United American Corp. (UAMA)

[mwab52]

Whats up with this stock. Is it dead or alive? Someone help please.

[65actual]

Don't believe UAMA BS. Research mining!

Coindesk says business going in a different direction that UAMA POS Agrodomes!

https://www.coindesk.com/business/2021/12/15/8-trends-that-will-shape-bitcoin-mining-in-2022/

[65actual]

Stay tuned for latest UAMA fraud!

[65actual]

UAMA CEO convicted criminal, bankrupt! Never forget!

He has been labeled as such by The Canadian Press. You can rest assured it is true as Mr. Benoit Laliberte has not filed suit against this news organization.

Mr. Benoit Laliberte is President, CEO & CFO of UAMA! All three positions held by Mr. Benoit Laliberte who was found guilty on 44 of 48 counts, stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

What kind of a company has convicted criminal President, CEO and CFO? CAVEAT EMPTOR.

evidence:

"Montréal – In a decision handed down on April 28, 2009, Judge Richard Wagner of Superior Court (Criminal and Penal Division), district of Montréal, found Benoît Laliberté guilty of three of the four charges under an appeal launched by the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) in September 2008.

At the request of the AMF, the Court thereby quashed the acquittal verdicts issued by Judge Céline Lacerte-Lamontagne in February 2008 in respect of charges 6, 9 and 38. Specifically, the AMF succeeded in its appeal in respect of two charges related to an insider's obligation to report transactions within the time period prescribed by law and in respect of one charge related to making misrepresentations in a press release."

and more evidence:

CP (Canadian Press)
PUBLISHED FEBRUARY 22, 2008 (Toronto Globe & Mail)
UPDATED APRIL 26, 2018 (Toronto Globe & Mail)
The former head of Jitec Inc. was convicted yesterday of insider trading and deceiving investors while pumping up the value of his now-defunct Montreal high-tech firm. A judge found Benoit Laliberte, 35, guilty on 41 of 48 counts of breaking Quebec's securities laws. Quebec's securities regulator will seek about $1.5-million in fines plus costs from Laliberte for manipulating share prices while the company was listed on the Montreal Stock Exchange. Thirty of the convictions were for failing to disclose changes in Laliberte's control over Jitec shares. The rest of the counts were for insider trading, deceiving investors in news releases and inflating the value of contract.

Then there's the FAILURE to properly disclose material PERSONAL BANKRUPTCY to investors and in SEC filings. Evidence in CCAA Proceedings before the Supreme Court of BC produced the following:

49. As stated above, Mr. Laliberte is an undischarged bankrupt. Despite this, he has claimed
to be an officer and/or representative of a variety of companies in the TNW Group, most
recently being Teliphone and Investel Capital Corporation.

Ask yourself, "What kind of company has convicted criminal CEO?"

Then ask yourself, "What kind of a company has a bankrupt CEO"

Caveat Emptor - CAVEAT EMPTOR - see OTC Markets - UAMA

[65actual]

"Illusion of progress" UAMAs most important product?

No secret Benoit Laliberte fond of big expansive news releases which never materialize.

My favorite the big plans for cryptocurrency mining campus in Quebec.

Nothing came of it.

BS baffles brains seems to be their approach.

Now talk of wireless MVNO which will predictably go nowhere!

[65actual]

UAMA CEO knowingly committed fraud in SEC filings!

Here are the facts:
- Benoit Laliberte signs as President, CEO and CFO of UAMA
- Claims "no violations in past 10 years" in Pink reports of YE 2018, Q1 2019, Q2 2019
- Court found him guilty v AMF in April 2009 on additional 3 counts
- Evidence clear of convictions within past 10 years at time of filings.

So Mr. Benoit Laliberte did knowingly commit fraud in these UAMA reports.

Complaints have been filed with the SEC.

[65actual]

Let me list what not to like:

-convicted criminal CEO
-crypto mining needs scaling not served with a salad
-successful crypto miners mine with latest most powerful processors
-management team has track record of serial failures
-this team can't raise significant capital

[fromtheuk]

Agrodomes looking like the future. Green Crypto Mining with Clean Heated Greenhouses.

Whats not to like…..

[65actual]

No specifics on how Agrodomes will actually make money.

A concept that's likely not worth more that the current market cap of this dog!

[65actual]

What a grand joke the "new vision" is.

UAMA MVNO initiative failed and predictably so will Agrodomes.

Another failing "vision" from Benoit Laliberte (Bert) and Lawry Trevor-Deutsch (Ernie).

A dumb vision that pretends to bring together cryptocurrency mining and agriculture.

Could only come from Bert and Ernie!

[65actual]

How's the last bright idea going UAMA?

You'll recall your 2021 press release on MVNO potential.

An obvious non-starter so let's dress up the Blockchain "pig" and see if anyone takes the bait.

[65actual]

Patents on negative pressure cabinets?

Highly unlikely that patents will be awarded for this.

Not un-obvious and quick look shows they have been available on the market for some years.

More BS baffles brains approach.

[65actual]

Patents in question after three (3) years!

Blockchain Domes not yet patented and likely never will be.

Using cool air from underground sources used for hundreds of years for cooling in desert areas of Southwest by Native Americans I believe.

[65actual]

Did UAMA ever settle land-use dispute.

Last word that the Tribunal ruling to remove miners and restore site to agricultural use was upheld by local Court.

UAMA said moving would be a costly move.

Has it been moved or still operating in violation of local ordinances and regulations.

[65actual]

A closer look illuminates the "fluff".

It truly is BS baffles brains.

No specifics on business model.

No specifics on funding or revenue.

Just all more of the same BS with new graphics.

[65actual]

Agridomes nothing more than Blockchain Domes.

Same old BS with new graphics.

Doomed to fail on launch pad.

[65actual]

At UAMA the perception of progress most important product.

Blockchain domes nothing more than a sophomoric high-school level science experiment.

Patent applications won't pass the test. LOL. Has to be non-obvious and drawing cooler air from underground for cooling been done for centuries.

No successful miner gives a rat's ass about combining their applications with agriculture. Find area with cheap power and mine, mine and mine. Seems to have worked just fine fro HUT 8.

[65actual]

Awesome new fraud from the fraud experts!

More BS baffles brains.

These "no-nothings" just changing the wallpaper.

Just an expansion of the sophomoric high-school experiment that was Blockchain Domes.

Brought to you by the convicted criminal Benoit Laliberte (The Canadian Press labeled him) and others who have never built a business of lasting or even promising value.

Speaking of new wallpaper maybe they should update financials on OTCBB (UAMA) and change the in "Introduction" to this site to reflect the new fraudulent vision. Like removing names of individuals that departed years ago.

But hey! It will never be about reality, just the "perception" of progress with these clowns.

[fromtheuk]

Awesome new look

https://agrodomes.com/

[65actual]

Fraud always a key ingredient in UAMA enterprise.

Supported and promoted by actions of CEO Laliberte and Lawry Trevor-Deutch and complicit posters who had to know better.

CEO was labeled as a convicted criminal for his 44 convictions on stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

Wireless initiative was a fraud from the start.

iPCS was a POS technology that nobody wanted anywhere in the world.

Cryptocurrency mining also a joke as UAMA et al were only acting as a contractor. Never even disclosed the name of the Vancouver-based company they contracted with. Quickly went sour and company abandoned in place the old-tired, outdated miner-processors.

Blockdomes were about as exciting as a high-school science experiment. Dumb from the start. Success in mining is all about mining where power is cheap and doing it on a large scale. Hut 8 knows how to do it.

The closer you look the more fraudulent this enterprise looks. In reality it was done in 2016 when they filed CCAA Proceeding. By the time that wrapped up there was nothing left.

Looking back the only thing they did was perpetuate this fraud through many, many misleading press releases and the support of complicit posters.

It was all one big lie from the beginning. Benoit Laliberte and Lawry Trevor-Deustch have never, ever built a business of lasting value and they have no relevant management track record.

Complicit posters played a role in supporting this fraudulent enterprise and they can't hide from the facts.

[65actual]

UAMA could have been quick success in 2017.

Should have left RuralCom CEO in place as he had pocket full of term sheets, which RuralCom Board of Directors were fully aware of. Working 3G cell sites with VSAT backhaul in rural Canada were a first-of-breed and worked from the get-go. Thanks to Gilat.

Had signed and executed inter-carrier roaming agreements in place with all major US carriers and in final negotiations with Bell Canada. These agreements captured by the CEO at a time when he was not being paid. In fact, RuralCom CEO took last paycheck in late 2009 when lead investor decided to ignore signed and fully executed private placement agreements first signed in 2006-2007 time frame. His peers in the industry advised him to abandon the ship when Employment Agreement first violated, though he chose to stay the course.

In 2017 best Laliberte, UAMA CEO could come up with was stupid JV agreement which no wireless CEO would have signed. Ask me nice and I'll publish it. It clearly illustrates his lack of abilities to attract and retain key personnel.

So RuralCom was market-ready with access to capital, a proven CEO with crews and contacts and the technical smarts to get a 3G cellular network built at lowest cost.

Under his leadership RuralCom (later TNW Wireless) could have been up and fully operational and generating enough revenue to reach positive cash-flow in less than a year. A lean-mean wholesale wireless carrier like Commnet Wireless LLC. UAMA could have been built to $40-60M in annual revenue earning 40-60% EBITDA as a wholesale cellular carrier in rural Canada.

Never happened because Laliberte was never about excellence or building a business. His focus on his own ego and took the complicit posters for a ride. Neither UAMA CEO or complicit posters had any track record of success building businesses of lasting value. They are fakers and clowns.

[65actual]

Could have been Happy New Years UAMA!

Were it not for ego-driven Benoit Laliberte, a person who has never built a business of lasting value or worth acquiring.

Complicit posters can take some credit for killing the enterprise as well.

[65actual]

Small-minded CEO and complicit posters killed UAMA

[65actual]

UAMA could have qualified for NASDAQ.

[65actual]

Just think UAMA $40M Market Cap.

[65actual]

UAMA could have been $40M market cap!

Should have left RuralCom CEO in place as he had pocket full of term sheets, which RuralCom Board of Directors were fully aware of. Working 3G cell sites with VSAT backhaul in rural Canada were a first-of-breed and worked from the get-go. Thanks to Gilat.

Had signed and executed inter-carrier roaming agreements in place with all major US carriers and in final negotiations with Bell Canada. These agreements captured by the CEO at a time when he was not being paid. In fact, RuralCom CEO took last paycheck in late 2009 when lead investor decided to ignore signed and fully executed private placement agreements first signed in 2006-2007 time frame. My peers in the industry told me to abandon the ship when Employment Agreement first violated, though he chose to stay the course.

In 2017 best Laliberte, UAMA CEO could come up with was stupid JV agreement which no wireless CEO would have signed. Ask me nice and I'll publish it. It clearly illustrates his lack of abilities to attract and retain key personnel.

So RuralCom was market-ready with access to capital, a proven CEO with crews and contacts and the technical smarts to get a 3G cellular network built at lowest cost.

Under his leadership RuralCom (later TNW Wireless) could have been up and fully operational and generating enough revenue to reach positive cash-flow in less than a year. A lean-mean wholesale wireless carrier like Commnet Wireless LLC. UAMA could have been built to $40-60M in annual revenue earning 40-60% EBITDA as a wholesale cellular carrier in rural Canada.

Never happened because Laliberte was never about excellence or building a business. His focus on his own ego and took the complicit posters for a ride.

[65actual]

For the record, UAMA could have been saved!

Should have left RuralCom CEO in place as he had pocket full of term sheets, which RuralCom Board of Directors were fully aware of. Working 3G cell sites with VSAT backhaul in rural Canada were a first-of-breed and worked from the get-go. Thanks to Gilat.

Had signed and executed inter-carrier roaming agreements in place with all major US carriers and in final negotiations with Bell Canada. These agreements captured by the CEO at a time when he was not being paid. In fact, RuralCom CEO took last paycheck in late 2009 when lead investor decided to ignore signed and fully executed private placement agreements first signed in 2006-2007 time frame. My peers in the industry told me to abandon the ship when Employment Agreement first violated, though he chose to stay the course.

In 2017 best Laliberte, UAMA CEO could come up with was stupid JV agreement which no wireless CEO would have signed. Ask me nice and I'll publish it. It clearly illustrates his lack of abilities to attract and retain key personnel.

So RuralCom was market-ready with access to capital, a proven CEO with crews and contacts and the technical smarts to get a 3G cellular network built at lowest cost.

Under his leadership RuralCom (later TNW Wireless) could have been up and fully operational and generating enough revenue to reach positive cash-flow in less than a year. A lean-mean wholesale wireless carrier like Commnet Wireless LLC. UAMA could have been built to $40-60M in annual revenue earning 40-60% EBITDA as a wholesale cellular carrier in rural Canada.

Never happened because Laliberte was never about excellence or building a business. His focus on his own ego and took the complicit posters for a ride.

[65actual]

LOL funny to read 3 years moderator posts.

Assembled and categorized for SEC Complaint.

Never any negative views of UAMA despite overwhelming facts.

Never any suggestions on improving the business or recognizing the obvious problems and communicating to management.

Why you ask?

[65actual]

UAMA now worthless and well-earned demise.

For years, a predictable failure.

The signs were always there. Little cash for years, no access to institutional capital after firing the original RuralCom CEO. Funny how institutional money abhors a CEO (Laliberte) with convicted criminal CEO status.

Under these circumstances it was doomed and that was evident to anyone with experience running a high-tech business.

Funny that those complicit posters, including a moderator, couldn't deal with the facts.

In the end the company and management received the ultimate vote of non-confidence.

[65actual]

UAMA a predictable failure.

The signs were always there. Little cash for years, no access to institutional capital after firing the original RuralCom CEO. Funny how institutional money abhors a CEO (Laliberte) with convicted criminal CEO status.

Under these circumstances it was doomed and that was evident to anyone with experience running a high-tech business.

Funny that those complicit posters, including a moderator, couldn't deal with the facts.

In the end the company and management received the ultimate vote of non-confidence.

[65actual]

Year(s) in review, a predictable failure.

The signs were always there. Little cash for years, no access to institutional capital after firing the original RuralCom CEO. Funny how institutional money abhors a CEO (Laliberte) with convicted criminal CEO status.

Under these circumstances it was doomed and that was evident to anyone with experience running a high-tech business.

Funny that those complicit posters, including a moderator, couldn't deal with the facts.

In the end the company and management received the ultimate vote of non-confidence.

[65actual]

IP litigation was a disaster, never got any traction.

Wireless technology a joke and never worth anything.

Blockdomes a sophomoric high-school experiment which only served to piss off the local land-use Tribunal. In the end they'll be forced to shut it down or move it. Likely generate more money as a hobby farm.

What ever happened to BS news issued April 2021 re MVNO opportunity?

Talk about FAKE NEWS!

[65actual]

Fake from the start and for duration.

LOL that Bert and Ernies (Laliberte & Trvevor-Deutsch) only fooled the complicit posters.

CRTC had them pegged from the start, ditto Industry Canada (ISED).

Potential wireless investors showed them the door!

Fakers!

[65actual]

Litigation all failed. Especially defamation.

Law firm filed suit agains Laliberte for non-payment.

LOL

[65actual]

UAMA crypto mining another bust!

[65actual]

UAMA Wireless strategy a total fail.

[65actual]

UAMA 3Q Financials now well overdue.

Filed for extension then missed promised date!

Surprised?

[fromtheuk]

Happy New Year to All !

[65actual]

Complicit posters engaged in fraud. SEC?

For years they supported this POS fraudulent company and its convicted criminal CEO, Benoit Laliberte. They thought he was wonderful which says a lot for the value of their advice and their ability to effectively assess management potential. My guess most suffer from their own character foibles. CAVEAT EMPTOR should have been the byword for any involvement with UAMA et al.

But they went further than simple cheerleading choosing to attack other posters exposing the actual facts and evidence. The materials passed on to the SEC clearly show a pattern of personal threats and harassment of the former CEO of RuralCom Corporation. In the end UAMA was exposed for the fraud that it is and it has obviously failed. No trades and no quotes. Dark or defunct. In the end the truth won out.

Guess some are super embarrassed over their behavior and they sought to support this obviously fraudulent enterprise led by a CEO who was convicted on 43 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

Maybe those former cheerleaders could come out of the shadows and explain what motivated them to trade in the obvious lies and misrepresentation of the facts.

Fact is the business has been capital challenged for years and following the CCAA Proceedings (bankruptcy in Canada) which began in November 2016 they couldn't raise any capital due to the convicted criminal status of the CEO. If Laliberte had any brains he would have brought in someone that knew what they were doing. But his ego too big for that and at the end of the day his only interest was in creating "the illusion of progress".

UAMA biggest blunder was after acquiring RuralCom, a market-ready wholesale cellular carrier with roaming agreements and a CEO who had brought in term sheets from qualified investors, they chose to "go it alone", chase the potential funding and fall flat on their face. Funny how those investors got scared off by the convicted criminal status of Benoit Laliberte and quickly showed him the door!

Fact is RuralCom could have quickly be built into a successful wholesale cellular carrier enjoying positive cash-flow status. Huge missed opportunity!

[65actual]

Complicit posters should be held accountable.

For years they supported this POS fraudulent company and its convicted criminal CEO, Benoit Laliberte. They thought he was wonderful which says a lot for the value of their advice and their ability to effectively assess management potential. My guess most suffer from their own character foibles. CAVEAT EMPTOR should have been the byword for any involvement with UAMA et al.

Guess some are super embarrassed over their behavior and they sought to support this obviously fraudulent enterprise led by a CEO who was convicted on 43 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

Maybe those former cheerleaders could come out of the shadows and explain what motivated them to trade in the obvious lies and misrepresentation of the facts.

Fact is the business has been capital challenged for years and following the CCAA Proceedings (bankruptcy in Canada) which began in November 2016 they couldn't raise any capital due to the convicted criminal status of the CEO. If Laliberte had any brains he would have brought in someone that knew what they were doing. But his ego too big for that and at the end of the day his only interest was in creating "the illusion of progress".

UAMA biggest blunder was after acquiring RuralCom, a market-ready wholesale cellular carrier with roaming agreements and a CEO who had brought in term sheets from qualified investors, they chose to "go it alone", chase the potential funding and fall flat on their face. Funny how those investors got scared off by the convicted criminal status of Benoit Laliberte and quickly showed him the door!

Fact is RuralCom could have quickly be built into a successful wholesale cellular carrier enjoying positive cash-flow status. Huge missed opportunity!

[65actual]

Complicit posters engaged in fraud.

For years they supported this POS fraudulent company and its convicted criminal CEO, Benoit Laliberte. They thought he was wonderful which says a lot for the value of their advice and their ability to effectively assess management potential. My guess most suffer from their own character foibles. CAVEAT EMPTOR should have been the byword for any involvement with UAMA et al.

Guess some are super embarrassed over their behavior and they sought to support this obviously fraudulent enterprise led by a CEO who was convicted on 43 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

Maybe those former cheerleaders could come out of the shadows and explain what motivated them to trade in the obvious lies and misrepresentation of the facts.

Fact is the business has been capital challenged for years and following the CCAA Proceedings (bankruptcy in Canada) which began in November 2016 they couldn't raise any capital due to the convicted criminal status of the CEO. If Laliberte had any brains he would have brought in someone that knew what they were doing. But his ego too big for that and at the end of the day his only interest was in creating "the illusion of progress".

UAMA biggest blunder was after acquiring RuralCom, a market-ready wholesale cellular carrier with roaming agreements and a CEO who had brought in term sheets from qualified investors, they chose to "go it alone", chase the potential funding and fall flat on their face. Funny how those investors got scared off by the convicted criminal status of Benoit Laliberte and quickly showed him the door!

Fact is RuralCom could have quickly be built into a successful wholesale cellular carrier enjoying positive cash-flow status. Huge missed opportunity!

[65actual]

LOL, complicit posters long gone!

For years they supported this POS fraudulent company and its convicted criminal CEO, Benoit Laliberte. They thought he was wonderful which says a lot for the value of their advice

Guess some are super embarrassed over their behavior and they sought to support this obviously fraudulent enterprise led by a CEO who was convicted on 43 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

Maybe those former cheerleaders could come out of the shadows and explain what motivated them to trade in the obvious lies and misrepresentation of the facts.

Fact is the business has been capital challenged for years and following the CCAA Proceedings (bankruptcy in Canada) which began in November 2016 they couldn't raise any capital due to the convicted criminal status of the CEO. If Laliberte had any brains he would have brought in someone that knew what they were doing. But his ego too big for that and at the end of the day his only interest was in creating "the illusion of progress".

UAMA biggest blunder was after acquiring RuralCom, a market-ready wholesale cellular carrier with roaming agreements and a CEO who had brought in term sheets from qualified investors, they chose to "go it alone", chase the potential funding and fall flat on their face. Funny how those investors got scared off by the convicted criminal status of Benoit Laliberte and quickly showed him the door!

Fact is RuralCom could have quickly be built into a successful wholesale cellular carrier enjoying positive cash-flow status. Huge missed opportunity!

[65actual]

Is Benoit Laliberte, UAMA CEO repeat offender?

UAMA CEO knowingly committed fraud in SEC filing!

Here are the facts:
- Benoit Laliberte signs filings as President, CEO and CFO of UAMA
- Claims "NO violations in past 10 years" in Pink reports of YE 2018, Q1 2019, Q2 2019
- Court found him guilty v AMF in April 2009 on additional 3 counts in addition to convictions on 41 counts in 2008
- Evidence clear on convictions within past 10 years at time of filings.
- Convictions were stated by The Canadian Press as "stock fraud", "market manipulation" and "deceiving investors"

Look it up yourself:
• go to OTC Markets
• enter UAMA in "Quote" field
• when UAMA page opens click on "Disclosure" heading where you will find all reports and financials

It is clear. Mr. Benoit Laliberte did knowlingly commit fraud in these UAMA reports.

Seems like he is "repeat offender"

Complaints have been filed with the SEC

[65actual]

UAMA CEO guilty of FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION?

1) US Pink-listed companies must file public disclosure documents.

2) Those Pink filing documents subject to SEC oversight especially when FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION reported.

3) See following identical case:

Identical violations! Benoit Laliberte claims he had no prior criminal convictions within the past 10 years in the latest YE 2018 and 1Q & 2Q 2019 UAMA Quarterly Reports and Pink Disclosures. The evidence is clear he was found guilty on 44 of 48 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors, with latest conviction in April 2009, clearly within the 10 year time period. UAMA Pink OTC market same as below and multiple violations so no accident.

Quote:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22442 / August 10, 2012

SEC v. Ronald D. Brooks, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2716 (N.D. Tx. Aug. 9, 2012)

SEC Charges Former Public Company CEO with Fraud

On August 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging that Ronald D. Brooks committed securities fraud while serving as CEO and chairman of Standard Oil Company USA, Inc., a purported energy company headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Brooks signed and certified Standard Oil’s initial disclosure statement filed with the Pink OTC Markets and made available to investors through that market’s website. Brooks represented in the disclosure statement that he had no prior criminal convictions. In fact, however, Brooks has three prior felony convictions, two for securities violations. The SEC therefore alleges that Brooks defrauded Standard Oil’s investors. The complaint charges Brooks with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and seeks a permanent injunction, a civil monetary penalty, an officer-and-director bar, and a penny-stock bar.



If SEC took same action with UAMA that would mean:

a) permanent injunction, and
b) a civil monetary penalty, and
c) officer-and-director bar, and
d) a penny-stock bar.

That would effectively protect the public market and investors by preventing Mr. Laliberte from acting in any capacity for a publicly-listed company. Action is long overdue in bringing Mr. Laliberte to justice for his well documented and evidenced fraudulent misrepresentation.

In case of Mr. Laliberte the quantity and seriousness of past convictions could result in the filing of criminal charges which could result in jail time for Mr. Laliberte. According to other posts on this board (Bilal Khabab) Mr. Laliberte never paid his fine to Quebec, has been an undischarged (and undisclosed) personal bankrupt for over ten (10) years and failed to properly disclose $47M bankruptcy of Navigata-Westel and receivership of Investel Capital Corp. Expect the SEC to take all of this into consideration when they get around to appropriate prosecution.

All of this will be devastating to UAMA and shareholders. Like INELCO and TELIPHONE both revoked by SEC? Mr. Benoit Laliberte and Mr. Lawry Trevor-Deutsch both deeply involved in the pleadings for those failures.

caveat emptor - CAVEAT EMPTOR

[65actual]

Attention SEC: Prosecute UAMA CEO

UAMA CEO knowingly committed fraud in SEC filing!

Here are the facts:
- Benoit Laliberte signs as President, CEO and CFO of UAMA
- Claims "no violations in past 10 years" in Pink reports of YE 2018, Q1 2019, Q2 2019
- Court found him guilty v AMF in April 2009 on additional 3 counts
- Evidence clear of convictions within past 10 years at time of filings.

So Mr. Benoit Laliberte did knowlingly commit fraud in these UAMA reports.

Complaints have been filed with the SEC.

[65actual]

UAMA CEO knowingly committed fraud in SEC filings!

Here are the facts:
- Benoit Laliberte signs as President, CEO and CFO of UAMA
- Claims "no violations in past 10 years" in Pink reports of YE 2018, Q1 2019, Q2 2019
- Court found him guilty v AMF in April 2009 on additional 3 counts
- Evidence clear of convictions within past 10 years at time of filings.

So Mr. Benoit Laliberte did knowlingly commit fraud in these UAMA reports.

Complaints have been filed with the SEC.

[65actual]

Attention SEC. Prosecute Benoit Laliberte,

Evidence supports conviction of UAMA CEO.

1) US Pink-listed companies must file public disclosure documents.

2) Those Pink filing documents subject to SEC oversight especially when FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION reported.

3) See following identical case:

Identical violations! Benoit Laliberte claims he had no prior criminal convictions within the past 10 years in the latest 2018-19 UAMA Quarterly Reports and Pink Disclosures. (See YE 2018 disclosures and Q1 and Q2 2019 disclosure reports). The evidence is clear he was found guilty on 44 of 48 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors, with latest conviction in April 2009, clearly within the 10 year time period. UAMA Pink OTC market same as below and multiple violations so no accident.

Quote:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22442 / August 10, 2012

SEC v. Ronald D. Brooks, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2716 (N.D. Tx. Aug. 9, 2012)

SEC Charges Former Public Company CEO with Fraud

On August 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging that Ronald D. Brooks committed securities fraud while serving as CEO and chairman of Standard Oil Company USA, Inc., a purported energy company headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Brooks signed and certified Standard Oil’s initial disclosure statement filed with the Pink OTC Markets and made available to investors through that market’s website. Brooks represented in the disclosure statement that he had no prior criminal convictions. In fact, however, Brooks has three prior felony convictions, two for securities violations. The SEC therefore alleges that Brooks defrauded Standard Oil’s investors. The complaint charges Brooks with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and seeks a permanent injunction, a civil monetary penalty, an officer-and-director bar, and a penny-stock bar.


If SEC took same action with UAMA that would mean:

a) permanent injunction, and
b) a civil monetary penalty, and
c) officer-and-director bar, and
d) a penny-stock bar.

That would effectively protect the public market and investors by preventing Mr. Laliberte from acting in any capacity for a publicly-listed company. Action is long overdue in bringing Mr. Laliberte to justice for his well documented and evidenced fraudulent misrepresentation.

In case of Mr. Laliberte the quantity and seriousness of past convictions could result in the filing of criminal charges which could result in jail time for Mr. Laliberte. According to other posts on this board (Bilal Khabab) Mr. Laliberte never paid his fine to Quebec, has been an undischarged (and undisclosed) personal bankrupt for over ten (10) years and failed to properly disclose $47M bankruptcy of Navigata-Westel and receivership of Investel Capital Corp. Expect the SEC to take all of this into consideration when they get around to appropriate prosecution.

All of this will be devastating to UAMA and shareholders. Like INELCO and TELIPHONE both revoked by SEC? Mr. Benoit Laliberte and Mr. Lawry Trevor-Deutsch both deeply involved in the pleadings for those failures.

caveat emptor - CAVEAT EMPTOR

[65actual]

SEC needs to prosecute Benoit Laliberte, UAMA CEO

Evidence supports conviction of UAMA CEO.

1) US Pink-listed companies must file public disclosure documents.

2) Those Pink filing documents subject to SEC oversight especially when FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION reported.

3) See following identical case:

Identical violations! Benoit Laliberte claims he had no prior criminal convictions within the past 10 years in the latest 2018-19 UAMA Quarterly Reports and Pink Disclosures. (See YE 2018 disclosures and Q1 and Q2 2019 disclosure reports). The evidence is clear he was found guilty on 44 of 48 counts of stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors, with latest conviction in April 2009, clearly within the 10 year time period. UAMA Pink OTC market same as below and multiple violations so no accident.

Quote:
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 22442 / August 10, 2012

SEC v. Ronald D. Brooks, Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-2716 (N.D. Tx. Aug. 9, 2012)

SEC Charges Former Public Company CEO with Fraud

On August 9, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas alleging that Ronald D. Brooks committed securities fraud while serving as CEO and chairman of Standard Oil Company USA, Inc., a purported energy company headquartered in Dallas, Texas.

According to the SEC’s complaint, Brooks signed and certified Standard Oil’s initial disclosure statement filed with the Pink OTC Markets and made available to investors through that market’s website. Brooks represented in the disclosure statement that he had no prior criminal convictions. In fact, however, Brooks has three prior felony convictions, two for securities violations. The SEC therefore alleges that Brooks defrauded Standard Oil’s investors. The complaint charges Brooks with violating Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder and seeks a permanent injunction, a civil monetary penalty, an officer-and-director bar, and a penny-stock bar.


If SEC took same action with UAMA that would mean:

a) permanent injunction, and
b) a civil monetary penalty, and
c) officer-and-director bar, and
d) a penny-stock bar.

That would effectively protect the public market and investors by preventing Mr. Laliberte from acting in any capacity for a publicly-listed company. Action is long overdue in bringing Mr. Laliberte to justice for his well documented and evidenced fraudulent misrepresentation.

In case of Mr. Laliberte the quantity and seriousness of past convictions could result in the filing of criminal charges which could result in jail time for Mr. Laliberte. According to other posts on this board (Bilal Khabab) Mr. Laliberte never paid his fine to Quebec, has been an undischarged (and undisclosed) personal bankrupt for over ten (10) years and failed to properly disclose $47M bankruptcy of Navigata-Westel and receivership of Investel Capital Corp. Expect the SEC to take all of this into consideration when they get around to appropriate prosecution.

All of this will be devastating to UAMA and shareholders. Like INELCO and TELIPHONE both revoked by SEC? Mr. Benoit Laliberte and Mr. Lawry Trevor-Deutsch both deeply involved in the pleadings for those failures.

caveat emptor - CAVEAT EMPTOR

[fromtheuk]

Happy Holidays, and a prosperous New Year.

[65actual]

SEC should prosecute Benoit Laliberte.

Falsified SEC disclosure docs when he submitted signed and executed claiming NO CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS within 10 years.

Abundant evidence of Mr. Laliberte's convictions during the time period fro stock fraud, market manipulation and deceiving investors.

Prosecute him!