Home > Boards > US OTC > Delisted >

UnifiedOnline Inc. (fka UOIP)

RSS Feed
Add Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: Goodbuddy4863, Ultimate Warrior, shajandr, TKane, Gmc2020, magnus_invest
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 8/25/2019 5:23:49 PM - Followers: 471 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 12

UnifiedOnline, Inc. (Delisted ticker: UOIP)

Active patent case v 13 high-tech companies

FINRA ticker was revoked on July 17, 2019

UOIP is no longer trading on Gray Market


CEO Mr. Robert "Rob" Maull Howe III
(Also Company President and Secretary)

Executive Profile: The late "Rob" Howe was
the CEO, President, and the Secretary of the
UnitedOnline, Inc. until his passing in 2018.

"Rob" received a baccalaureate degree from
Birmingham Southern College and received
his master's degree from Auburn University.

(In Memoriam: 9/21/1946-5/24/2018)


UOIP OTC Markets Company Profile Link: https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UOIP/profile

UOIP EDGAR Online Details: http://yahoo.brand.edgar-online.com/default.aspx?cik=1097718

UnifiedOnline, Inc. (the “Company”) began trading publicly in April 2002.  During the six months ended Dec. 31, 2015 we had three wholly owned operating subsidiaries, Computers & Telecom, Inc. and KCNAP, LLC, (collectively “CTC) and IceWEB Storage Corporation (formerly known as Inline Corporation).  CTC provides wireless and fiber broadband service, co-location space and related services and operates a Network Access Point (“NAP”) where customers directly interconnect with a network ecosystem of partners and customers.  This access to Internet routes provides CTC customers improved reliability and streamlined connectivity while significantly reducing costs by reaching a critical mass of networks within a centralized physical location.  In addition, through our IceWEB Storage Corporation subsidiary we deliver on-line cloud computing application services, other managed services such as Disaster Recovery, Archive Storage, Redundant File Storage, Redundant Broadband Services and Business Continuity Services.CTC operates a wireless internet service business, providing WIMAX broadband to small and medium size businesses in the metro Kansas-City, Missouri area.  In addition, CTC offers the following solutions: (i) premium data center co-location, (ii) interconnection and (iii) exchange and outsourced IT infrastructure services. We leverage our NAP which allows our customers to increase information and application delivery performance while reducing costs.  Our platform enables scalable, reliable and cost-effective co-location, interconnection and traffic exchange thus lowering overall cost and increasing flexibility. On Oct. 27, 2015, the Company acquired 100% of the membership interest ChanBond, LLC (ChanBond), a portfolio of patents that disclose technology that allows cable companies to provide high-speed data transmission over their existing hybrid-fiber coaxial networks. The Company entered into a purchase agreement with Deirdre Leane and ChanBond, LLC, pursuant to which the Company purchased Chanbond, in exchange for $5,000,000 payable on or before Oct. 27, 2020, and a shares payment of forty-four million, seven hundred thousand (44,700,000) shares of the Company’s common stock. William R. Carter, Jr. (a related party to the Company) was appointed as sole manager who shall have sole and exclusive authority over the business of ChanBond. ChanBond consists of a portfolio of patents that disclose technology that allows cable companies to provide high-speed data transmission over their existing hybrid-fiber coaxial networks. The purchase of ChanBond included acquisition of intangibles currently valued at $5,223,500. The initial accounting for the business combination of ChanBond with the Company is not complete as the Company is working on obtaining valuation reports to support amounts. The Company may record possible contingent assets due to the lawsuits to which ChanBond is currently a plaintiff.  ChanBond contends that virtually every cable multi-system operator (MSO) in the U.S. utilizing DOCSIS 3.0+ is infringing upon its patents, and accordingly, on Sept. 21, 2015 ChanBond filed lawsuits in U.S. District Court in Delaware against the 13 largest cable MSOs in the country.


5/23/2018: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PTAB/IPR2018-00572/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8341679/06-01-2018-Patent_Owner/Exhibit-2043-62-EX2043_DI_271_2018_05_24_Amended_Scheduling_Order/

Court Schedule effective February 2019https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn%3Aaaid%3Ascds%3AUS%3Ad7f03909-6e04-4a95-b750-69af8272c2d2

What lies ahead next for Chanbond (and UOIP):

* Pre-trial Conference: TBA

* First 5-day jury trial: TBA

Counsel for Patent Owner ChanBond, LLC

Mishcon DE Reya

Robert Whitman
Andrea Pacelli

Ascenda Law Group

333 W San Carlos Street, Suite 200

San Jose, CA 95110

2018-00575: https://www.docketalarm.com/cases/PTAB/IPR2018-00575/Inter_Partes_Review_of_U.S._Pat._8984565/05-16-2018-Patent_Owner/Exhibit-2005-24-EX2005_DI_247_2018_04_24_Stipulation__Proposed_Order_to_Amend_Scheduling_Order/

No. 17-1686: https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/17-1686.html

ChanBond, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

A little more detail on Chanbond/Cisco appeal. 

- Court started Calendar Stage with date of hearing to be scheduled by Oct 2019 and requesting scheduling conflicts. 
- Both sides submitted their conflicts in March. 
- Court hears argument only in 1st week of a month (except July is 2nd week) 
- Court Calendar currently does not show Chanbond /Cisco in June or July schedule- that leaves Aug, Sept, & Oct. 

If curious, check Court Calendar out at: 
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 

The life of an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit


Court Case: https://search.rpxcorp.com/ent/969818-chanbond-llc

Court Proceedings Schedule

Decision for Cisco (~1/3rd of -822 patent unpatentable) / Appeal filed by UOIP:
April 26, 2018: https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/24339392/ChanBond,_LLC_v_Cisco_Systems,_Inc
February 24, 2018: https://ptab.uspto.gov/ptabe2e/rest/petitions/1469056/documents/d29ya3NwYWNlOi8vU3BhY2VzU3RvcmUvYmM4MTRkODEtNjI0OS00YmI1LTg0NDUtNjMwNTg4MWYzMGFkOzEuMA====/anonymousDownload

Willful Infringement for treble damages (3x standard) / Deposition of Comcast SVP (Intellectual Proporty Strategy):
April 10, 2018: https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139940185
September 15, 2017: http://www.reexamlink.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/ChanBond-Complaint-ded-1-15-cv-00848-1.pdf

RPX Can't appeal:
Jan 17, 2018: https://www.bna.com/patent-risk-defense-n73014474290/

PTAB Decision for UOIP:
April 3, 2017: https://www.natlawreview.com/article/chanbond-avoids-institution-six-cisco-ipr-petitions
March 30, 2017: https://www.law360.com/articles/907966/ptab-nixes-six-cisco-ipr-petitions-over-networking-patents

Markman Hearing for UOIP:
Dec 9, 2016: https://www.morrisjames.com/assets/htmldocuments/patent%20blog%20-%20Chanbond%20-%201826.pdf

Pacer Court Updates (MSO's):

-918: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7346918B2
-822: https://patents.google.com/patent/US7941822B2
-679: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8341679
-565: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8984565B2
-774: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9015774B2
Pending: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20130266050A1
Pending: https://patents.google.com/patent/US20140150038A1

Background on Billy Carter (Holds 900 million shares of UOIP):
July 13, 2013: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/14/business/how-a-typical-patent-battle-took-an-unexpected-turn.html

UOIP's lawyer, Robert Whitman:



PTAB Nixes Six Cisco IPR Petitions Over Networking Patents
By Kelcee Griffis

Law360, New York (March 30, 2017, 5:59 PM EDT) -- The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has denied six petitions for inter partes review launched by Cisco Systems Inc., shooting down the company’s bid to invalidate two high-speed networking patents held by ChanBond LLC. In declining to review the two relevant patents, the PTAB said Wednesday that Cisco failed to show that the patents are likely invalid after ChanBond asserted the patents against a group of telecom companies. ChanBond has been active in asserting the patents against major cable companies including Charter Communications Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Comcast Corp. and others, court records show. In response, Cisco filed six separate IPR challenges with the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in September 2016. Now, the PTAB says Cisco has not proved that it can be successful in invalidating the challenged claims. Both of the challenged patents cover a “system and method for distribution of digital signals onto, and off of, a wideband signal distribution system,” according to case documents. Andrea Pacelli, an attorney with Mishcon de Reya New York LLP who represented ChanBond, told Law360 on Thursday that the board’s decision focused on two elements: claims construction regarding the term “RF channel” and analysis of potential prior art references that Cisco had put forth. The board found that the term “RF channel” should be given the "broadest reasonable interpretation." As such, it does not include “code channels” such as data streams and only applies to frequency bands. The PTAB also said that asserted prior art references can’t be combined to reach the patents at issue. “We agree with patent owner that petitioner does not show adequately that any of the cited portions of the prior art references teach modulating digital information into at least two separate RF channels as required by each of the challenged claims,” the board said. Robert Whitman, ChanBond lead attorney, said in a Thursday statement that the company was pleased that the PTAB agreed with ChanBond "on virtually all issues." “The board’s decision confirms the strength of ChanBond’s patents,” he said. Counsel for Cisco declined to comment Thursday. The patents-in-suit are U.S. Patent Nos. 8,341,679 and 8,894,565. ChanBond is represented by Robert Whitman, Timothy Rousseau, Andrea Pacelli and John Petrsoric of Mishcon de Reya New York LLP. Cisco is represented by Wayne Stacy and Kathryn Juffa of Baker Botts LLPThe cases are Cisco Systems Inc. v. ChanBond LLC, case nos. IPR2016-01889/IPR2016-01890/IPR2016-01898/IPR2016-0189/IPR2016-01899/IPR2016-01900, before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. --Editing by Sara Ziegler

Case #:
  Nature of Suit
830 Property Rights - Patent
35:271 Patent Infringement
                           Case Filed:
      Sep 21, 2015

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.001 par value:

Outstanding at February 15, 2016 was: 1,011,928,504

Insider ownership per filing: 903,325,954

Some Possible Settlement Amounts / Outstanding Shares:

  $10 million settlement: $0.01 PPS
  $50 million settlement: $0.05 PPS
$100 million settlement: $0.10 PPS
$250 million settlement: $0.25 PPS
$500 million settlement: $0.50 PPS

A $1 billion settlement: $1.00 PPS




10/9/2018 Certificate of Interest (Form 9) with share relationship between Chanbond and UOIP


Registration of UOIP Securities REVOKED by SEC

#71912  Sticky Note Some background on the UnifiedOnline Inc purchase of magnus_invest 08/12/19 11:13:33 AM
#71623  Sticky Note UPDATED PACER REPORTS: Goodbuddy4863 08/07/19 11:09:35 PM
#71331  Sticky Note Scruffer's 10 stages of defendant's psychological mindset Scruffer 08/03/19 10:09:36 AM
#60532  Sticky Note ABSOLUTE MUST READ STICKY Ultimate Warrior 01/14/19 09:54:01 AM
#59560  Sticky Note Subpenny turd shajandr 12/13/18 02:51:17 PM
#46778  Sticky Note Everyone get back and stay on-topic. IH Geek [Dave] 06/06/18 11:40:10 AM
#72504   That is funny! money2013 08/25/19 05:23:49 PM
#72503   I wonder how many read any of the AllinFun 08/25/19 05:07:45 PM
#72502   I have discussed this matter with Dutch, and TonyJoe1957 08/25/19 05:05:49 PM
#72500   Think the problem with Verizon and Att is Nicasurf 08/25/19 04:54:17 PM
#72499   Dutch does not agree with you. Keep TonyJoe1957 08/25/19 04:34:48 PM
#72497   I'm old enough to look at it this rockie101 08/25/19 04:13:39 PM
#72496   This is where we go next.... Long term 08/25/19 03:21:47 PM
#72495   No biggie...just dead money...back to mowing the lawn...AJ TonyJoe1957 08/25/19 01:06:49 PM
#72494   Tony you haven't done ENOUGH YET....you still got rockie101 08/25/19 10:36:17 AM
#72493   Hey man, you continue to outdo yourself!! Nothing gooferball 08/25/19 09:56:13 AM
#72492   I think he knows Bruce's dog. TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 09:21:06 PM
#72491   Omg ... this is PRICELESS Tony. I Gm1850 08/24/19 07:28:12 PM
#72490   Just for fun: TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 07:03:18 PM
#72489   Besides the inventors being in court I this justus1 08/24/19 01:28:50 PM
#72488   Enjoyed watching this last night. Makes you appreciate justus1 08/24/19 01:23:10 PM
#72487   Just keeping it simple. Volume has about TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 12:53:11 PM
#72486   That opening might be the only thing they Gm1850 08/24/19 12:50:15 PM
#72485   PS: I seriously considering staring with "did any TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 12:32:53 PM
#72484   I took it easy on them. Stay TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 12:30:47 PM
#72483   Only 2 bounced back...sent today. TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 12:30:17 PM
#72482   Definetly an awesome salutation to begin with lmao Targun 08/24/19 12:29:43 PM
#72481   How should I open the email I send TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 12:09:31 PM
#72480   Same here. I sold the half tripling what Targun 08/24/19 11:13:56 AM
#72479   Now I wish I had never sold any....most rockie101 08/24/19 10:49:47 AM
#72478   Mine are free, but not as free as TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 10:32:59 AM
#72477   BA....my best buy was several hundred thousands at rockie101 08/24/19 09:54:54 AM
#72476   Prime rib nite with a long island iced tea! TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 09:38:45 AM
#72475   Splendid !!! Enjoy your weekend as well please Gm1850 08/24/19 09:28:37 AM
#72474   I will send emails to torment them and TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 09:26:49 AM
#72473   Top 10 Institutional Holdings of CommScope with emails Gm1850 08/24/19 09:23:27 AM
#72472   Cisco thing is not relevant IMHO. COMM TonyJoe1957 08/24/19 09:09:27 AM
#72471   Personally I don’t see the relevance with Cisco, rbd1 08/24/19 09:04:41 AM
#72470   The article says they have been doing layoffs MjMilo 08/24/19 09:00:14 AM
#72469   Interesting find BA. This may be just thunley1 08/24/19 08:09:10 AM
#72468   Hmmm. Not sure what to make of this. https://www.wraltechwire.com/2019/08/23/cis BrokeAgent 08/24/19 02:51:21 AM
#72467   No. Far cry from my average. :( Though BrokeAgent 08/24/19 02:42:21 AM
#72466   Sweet. Hope loaded the boat. Need Pacer. Scruffer 08/23/19 09:04:19 PM
#72465   Sure hope settlement. Long drawn-out trial may break_me. Scruffer 08/23/19 08:43:15 PM
#72464   I got some of the .0019s. ;) BrokeAgent 08/23/19 08:39:48 PM
#72463   Cool! Kinda tough to identify or develop a fact TonyJoe1957 08/23/19 08:31:40 PM
#72462   .005 for me and a couple of friends. Mic ll 08/23/19 08:27:15 PM
#72461   Oops! Here'e the exact formula 4 % gain. Scruffer 08/23/19 08:12:02 PM
#72460   I guess that would be determined if they BrokeAgent 08/23/19 07:58:36 PM
#72459   Average volume has gone up quite a bit TonyJoe1957 08/23/19 05:00:57 PM
#72458   Yeah good old days.. I remember trying to Targun 08/23/19 04:40:42 PM
#72457   Look for COMM to go below 10.00 next rockie101 08/23/19 04:07:23 PM
#72456   Thanks BrokeAgent magnus_invest 08/23/19 03:02:08 PM
#72455   Not all of those shares were sold into BrokeAgent 08/23/19 02:53:06 PM
#72454   Yes, I am referring to the market cap magnus_invest 08/23/19 02:45:56 PM
#72453   Beats the heck out of me. Money? TonyJoe1957 08/23/19 02:43:28 PM