loophole can you break that number down to cases that were overturned because of pending IPRs and EPRs were rulings came in after trial, those IPRs and EPRs can ruin a case when lost. VP has defeated everything these Giants threw at them. Never lost a claim

No need to argue with a fool, we know what VP owns and we were here when they received the patents and the child patents, as well as winning all those IPRs and not to mention having the examiner say for a second time that the 606 is patentable and will now be double stamped. Not much more to do except wait till we get a little closer to trial and we can all start to sell some of our shares which most of mine are long term now…. I’ve learned to not waste time here cause what is said here really doesn’t affect the stock or trial. It’s just a bunch of bashers who really don’t know shit and will be proven wrong in the coming months. Peace out!

Emil really built a patent dream team way better then Elon has, and kept the team together even through those dark times back in NDCA, with bread crumbs compared to Elon.

Yep and more like 120lbs soaking wet.

Dontnosheet
Re: henery8th post# 1979
Friday, October 07, 2011 12:19:53 PM
Post# of 127898 Go
I have inside info and I won't declare anything more.

Dontnosheet
Re: None
Friday, October 07, 2011 11:56:06 AM
Post# of 127899 Go
Buy em up Boys!! Big things coming!! Go VPLM!!!

That would be great, looking forward to more positives. Stay warm

Yet here is a board member with over 300 MILLION SHARES, WHO DIDNT GET THE MEMO OR BELIEVES BRIGHTER DAYS AHEAD. It’s good to do a deep search about VP to get the real truth. I cant find the other filing of another more than 5 pct owner actually 8 pct who has not sold a share along with this large shareholder who is also a board member.

Name and Address of Reporting Person *
SAYLOR HOWARD CLIFTON 2. Issuer Name and Ticker or Trading Symbol
Voip-pal.com Inc [ VPLM ] 5. Relationship of Reporting Person(s) to Issuer (Check all applicable)
__X__ Director _____ 10% Owner
_____ Officer (give title below) _____ Other (specify below)
(Last) (First) (Middle)
801 WINCREST PLACE 3. Date of Earliest Transaction (MM/DD/YYYY)
5/31/2023
(Street)
GREAT FALLS, VA 22066-2736 4. If Amendment, Date Original Filed (MM/DD/YYYY)

6. Individual or Joint/Group Filing (Check Applicable Line)
_X _ Form filed by One Reporting Person
___ Form filed by More than One Reporting Person
(City) (State) (Zip)

Table I - Non-Derivative Securities Acquired, Disposed of, or Beneficially Owned
1.Title of Security
(Instr. 3) 2. Trans. Date 2A. Deemed Execution Date, if any 3. Trans. Code
(Instr. 8) 4. Securities Acquired (A) or Disposed of (D)
(Instr. 3, 4 and 5) 5. Amount of Securities Beneficially Owned Following Reported Transaction(s)
(Instr. 3 and 4) 6. Ownership Form: Direct (D) or Indirect (I) (Instr. 4) 7. Nature of Indirect Beneficial Ownership (Instr. 4)
Code V Amount (A) or (D) Price
COMMON 87,333,334 I SAYLOR MARKETING
COMMON 106,744,081 D
COMMON 115,375,927 I CLIF AND

Yep and after he got burned on World Com he thinks all telecoms are bad, that’s the stinking thinking with a few of these weenies.

Exactly the less factual info she had made it easier to kill VP.
I agree with this and personally I would agree to a buyout like you want, the only thing I disagreed with was why some rulings were overturned like VHC and VLSI, and VP doesn’t seem to have those skeletons in their closet. But I get your point.

Do you know why VP lost the Alice appeal? Did you know you can only include evidence or info that was allowed in the case in your appeals argument. Koh did not allow claim construction and she shot down VPs motion to allow some expert witness testimony in the case. This is why it’s hard to win in Cali. You have yet to post why these rulings were overturned, once you do that the lightbulb will turn on above your head. Before replying back post some substance please.

I don’t agree, we have a re-examination and the examiner is saying for a second time it’s “Patentable”, no IPRs to bite us in the ass after trial and no more re-examinations pending so I disagree with your statements. And no Alice in California.

What was the reason of the appeals court to overturn. It would be great if you post that too so we can compare this to that.

Short the stock and post your short position or your just full of shit.

Since this world is headline news nobody reads the articles, I don’t believe they are trying to pump it or they wouldve put that in the headline line not Kipling news. Let’s get a trial date and this will move, you can’t predict the winner till the race is over. Shit 2 weekends ago it looked like the Chiefs were gonna beat Philadelphia but what happened, Super Bowl were the Falcons blew a large lead to the Pats. We have to wait for this to play out before you can claim anything. But keep trying as I know you will.

If the judge made any errors then it could be appealed but I’m not really sure.

What did VPLm get ??? And why did VP sell her these shares? Is it cause VP has huge revenue sources or any rev sources yet ?

And yet a board member that holds more than 10pct hasn’t sold and another shareholder who filed as a 10 pct holder has not sold. Just maybe it’s not as bad as you make it sound. I actually feel good but frustrated that we may need to hold a few more months. Re-examination was significant IMO and tells me these guys don’t want to go to trial after the examiner said for a second time that it’s patentable.

It’s the current info if it changes so will amount per share but until it does I can only go by what is current.

Nite is playing peek a boo with that big block @.0325

Someone posted here 3 billion against TMO but not VZ, we could take a conservative guess that it’s 4 billion, so 7 billion total which equates to over 2.00 per share based on the info we currently have. We need that trial date for this to start making a move towards the North Pole.

Yes they are burning through cash, didn’t they burn through 1.2 million in the 1st quarter? I’ll pull it up if anyone needs a copy.

Thanks for the update. That’s a big positive.

Im willing to wait till trial date for VZ and Tmobile, that is where the big money move will be and the catalyst is trial or settle in Waco and we know that TMO is a 3 billion dollar case. So that’s what I’m gonna do and based on my DD that’s the trade. Good luck watching Skippy.

Since MSFT filed for the exact same patent and was denied cause VP filed first, and again with Apple as they got denied as VP had the prior art tells me different. Favorable claim construction and favorable rulings against IPRs made the patents stronger and makes VPs case even stronger. Right court helps too.

And that’s why they steal.

First off this has got to be the dumbest question ever without a doubt.

1. Defendants look at who is claiming infringement.
A. Little VPLM is claiming it
a. No revs
b. No money
c. A penny stock company
d. And at the time no Albright
e. TC Heartland

In a perfect world Nytwit would be correct but not in the world since 2014 when many rules changed in favor of infringers. Large companies don’t have a problem it’s more the little guy. Just read Judge Albright’s mission statement and it tells you all you need to know why, but NYTWIT will not accept this answers cause that moron is always Soooooo Right. LMAO

Most will tell VP to go stick it were the sun don’t shine, but now in Albright’s court the sun is shining everywhere and this will not be the case anymore. I hope NYTWIT will finally zip it on this stupidest claim that we keep hearing over and over.

I can go on and mention IPRs those are very expensive for VPLM but not to Meta, TMobile, VZ, Amzn and so on.
Each patent trial cost between 2-4 million
If you get stuck in California and you are an NPE you will lose.
The system is rigged and Albright as well as East Texas make it a fair case, there are one or two courts were you have a chance and that’s it.
Thank god we were fortunate enough to have Emil run the show and continue to raise money to fight these deep pocket behemoths.

Like this post for example

What a moron!

Ditto to the idiots who don’t have a clue and shouldn’t buy stocks, heck they don’t even understand how restricted stocks work. And you want to listen to them, January can’t come soon enough! It seems like yesterday it didn’t even know that you need a buyer to accommodate a seller. It just pisses them off that their theories get blown up when you apply some intelligence in DD. Mic drop

I was talking about a 2011 d/e when MSFT paid them 200 million and they paid shareholders .50. I did well on VHC recent 1.00 D/e bought the stock around 1.30 after the spike to 2.47, held it about a week and sold it on the pay date for .72 cents and received the 1.00 D/E, not huge money but a 30 pct move in a week…Based on those 3 patent play examples the charts tell you to sell into the first victory or settlement as that will be the highest pop. But again those amounts don’t compare to VPLM. This is not a growth play as the Revenue stream will not be as consistent based on those 3. But a nice pop solves that problem or a reasonable buyout. Just like most stocks make their high as they grow and split like IBM, but the past 6 years has been harder for IBM to grow and really has a tough time around the 150-160 area even with the red hat acquisition but it does pay a nice d/e and you can use options to increase your income without selling your position.

If you read one of my previous responses to you it said Netlist, Parker and VHC were only suing for 100-400 million where VP’s lawsuits are in the billions. As I stated just the TMobile lawsuit equates to 1.00/ share and that’s only one defendant. I can only make an educated guess that VZ is more being the top provider in the US. The value of Mobile Gateway is less then the RBR.

Vhc was a BB stock took in a licensing from MSFT paid a nice D/E then moved up to the big board. There are lots of SnP companies that won’t make, big fing deal. I had a Nasdaq company go belly up on me, and you were no were to be found. I also owned SMTP, paid me a 9 pct d/e while I waited for them to uplist then I sold much higher and they stopped paying a D/E after the uplist.

What were they producing ? And what revs did they have before the patents? Call them what you want but it’s their property and should they lose it cause they a an NPE ? No and that’s why this judge is great as he follows the constitution, do you have a problem with the constitution (US) in case you’re a Canadian? This judge believes that if someone is gonna lose their property it should be by a Jury of their peers and not a lazy ass judge.

I would never say that I just go by my DD and base it on many things and percentages of risk and reward. There are many positives here, you don’t knock out 36 IPRs with weak patents, some of the early developers even had MSFT pay them to apply for LI but too bad VPLM was first to file. MSFT has some of the best patent engineers and they thought the patents were worthy enough to pay these guys and apply for a patent. That tells me the tech is real and potentially strong. Apple applied for the same patent (RBR) as VP and Apple was denied. So Patents are strong. And the list goes on but personally I’m not gonna share all of my hard work with someone else that doesn’t brin* anything to the table.

Back to tax loss selling, do you really think most bought this ticker cause they had a strong grasp of the tech or maybe they bought it cause of (FOMO) or (Momo) who really knows and who really cares I’m expecting it to do what I believe it can and that’s it. I’m not expecting this to end like Rite Aid or BBBY. And to be honest I don’t care if they ever take in money that’s Hudnell problem I’m out on a significant pop and goodbye.

I believe your wrong, in the past insiders would just report sales from the previous week but about 60 days ago I’ve noticed the insiders reported an amount of what they intended to sell and the wife’s amount was 15 million and Williams was 2 or 3 million and not sure about Chang. This could be the new way of doing things so I don’t expect her to sell more then 15 million. We will have to wait and see.

Large shareholder, it didn’t even trade a million shares. Market had a good year and people will sell whatever they’re down in. So are you saying something big is happening by December here?

Just cause you group all otc stocks as crap doesn’t mean shit to me. The 3 patent plays I follow were all Nasdaq stocks, and they really don’t compare to VP. The infringements are billions for VP as the other 3 patent plays are in the millions.

I’m expecting a nice pop on licensing, or nice steady climb north going into a trial date. It could even be a buyout, who knows. Anything over .30 cents will give me multiple millions on this trade. Greedy no, just got to know what you hold But please stick around till a few weeks before trial. Not sure the date cause I haven’t seen a filing but someone posted early Feb on here.

Notice there is no reply to this, hmmmmm.

I’m gonna take a wild guess (knowing it is tax loss season) and say they were sells. LMK if I was right.

But the float tells you that is not the case.

Why do you never include the float in your bias posts?
Outstanding Shares
3,023,173,940
10/27/2023
Restricted
1,656,124,047
10/27/2023
Unrestricted
1,367,049,893
10/27/2023
Held at DTC
1,212,106,109
10/27/2023
Float
831,342,791
09/30/2023

Someone posted that TMO was on the hook for 3 billion and the OS is 3 billion, that’s a dollar per share so no need to rollback. But keep the bs rumors going. Keep in mind that’s only one defendant.

The Float hasn’t grown much

WOW 2 wrongs don’t make a right. LMFAO please don’t correct it or you’ll get a novel reply.

I would agree with this in 11/2023 but not back then.

Fun Times at Ridgemont High