into President Joe Biden, House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan told CNN on Wednesday.
The attorney, Abbe Lowell, argued the hearing “is not a serious oversight proceeding. It is your attempt to resuscitate your Conference’s moribund inquiry with a made-for-right-wing-media, circus act.”
Calling the invitation “a Hail Mary pass,” Lowell wrote: “I thought even you would recognize your baseless impeachment proceeding was dead.”
In his letter, Lowell also criticized Comer’s decision to invite some of the discredited business associates tied to the president’s son to the same hearing. He argued if Comer was serious about holding an oversight hearing to address alleged influence peddling, the committee should invite Jared Kushner and members of the Trump family alongside Hunter Biden.
Lowell said that the president’s son answered every question Republicans had for him in the six-hour closed door deposition. And Lowell even used Comer’s own words against him to argue that a hearing was not necessary.
In January, Comer said, “All we need are people to come in for the depositions and then we’ll be finished.“
Lowell also said he and Hunter Biden have a court hearing in California that conflicts with the date Comer requested but that “the scheduling conflict is the least of the issues.”
In response to Lowell’s letter, Comer told CNN: “I’m confused. I thought they wanted a public hearing.”
One of the witnesses who was invited to next week’s hearing is Devon Archer, a former Biden family business associate, who testified behind closed doors last year that “nothing” of importance was discussed the 20 times he recalled then-Vice President Joe Biden being placed on speakerphone during meetings he participated in. Republicans have seized on Archer’s testimony that Hunter Biden sold his father’s “brand” around the world to enrich the Biden family.
Another witness is Tony Bobulinski, who has levied unproven allegations against the president that other witnesses have disputed. And the third is Jason Galanis, who is currently in federal prison for his role in an unrelated fraud scheme.
The back-and-forth between Biden’s legal team and House Republicans has been ongoing for months.
When Republicans initially subpoenaed Hunter Biden, Lowell said his client would only participate in a public hearing. When Republicans were poised to hold Biden in criminal contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with the subpoena for a deposition, the two sides came to an agreement on a deposition.
Yes, agreed...so here ya go using 1-29 close of .037, And, as you can see, the math and stated levels presented initially still work just fine. BTW, a month is not random, it is one of the suggested periods when the exact starting date or price is subject to conjecture. In any case I was just offering a response to a query...and yes, so to each their own devices.
Yes, eewwww, more like abhorrence for what she was attempting to do vs. any sort of tingles, but to each their own...
Thank you & bingo, that was it! I use Facebook Container to limit FB tracking & data swapping between IHub and FB...just wanted to be sure I wasn't missing something historic, lol!
No, but at least I now know it's just me...thanks.
Are you sure what you are sharing is visible to others? I for one sure can't...just wondering...