Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Please repeat the question. Thanks.
I can only guess that this might get wrapped up in very late 2010 or early 2011. The governmental bar date is not until October 31, 2010 and the PAR claim also has to be expunged. Rest assured that the debtors and the equity committee will be moving towards a swift winddown because they are both incentivized to return the greatest value to the estate.
This is one of the holdings I am least concerned about. The money is there to make a meaningful distribution to the equity holders it is merely a matter of waiting. This is also a name I am always looking to accumulate on pullbacks when impatient holders move on. I was on vacation when it plummeted to a nickel or else I would have been holding a much larger position. I don't post much on the name and I am not planning on publishing any updates to the valuation. All that has done in the past is to invite and create competition for shares when they reach the most attractive levels.
GLTA
Thanks for the links madclown....what do you think is the time frame for wrapping up the sale?
MBRKQ: MiddleBrook Objects to PAR Claim
Debtor’s Motion to PAR Claim
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1011485/1011485100830000000000004.pdf
Equity Committee Joinder:
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1011485/1011485100830000000000006.pdf
Shows all the legal documents I missed while on vacation haha. Thanks.
Sure was, a couple of orders signed concering the Equity Committee:
http://www.kccllc.net/Docket/SearchResults.asp?T=2180
My god, filed 30 April, and the EC is already charging ahead, that's fast. And good for me.
Wow look at that volume today on two huge back-to-back trades.
Any recent news?
Thanks to Madclown.
Posted by: madclown Member Level Date: Saturday, July 31, 2010 2:55:15 AM
In reply to: PlanMaestro who wrote msg# 419 Post # of 430 Send a link via email Share on Facebook Tweet this post
MBRKQ: On Wednesday, Judge Walrath signed an order approving the sale to Victory Pharma so it would seem that the term sheet offered up by EGI at the sale hearing did not curry enough favor with the Debtors or with the court to prevent the sale. I can only guess that the Debtors went with the bird in the hand theory since there was apparently some uncertainty surrounding EGI's standalone plan of reorg that was submitted at literally the last minute. Here are my thoughts on two of the remaining options even though the 363 sale appears to be final:
This is a little easier to value within the context of a Chapter 7 liquidation because we are dealing with a clearly defined pool of assets and a reasonably estimable pool of liabilities. Under the EGI term sheet, they don't clearly define what portion of the pool of assets would be distributable. $2 million of the $22 million is a DIP loan so it looks like the purchase price would be $20 million. Given that they don't define how much they are contemplating distributing I can't get totally comfortable with a value for the stock under the standalone plan contemplated by EGI other than to say that the recovery would be considerably more than the current price. Even though the 363 sale went through, the Judge's order is appealable so perhaps EGI will cure whatever defects their plan term sheet contained and then represent their offer. That option is likely a longshot because of the real threat of Victory walking away if their offer is spurned or challenged.
Right now I am looking at 2 pieces of information to try and value this stock. In docket #226 filed on July 23, 2010 by the equity committee, they stated that they believed the distribution to equity would be in excess of $10 million. That would equate to a per share value of about $0.116 but I am not certain if their distribution value is net of the effects of the payouts due under the Management Incentive Plan. I am assuming that statement by the EC was based on the distributable value under the Victory Asset Purchase agreement. The second piece of information I am looking at comes from the plan term sheet by EGI on Wednesday. In that document they state that the Debtors own assessment of EGI's offer would yield a recovery to equity that is 50% greated than the Victory offer. Based on that statement coupled with the EC's aforementioned statement, I will assume that the distributable value to equity under the EGI plan would be in the $15 million range which would be about $0.17 on a per share basis.
Looks like they retained some good counsel too.
EGI finally makes an appearance.
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1011485/1011485100727000000000006.pdf
I hope you get your run. This stock has burned everyone it has touched! Best of luck to you as well.
Just need one run my man,everything else is gravy.Happy B-day to you good luck.
Stay away with this thing! The burn rate is 600k-800k per month and that doesn't include several million to attorneys at least! This will be dragged out until November as they requested more time to dispute claims. Severance and Vacation and other leave payout is 3 million (not including their minimum of 1.1 million bonus should shareholders receive a gross of 7.5 million (net of 6.4 or 7.4 cents per share! Par will get a couple million. Gleacher will get close to a million. Their lease agreements will cost them a million to 1.5 million. They have other AP still to pay in the millions. They are owed over a half a million in AR which is doubtful to be paid. There is a big RISK of Victory Pharma, the winning bidder, walking away in since there were no other bids. A nickel or less is worth the risk but not over it.
Hey Slick,anything under .10 is a good buy,w/o news i feel it will have its Q type runs like the others.With news who knows what will happen.Summer sucks for small caps.GL
I have to say madclown, your analysis is informative and cautious. As a beginner to the BK stocks, i wonder if you have any suggestions other than following the boards?
Despite objections from the unsecured creditors, on July 12,2010 the court approved the Management Incentive Plan that was supported by the official equity committee.
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1011485/1011485100712000000000003.pdf
Impressive analysis. An 18 cent payout would provide a significant return and you still get greater upside if a buyer comes along and makes a bid for everything higher than the current $17.1M on the table.
MBRKQ Case Summary Updated 07.03.10
Here are some excerpts from the updated summary. The link to the full report can be found at the bottom of the post.
SYNOPSIS
Purchasing the equity of bankrupt MiddleBrook Pharmaceuticals, (MBRKQ) at the current market price of $0.11 is a compelling investment that could return over 60% to the investor in a relatively short timeframe (3 to 4 months). MBRKQ investors have their own statutory Equity Committee that was appointed on June 23, 2010. The Company has proposed and the Equity Committee has agreed to support a Management Incentive Plan (MIP) that does not begin to pay out pre-petition amounts owed or post-petition bonuses to management or employees until all creditors have been paid in-full and a minimum distribution to equity of $7.5 million occurs. The terms of the MIP could conceivably place a floor of value and limit the downside to about $0.08 (which happens to be the lowest price at which the stock has traded on a post-petition basis). I estimate that the funds available for distribution to equity after the §363 sale of substantially all of the company’s assets will be near $17 million or $0.18 on a per share basis.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MiddleBrook Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is pharmaceutical company that sought protection from creditors under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 30, 2010. On the filing date, the Company had no secured creditors and owed as much as approximately $16.8 million to its unsecured creditors. However, a large portion of the unsecured claims belong to Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. which has asserted a claim of approximately $11.6 million stemming from an unfulfilled development agreement. The official equity committee has indicated in court filings that it expects the claims of Par Pharmaceuticals to be disallowed in their entirety. When backing out Par's claim, the total unsecured claims are reduced to $5.2 million.
On May 11, 2010, the office of the United States Trustee (the "UST") appointed the Creditors Committee.
On June 9, 2010, the Court entered an order approving the sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company in a §363 sale to Victory Pharma who will serve as the stalking horse bidder. The stalking horse bid includes cash of $17.1 million, plus the assumption of about $750,000 in liabilities, according to court records. Competing bids are due on July 15, 2010. According to court filings, the Company is still in discussions with other interested purchasers.
On June 23, 2010 the Trustee appointed the Official Equity Committee.
Explanation of Value Revision
In my original summary I had estimated the distribution to equity would be about $0.09 per share. Admittedly, there is a wide variance between my current estimated recovery of $0.18 and the previous estimate. Originally, I based my valuation on the account balances reflected in the Monthly Operating Report (MOR) from May 2010. Upon further review of the court docket, the Debtors released their Schedule of Assets and Liabilities on June 1, 2010. This schedule excludes many accrued liability accounts that are reported on the MOR.
Given that the §363 sale appears to be moving forward and that end result appears imminent, the estate’s valuation is most appropriately viewed as a liquidating Chapter 11. As such, many of the accrued liabilities from the MOR are not truly items that have to be paid in cash or at all because the company will no longer be a going concern. My best estimate of what remains of the estate after the §363 sale will be a shell company with about $17 million in distributable cash & equivalents after satisfying all unsecured and administrative claims. The shell will also have an NOL carry-forward of $236 million. Given the uncertainty surrounding whether the estate could ever make use of or otherwise monetize the remaining NOLs, the $0.18 estimated recovery does not include any NOL value.
CATALYSTS AND RISKS
The biggest catalysts for recovery in this case include (1) higher bids emerging to compete with the stalking horse bidder, Victory Pharma; (2) an equity infusion to refinance the company as a standalone enterprise or (3) some other form of M&A transaction that seeks to preserve the enormous remaining net operating losses (NOLs). With the current market price for a share of stock of MiddleBrook Pharmaceuticals trading at $0.112 and a projected distribution of $0.183, it would appear that there may be more than 60% upside from current trading levels. In measuring the downside, I look to several issues that are discussed in more detail later in the report. Just briefly, with the proposed Management Incentive Plan (MIP) structured to begin paying out only upon payment in full to creditors and a residual value to equity of $7.5 million, it would appear that the downside could conceivably be measured at a per share distribution of $0.086.
The risks inherent in this case include the uncertainty surrounding liabilities that may potentially be owed to certain holders of MiddleBrook common stock who entered into Registration Rights Agreements in connection with a private placement of MiddleBrook stock during 2005 through 2008. Although the risk remains that the unsecured claims of PAR Pharmaceuticals totaling in excess of $11 million may be allowed, based on statements made in court filings it is expected that these claims that are currently reflected on the company’s books, will be disallowed in whole. If some or all of these claims are allowed, it could have a materially adverse impact on the distribution to holders of MiddleBrook common stock.
DISCLAIMER
The content provided herein is for informational and educational purposes only. In formulating this summary, the author had to make a number of assumptions and estimations. Because of the many uncertainties of the case, including the amount of claims that will survive the claims vetting process and the actual value of the final Asset Purchase Agreement, approximating the final distribution to equity holders is difficult if not altogether premature. None of the contents of this document should be construed as an offer or recommendation to buy or sell any security. The readers of this document should perform their own due diligence before taking any action and are encouraged to contact a financial advisor before making any investment decisions. This summary does not purport, and should not be construed, to advocate, solicit, encourage or discourage votes for any potential plan of reorganization for the Company. In full disclosure, the author is long MBRKQ common stock.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33888674
MBRKQ MiddleBrook Pharmaceuticals Case Summary 06.30.10
http://www.scribd.com/doc/33766011/MBRKQ-MiddleBrook-Pharmaceuticals-Case-Summary-06-30-10
its posted on docket at Kccllc.com - EC has been appointed.
The proper way to fo this at first is to ask the US trustee which they have done I read in a docket. If that does not sork then you draft a motion for judge. The trustee can take some time it depends or it could be part of omnibus hearing in July.
The person who is doing this I read over at Yahoo said they have an attorney on contingency. That is very rare an attorney will do that.
How long does getting an equity committee approval normally take? I haven't seen any filing regarding it since the ad hoc committee mentioned it in a note in one of their filings.
Who is Hudson accumulating for? They have been sitting off the bid all week buying. Any eduacated ideas ?
Chapter 11 omnibus hearings. Did it with ABWTQ,WAMUQ, etc. It would be to late now anyhow. You usually have to register a day before. It is very cool! Matt
I've been in Washington Mutual for quite a while. One of the guys there is able to access the court system's lines and he then connects that to a conference call to allow multiple listeners
Not sure about here, but basically you can hear just about everything in the courtroom without being there
Am not familiar with being able to listen in on court hearings.Have you done this on other chap. 13 cases,Matt.I will take a look into it.
ne, thanks. matt.
PS. I wish they would have used Epiq Systems for their court reporting. It is so much easier to manuever and read the nature of topic. Oh well. You cannot have everything. Only try. Also do you know if there a call in number for Monday to listen in on proceedings?
Go right to sticky notes for court documents.
I think there might be two forces at work Zell and his cronies who can afford the "mouth pieces" who I do not think would really be looking for an EC, just an "ear" and the group who are looking for the EC who I referred to off the Yahoo board ??!! Matt
PS. Thanks for the link will check it out.
http://www.kccllc.net/documents/1011485/...
don't know if the link will work - you can go to kccllc if not and look for the cred committee limited objection to sale motion. About half way through they request modification to allow for alternative bids as it is their understanding that certain equity holders have been in discussion with mgmt to refinance the enterprise. (I would presume this is Zell)
I think the EC came from a group of investors who have been spending their time on Yahoo's board. Not positive but that is what I gleaned from reading posts over there. FYI. Check it out. Matt
Just bought some shares today!
Faster access and more info i believe.
Is there anything here (PACER) of importance that can't be found in the kccllc.net/MiddleBrook directory? Maybe just quicker postings?
Regarding Sam Zell, Phil Tinkler, and EGI
If anyone has spare time and is following this case, it might be helpful to get an idea of their track record with investments going into bankruptcy. Are they getting involved in the BK process or just taking whatever they're given?
These guys know what they're doing - Tinkler and Zell are very experienced investors and so I have to believe that they bought those shares in December with an idea of something that could be a catalyst for an outcome where the shares are retired above 40 cents each. They can't buy/sell shares now that the significant holders are restricted.
The question is why did they buy those? They have 45% of the company now: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1161924/000095012309072308/c93913sc13dza.htm
They had 43% in the previous month.
Did that 45% mark achieve something for them (control? wouldn't that need > 50%?) or was this a "value play" because they believe the price will end up higher? If so, why weren't they buying more in March in the low 30's? I don't think they would be throwing good money after bad by buying $840,000 of stock in December, but we haven't seen anything to prove them right so far.
Not sure if anyone else faces this, but it constantly does take some effort to make sure the decisions we make are ethical. Unethically, I think I could have made more progress and sooner. Won't go into any details, but I'm convinced that being ethical is actually a skill and something we have to practice.
Maybe they're going to help find a buyer for the assets and that is going to take some time because they don't want to make an offer to early and have to deal with others? It'll be sold in an auction eventually anyway though, right?
They are, but you should wonder that if these guys are willing to fight it, why haven't the 2 other major holders done anything?
I still have to believe that Sam Zell's group sees something because of their 40 cent purchase in December, but I haven't seen a filing from them yet.
Any group acting as one on behalf of equities or shareholders is a plus for us,as they are fighting for share value in turn helping us get value for our shares.
what does this mean for us grubs??