SureTrader Nadex Advertisement Interactive Brokers Advertisement SureTrader
Home > Boards > US OTC > Alternative Energy >

Solar Wind Energy Tower, Inc. (SWET)

SWET RSS Feed
Add SWET Price Alert      Hide Sticky   Hide Intro
Moderator: waterchaser, Ben Lurkin, Homebrew, swingingRichard, Cycleman
Search This Board: 
Last Post: 5/26/2017 8:31:54 AM - Followers: 179 - Board type: Free - Posts Today: 0

 

SWET Logo

 

WARNING: REPEATED PR PUMP & DUMP. NOTHING ACCOMPLISHED
EMPTY SHARE SELLING SCAM !!
BOGUS CONCEPT DEFIES LAWS OF PHYSICS - BUYER BEWARE
1. Humid air is LESS Dense than dry air, so will not flow down.
2. Pumping water to the top, + efficiency losses, will use MORE energy than can be gained. SWET is promoting a "Perpetual Motion Machine", that's impossible.



BEWARE:

PERIODIC PUMP-N-DUMP PROMOTIONS UNDERWAY

for SWET ZOMBIE TICKER.
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 2M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 2Y
  • 3Y
  • 5Y
SWET
Current Price
Volume:
Bid Ask Day's Range
SWET News: Quarterly Report (10-q) 05/12/2017 03:54:15 PM
SWET News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 04/17/2017 11:11:05 AM
SWET News: Amended Notification That Annual Report Will Be Submitted Late (nt 10-k/a) 04/10/2017 04:37:13 PM
SWET News: Notification That Annual Report Will Be Submitted Late (nt 10-k) 04/10/2017 11:06:18 AM
SWET News: Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership (4) 03/30/2017 12:36:53 PM
PostSubject
#14463  Sticky Note These guys (Pickett and his "scientists") are sitting Ben Lurkin 03/18/17 04:07:31 PM
#11952  Sticky Note BEWARE: PUMP-N-DUMP PROMOTION UNDERWAY, SWET ZOMBIE TICKER. Homebrew 06/08/16 02:07:38 PM
#10467  Sticky Note Just priceless. 20 billion shares and a 1 swingingRichard 09/17/15 10:35:06 PM
#15324   $SWET Rating Barchart as of pre trading Friday Dailygainz trading 05/26/17 08:31:54 AM
#15323   the way they've stacked it The term the Ben Lurkin 05/25/17 09:30:23 AM
#15322   Barchart rating 100% LINK below Very nice price Dailygainz trading 05/25/17 08:55:46 AM
#15321   I don't understand why you are having such Cycleman 05/25/17 08:48:26 AM
#15320   Does "keep up" really mean "keep down" then? Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 11:09:12 PM
#15319   "going out of trips" is the opposite Yes, Cycleman 05/24/17 10:31:09 PM
#15318   "WTF, why isn't this back at 0.0001 by Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 05:36:50 PM
#15317   What part of my calling this a POS Cycleman 05/24/17 04:19:47 PM
#15316   Hard to believe, isn't it? Slojab 05/24/17 03:57:18 PM
#15315   It is???? So how did this jewel Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 03:27:11 PM
#15314   And yet, nevertheless, this POS is making a Cycleman 05/24/17 02:55:20 PM
#15312   This all comes from a single source of Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 02:01:53 PM
#15311   Here is another misconception. Holding a Patent Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 12:23:20 PM
#15310   Here's some useful patents . . . swingingRichard 05/24/17 11:42:18 AM
#15309   That makes sense. Some of the claims Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 11:37:31 AM
#15308   They did name one guy. A friend of swingingRichard 05/24/17 11:33:26 AM
#15307   Google searches can be a scary thing....sometimes like Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 11:33:20 AM
#15306   Well, there ya go. Case closed. Slojab 05/24/17 11:30:05 AM
#15305   A model or prototype is normally not required Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 11:28:45 AM
#15304   Correct. That's why my machine to convert Slojab 05/24/17 11:27:54 AM
#15303   From what I have researched, I believe that CyberC 05/24/17 11:27:01 AM
#15302   That allows the patent office to deny the Slojab 05/24/17 11:26:41 AM
#15301   And here is some research you missed. Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 11:19:53 AM
#15300   The patent law specifies that the subject matter CyberC 05/24/17 11:14:40 AM
#15299   HERE IS SOME RESEARCH YOU MISSED: CyberC 05/24/17 11:13:08 AM
#15298   They are called "consultants" to "protect their identity". Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 11:02:31 AM
#15297   Name these scientists. swingingRichard 05/24/17 10:35:54 AM
#15296   You need to do research on the requirements Slojab 05/24/17 09:38:47 AM
#15295   There has to be a reason for this Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 09:22:24 AM
#15294   and hence the study's to see how high Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 09:20:37 AM
#15293   In order to get patents on a system, Ben Lurkin 05/24/17 09:18:32 AM
#15292   You may be correct, either scenario will be CyberC 05/24/17 08:37:22 AM
#15291   I agree mostly with you. I do see Dailygainz trading 05/24/17 08:30:24 AM
#15290   You are correct, and hence the study's to CyberC 05/24/17 07:42:40 AM
#15289   SWET bases their projections on several patents. CyberC 05/24/17 07:30:01 AM
#15288   SWET http://www.solarwindenergytower.com/the-tower.html#towervid bythemills 05/24/17 01:39:17 AM
#15287   At the same volume, temp, and pressure, the Ben Lurkin 05/23/17 08:00:51 PM
#15286   There are scientists who believe otherwise. The strawpatch 05/23/17 07:49:33 PM
#15285   This makes no sense. swingingRichard 05/23/17 03:51:47 PM
#15284   Didn't say they should. I said they Ben Lurkin 05/23/17 01:37:36 PM
#15282   Yes it does. And that amount of Ben Lurkin 05/23/17 12:31:36 PM
#15281   It's good to know that Pickett religiously follows Ben Lurkin 05/23/17 12:22:53 PM
#15280   The energy from evaporative cooling releases HEAT resulting 300stk 05/23/17 11:42:34 AM
#15278   I am really hoping for the "new" final strawpatch 05/23/17 08:40:25 AM
#15277   This is a good sign. strawpatch 05/23/17 08:39:37 AM
#15276   $SWET analyst Barchart giving it a 64% buy https://www.barchart.com/stocks/quo Dailygainz trading 05/23/17 08:27:00 AM
#15275   Nonsense. So now we go back to Ben Lurkin 05/22/17 08:27:35 PM
#15274   It is a standard delay tactic. That Ben Lurkin 05/22/17 08:25:59 PM
#15273   And considering they didn't complete the K for 300stk 05/22/17 08:25:53 PM
#15272   You are correct it doesn't take a year 300stk 05/22/17 08:20:28 PM
PostSubject