Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
2 8ks and 2 statement changes of beneficial ownership filed but,
now 6 months late on 10Q.
I would like to see how he explains this on the 10Q. If he ever files it!
What the Hell is this? He sells it then he buys it back! wtf
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=64003832&symbol=CGFI
Haven't gone anywhere. Just waiting like everyone else.
Here's the info from the last 10Q
Post Judgment Collection Actions by Hennis
On August 23, 2013, Hennis attempted to have a receiver appointed to take control over the Company by means of an Ex Parte Motion for the Appointment of a Receiver filed in Jefferson County, Colorado. This motion was denied by the court on September 4, 2013. The court’s order stated, “Should plaintiffs wish to pursue their Rule 66 motion, they should serve their complaint and motion upon defendant and, after service is effected, contact the court to request a forthwith hearing.”
On September 6, 2013, the Company was served, through its registered agent, with 1) Renewed Motion for Appointment of Receiver, and 2) Verified Complaint, seeking a judicial foreclosure, declaratory judgment, breach of fiduciary duties.
A hearing on the motion to appoint a receiver was held on November 12 and 15, 2013. The motion to appoint a receiver was denied on November 19, 2013. The Company has filed its answer and initial disclosures regarding the underlying complaint regarding judicial foreclosure, declaratory judgment, breach of fiduciary duties, and awaits the court’s scheduling of a case management conference.
On December 20, 2013, Hennis filed a Motion with the Court seeking Judgment on the Pleadings, Alternatively for Summary Judgment, as to Plaintiffs’ First Claim for Relief, that claim being a judicial foreclosure of Defendant’s assets.
On January 6, 2014, Hennis filed a Notice of Appeal with the Colorado Court of Appeals appealing the Court’s November 19, 2013, denial of Hennis’ Renewed Motion for Appointment of Receiver.
Recreation Properties, Thomas A. Warlick
On December 5, 2013, Recreation Properties, Thomas A. Warlick, President, served upon the Company, C. Stephen Guyer (“Guyer”), and Lee R. Rice (“Rice”) a Complaint alleging; 1) Default Upon a Promissory Note Payable, 2) Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty (Guyer and Rice), and 3) Fraudulent Transfer Under CRS §§ 38-8-105(1)(b) & 106(1). The Complaint seeks a judgment in favor of Recreation Properties, recovery of funds transferred to Guyer and Rice during the last four years preceding the complaint, and avoidance of the Deeds of Trust granted to Guyer and Rice.
The Company filed its answer on December 26, 2013. On the same date, the Company filed a Motion to Consolidate this case with the Hennis action described above. On January 24, 2014, the court granted the Company's Motion to Consolidate.
san juan corp vs colorado goldfields or hennis vs colorado goldfields I keep having trouble. But if there's a case there must be public info on it. Also not sure what county. I think I read jefferson county.
GL
Can you post the Case# and link to the court. I can't find it on Pacer.
They filed their annual report and someone decided to pick some up.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=UNMK&id=118642
Any boots on the ground here? Near Platteville, Wisconsin
Swiss Valley Dairy Co-Op in Platteville, Wisconsin
Shareholders don't always have to start class actions as some law firms troll for cases like this. And I don't believe there is a statute of limitations for fraud.
The question now is any of that money coming here?
MIA from here but not public. Don't know 100% but, if there was something on management, I haven't seen any of their names show up in an SEC action. Stuff like this doesn't happen without everyone being talked to and looked at.
Main point is there are people liable for this. Both criminally and civilly. Sedar, SEC and now Civil court has shown their liability.
Collection may be an issue.
If I read it correctly some of the award was to Magellan Energy LTD and this is Magellan Energy LTD. Not sure, how or if any will come here. 2 different companies same name. I agree with the last post why isn't there a class action or SEC action to make shareholders whole?
That's just between brokerages. Grey trading is different. Not retail. We want retail trading so we can buy and sell our shares. As it is right now we can't.
Are you saying Boock was involved in both?
Sent an e-mail to OTC. They said "A broker would need to file a Form 211 with FINRA to get MGLG trading again.
Great news though. I've always thought the company wasn't at fault.
Any response from heish yet?
I'd really like one of my pinks to make it. This one has the best chance.
That's not saying very much either....LOL!!!!!!!!!
btw how do you like how they are shaping up for this year?
10K already came out. This is the 10Q Quarterly Report
10Q filing on or before January 21st 2014
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1344394/000135448814000158/cgfi_nt10q.htm
We're all here for information purposes. We share what we know and can find for the good of the boards members. As ficose said " we are all in the together" U seem to know things some of us do not. The info u might have is relevant to me and my shares and others as well.
Please share.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ball_mill
OK I get what a ball mill is now. So what is it worth to sell? $$?
I do a lot of research on this company as well as all stocks I own but, no one can have me believe that the internet has any proof like that. Boots on the ground with pictures of it happening would be about it.
That being said, I'm willing to look at whatever the poster has; pictures, links and so on.
Maybe there is something out there that I missed.
How do u know he's selling equip? Link Please. or something other then opinion in a post.
Guyer may not be able to pull this out of the Fire this time. Hell, he really doesn't even deserve to.
But no way in hell does hennis deserve to get the mill. Give it to the bankers and let them sell it off to the highest bidder.
At least someone who can afford to buy it at a high price, will also have the money to get it going.
good ? I don't know the answer to that. I don't see how a promissory note does not end up as an exhibit on a 8K.
Leave it to Hennis to not put a promissory note exhibit in the 8k.
At least he filed the 8K...................a month late..............
I didn't say it didn't exist. Just I couldn't find it.
I don't see a promissory note associated with this option agreement on the SEC website.
Not talking about that.
U said "they have two new lawsuits against them, either one of which would force them into receivership if successful. And both seem to have merit. "
From the 10K
Recreation Properties, Thomas A. Warlick
On December 5, 2013, Recreation Properties, Thomas A. Warlick, President, served upon the Company,
2nd lawsuit - Hennis signed this option agreement and it has expired. And it pertains to his properties; Gold King and Mayflower, not owned by CGFI but, Hennis. Not sure what imanband was saying, "has merit", clearly didn't read the docs.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/containers/fix240/1344394/000103570408000012/d53039exv10w9.htm
Hennis is just trying to have cgfi defend on 2 fronts. Looks like he's pulling out all the stops trying to get the mill.
Global Lock 1RSF. They can't RS if they wanted to. Finra would never approve even if they could. I can't do anything with my shares but, wait.
I shouldn't say never. Maybe they can RS the shares not held by the Depository. I'm not sure of this!
Wrong!
Name:Colorado Goldfields
Logo: see below PR same as it is now but under Hennis.
President and CEO: Todd C. Hennis
http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/colorado-goldfields-inc-announces-assay-results-from-2007-program-824766.htm
July 2012-DRMS Pre Hearing Conference Sign up sheet.
http://drmsweblink.state.co.us/drmsweblink/0/doc/961143/Electronic.aspx?searchid=7d9536af-b477-4e05-aeeb-1afb9aceb631
Right------- Just gonna post one example to Disprove the Lies posted in post #66458
Guyer spoke in "2013" at the:
Colorado Mining Association 115th National Western Mining Conference
FEBRUARY 25 — 27, 2013
Colorado Convention Center
Denver, Colorado
http://www.smenet.org/docs/meetings/2013/2013AMCMAProgram.pdf
Thats how it's always been. In my opinion someone is trying to destroy them and their plan. Hennis? or maybe a Major? Someone wants to pick up the pieces.
But lets not delude ourselves, management screwed this one up. Not that they didn't have some serious challenges but, how they played them was terrible at best. And CD was not the way to go for investors = 2 RS es!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2010 MLRB meeting was the beginning of the end. The only thing was few, if any of us, realized it at the time. If they hired an engineering firm to support their plan, would things have ended up differently? Maybe but, they would have at least had a fighting chance. Instead they decided to go it alone and the rest is history.
"Hope. It's what we cling to when reality leaves us nothing else."
- Hope of success
- Reality, the shaft
Losing $$ suks!!!!!!! But, losing Money on a play that had so much potential is just salt in the wound.
The AS hasn't changed or increased. It's been 300M since at least 2009! Maybe sooner.
It's in the 10Q below
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1363573/000114420409064696/v168979_10q.htm
Thanks sj They sold that fast. As long as they keep using their own money. I'm good with this not spiking up yet.
Oh Ya!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2 - 1
Thanks for beating me to it........LOL