Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
TOMKiLA
8:13 AM
$NLST lol
Samsung is reportedly planning to adopt a manufacturing technology used by its HBM rival SK Hynix. However, the company has denied the rumors.
https://www.ccn.com/news/samsung-denies-plans-to-copy-sk-hynix-hbm-chip-manufacturing/
if they agreed it cant be bad. no need to over think that one.
NLST agreeing to this delay....hmmm...its for ethical reasons? we got them right where we want them...
birds of a feather so they say. once we can get in the court room again, prevail we will.
Yes sir, scamscum, micrumb, googs and clowny are a good match.
NLST will prevail eventually.
i think your about right. its cowardly and decietful hence why they keep delaying getting in front of a judge.
I'm guessing it's a self portrait. Maybe scamscum and micrumb can arrange to use its likeness.
Correct, Green looks good on NLST.
pink is a nice color. it shows ones true self. maybe scamsong and micrap should use it their logos. nlst should go with deep green.
right now its all a play of words holding it up. what would be fantastic is if the judge intervened and informed both parties of a show up to court date or forfeit. there both guilty and even they know it. thats why they keep trying to stay out of the court room.
So you think the BOC will be delayed ..and if so. It could be a month or two?
A settlement would be great.. I think we got both of them right where we want them..
Doc...464 STATEMENT of the Case filed by Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Feinstein, Marc) (Entered: 03/13/2024)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.464.0.pdf
Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 463 Filed 03/13/24
Jury Instructions
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.463.0.pdf
Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 462 Filed 03/13/24
Proposed Verdict Forms
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.462.0.pdf
They are definitely not waving the white flag. Either make us an offer or go to court. It's really that simple!
The more I look at this stupid BOC case, the more I realize that Samsung is in a very precarious position.
Samsung is saying that the JDLA was about "manufacturing a specific NVDIMM-P product, if this product was ever commercialized.". But the JDLA isn't worded like that. It simply says that they would supply NAND and DRAM at Netlist's requests, at a preferred price. It is ambiguous. Indeed, the very reason the 9th returned the case to Scarsi's court was that the agreement WAS ambiguous and needed to be looked at again.
From Silvia J over on ST:
Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 464 Filed 03/13/24
the way this is playing out right now who knows. still need the judges signature to say whether or not it is medically approved so the clown with emoji ocd's can keep busy. then you need scums reply to this..........
NOTICE OF DELAY IN PREPARATION OF REVISED JOINT DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS—"Plaintiff Netlist, Inc., by and through its undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Notice that the parties have been working diligently on preparing revised jury instructions. Netlist sent its last proposal at 5:20 PM on March 12, 2024. Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. sent its last proposal at 2:30AM on March 13, 2024. Netlist is waiting for Samsung’s final approval to submit a joint document. As soon as that is received, Netlist will file."
they so dont want this trial to happen.
the 29th looks good so far but still to far off to be put in stone.
Ok so we are on for the BOC March 26th....or do we have to wait to find out if yoder has covid again?
now we are on for April 29th...that looks set..do I have that right?
Case No. 8:20-cv-00993-MCS (ADS)
NOTICE OF DELAY IN
PREPARATION OF REVISED JOINT
DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.461.0.pdf
i just want this part to happen............ Case No. 8:20-CV-0993-MCS (ADS)
NETLIST’S PROPOSED
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Judge Mark C. Scarsi
Final Pretrial Conference:
Date: March 18, 2024
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Trial: March 26, 2024
Case 8:20-cv-00993-MCS-ADS Document 460 Filed 03/13/24
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.460.0.pdf
Maybe 🤔 maybe smoke and mirrors
Stokd
12:47 AM
$NLST Switching to something else, but staying with the BOC case, Netlist just filed—PLAINTIFF NETLIST’S PROPOSED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS—"Plaintiff Netlist, Inc. (“Netlist”) respectfully requests that the Court ask the jury panel the following additional voir dire questions:
1. Who here has any familiarity with how the U.S. patent system works?
2. Have you, a relative, or a close friend, had any experience with patents or trade secrets or the United States Patent and Trademark Office?
3. Do you or does your employer rely on patented technology or trade secret information as part of its business?
4. Do any of you have strong opinions about a patent or a copyright or a trademark granting exclusive rights to the owner of the intellectual property?
5. Have you ever been accused of breaking a contract?
6. Have you ever sued someone for breaking a contract?
7. Have you or someone close to you ever considered filing a lawsuit, but chose not to?
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565562113.png
Stokd 5 mins ago -
https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/565559723
Stokd 22 minutes ago - another delay??
https://stocktwits.com/Stokd/message/565557373
$NLST You’re not going to believe this!
Remember Samsung attorney Yoder faked Covid day before first BOC trial, asking the judge to postpone trial, which was denied, all of a sudden Yoder got well and showed up to court the next day. Well, in the second/upcoming BOC trial, a doc was just filed—APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT RE: SAMSUNG’S REQUEST FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE AND SUPPORTING MATERIALS UNDER SEAL—meaning we are about to get a filing which is a request by Samsung to continue/delay trial. Why... “Due to Medical Emergency”
This doc is for sealing the incoming request.
“The parties, through their counsel, met and conferred on March 11, 2024. Following the conference, to expedite consideration of this issue, the parties agreed to file Samsung’s request in the form of a Joint Statement, rather than an Ex Parte application. Netlist’s counsel further does not object to the filing of the Joint Statement and materials in support thereof under seal.”
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923/gov.uscourts.cacd.783923.454.0.pdf
What a pile of crap Samsung and Yoder are!
lol !!! you know whats funny about frivolous ? it comes with clown emoji's all over the nlst board all of a sudden mind you. like this frivolous post......... https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174015749
behave in a silly or light-hearted way, rather than being serious and sensible. I just decided I was a bit too frivolous to be a doctor. Synonyms: flippant, foolish, dizzy [informal], superficial
very fitting....
Wow, I didn't know it was Boxclown Day.
NLST!
Only a matter of time now. It looks like they've begun to cover in a small way. Today's late day action might be a clue that something is happening behind the scenes. Let's see if the mini-rally continues tomorrow.
$NLST shorty MUST cover!! hang in there!!!!
Stokd
1:34 PM
$NLST It's official for the Micron 294 case — "Jury Selection originally scheduled for 4/22/2024 has been RESET for 4/29/2024 at 09:00 AM followed by Trial Day 1" — and this is good news. Didn't wan't to say anything till we got confirmation, but Sheasby has trial Apr 15, which would mean back to back trials if our case started Apr 22nd... this way he has a week between to prepare and get his head focused on our game.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565478448.png
date coming, NLST Gilstrap is making it clear with his recent rulings in the Micron 294 & Samsung 293 cases, that he intends to hold trials, and there will be no escaping justice.
Gilstrap renders the same 🔥denial🔥 to Micron's Renewed Motion to Stay Pending IPR in 294 case — "ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants Micron's Renewed Motion to Stay Pending IPR. In the Motion, Micron requests that this case be stayed pending inter partes review of the two Asserted Patents in this case U.S. Patent No. 11,093,417 (the “’417 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,619,912 (the “’912 Patent”). Having considered the Motion to Stay, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion to Stay should be and hereby is DENIED."
Link to full 3pg filing below--
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.72.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565449768.png
Wow. What an unnatural-looking chart.
Whoever did the clown got only two of the five correct.
NLST!
Thanks.. I think he is waiting on the BOC ....and sorta the 912 trial...IMO the negotations dont have enough stick for Micron and SS to surrender...but after these two events...or before the April 22 trial...we should have that firepower to say...Pay up or lets make a deal...
with the Boc...NLST has emails and the testimony from the april 2023 win..
April 22nd..NLST has the 912 which has been validated in two courts and has been exploited by many infringers for year...IMO that will be our coming party....10+
IMHO
Does the 293 have a date? my dates of importance are the March 26th BOC and April 22 with MICRON...anything else?
NLST Another 🔥win🔥 for Netlist, this time against Samsung in 293 case — "ORDER: Before the Court is Defendants Samsung Renewed Motion to Stay Pending IPR. In the Motion, Samsung asks the Court to stay this case pending final decision in Samsung’s petitions for inter partes review (“IPR”) of the patents in suit. Having considered the Motion to Stay, and for the reasons stated herein, the Court finds that the Motion to Stay should be and hereby is DENIED."
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.689.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565439227.png
The latest short interest report indicates that the short interest in NLST decreased slightly - the first decrease in some time. But it is still well over 9M shares (actually over 9.6M shares) short.
TOMKiLA
7m
$NLST Samsung: HBM Production to Increase 2.5 Times in 2024, Another 2 Times in 2025
😂😂 omg! The damages should increase exponentially between this and the next year!
Han Jin-man, Executive Vice President in charge of Samsung’s semiconductor business in the United States, stated at CES 2024 this year that Samsung’s HBM chip production volume will increase 2.5 times compared to last year and is projected to double again next year.
Samsung officials also revealed that the company plans to increase the maximum production of HBM to 150,000 to 170,000 units per month before the fourth quarter of this year in a bid to compete for the HBM market in 2024
. Previously, SK Hynix forecasted that by 2030, its HBM shipments would reach 100 million units annually. As a result, the company has decided to allocate approximately KRW 10 trillion (approximately USD 7.6 billion) in CAPEX for 2024.
MOOT… burn shorty burn 🔥🔥
Stokd
15m
$NLST So there's no confusion as to the Denied-As-Moot on Netlist's second motion — "The second motion before the Court is Netlist’s Motion to (1) Dismiss Micron Defendants’ Counterclaims or in the Alternative Sever and Stay and (2) Strike Micron Defendants’ Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse."
From the conclusion pictured below — "For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is granted. Additionally, as the Motion to Dismiss CONCERNS THESE SAME CLAIMS, the Court finds it should be and hereby is DENIED-AS-MOOT." — Meaning it is irrelevant to dismiss/sever/stay/strike Micron's counterclaim & defense since the first and main motion was already ruled against Micron and granted in Netlist's favor... Micron lost on their Antitrust Counterclaim and Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565377526.png
NLST Stokd By asserting antitrust counterclaim and patent misuse defense, Micron tried a similar tactic to Samsung by going after the language and interpretation of Netlist/SK Hynix supply & license agreement. — "Micron’s antitrust counterclaim and patent misuse defense are both based on the Strategic Product Supply and License Agreement between Netlist and SK hynix Inc." — "The Agreement, Netlist contends, does not constitute price fixing or unreasonably restrain trade—it contains a standard most favored nation clause with two remedies."
Gilstrap is on point, unlike 9th Circuit's ridiculous ruling of ambiguity and ignoring contract law/principles. — "The Court finds that Micron’s interpretation is unsupported by the Agreement’s PLAIN and UNAMBIGUOUS meaning such that the Agreement cannot constitute an unreasonable restraint of trade as a matter of law. Contrary to Micron’s arguments, the language of the Agreement simply does not support Micron’s interpretations and conclusions."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565375493.png
NLST Stokd Just dropped is a big 🔥win🔥 for Netlist in the Micron 294 case in Gilstrap's MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER—initially from March 4th, but was held till parties can make redactions—GRANTING Netlist's Motion for Summary Judgment of Micron’s Antitrust Counterclaim and Affirmative Defense of Patent Misuse.
Link to full 17page filing below-- https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.69.1.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_565372061.png
robcobb
8m
$NLST At the recent Pre-Trial ,(motion 360 )parts were granted and denied.Motion to strike Dr.Kennedys opinion on willfulness was granted as Judge Gilstrap did not think he had expertise in this field.Also Dr.Kennedys testimony regarding Samsung was also struck. Dr.Kennedys analysis regarding the Rambus license was denied! There have been many times Rambus has been mentioned at the proceedings I have been to.Everyone knows Dr.Kennedys numbers were a big factor in the ruling on the 463 Samsung case .A slide that was shown at the pre-trial hearing showed Dr.Kennedys proposed numbers for the Micron 294 case being 23.42 for Micron 1 and 46.70 for Micron 2 and a proposed royalty of 70.12!Please no questions regarding how this breaks down , I don’t know.This was something I observed on a slide presented at pre-trial.There were more rulings on (motion 360 )that will show up in the transcripts. I thought I would share the ones I am sure about!
294.... Mar 11, 2024 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Pretrial Conference (Volume 2) Proceedings held on 03/07/2024 before Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Shawn McRoberts,Telephone number: (903) 923-8546. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.txed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Motion to Redact due 4/1/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/10/2024. (smm) (Entered: 03/11/2024)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
294..... Mar 11, 2024 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Pretrial Conference (Volume 1) Proceedings held on 03/06/2024 before Judge Rodney Gilstrap. Court Reporter/Transcriber: Shawn McRoberts,Telephone number: (903) 923-8546. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located on our website at www.txed.uscourts.gov Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Motion to Redact due 4/1/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/10/2024. (smm) (Entered: 03/11/2024)
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64861663/netlist-inc-v-micron-technology-texas-llc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc
293......March 15, 2024 *File Joint Pretrial Order, Joint Proposed Jury
Instructions, Joint Proposed Verdict Form, Updated
Exhibit Lists, Updated Witness Lists, and Updated
Deposition Designations
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216364/gov.uscourts.txed.216364.685.0.pdf
Followers
|
305
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
15
|
Posts (Total)
|
25491
|
Created
|
05/14/07
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators papaphilip gdog 100lbStriper Jetmek_03052 eyeownu Redoocs |
IN HONG WE TRUST....
Created by Sub-Teacher:
Samsung's Expert WItness Quote:
https://netlist.com/
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |