Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Focusing on the wrong person, again....
Bogus???? I wouldn't call it bogus,
It's for MAXD shareholders....
Doomed????
lol Yeah, you can say that,
for Harvey Vechery,
doomed!!!!
I can't wait either!!!!
Meanwhile crypto is the current future
and much much more....
Speed lightning coinage moving and grooving upwards with payments....
Faster than PayPal....
I'll post the document whenever I see it
and
do what you want....
But hey,
keep us updated on precedings....
Btw
Harvey Vechery
already showed his hand,
with nonsuit 10/10/23....
That was one hell of a step master climb to the 38th floor....
Next stop floor 45....
tldr; Greg Halpern plans another bogus doomed lawsuit.
hahah i cannot wait.
Based on the oral arguments, I believe both Attia's appeal & Google's appeals will be rejected.
Attia got himself yet another lawyer, Myron Moskovitz. Moskovitz was underwhelming. He claims the signed Attia / Google document "is not a contract". Judge Bromberg very quickly asked him WTF he talking about, and Moskovitz backed down.
Moskovitz then tried the argument that Google had breached a good faith clause of the contract. Judge Lie asked him to explain how this was distinct from the trade secrets claim that Attia had already lost at trial. Moskovitz apparently failed to deliver a decent explanation because several minutes later she repeated that she needed him to explain how this was not settled fact by the trial decision.
During all this time, Judge Bromberg was actively challenging Moskovitz. Judge Wilson was silent. Moskovitz went over-time.
IMO Moskovitz was simply not capable of making this appeal work. He's either a bad trial lawyer, or a decent trial lawyer who knows he's got a losing case but will put in decent effort to justify his paycheck. IMO he wasted a lot of time spouting irrelevant claims & trying to build an appeal-to-emotion.
Fred Rowley argued for Google. He was brisk and kept his feet out of his mouth. Rowley made a half-hearted effort to argue that Google deserved costs because Attia's lawsuit was so frivolous. Judge Lie told him it was "high hill to climb" for the appeals court to overrule the trial court's discretion, and Rowley capitulated. Seems like Rowley was barely going through the motions on Google's appeal, and that Google doesn't really care much about trying to get money from broke Attia.
---
Some quotes i found funny:
...
Moskovitz: "google estimated they would make over $200 billion / year on this" (google's 2022 revenue was $280b)
...
Moskovitz : "this is not a contract"
...
Bromberg: "So this is a 6 month long contract."
Moskovitz: "Yes. So? I mean-"
Bromberg: "I am trying to understand why forming another company after that time period breaches the covenant of good faith and fair dealing"
Moskovitz : "Well. This is- This whole thing was written by Google. Alright? Attia had no input into it."
Tell Greg to be on the lookout for a love note from New York. I believe it’s on its way or about to be.
Damn it’s a small world.
Tell the little runt to stand up when I talk to him.
Just heard from Greg in a email,
it's been months
thought he disappeared....
NOPE!!!!
He's been working for legitimate MAXD shareholders....
Not a wantabe Florida researcher....
Who is not a legitimate shareholder, just fighting for a friend....
Great, maybe now
that friend will be able to join the right team,
or not....
It doesn't even matter anymore....
All one needs to do is,
Google,
Harvey Vechery Key Brands
everything comes up and anyone can read the fraudulent claims, over the years
which is and will be considered in this lawsuit as
TAX EVASION!!!!
According to GH,
it takes 45 steps to bury someone
like Harvey Vechery....
Greg is on step 38....
MAXD shareholders will be able to join this lawsuit...
A lawsuit estimated as a loss to MAXD shareholders,
or what Harvey Vechery has cost MAXD shareholders, since this charade begun!!!!
$30million!!!!
A couple months Greg will forward the info and I'll post it so any legitimate shareholder will be able to join the suit!!!!
I posted the beginning of Harvey Vechery's woes yesterday....
Nonsuit!!!!
This was Harvey Vechery's plan all along,
use MAXD as a tax loss write-off!!!!
Everyone been booing Greg Halpern
whereas
he's been fighting for this company
and his invested $95Million....
Say what you want, but the real villain in this case is and has always been Harvey Vechery!!!!
Where's puppet, bad YouTube video maker???? Lol
Stay tuned,
it's going to be a wild 2024!!!!
Interesting that a lawyer who's interested in this lawsuit wouldn't have any comment on the recent oral arguments
That’s ok. Did you hear about the lawsuit against Halpern in New York ?
Now THIS is going to be funny
This popped up while I was checking out crypto,
for those chasing that dream,
this happened in Texas!!!!
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fn3h6oQIlMuMYn9zQlfesCxXDAeMpNK_/view?usp=drivesdk
Harvey Vechery was GRANTED notice of nonsuit!!!! lol
Basically,
HV is throwing in the towel on
FORMULA 4 from yesteryear.... lol
For those wondering about a nonsuit....
Nonsuit is a judgment given against a plaintiff in which the court dismisses a case because the plaintiff either was unable to make an adequate showing or is unwilling to continue with the case....
Amazing. It's taken years Galt, to open your eyes or mind yet, it's obvious that you've discovered; there is a forest behind the trees and you may not hear it, but when one falls it makes a sound.
How’s the runt man doing ? I heard he purchased some platform shoes, I heard he is almost 4’9” in heels standing up. Hope the wind doesn’t blow the loser onto his loser butt.
MAXD is a SCAM
MAXDSCAM
MAXIMUM HALPERN SCAM
Party of four, two thumbs up!!!!lol
Excellent buying opportunity followers,
imo,
now through April 2024
as settlement is looking good....
Outdated researcher still keeping on track with yesterday's news....
Biometric,
bravo....lol
MAXD is gone, move on!!!!
New management,
Harvey Vechery
is not going to do anything,
if he was there would of been a signature in Delaware!!!!
I've moved on, but hey best of luck!!!!
Look, our cryptocurrency down @$0.49 an excellent time to add....
I did, now sitting @85,000 coins,
And I wouldn't be surprised to watch it float downward towards $0.42,
or
it could bounce to its new high,
still way below those predictions of 2024 and beyond!!!!
Halpern is a little wee wee runt Boi
Thanks for answering my question so I could clear up the confusion on my end. I also thank you for engaging in the debate instead of casting aspersions and avoiding the questions like a certain other board poster.
The only thing I know about the transaction is what Greg Halpern posted on his websites. He claimed to have taken the MAXD Audio Biometric Security in exchange for money he claims is owed to him by MAXD. He then claimed he has taken all the technology in exchange for more of the money supposedly owed by MAXD. I haven’t read anywhere that he had a contract, or document of any type for that matter, as he wasn’t specific. He claimed to have made these “transfers” back in “late December 2022” because that was before the judgment against him on January 11, 2023. Very convenient. As mentioned, he did not file an 8K or any notice that he was taking these MAXD assets. He did not tell Vechery. There is no evidence that he made this transaction other than his words printed on the website. He never mentioned this transfer, at the time, on any of his websites and nothing was mentioned by Jay & the UnAmericans. Therefore, this appears to be nothing more than Halpern attempting to backdate a transfer of assets prior to losing control of the company.
All this is a moot point as Halpern forgot that he pledged all MAXD assets in notes to Harvey Vechery which are now in default. The technology was not Halpern’s, or MAXD’s, to transfer. Not then, and certainly not now.
Debating facts with this board poster in impossible because there is no substance to the comments made. Why aren’t my comments or questions answered directly instead of posting insults and gibberish?
For example, the reference to an eight-year period from “2024-2032” had no attached explanation by the poster. As usual. There is no way to “research” a stand-alone statement with no context attached. How can a comment be addressed if no one knows what you are talking about? I still don’t. I assumed it was referring to the comments in the past about eight years of litigation from Halpern against Vechery. It’s not so much a “clueless researcher” as typically unexplained and cryptic comments from Jay & the UnAmericans. If the poster would care to explain himself, I will be more than happy to research the comments.
The comment “losing people's money from bad deals.... Yeppers!!!!” is interesting in the fact that all of that money was lost due to investing in MAXD and Greg Halpern. Now Halpern wants us to follow him again? Believe he has the keys for the regeneration of MAXD and only he can lead the way? If only Vechery gives him more money and allows him to run the company into the ground for a second time? Once again, I refer you back to Einstein’s theory of insanity.
“Might as well tell that friend who's money that was lost; it's over!!!! GREED!!!!lol.” It’s not about “greed.” Only an unethical simpleton would believe that nonsense. My “friend” is not one person but an entire group who lost money in MAXD. And they knew their money was lost long before “new management” arrived. Halpern’s managerial style and misdeeds cost them their investment. If an investor originally buys in at $.10 and the price drops to $.0001, you are operating at a loss on your original investment. If you realize the people in control of that investment are unethical, immoral, manipulative deceivers who are filled with individual greed, you don’t repeat your mistake and invest with them again. If you are told “great things are around the corner, big things are about to happen, don’t sell and buy more,” then most people hold and don’t sell. When all that turns out to be lies and the stock tanks, all you can do is write off the debt and never invest with the manipulative deceiver again.
“Constance Nash has it right, Florida....lol.” Connie Nash is wrong about “Florida” and half of the rest of her comments. She intertwines fact and fiction and expect those of us who know the truth will bend to her will and accept her fictional version of the truth. Not happening. This poster, on the other hand, believes her story because it plays into Halpern's case and he enjoys her bashing his adversaries.
These comments, “I'm a researcher too, And I've done my homework.... I've moved on, (you are) chasing pennies of a useless stock.” You’ve done your homework and realized MAXD is a “useless stock.” Your intent is to blame Harvey Vechery for making MAXD a useless stock when in reality it became that under Halpern as he was in control. Halpern took MAXD to non-reporting status and intentionally placed it on the Expert Market. Those moves killed MAXD. The market cap was approximately $7,500.00 at that point in time, was the same when Halpern was removed, and is the same now. MAXD is a “useless stock” entirely due to Greg Halpern.
I'm talking about the same contract you are: the purported contract where Halpern buys the patent & "technology" from MAXD in exchange for extinguishing MAXD's debts to him.
I believe your theory is that such a contract was actually written AFTER Halpern was removed from executive position at MAXD, and he's fraudulently backdating the contract to make it appear as if he executed it while he still had authority to do so.
I'd agree with that theory. If Halpern did produce such a conveniently secret contract, I wouldn't believe it was authentic. But if I were a shareholder, I wouldn't dispute the contract, because it's wildly advantageous to MAXD shareholders for such a contract to be enforced.
What is your analysis of Attia's oral argument?
Hey little runt man, stand up when I am speaking, boi. Oh sorry boi, you are standing little runt boi.
Halpern is a fraudster, period
But I am certain he knows this already
What a loser the bald head Halpern turned out to be
MAXDSCAM
Clueless quote....lol
As to “2024 to 2032 comment,” I assume you are talking about the “eight years” of legal action promised by Halpern.
Again, clueless researcher from yesteryear....
Who's feeding whom that info....lollollol
The only one that follows this BS
are the ones from yesteryear
fighting amongst themselves....lol
Party of four,
with
two thumbs up!!!!
I love that bla bla bla
is wasting away
with nothing
but lies that were spent over the
last 11 plus years,
probably more like 15 years with the other non responsive units of mind boiling over like the water evaporating into air....
Useless mishmosh of
bla bla bla
and
losing people's money from bad deals....
Yeppers!!!!
Constance Nash has it right, Florida....lol
Connie Chronicles,
And
an outdated researcher that can't face facts....
Keep guessing,
it's hilarious to read the comical events unfolding....lollollol
Oh look, me, 75,000 coins
turning pennies into gold
and
an outdated researcher still chasing pennies of a useless stock,
because
MAXD new management has no plans to do anything....
Might as well tell that friend who's money that was lost;
it's over!!!!
GREED!!!!lol
It doesn't take GH to tell me that
;)
I'm a researcher too,
And
I've done my homework....
I've moved on,
but it seems yesteryears news
can't let go
and
CN thrives on every adjective and pronoun being printed....lol
Delaware still waiting for that signature that will never come!!!!
February, April, missed May 1
and now October!!!!
R.I.P. Harvey Vechery!!!!
Yes, 40 plus years I've been a researcher, but not posting online about MAXD. Never said that. Reading comprehension skills? I’ve only been posting since 2012, and that started on IHUB. You can verify that if you choose to do so. Therefore, the “blab la bla” mentioned in the post wouldn’t have been read by anyone on the boards as it was all in house and connected to my business. Facts matter.
The board poster stated, “I’m not associated with GH” yet he posts links from Halpern that are not found anywhere else. Links to defamatory websites and shareholder letter templates. Yet he has been an online first responder for Halpern for years, instantly responding to any comments about Halpern with information only known to Halpern or a tight knit circle. That means you are either Halpern or have the ability to contact him quickly for answers. Everyone can see that and there have been many comments from others about this obvious detail. He has been a promoter for every one of Halpern’s pump and dump schemes over the years, and even profited from them. He has “received emails” from Halpern, Rurouni, and Tenchi San, dutifully posting information at their command. In other words, allowing his IHUB alias to be used to distribute talking points from the regime.“I’m not associated with GH.” Right. No one believes that.
Anyone not wanting to point out the error in someone else’s research is either not telling the truth or preparing for litigation. We all know what Halpern is doing. He's been promising lawsuits against Vechery in every post and on every website. As to “2024 to 2032 comment,” I assume you are talking about the “eight years” of legal action promised by Halpern. Good luck with that being rewarding in any way for Halpern.
Yesteryears alias is locked on me n Halpern....lol
I'm not associated with GH
but
keep telling yourself that story,
outdated researcher of
40 plus years....
Your words!!!!
Nah,
why let you get into something that was missed by poor researching....
However 2024,
through 2032
look very, very rewarding....
Move on noise from yesterday, yesteryear and forever chasing pennies, researcher....lol
R.I.P. Harvey Vechery!!!!
Here’s my lol of the day. I’ve been reading the “shareholder letter template” that Halpern posted online for “legitimate” shareholders to copy and paste. It’s so obviously transparent what this is all about. Halpern killed MAXD a long time ago and he is blaming the fact that the corpse is now rotting on Harvey Vechery. He wants everyone to follow his lead and file suit on Vechery, using his self-aggrandizing letter as the basis for his master plan to get Vechery’s money through legal means.
The phrase, “Halpern makes his case online” was repeated several times in the shareholder letter. Why didn’t Halpern make his case in court? He didn’t show up for the Judgment hearing, the Minute Order hearing, the Final Order hearing, and did not file any appeals. Just as in the case of Connie Nash, you can post anything you want online but the only place to get justice is in court, not on the internet. Halpern didn’t even hire an attorney to represent him. Making a case online does not count in the real world. The internet is where people of low moral fiber go to defame people and hide behind the “first amendment.”
The phrase “according to Halpern” also appears throughout the letter. Why would anyone believe anything Halpern says as he’s known as a serial fabricator. Just because Halpern states something online doesn’t make it the truth. Why didn’t he defend himself with these so-called facts in court?
Halpern states, “some have posted online recordings of Vechery.” That is typical Halpernian deception. Greg Halpern recorded his ex-girlfriend talking to Harvey and Scott and posted that recording online. Posing that "some have posted" is attempting to fool people into believing more than one person has posted. If you’re going to commit an unethical, immoral, and possibly illegal act, you should take full credit for your villainy.
Halpern continues to promote his “four decades” of amazing success. All that matters to MAXD shareholders is the success of the company they invested in. Where is that success? Temporarily running up the share value on fake promotions without developing a product to market, is not success. Telling tall tales about pending deals that never come to be is not success. Wasting millions of investment dollars on personal luxuries, and then defaulting on the notes, is not success. No matter what successes Halpern had in past deals, no matter what “failures” Harvey Vechery may have had in his past business career, the only thing that matters to MAXD shareholders is the fact their investment was destroyed by malfeasance and poor management. Vechery funded the company but the decision making was up to Halpern. Where is the success at MAXD?
Why should I expect anything from Halpern in response to legitimate comments other than more drivel. Another post filled with more Pleiadean nonsense. So, Jay & The UnAmericans are now investing in crypto. Who cares. I must have missed it, but I’m sure it’s somewhere in the Halpern self-promotional archives that he invented crypto. Along with SEO, alternative power sources, and proprietary mineral mapping technology. Not to mention num-chuk skills and Liger drawings. Vote for Pedro.
The poster stated, “lol MAXD is gone, with new management that doesn’t plan on doing anything.” MAXD was GONE years ago when the brains of the operation and inventor, Lloyd Trammell, left because he no longer wanted to be associated with an immoral and unethical Greg Halpern. MAXD was GONE when Halpern decided to focus all the company’s time and money on an illogical lawsuit against one of the largest and most powerful companies in the world, Google, instead of R&D on the technology. MAXD was GONE when Halpern took Harvey Vechery’s money, which was targeted for AT&T and the engineers, and then paid only himself, killing a potential deal. MAXD was GONE when the former CEO, John Blaisure, refused to sign illegitimate SEC filings and the was terminated for that reason. MAXD was GONE when Halpern started stealing Harvey Vechery’s money for personal benefit instead of using it for the company. MAXD was GONE when Harvey Vechery finally realized Greg Halpern had been lying to him and decided to cut off his allowance. MAXD was GONE the moment Greg Halpern posted the Hoodwinkers website, trashing Vechery and everyone else associated with MAXD.
“Boo hoo.... R.I.P. Harvey Vechery....” Care to explain the meaning of your closing comments? Once again, on day one, Greg Halpern begs and pleads with Harvey Vechery to reinstate him, give him money, land, hereditary titles, castles, and gold, and he’ll make him richer. Then on the very next day, Halpern targets his family, trashes his name online, makes threats of lawsuits, and wants him to “rest in peace.”
By the way, my posting on the internet started in 2012, so the “blab la bla” has been for 11 years, not forty. How about responding to direct comments instead of misdirecting readers to crypto? If you have evidence of “bad research” point it out and let’s debate. I’ll stand behind my research skills any day of the week over Halpernian deceptions.
Lol let me start it off with a laugh,
for all the old,
yesterday's aliases....
Keep chasing those ghosts of yesterday....lol MAXD is gone, with new management that doesn't plan on doing anything....
Harvey Vechery can't even transfer the name,
since Delaware
is still waiting for that signature....lol
Another laugh at the alias that can't do correct research....
lol lol lol
I've already instructed my followers,
which have already started regaining
their losses from MAXD
with cryptocurrency....lol
Total market cap sitting at $1.045 trillion....
Look another laugh at yesteryear's researcher,
forty years of bla bla bla....
Move on bad researcher,
or
is it playing to a party of themselves more tantalizing....lol
Boo hoo....
R.I.P. Harvey Vechery....
It doesn’t matter what the market cap value of MAXD was in years past as it was based on Halpern’s deception. It doesn’t matter what the percentage increase in stock value was as the increases were all temporary and based on Halpern’s pump and dump schemes.
Fake deals to pump the stock and make the company look strong. BUY MORE STOCK! Pumping Connie Nash’s 339 technology to fool shareholders into believing Halpern had found the Holy Grail combination of audio and video, which would take over the world and make all shareholders rich. BUY MORE STOCK! Google lawsuits designed to fool shareholders into believing billion-dollar settlements were “just around the corner” and they would all be wealthy beyond their imagination. BUY MORE STOCK! Beluga Whale cars, Mexican land deals. Mexican gold mines. Gold backed currency in Zimbabwe. Proprietary MAXD mineral mapping technology. MAXD Audio Biometric Security. Gold backed currency with the Indian tribes. Plush bunny deals in Japan. All BS. Doesn’t matter to Halpern. BUY MORE STOCK! That's what it's all about for Greg Halpern. The product is irrelevant. All that matters is the temporary increase in the share value. That's not a successful business model.
What product has MAXD ever successfully brought to market? Name one. What revenue deals has MAXD brought in? Name one. And don’t count Tip Solutions and Formula Four as those were nothing more than nepotistic “in-house” deals which were funded with Vechery’s money and made to look like legitimate revenue deals. For Halpern to promote the stock, of course.
There is no product. There has never been any revenue. The company has no way to pay its debts or operate without Harvey Vechery’s money. As a matter of fact, MAXD would have gone out of business years ago if not for Harvey Vechery’s money. And now Halpern is threatening him with legal action so he can get his money by any means possible?
I wonder if Halpern really wants Harvey Vechery to walk away so there is no forensic accounting and SEC/DOJ accountability for Halpern to deal with? Otherwise, why would Halpern attack his only money source? Where;s the logic in that? What’s Halpern’s game? I wonder, is Halpern going to continue to post negative information about Vechery while he’s attempting to rebuild MAXD?
Here is the real question we should all be asking right now. Why would Harvey Vechery, or any businessman for that matter, want to continue investing money in a company where that investment would financially assist a large shareholder who is trying to destroy his reputation, his family, and his business?
Why would any sane person want to do business with someone with no morals, values, or ethics? Would you trust a man who demands payment one day and instantly goes on the attack when his demands aren’t met? Would you associated with a man who throws a temper tantrum each time he doesn’t get his way, no matter how ludicrous his demands might be, and proceeds to air personal dirty laundry on public websites? How could anyone ever trust a man like that? It’s the same as trusting a blackmailer not to come back for more after his first round of extortion.
Halpern began posting defamatory information aimed at Harvey Vechery, Scott Kapp, John Blaisure, and others over a year ago on his Hoodwinker website and has not stopped since. It’s hard to even keep track of how many defamatory websites Halpern is now operating, including the link in the latest post.
Halpern provoked Vechery into using legal means to remove Halpern from the company with this vile approach. He intentionally took the company to “non-reporting” status and to the Expert Market so he could avoid forensic accounting and the analysis that came along with each SEC filing. And he now wants Vechery to save Halpern’s investment?
Halpern has been consistently threatening Vechery with legal action on the boards and on his websites. That’s what this is all about. Making money through lawsuits since he can’t earn it the old-fashioned way. Proposing outrageous business deals and then clearly stating “if you don’t go along with my proposals, I am going to use my SEO skills to take you down.” Once again, who would do business with someone like that? All Halpern is doing is driving Vechery farther away from him with each new threat disguised as a “business opportunity.”
Why does Greg Halpern think anyone cares if Harvey Vechery is “squeaky clean?” His only involvement with MAXD in the past was to fund money for Halpern to use at his own discretion. Without oversight by the way.
Are most bankers, hard money lenders, and hedge fund executives “squeaky clean?” Does anyone in the financial sector fall into that category? Does the average borrower ask the lender for credentials before begging for alms? Greg Halpern was anything but “squeaky clean,” yet we’re supposed to focus on what Vechery did separate from MAXD? This is nothing more than Halpern deflecting from his own track record.
Why does this board poster finish so many of his posts with “lol?” Why is everything a joke to this person? Does he take joy in the misfortune of others? If that’s the case, he should be a truly joyful person after so many years of supporting Halpern’s financial follies. Not to mention all the losses experienced by MAXD investors.
Why does this poster now believe Verchery’s past is important when he has been condemning anyone who posts accurate information about Greg Halpern and his fraud judgments from his Z-Trim days? Or any of Halpern’s past misdeeds with MAXD. It’s “ancient history,” which should be ignored, when it comes to Halpern’s transgressions, but it’s vitally important that Harvey Vechery be squeaky clean before investing more money into MAXD? What nonsense.
Finally, why is this board poster breaking the rules of the Final Order by “acting in concert” and shilling for Greg Halpern? Posting links to Halpern’s latest attack site is doing exactly that.
Harvey Vechery not so squeaky clean....lol
Yesteryears stories speaks volumes,
on where MAXD is headed!!!!
Delaware still waiting for Harvey Vechery signature....
https://bizwackertaxevadorharvey.com
I would venture to say that most MAXD shareholders did not know anything about what was going on behind the scenes, including his fraudulent filings. I don't hate money by the way.
"Now that the potentially fraudulent contract, for the first time in history, will return money to shareholders from Halpern instead of otherwise, and you believe they should suddenly stand on principle?"
What are you referring to here? What "potentially fraudulent contract" are you talking about?
No one's ever called ME an "expert" on MAXD and I've been accurately predicting its dilution, lawsuit results, technology trends, and stock price movements for many years on this board.
Seems that the criteria to be called a MAXD "expert" by shareholders, is simply to perpetuate their fantasy that they bought shares in a genuine business.
MAXD shareholders have been supportive of Halpern's fraudulent filings for years.
Now that the potentially fraudulent contract, for the first time in history, will return money to shareholders from Halpern instead of otherwise, and you believe they should suddenly stand on principle?
No accounting for people who hate money, I suppose.
I’ve had several shareholders ask me why I didn’t respond to this post and I realized I wrote it but apparently forgot to post it. Getting old.
Yes. My specialty is in research. It’s part of what I’ve done in business for over forty years, which has nothing to do with MAXD or the market by the way. I didn’t post that my “expertise” was in MAXD, I said “I’m considered to be an expert in that area,” meaning research. I have been a researcher in many fields including a research assistant in the legal field. I also did not say who made that consideration, but I would bet most board readers would admit I provide detail not typically found on this forum in my analyses of SEC filings, legal documents, Tenchi San, and Halpernette board posts. I’ve researched MAXD from top to bottom to make up for the fact that I did very little research before our investment dollars were committed as I was “listening” more than I was investigating and/or researching. Which was a mistake I’ve been paying for ever since. My bad.
I was not a “loyal supporter of his plan until he went bankrupt.” That’s factually inaccurate. Go back and look at all my board posts from the beginning and show me where I was a loyal supporter of Halpern. I openly came out against him when I learned the truth about Z-Trim and his past. When I learned what was really going on behind the scenes. When people stopped lying to me. That was years before the bankruptcy. I have posted the truth before, during, and after the bankruptcy. Facts matter. Not conjecture.
Here’s some additional facts that bear repeating, I have never met Harvey Vechery or Scott Kapp. I have never talked to them, emailed, texted, or communicated with them in any way. Constantly assuming I am in direct contact with them is not based on the facts. Stating that I am “spreading news” that Vechery has “changed his spots” is both inaccurate and assumptive on anyone’s part. I did not state anything about “changing spots” in my post. However, Greg Halpern ran the company and made all the decisions. Harvey Vechery was the bank providing money for Halpern, both personally and for MAXD. From what I have learned, Harvey did not design or participate in the marketing plans, develop the promotions, write the PRs, or pump the stock. He bought out the toxic debt and invested in the company. He has not sold his stock; therefore, he did not benefit from Halpern’s manipulations, nor was he part of the “pump and dump” schemes Halpern developed. Like so many other people in this melodrama, he listened to Halpern and believed what he was hearing. A man of his means should have employees in his company who can do the research for him to prevent him from getting involved with a man like Greg Halpern.
Where did I mention “secret patents” and “secret contracts?” The patents were all public and the information is available to anyone who wants to do the research. There is only one patent left active and that is on the MAXD Biometric Audio Security. What contracts are you talking about? There are no current contracts that I’m aware of as the company is not doing any business. Lumping me in with the Halpernettes, who constantly promoted one fake “big deal” after another, is inaccurate as I had nothing to do with promoting the stock.
Not signing and submitting SEC forms at this stage hardly classifies Vechery as a “scammer.” There are legal reasons for what is happening, as well as what is not happening. We will all be able to read the PR or shareholder letter when it is released, and I’m as anxious as everyone else for that to happen. However, since Halpern famously moved the company to “non-reporting” status with the SEC, and then intentionally took MAXD to the Expert Market, before being removed from the company, where is the urgency to file with the SEC? MAXD is already out of compliance with the SEC on filings and there is virtually no trading going on thanks to the EM status. Therefore, anything Harvey Vechery does or doesn’t do publicly is not impacting the share price right now. Furthermore, the SEC has been made aware of Greg Halpern’s actions and has done nothing. I doubt Vechery’s legal team is worried about the SEC right now. For that matter, it’s more than likely going to be difficult to get the company reinstated to the OTC based on all the information the SEC has on file.
Harvey Vechery had the “best interests of the shareholders at heart” when he challenged Halpern in court and had him removed from the company. He is the second largest shareholder in the company and holder of the notes. Which means he also has his own best interests at heart. Greg Halpern has been scamming shareholders for years and it was in the best interest of everyone associated with MAXD that he be removed. Harvey Vechery has lost many millions of dollars in his investment in MAXD and has earned nothing from this relationship. Those are provable facts.
One other point, converting stock does not mean that Vechery liquidated stock. People often equate the two. Other than one minor stock sale of approximately $256, Harvey Vechery has never liquidated stock, as has been implied on this board. He stands to lose more than anyone involved in this fiasco as he has the most invested. That includes Greg Halpern who continues to claim to be the largest shareholder investing millions of “cash” dollars into the company. Right.
Because it would be a fake contract and could create issues down the road that could potentially negate profits. Personally, I think forgery, for any reason, is not only “wrong,” it’s also illegal, and I don’t know why anyone would want to associate their business investments in an illegal arena.
If you’re referring to the Connie Nash forgery claims, I was told at the time that Halpern had a “wet” signature on file in the safe and that Connie Nash was not telling the truth. Nash denied this claim. Considering all the deception coming out of the principles involved, I have no way of knowing what was, in fact, the truth, and what was complete fiction from this group. I was never in favor the Google suits, but I certainly wouldn’t have been in favor of promoting a forged contract, which is why I asked the question after Nash posted her claims.
Yes, it's "wrong" for Halpern to forge a contract... but when that forged contract is so great for MAXD shareholders, and so terrible for Halpern... why should shareholders want to stop it?
If shareholders force Halpern to retain ownership of his MAXD debts & preferred shares, then MAXD's debt to Halpern will grow by $100,000s every year, without end.
Presumably shareholders hold out hope that MAXD will one day generate a profit. It's be silly to insist on pledging a huge amount of that profit, in perpetuity to Halpern, when Halpern is offering an escape hatch to extinguish that debt immediately.
The question, even with the correction, is mangled and hard to follow, but I will attempt to answer what I believe to be an honest question. Other than Halpern, the entire management team was against MAXD becoming a patent troll. I know because I talked to each of them at the time. The attorneys were in favor of filing suits as they stood to make a great deal of money. Halpern was in favor because he believed there would be “billions of dollars” for MAXD and its shareholders and he wanted to take on the “bully” Google. The rest of the management team wanted the focus to remain on the technology. Eliminate the name “Greg Halpern” from the team and you have your answer as to whom I am referring to. As to your question about the filings, you would have to ask someone directly involved in the Vechery team, which I am not.
Correction "no one else involved" rather than "no one else no".
Who is the "no one else no" and when to whom you refer?
Where are the filings?
Sorry for the slow reply. The “boys down under” comment refers to the VLL “gang of four” Connie Nash always writes about. They had nothing to do with the Attia v Google case.
You are correct. MAXD had a business arrangement with Attia. That business arrangement was ended after Greg Halpern went around Attia’s attorney and attempted to settle the Attia case without their knowledge. He also settled the MAXD/VLL v Google case without the knowledge or approval of the VLL group. I won’t speak to the decision to give Halpern limited POA over anything as I was not involved, but it does seem crazy. My understanding is that Halpern was allowed to negotiate but not settle without approval. My comments were unintentionally misleading as I was attempting to make a character assessment of Greg Halpern using the similarities between going behind Attia’s and VLL’s backs to make a deal benefitting himself and not the group or the MAXD shareholders.
As to the sanctions question, I was being a bit facetious in my comments. It was Greg Halpern who talked Attia into the legal approach they used and placed himself in charge of the case, and it cost Attia. No one else involved in MAXD wanted to pursue these lawsuits and turn the company into a patent troll, it was all Halpern’s idea. In my opinion, MAXD the company is not legally liable, but Halpern should be held morally responsible for his overall litigious approach to life.
Greg Halpern has no self-serving right to steal the MAXD technology as it not only violates the court order but is also illegal as all MAXD assets were pledged to Harvey Vechery in the since defaulted notes.
Halpern's attempted fraud to steal MAXD's patent & "technology" might be worrying... except MAXD's patent is completely worthless, and MAXD's "technology" is fictional.
MAXD shareholders should jump at that the opportunity to get Halpern's debt off the books at the cost of literally nothing.
As for the sanctions: The blame quite clearly lands on attorney Nick Kliewer. The sanctions extend to lawyer Ken Kula & Eli Attia ostensibly because they were responsible to supervise Kliewer's actions. These sanctions would probably not have been levied if Attia had wisely withdrawn his lawsuit before the courts made a ruling on sanctions.
I suspect MAXD is not legally responsible for the sanctions because MAXD *WAS* smart enough to withdraw from the lawsuit. Morally, MAXD may have some culpability because they contributed/sanctioned the choice of hiring Ken Kula.
I don't see how Greg Halpern could have personal liability for contributing to the bad choice of hiring Kula- any input he had seems within his actions as MAXD executive.
Who are "the boys down under"? Are they mentioned in any filings or court documents?
MAXD Corporation had some kind of business arrangement with Eli Attia with respect to Attia's claims against google. This was public knowledge via press releases, SEC filings, and court filings.
It would be moronic for someone to make a contract / give power of attorney to Greg Halpern (the person) in these circumstances, when it's obvious the relevant parties are Eli Attia & MAXD corporation. So it sounds like these suckers got what they deserved.
There's this amazing pattern with MAXD of people signing contracts with people who clearly do not own what they are purporting to sell.
Greg Halpern through Jay has shown himself to be one of the most psychologically challenged individuals to present himself to the investing public in years. I appreciate the rapid work Jay does to forward this work from Greg Halpern. I think it’s amazing how that knowledge/document pipeline works so efficiently. One could sit back and ask “could Jay be Greg ?” , based on how these posts magically appear.
But that’s ok, per the court order, Greg cannot be Jay and risk contempt discovery from the court…. No couldn’t be, nah…
But we do know from Greg’s writings delivered instantaneously to us from Jay, we just need to be appreciative that such a close relationship is established between 2 separate psychological minds, though the possibility exists these 2 minds are just a small subset of many others, that exists inside of a single human being.
We may never know.
We do know, Greg Halpern is a 40 year serial fraudster,and continues to be so through today.
I read Halpern’s shareholder template letter and will have comments tomorrow. I just want to make a point that Halpern seems to have overlooked. The share value had been hovering around .0001 for a very long time before Vechery’s court action removed Halpern from the company. The value of the company decreased to .000001 due to the Expert Market fiasco. That means the market cap for MAXD had the company valued around $7,500.00 when Halpern was in charge and is still in the exact same place now. Exactly how has Harvey Vechery damaged the share value since Halpern was removed?
The only time the stock price surged, no matter how low it was at the time, or when there was any trade volume, was due to Halpern’s many fictitious deals and fake promotions, and a great number of people lost money on those fabricated deals. Remind me again, how many revenue deals were there during the Halpern years? How many products were brought to market while Halpern was in charge?
If Halpern's legal game plan is to target Harvey Vechery for the current state of financial affairs for MAXD, he might want to have a sketch artist draw his self-portrait so a BOLO can be issued to the shareholders featuring the real perpetrator. Which would be Greg Halpern.
The “Groundbreaking News” website, featured in the link, is nothing more than rehashed and renamed MAXD promotions from the past. MAXD Audio Biometric Security is now “MAXD Only In-Class Biometric Audio Security Hack Proof Exascale Morph Logic Voice and Cyber Armor.” That appears to be analogous to a realtor taking a house off the market and listing it a few weeks later as a new property. Or a marketing director lowering the price of a product from one hundred dollars to $99 to promote it as a new deal for less money. It’s just placing a new name on an old product. Lipstick on a pig so to speak.
Once again, the MAXD Audio Biometric Security is the foundation for an undeveloped product, and that’s the exact condition it’s been in since Lloyd Trammell invented and patented it. Greg Halpern does not have the ability to advance the engineering and he has not provided any evidence that he has paid anyone to complete the technology. It’s nothing more than a marketing idea which needs to be handed back to the engineering department for development.
This entire proposal is nothing more than building on Halpern’s plans for a lawsuit against Vechery so he can claim to shareholders he has made an “amazing” business offer to Harvey, and Vechery declined. That way Halpern can claim that he was doing everything in his power to save the shareholders, but Harvey Vechery had ulterior motives. Right. Harvey invested all this money in MAXD over the years for a tax write off. No one will believe that thought process. There are many charities who would benefit from Harvey’s money and would also be a write off. Without all the drama attached. The money was loaned/invested for an expected ROI which was promised by Greg Halpern, not for a tax write-off.
Reading through the latest Halpern proposal/threat document on the provided link, Halpern states, “If a deal is struck, all websites will go positive.” Halpern also states he is going to use his “SEO skills” to manipulate Google to keep all the Harvey Vechery defamatory websites at the top of each page if his proposal is not accepted. There’s a word for that action in legal and criminal circles.
Halpern also made this statement, “In late 2022, Greg Halpern took ownership of all primary rights of all MAXD technology, in exchange for a fraction of the 7 figures of MAXD still owed Halpern but is unable to pay.” Halpern had claimed in a prior posting that he had taken the MAXD Audio Biometric patent in exchange for money owed. Now he has taken the rights to “all MAXD technology.” He is using the date of “late December 2022” for this larceny. That way he can claim it was done prior to the judgment date of January 11. The problem with this approach is that there was no 8-K issued for a material event. No Notice to Harvey Vechery or the shareholders. Just another acquisition by our resident thief in the night.
Greg Halpern is expecting Harvey Vechery to step up and invest more money in the company and save Halpern’s shares and make them worth something. Just like Vechery did in the bankruptcy case, paying off everything for Halpern. The house, the cars, the credit cards, etc.
“Click here to find the amazing offer Halpern gave Vechery to allow Vechery to fix Vechery’s giant mess Vechery created.” Vechery didn’t create the mess, Halpern did. All Vechery did was stop the bleeding by buying the toxic debt and loaning money to Halpern and MAXD every time Halpern asked for help. Harvey Vechery could legitimately be accused of being an enabler, allowing Halpern to continue swindling people using Vechery’s money, but the creator of the “mess” and responsible for fixing Halpern’s mess? That’s not only a stretch of reality, it also would be the ultimate example of Einstein’s definition of insanity if Vechery accepted this “amazing offer.”
Halpern stated, “I wish you and your family the best in everything.” Are you serious? The follow-up comment from Halpern should have been, “Pardon me while I now continue to slander, libel, defame and basically take down your entire family and all your related businesses on my various websites.” I don’t understand why Halpern continues to believe he can treat Harvey Vechery like a dog and then come back the next day and expect Vechery to consider his offer. Words have meaning, as do actions.
The latest attempt by Greg Halpern to bamboozle Harvey Vechery into pouring more of his money down the plush bunny rabbit hole was included as a link in the board post on 9/11 and again tonight.
Even though the court order specifically prevents him from doing so, Halpern is obviously instructing his Halpernettes to post links to his business proposal for Harvey Vechery so anyone can read it. Not only is preventing “anyone from acting in concert with him” part of the ruling, it’s also a breach of the court order for Halpern to be representing himself as an agent of MAXD by submitting a proposal to Vechery featuring MAXD symbols and discussing assets belonging to MAXD.
According to Halpern in his “groundbreaking news” report on his latest website link, Harvey Vechery has not only “proven beyond any doubt that he is a total fraud,” he is also “a rotten man and a truly bad actor.” Those personal character flaws aside, Halpern wants money from that “bad actor” anyway.
Only a true megalomaniac, narcissist, and pathological dissembler of the truth, such as Halpern, would attempt to justify doing business with a man he claims is “rotten,” but I guess “the end justifies the means” when you have a personal agenda. Or vendetta. Depending on which way the wind blows on any given day. Halpern also wants an executive position with MAXD, even though the court ruling prohibits Vechery from doing so. Past comments about my “reading comprehension” skills aside, Halpern may want to go back and read the Final Order. He can’t hold a position like that with MAXD anymore. It’s in the Final Order.
One final point in reference to the Attia case, Greg Halpern had a deal with the boys down under. They gave him limited power of attorney to negotiate in the Google case, and he went around their backs and broke their agreement by settling the “life altering multi-billion dollar” Google case he had been promoting to the shareholders for years for absolutely nothing. Nada. Less than uno dinero. Without the knowledge or approval of his Aussie/New Zealand partners I might add. They were understandably blind sided with this action and very angry. Once again, Halpern doing what’s best for him without the slightest consideration for others. Partners, shareholders, or business associates, makes no difference. Its always been all about Halpern. Yes, Attia should seek damages from MAXD and Greg Halpern for those sanctions.
Gotta say “Jay”. Halpern is one derelict mentally deranged individual. That letter is textbook.
MAXDSCAM
A MAXIMUM HALPERN SCAM
Now that sanctions have been affirmed against Attia + Attia's lawyers, do you feel MAXD has any ethical or contractual obligation to pay a share of those sanctions?
Tomorrows news, today....
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1bm6f2nEeQMN3UoK6WLIHPeo9UzctuC8Y/view?usp=drivesdk
Attia's clownish lawyers can't even submit their paperwork properly without hand-holding from the clerks.
Looks like there are 3 cases involving Attia at the 6th appellate district:
H049869 20141CV274103 Attia v. Google LLC
H049586 20141CV274103 Attia et al. v. Google LLC
H048803 2014-1-CV-274103 Attia et al. v. Helix RE, Inc.
Followers
|
327
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
0
|
Posts (Total)
|
39878
|
Created
|
10/08/09
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators grantastic |
3525 Del Mar Heights Road # 802
San Diego, CA 92130
(800) 327-6293
info@maxsound.com????? C. ???
MAFIP
red@mafip.org
John Blaisure
John Blaisure is the President and Chief Executive officer of Max Sound Corporation. Prior to joining Max Sound Corporation, Mr. Blaisure was the Founder, President, and CEO of Effective Network Systems (ENS). Effective Network Systems was a telephony software company that debuted at the Intel Technology Summit in 1999 as one of the top 40 telephony software companies in the world. Prior to his work at ENS, Mr. Blaisure was the creator of Fonz by the day stores, a cellular communication reseller and retailer in Dallas, Texas. The stores achieved great success and became a market leader throughout the Fort Worth area.
Mr. Blaisure brings over 20 years of experience in strategic planning and in the marketing of communication technologies from the ground floor up. It is because of this extensive resume that John has been able to envision MAX·D HD becoming the standard in audio technologies.
Greg Halpern
Greg Halpern became an International Gold Medalist in Judo and an Author in the late 70’s, spending more than three decades since as a pioneer of innovative emerging inventions and technology transfers which he has played the critical role in bringing from conceptualization to reality and commercialization. During his 36-year career, Halpern has provided savvy management, small business infrastructure, significant funding and substantial intellectual capital to bring important and timely life-changing technologies to market through all phases of the commercialization process.
In the 80’s, Halpern was featured in Omni Science and Venture Magazine among many other media features for pioneering Computer Animated Imaging and Electronic Anesthesia to which he received various patents and trademarks and also appeared on the Oprah show.
In the 90’s Halpern developed early search engine algorithm software and successfully launched the first true crowd funding - raising three million dollars online in a week. The S.E.C. cleared offering was featured on CNN.
From 2000 to present, Halpern was the Principal owner of CGI Capital an NASD Member 5k Broker Dealer, the Chairman & CEO of Circle Group Holdings Inc. (AMEX: CXN) and Z-Trim Holdings Inc. (AMEX: ZTM) where he designed and built a green plant to produce a USDA food ingredient breakthrough and is the current Chairman of the high definition audio company Max Sound Corp. (OTCBB: MAXD). Halpern also developed Fairplay, a DRM solution component of Veridisc, which was sold to Apple as a piece of their media ecosystem.
For his diverse efforts, Halpern and his innovations have been featured on most major TV and radio networks and in many major publications including books by celebrities such as Dr. Oz. Famous leaders in several industries have endorsed and worked with Halpern and his innovative ventures including Steve Forbes, Al Gore, Wes Clark, Steadman Graham, George Foreman, Larry King, Mick Fleetwood, Pitbull, SBA Chief Hector Barreto, Congressman Michael Oxley and Congresswoman Sue Kelly who brought him to congress to testify on ways to improve small business in America.
Halpern has worked extensively with agencies such as the FDA, USDA, USPTO, FCC, DOE, DOD & SEC and is an assigned inventor on 31 patents issued or pending.
On the side, Halpern is the backer for his daughter's band KI and finalizing books and movies for his own story 13 Lives.
* In the past year, it has become clear which markets will give us the fastest acceptance and the quickest realization of our collective dreams, consumer adoption, brand awareness and financial success. Every day my team and I are focused on creating revenue events with big name customers and their associated partners. As we pursue and conquer these opportunities, it will be clear to our shareholders, manufacturers and content providers -- that consumers prefer the audio perfection created by MAX-D HD!
*Ask yourself -- "What would Max Sound's value be if consumers all over the world realized how MAX-D HD provides a far better audio experience?" You probably have an idea what that value could be, which is probably why you first invested in Max Sound Corporation. We have an idea too, which is why we keep investing our time, energy and financial resources (over seven figures has already been invested by our founders). I have personally invested four months of my salary purchasing MAXD stock in the open market, because I strongly feel our shares are severely undervalued. Our goal is that everyone will know about MAX-D HD and everyone will know about MAX-D stock. Right now the investor audience is small, but as you'll learn below, we think we now have the necessary elements for our shareholder base to grow substantially in 2015.
*Our sales and marketing teams are laser focused on penetrating the smart device industry, content streaming industry, auto industry and the television and film industry (post production audio for movie companies). The development team has concentrated on enhancing the existing MAX-D HD API, while developing additional API interfaces. The MAX-D API can be deployed across all streaming platforms along with most audio/video web based services. MAX-D HD can now reside in audio hardware (speakers and audio receivers -- such as car smart head units).
* One accomplishment in Q4 of 2014 was the completion of testing for Industry MAX-D HD Audio Boxes. I'll talk more about that below.
* We've also completed the initial development of the MAX-D Accurate Voice. Not only does it dramatically improve voice quality on cellular devices, it also has the ability to improve voice recognition in homes smart devices and auto infotainment systems.
Market Value | $3,885,855 | a/o Apr 15, 2016 | |
Authorized Shares | 1,650,000,000 | a/o Mar 24, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 647,642,452 | a/o Mar 24, 2016 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | Not Available | ||
Par Value | $0.00001 |
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=15418949&guid=d6IwkHLSAQbdB3h#MAXD_EX101_HTM
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |