Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How many units of the old version were sold?
what about the 50 million shares being dumped?
next stop .005
or this statement in the same filing about the 50 million shares that will be dumped.
7 retweets and 22 likes in 2 days is not very impressive. That's like telling the people at a holiday barbeque about it.
You must have received your latest paycheck from Mark. Or does he pay in cash so there's no trail?
Buy buy all you can , next stop 0.5 then 5 $$$$
Or these statements:
OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM HAS EXPRESSED SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT ABOUT OUR ABILITY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN, WHICH MAY HINDER OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN FUTURE FINANCING.
We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations
Over a year behind, plus real IT professionals have already put in security measures.
Now that is what I call a MIC DROP!!!
SFOR... late to the game as usual!
I really like the is statement in the latest filings.
Wow, with the recent filings, you have now been EXPOSED!!!
your math holds the assumption that the stock will all sell at the .04-.05 cent range... 50 millions shares being dumped will drive down the stock price significantly so all shares will not be sold in the .04-.05 range. In short, ITS GOING DOWN!!!!!!!! Wayyyyy DOWN!!!!
Could anyone help me understand this:
Two entities gave Strikeforce Technologies $50,000, in exchange for the right to own and sell 50 MILLION shares at .04 -.05 cents?
When they essentially would have obtained them for .001 each?
Let’s see, 2,500,000 / 50,000 = 50,
Or, 5000% profit on this private investment?
Confirmation of this math, anyone?
Pathetic.
I think Will go down to $0.01
yes it will, you will be diluted down to nothing then a r/s to finish you off. That is this company's history, proven and verifiable!!!
.005 is what the fins and filings support.
we don't care about what posters who clearly have an agenda pump.
to judge a company, fins and filings, and those show that this is a turd.
go away!!
Don’t sell, wait for the next pr
+ 1000 % in one trading day
History will repeat itself
Buy all you can
Don’t sell now
5’$$$$ just wait for the next pr
don't you mean .005
thats what the filings and fins support..
Sfor to 5 $$$$$$$$$
Buy buy buy all you can, 5 $$$$$$$
The Selling Stockholder may sell its shares in the over-the-counter market or otherwise, at market prices prevailing at the time of sale, at prices related to the prevailing market price, or at negotiated prices. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares.
Kay is laughing his ass off! 50 milly more shares to hit!
well considering any money would require an 8k we know nothing is coming!!!!!
Not in cash
But if the company gets $m
The stock will react
Something like that
Was not sure,but was also not confirmed
Wasn’t it $38 million?
he doesn't give investors KY....
just empty promises of KY that like his other lies never comes to be. He sticks it to them hard and raw!!!
How was the KY that KaY gave to investors?
Haha
Are you an Attorney?
Cyber Safety with 99% of they business around Sfor products
Loose that and they go bankrupt
They are in the corner now
Supposedly their revenues we're $30m Plus?
Results will have no impact on the stock.
You will not see a penny from any settlement.
The lawsuit is still going on
Cyber had to respond in 30 days,for Wich I understand did and got 2 more weeks
Now they supposedly going back and forth
Kay lies... you're not missing anything.
There's a post on Yahoo... something about software being returned by a Manufacturing group due to errors. Imagine that!
There are numerous digital security etfs, and such, and none of them owns shares of SFOR.
After being in business for 20 years you'd have to think that either the company is doing the worst marketing job in history - business to business - or the software turns out to be just not that great.
All those times Kay stated, on the record, that big companies were testing and exactly none of those times has a contract ensued.
Either he's been misleading investors or the products don't compare favorably with similars. What am I missing?
You are so right, there is no comparison.
Zoom is in Gartner's Magic Quadrant and I would be willing to bet, Gartner has no clue who SFOR is.
When the 2021 FINs come out, it will be a sad day for all investors.
That would be cheery indeed!
sfor isn't even in the same league as ZM. Only a fool would believe that any company would use SFOR v chat over zoom.
the financials alone will keep them out of any reputable company!!!!!
20+ years in IT here!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nice! Someone with personal knowledge of the product has been lacking on this board. But I agree when the news hits the wire, SFOR will shoot up so fast it will likely gap up to $.40-1.00 right off the bat.
StrikeForce Technologies
This information found below is from different Mods. It can not be removed without their permission. Any additions must go below the last entry.
WARNING: PLEASE USE THE SYMBOL SFOR OR COMPANY NAME WHEN POSTING-USE OF ABBREVIATIONS SUCH AS "SF" WILL BE DELETED!
This board is to be used to discuss SFOR(D) the company, its officers and its stock. Messages about other posters or intentions, the mods, name calling, profanity, deletions etc. are off topic at the very least.
To answer some of your questions regarding posts, please read the following, that you should have known already, taken from the Ihub FAQ section of the Ihub handbook. So you can stop with the moronic conspiracy theories about the Mods and Admins on this board!
Regarding libel and slander suspected posts:
"Libel can only become a fact if a judge says it is. Nobody else, including Moderators or Site Admins, can nor will determine that Member posted content is libelous. Members are often of the opinion that a post is libelous, but no Moderator should act based on that opinion. Libel is decided by a judge in a court of law after conducting proper evidentiary hearings. If such a judgment is issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, iHub will abide by that ruling. Otherwise, it is not a matter that Site Admin or Mods can decide. Our only role here is to ensure adherence to the Terms of Use. Anecdotally, quite often the information that some Members allege to be libelous ends up being accurate, which is why neither Site Admins nor Moderators remove posts on the basis of being allegedly false or libelous."
Regarding posting lies (or what some posters feel are lies):
"Mods or Admin do not make decisions about the veracity of information posted. "Truth" is a very subjective term and neither Site Admin nor Mods remove posts based on judgments of this type. Each reader has both the right and obligation to decide for themselves if they feel a post is accurate and its author credible. As a participant on the board, the Moderators' recourse is the same as any other Member; to debate the information contained in the post without attacking the Member, or to ignore it. Attack the message, not the messenger."
Regarding a good DD post with a personal attack lumped in:
If a post is 99% on topic and 1% personal attack it still needs to be removed. Personal attacks in any form are disrespectful of others and are unwelcome on the site. These types of gratuitous comments also create noise and dilute the quality of the board. When a Member attacks another poster, other participants inevitably feel the need to respond, either agreeing or defending. Then others feel the need to respond to these…and so on and so on ad nauseam. Pretty soon the board has devolved into personal attacks and discussion about other Members, i.e., noise and no signal. There are plenty of other sites that allow these types of posts and it is difficult to find any meaningful content on such sites. The goal at iHub is to have all information, whether positive, neutral or negative, discussed in a civil manner, free of personal attacks.
Regarding proof of member post content:
Members do not have to provide "proof" when offering their opinions. There is no requirement for Members to substantiate their posts. Veracity of posts and credibility of the author is determined by the reader.
http://www.strikeforcetech.com/index.aspx
SFOR Security Details Outstanding Shares confirmed unchanged as of 8/19/2016
|
Market Value1 | $9,497,134 | a/o Aug 19, 2016 | |
Authorized Shares | 5,000,000,000 | a/o May 16, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 2,282,964,907 | a/o May 16, 2016 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 2,282,934,907 | a/o May 16, 2016 |
Leadership Team:
http://www.guardedid.com/about_leadership.aspx
Advisory Board:
http://www.guardedid.com/about_advisory.aspx
StrikeForce Technologies' IR Contact
Mark L. Kay
CEO
(732) 661-9641
marklkay@strikeforcetech.com
NOW SOLD IN TARGET
http://www.target.com/p/mobile-trust-keystroke-encryption-software-2-mobile-devices/-/A-50575250#prodSlot=medium_1_1&term=mobiletrust
http://www.target.com/p/guarded-id-21-keystroke-encryption-software-2-pcs/-/A-50568581#prodSlot=medium_1_1&term=guarded+id
http://anti-keylogger-software-review.toptenreviews.com/?full_site=true
StrikeForce Technologies is a leading provider that Specializes in Identity Theft Online solutions for consumers, industry and government. By leveraging StrikeForce's breakthrough technologies, consumers and organizations can finally secure their electronic assets while protecting their employees, business partners, suppliers and customers from malicious hacking and theft.
StrikeForce's revolutionary technologies are represented by a proprietary software product suite that guards both businesses and consumers from keylogging, phishing, malware, spyware and other identity attacks and scams.
For more on StrikeForce Technologies, see our corporate web site.
RECENT CYBER BREACHES ALL POSITIVE FOR SFOR (Thanks TradeSlinger)
The threat from cybercrime? 'You ain't seen nothing yet"
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100959481
August 29,2013
Telecoms companies now subject to new personal data breach notification rules
http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2013/august/telecoms-companies-now-subject-to-new-personal-data-breach-notification-rules/
August 28, 2013
Phishing email grants hackers access to DNS records of major websites
http://www.scmagazine.com//phishing-email-grants-hackers-access-to-dns-records-of-major-websites/article/309274/#
August 2013 CyberBreaches...
Infosec 2013: Cost of cyber breaches rises three-fold, research shows
http://www.computerweekly.com/news/2240182218/Infosec-2013-Cost-of-cyber-breaches-rises-three-fold-research-shows
C/Net News:League of Legends is hacked,
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57599450-83/league-of-legends-is-hacked-with-crucial-user-info-accessed/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57599646-83/cybercrooks-use-ddos-attacks-to-mask-theft-of-banks-millions/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57600336-83/syrian-electronic-army-implicated-in-twitter-new-york-times-attacks/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-57598603-83/google-confirms-android-flaw-that-led-to-bitcoin-theft/
Nasdaq outage resembles hacker attacks
http://www.usatoday.com/story/cybertruth/2013/08/22/nasdaq-outage-aligns-with--denial-of-service-attacks/2687323/
August 2013 global threats
http://www.scmagazine.com//august-2013-global-threats/slideshow/1502/#0
LivingSocial
http://www.scmagazine.com/top-five-data-breaches-in-2013so-far/slideshow/1387/
Daily-deal website LivingSocial confirmed that its computer systems were hacked, resulting in “unauthorized access.”
The company updated its password encryption method after the breach impacted more than 50 million users. Names, email addresses, dates of birth, and salted passwords were stolen.
1-15 June 2013 Cyber Attacks Timeline
http://hackmageddon.com/2013/07/01/1-15-june-2013-cyber-attacks-timeline/
http://www.strikeforcetech.com |
IDGenie Mobile Security
|
|
OTCQB (as if that means anything)
SFOR now on OTCQB Benefits of uplisting to OTCQB per OTCMarkets website as follows:
"The OTCQB is considered by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as an "established public market" for the purpose of determining the public market price when registering securities for resale with the SEC. The OTC Pink is not considered as such and most broker dealers will not trade or recommend OTC Pink stocks. Because the OTCQB dramatically increases transparency, reporting standards, management certification and compliance requirements, the majority of broker dealers trade stocks on the OTCQB. Historically this has resulted in greater liquidity and awareness for companies that reach the OTCQB tier.
Key elements and benefits of uplisting to the OTCQB include:
?Companies must remain current and compliant in their reporting to the SEC
?Minimum bid price test of $0.01 removes companies that are most likely to be the subject of dilutive stock fraud schemes and promotion
?Improved investor confidence through verified information, confirming that the Company Profile displayed on www.otcmarkets.com is current and complete
?Annual management certification process to verify officers, directors, controlling shareholders, and shares outstanding
?Greater information availability for investors through the OTC Disclosure & News Service
?Transparent prices for investors through full-depth of book with Real Time Level 2 quotes"
NEXT QUARTER
500 to 1 Reverse Split Coming, end of April, 2020
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14077781&guid=v5zHUFJLzJ56Ayh
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |