Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
>>> Here's why the US dollar is 'priced to perfection' — and why it could move even higher
Yahoo Finance
by Alexandra Canal
January 8, 2025
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/heres-why-the-us-dollar-is-priced-to-perfection--and-why-it-could-move-even-higher-194141160.html
The US dollar (DX=F, DX-Y.NYB) extended its rebound on Wednesday, adding to gains after the currency was on track for a one-week low following a report from the Washington Post on Monday that suggested President-elect Donald Trump won't commit to an aggressive tariff plan.
But just two days later, CNN reported Trump could declare a national economic emergency to enact universal tariffs, pushing the dollar even higher as equities faltered.
The US dollar "is priced to perfection," Bank of America's global rates and currencies research team, led by FX analyst Athanasios Vamvakidis, wrote in a note published on Wednesday. "The USD has rallied strongly since the US election, from an already high level."
After hitting a September low, the US Dollar Index — which measures the dollar's value relative to a basket of six foreign currencies, including the euro, Japanese yen, British pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc — has rallied nearly 9%. Since the election, it has climbed by over 5%.
"In real effective terms, our estimates suggest that the USD ended 2024 at a 55-year high," Vamvakidis said. "This has been the longest USD uptrend in recent decades, which started in mid-2011."
The currency's price action has largely been driven by two main catalysts: Trump's election and the subsequent Republican sweep, along with the recalibration of future Fed easing in the face of strong economic data.
"American exceptionalism in terms of better economic growth, faster productivity growth, superior equity market performance, and higher yields all act as a collective magnet for attracting capital to the United States," wrote Blake Millard, director of investments at Sandbox Financial Partners.
Even data that's often viewed as not so good, like sticky pricing pressures, can be positive for the dollar.
The latest example: Data released on Tuesday showed prices paid in the services sector during the month of December jumped to a nearly two-year high, suggesting the inflation fight is not yet finished.
Traders scaled back rate cut bets as a result, placing a less than 50% chance the central bank cuts rates ahead of its June meeting, per the CME FedWatch Tool. That possibility spooked markets, with all three major indexes closing firmly lower. The dollar, though, instantly rebounded to end the session higher.
"With the Federal Reserve expected to cut rates less than most other major central banks, expected interest rate differentials favor the greenback," Millard wrote. "Also, tariffs will restrict the flow of goods leading to fewer dollars going abroad and reducing the demand for foreign currency."
And with most economists in agreement that Trump's proposed tariff plans will lead to higher inflation over time, the cycle surrounding bullish dollar sentiment remains intact.
The dollar's path forward
Of course, certain risks remain that could derail the dollar's positive path. And a lot depends on the unknowns of Trump 2.0.
"We expect the USD to remain strong in the short term on the back of US inflationary policies, and particularly tariffs, but to weaken later in the year, as these policies take a toll on the US economy while the rest of the world responds," BofA's Vamvakidis and his team wrote. "Policy uncertainty makes our baseline subject to substantial risks."
Some strategists believe markets have already overreacted to policy rumors that might not even come to fruition.
"I think we've got to take it all with a grain of salt," Tony Roth, chief investment officer at Wilmington Trust, told Yahoo Finance's Catalyst program on Wednesday. "I'm a little surprised, frankly, that the markets are ascribing as much importance to this sort of 24-hour rumor cycle mill on what he's going to be doing with tariffs."
But for now, the dollar is trading around a key inflection point, Millard said.
"Should the dollar continue its 3 to 4 month ascent higher, expect risk assets to remain under further pressure and a messy tape going forward," he said, referencing the historic negative correlation between the US dollar index and domestic equities.
A main reason for that is a strong US dollar can adversely impact companies that do business overseas, particularly due to slow earnings growth amid unfavorable foreign exchange conversions.
Per FactSet data, S&P 500 companies with international exposure drove the bulk of earnings growth during the third quarter. So a stronger dollar, coupled with blanket tariffs, could spell big trouble for stocks.
But "if the dollar stabilizes or breaks down from here," according to Millard, "then it should be party on for the bulls."
<<<
---
More from Timiraos - >>> Will the Fed Keep Cutting in 2025?
Officials try to find a path to a ‘normal’ rate under the second Trump presidency
WSJ
by Nick Timiraos
Dec. 16, 2024
https://www.wsj.com/economy/central-banking/federal-reserve-interest-rates-2025-1c5cc687
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell faces misgivings from colleagues who have been skeptical of cuts.
Investors see an interest-rate cut by the Federal Reserve this week as all but certain. Inside the central bank, the case for continued reductions will be less clear-cut if the economy continues to chug along.
Fed officials have signaled recently that a rate cut this week could conclude the first of a two-step phase of lowering rates. In that first interval, officials had a relatively low bar for cutting rates because they had held borrowing costs at such a high level. They had also waited several extra months to gain confidence that inflation was closer to their goal—and heading lower...
<<<
---
Timiraos - >>> The Fed’s Game Plan on Interest-Rate Cuts Keeps Shifting
Investors widely expect a third-in-a-row rate cut this week. Officials are ready to slow—or even stop—lowering rates after that.
WSJ
by Nick Timiraos
Dec. 16, 2024
https://www.wsj.com/economy/central-banking/fed-interest-rate-cut-outlook-2025-657e718a
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell had to reassure some skeptical colleagues that the central bank wouldn’t inadvertently send signals of distress when he led them to start lowering borrowing costs at the end of the summer with a gutsy, larger-than-usual half-point reduction.
Now, they are confronting another potential hinge point. Officials lowered their benchmark rate again in November, by a quarter point. Investors widely expect a third consecutive rate cut this week...
<<<
---
>>> Trump's tax cuts could 'offset' tariff headwinds: Strategist
Yahoo Finance
by Julie Hyman and Josh Lipton
December 3, 2024
https://finance.yahoo.com/video/trumps-tax-cuts-could-offset-215938932.html
Investors consider the market impacts of President-elect Donald Trump's second term in the White House with tax cuts, tariffs, and deregulation in focus. J.P. Morgan Private Bank US equity strategist Abby Yoder sits down with Market Domination Overtime Hosts Julie Hyman and Josh Lipton to discuss her 2025 outlook.
Yoder says the impact of Trump's policies will vary sector by sector. "For our clients, we're talking about really thinking about taxes as it relates to the deficit and down the road, how that really plays out is important to our client base," she adds.
"The thing that I think the biggest takeaway from a headline level is that the growth impulse as a result of the extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act will offset what we think would be headwinds from tariffs," the strategist says, adding that the headwinds impact the US economy from "a growth standpoint and an inflation standpoint."
She highlights the financials sector as being positioned to gain in this environment.
<<<
---
S&P 500 Bear Markets -
August 1956
-21.6%
December 1961
-28%
February 1966
-22.2%
November 1968
-36.1%
January 1973
-48.2%
November 1980
-27.1%
August 1987
-33.5%
July 1990
-19.9%
March 2000
-49.1%
October 2007
-56.8%
February 2020
-33.9%
Jan 2022
-25%
https://www.investopedia.com/a-history-of-bear-markets-4582652
---
>>> What To Expect From Trump 2.0
By James Rickards
December 2, 2024
https://dailyreckoning.com/what-to-expect-from-trump-2-0/
What To Expect From Trump 2.0
With the 2024 election in the rearview mirror and Donald Trump set to take office on January 20, 2025, what will his second term mean for America?
Let’s review the good, the bad and the ugly to prepare you for what’s coming:
The Good
Trump will pursue a twenty-first-century version of what was originally known as the American System. This system relied on the following policies:
High tariffs to support manufacturing and high-paying jobs
Infrastructure investment (public and private) to support productivity
A strong army and navy to protect the U.S. but not to fight foreign wars
A central bank with limited powers to provide liquidity to commerce
To the extent there was government spending, it was for productive projects such as canal and road building and later to support railroads. To the extent that early central banks existed, they were for secure lending to sound entities (including the U.S. government) and not for purposes such as printing money, fixing interest rates or “stimulus.”
The entire system could be summarized as sound money, smart investment and a strong military in the service of high-paying American jobs.
The American System prevailed from 1790 to 1962 with occasional periods of agrarian ascendency and some disruptions such as the Civil War. Beginning after World War I, the neo-liberal movement of Austrian economists and libertarians began to promote globalist policies of open borders, open capital accounts and free trade.
Of course, free trade is a myth because of subsidies and non-tariff barriers. Comparative advantage is obsolete because the factors of production are highly mobile. Taiwan had no comparative advantage in semiconductors in 1979, but today they dominate global production. They made that happen through a Taiwanese version of the American System.
In contrast, the neo-liberals were living an ideological fantasy in which globalism was to displace sovereignty. At a minimum, their goal was encasement of sovereigns in a larger orb of multilateral institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, WTO and the United Nations.
Beginning with the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, the Trade Act of 1974 and successive rounds under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (today the WTO), the U.S. embraced the neo-liberal consensus including drastic tariff cuts. As jobs moved offshore to take advantage of cheap labor, capital followed as direct foreign investment.
The result was the hollowing-out of U.S. manufacturing, wage stagnation, slower growth, greater debt and a succession of failed wars. The open border policy of Biden-Harris is consistent with neo-liberal views on the end of sovereignty but is a death knell for American jobs and social cohesion.
Trump and his economic team will return the United States to the pre-1962 glory days with the revival of the American System. Foreign companies will be free to sell goods to Americans but only if they are manufactured in the U.S.
This will lead to a wave of inbound investment in the U.S., a reduction in U.S. trade deficits, a stronger dollar (as the world demands dollars to invest here), and higher wages for U.S. workers. Higher wages will raise real incomes, stimulate consumption, decrease income inequality and expand the tax base to help reduce deficits without raising tax rates.
It’s a win for American manufacturing and a win for the American people.
The Bad
But before we get there, expect a tough economic (and market) environment at the beginning of Trump’s term. Administrations matter, personnel matters, policy matters, but there’s something bigger than Trump in the White House. It’s called the economy. The economy goes its own way. Business cycles have not been erased. The transition from Biden to Trump will bring economic pain as Trump inherits Joe Biden’s mess.
There are ample signs that the economy is headed for a recession (or may already be in one) including higher unemployment, lower interest rates (low rates are not “stimulus;” they are associated with recessions and depressions), flattening yield curves, negative swap spreads, collateral shortages in Eurodollar markets, reductions in China’s reserve positions (not a sign of “dumping” Treasuries but a sign of a dollar shortage and a need to provide liquidity to banks), declining oil prices (despite output reductions), and others.
The emerging recession will cause a stock market drawdown as earnings are revised downward, consumer confidence crumbles, consumer discretionary spending hits a wall and precautionary savings rise. The world will not bail out the U.S. economy because China, Japan, Germany and the UK are all slowing economically at the same time or already in contraction.
The U.S. economy (in contrast to economists) does not pay that much attention to elections or new administrations. It’s too big and moves to its own complex tempo. Investors may cheer the Trump policies and his reelection, but it will be a very bumpy ride in the first year of Trump 2.0.
The Ugly
Don’t underestimate “The Resistance.” Because it’s out there and can do a lot of damage in a couple of months before Inauguration Day. What are they up to? Biden and company are trying to Trump-proof the presidency by signing contracts. Let me explain.
Remember the famous Inflation Reduction Act? Despite its name, the act actually increased inflation by being the Green New Scam in disguise. There was about $850 billion for garbage like windmills, solar modules, and green initiatives. A lot of the money went to the Democrat’s favorite contractors and electric vehicle makers. That passed in August of 2022, but guess what?
Most of the money hasn’t been spent yet.
So, now there is a mad scramble to sign contracts. You actually can’t spend the money that fast, but you can sign a contract with a five-year or three-year life saying you’ll spend it over three years. And the idea is to sign the contract now so that even when Trump becomes president, even though the money hasn’t been spent, it has been appropriated and it’s contractually bound.
And that’s the key. Bind the spending in contractual form so Trump can’t do anything about it. There’s a lot of wasteful government spending that’s in the pipeline. The Democrats are also going to try to tie up as much federal land as they can to take it out of circulation to stall oil and natural gas production as well as mining.
The Resistance will try to get as much money to Ukraine as they can. They will try to appoint as many judges as they can. The Republicans can gum up the works a little bit, but the Democrats still have the majority in the Senate right now. And the one useful role of Kamala Harris left is being a tie-breaking vote in the Senate if needed.
The Resistance could cause havoc in the months leading up to Trump taking office and beyond, depending on how much damage they do. It won’t be a pretty picture for markets with so many companies impacted by their actions on top of a recession.
Bottom Line
After taking office, Trump’s agenda will incentivize billions of dollars of investments in U.S. energy and manufacturing jobs. He will make domestic oil drilling and refining a top priority which will provide America with energy independence. This will also benefit companies (and provide more jobs) in the energy sector.
But there will be plenty of minefields for markets to deal with in the first year as the transition takes place.
<<<
---
>>> More Trump tariffs are coming but CEOs sound prepared
Bloomberg
by Shawn Donnan
November 15, 2024
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/rates-lot-lower-12-18-141632652.html
(Bloomberg) — The alarm from economists has been clear for months: Brace yourself. If he delivers on his campaign promises for an aggressive package of new US tariffs, they’ve warned, a re-elected Donald Trump will set the stage for a historic period of turmoil in the global economy.
And yet there’s a reason CEOs, bankers, investors and even Trump advisers have largely shrugged off warnings about the damage a 10%-to-20% universal tariff and even higher import duties on China would do, or the resurgence in US inflation they might bring.
From the incoming president’s own track record, many see evidence Trump is unlikely to deliver on all he has threatened, and express confidence they can adapt to whatever he delivers this time around.
Even as economists decried his plans as a terrible miscalculation, Trump ratcheted up protectionist threats on the campaign trail because they were a key part of an agenda popular with voters. After his win, he claimed a license to deliver on those promises.
“America has given us an unprecedented and powerful mandate,” Trump told supporters. “Success is going to bring us together, and we are going to start by all putting America first.”
His former trade czar, Robert Lighthizer, who is expected to have a prominent post in a new administration, has warned that the rest of the world should be ready for new US tariffs and that any country with a trade surplus should be willing to address Trump’s grievances.
“Countries that run consistently large surpluses are the protectionists in the global economy,” Lighthizer wrote in the Financial Times last week. “We would be merely responding to the harm they have caused.”
But hanging over those threats are big questions: Is Trump bluffing, and even if he isn’t, how will the world respond? His first term in office was renowned for chaotic economic policymaking and bitter internal battles between rival aides on trade.
Trump also built a reputation as a transactional president, who was open to lobbying from CEOs like Apple Inc.’s (AAPL) Tim Cook on tariffs and flattery from foreign counterparts who learned trade threats could be defused with a promise to buy more Iowa soybeans, or even a peck on the cheek.
The world has also changed. Companies have worked hard on adapting to tariffs — avoiding them where possible and realigning supply chains. These are core skills now, honed through the chaos of the COVID pandemic and the advent of an era in which geopolitics drives trade and investment more than the sole pursuit of cost efficiencies.
In earnings calls Wednesday, executives at automakers including BMW (BMW.DE) and Honda Motor Co. (HMC, 7267.T) signaled they were prepared to weather any Trump tariff storm, thanks in large part to the large manufacturing operations they have already in the US.
“There is some natural cover-up against possible tariffs or whatever, but let’s not speculate whether there are tariffs. It might also only be that this is a verbal issue,” Oliver Zipse, BMW’s CEO and chairman, told analysts, pointing to growing sales in the US where it already manufactures cars. “In the United States, I would think we almost have a perfect setup for the time to come.”
Stanley Black & Decker Inc. (SWK) CEO Donald Allan Jr. told analysts recently the company had been planning for a Trump victory and a new tariff regime since the spring. The plan calls for price increases on its machine tools to offset any new duties and shifting production out of China to other Asian countries or Mexico as necessary.
“We have a playbook on the shelf ready to go,” Allan said. But that doesn’t include doing what Trump wants companies to do. It’s “unlikely that we’re moving a lot back to the US because it’s just not cost effective to do,” Allan said.
Williams-Sonoma Inc. (WSM), the home-furnishing chain, is ready for changes, too. Back in 2018, half of the San Francisco-based retailer’s imports came from China. Now, that reliance is 25%, Jeff Howie explained to analysts recently. “If this does come up and tariffs are expanded, we’re prepared to reduce it further.”
Such planning reflects an acknowledgment of a new business reality. But it also illustrates a growing acceptance among both policymakers and executives that tariffs can be a useful tool for governments facing international competition.
Everett Eissenstat, who served as Trump’s representative to the Group of Seven and G-20 in his first administration and is now a partner at law firm Squire Patton Boggs, said there was little to stop Trump from carrying out his tariff threats.
“This is really a huge shift,” he said. “I think we’re entering into a period of a recalibration of the global trading system.”
Even true believers in protectionism admit broad tariffs have some negative side effects. Trump’s victory sent the dollar (DX=F) sharply higher against Chinese, European and emerging market currencies. That raises the specter of not only less competitive US exports, but also potential economic turmoil outside the US that would reduce demand.
Trump’s stated goal for his trade strategy has always been to export more and import less. It’s why he sees the US’s persistent trade deficits as a profit-and-loss statement deeply in the red. A strong dollar that leads to US companies selling less overseas might anger Trump and only cause him to double down on protectionism.
Still, senior bankers say privately that companies and policymakers around the world are confident they learned how to deal with Trump and his trade wars during his first term.
Some of that has been fueled by other Trump advisers who quietly have been circulating on Wall Street and beyond for months, insisting that the now-incoming president’s tariff threats will be used as negotiating leverage against countries including China — not to spark all-out trade warfare.
The economic risk, of course, is that this is America’s frog-enjoying-the-warm-water-before-it-boils moment, where inflationary worries are ignored. One senior banker recently expressed concern that the clients he met with on his travels were in fact too sanguine about the turmoil ahead.
Aside From Tariffs
Tariffs aren’t the only ways Trump can upend global trade.
The next few years will likely bring a renegotiation of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement — the rebranded North American Free Trade Agreement that was a signature trade achievement of his first term.
Trump has signaled anger at Chinese investments in Mexican factories to produce electric vehicles and other products and avoid his original tariffs. He’s also linked immigration to tariffs by threatening harsh levies on imports from Mexico, if the new government there doesn’t block migrants from crossing to the US.
Delivering on much of what Trump promised on the campaign trail may depend on who controls Congress. That’s not necessarily the case with trade policy, in which US presidents have expansive authority to act unilaterally, particularly if national security can be invoked.
Any restraint will have to come from within a new administration, from financial markets or from domestic constituencies hurt by US tariffs or their inevitable flipside: retaliation.
‘Super Genius’
Elon Musk’s investments in both China, via Tesla (TSLA), and Trump’s campaign could wield more influence on what the new president chooses to do than the hawks in his national security team. “He’s a super genius,” Trump told supporters on Wednesday. “We have to protect our super geniuses.”
Though Trump repeatedly shrugged off economists’ warnings about his tariffs, the scale of the potential impact may also eventually end up giving him and his advisers pause.
According to calculations by economists Maeva Cousin and Eleonora Mavroeidi of Bloomberg Economics, raising tariffs on Chinese imports to 60% and those from all other countries to 20% would lead to a bigger shock than even the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930 delivered.
That legislation, widely credited with setting off trade wars that deepened the Great Depression globally, saw average US tariff rates go from 14% to close to 20%. Trump’s proposals would send the average from 3% currently to more than 20%, a far steeper jump.
Combined with retaliation from China and other countries, by the 2028 election the tariffs would lead to US economic output being 1.3% lower than otherwise, the Bloomberg Economics pair calculated.
Given the scope of the potential fallout, Anna Wong, Bloomberg Economics’ chief US economist, says the most plausible scenario is that while Trump will increase some bilateral tariffs, he won’t impose universal tariffs.
“We think procedural requirements, as well as the response from the economy, will limit the scope of trade actions,” Wong wrote in a research note this week. “We also assume US trade partners would retaliate in kind.”
In a recent report, Goldman Sachs economists said the most likely scenario would feature higher duties on imports from China, delivered quickly. The top rates would likely be reserved for strategic products, with consumer goods facing lower levies. That would lead to an average tariff hike on China of around 20 percentage points, they calculated — a level lower than the 60% Trump has threatened.
Trust Issue
There are those who also worry about a broader erosion in global trust in the US, even if Trump is slow to deploy his economic weapons.
Emily Blanchard, who until last year served as chief economist at the US State Department and is now at Dartmouth College, said there is little doubt that a second Trump term will bring a further deterioration in the US standing in the world and its economic alliances.
“If the US takes actions demonstrating that we’re no longer committed to openness and fairness, rules and transparency and predictability, then the whole game changes,” Blanchard said. “Firms, investors and governments are going to try to protect themselves and build out contingency plans.”
For those who believe that they can adapt to another Trump term or even charm their way through a trade standoff, there are examples to follow. Musk’s rise in Trump’s inner circle, for one, has proved that a politician once full of vitriol for electric cars can be won over by a man who made his fortune selling them.
Cook’s Approach
Then there was Apple’s Cook, who managed to avoid most of the company’s China-assembled products from being subjected to Trump’s tariffs in August 2019 by flying in to dine with the president at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey. Cook’s argument was simple: How could Apple compete against South Korean rival Samsung if the government was going to make his products more expensive?
“I thought he made a very compelling argument,” Trump told reporters the next day. Most of Apple’s products have avoided the 25% tariffs that other imports have faced.
Some national leaders similarly courted Trump, and seem to be preparing to do the same in a second term. Mindful of the risk their trade surplus with the US presents, South Korean officials have for months been drafting a plan to boost energy imports from the US if Trump is elected, Bloomberg reported this week.
European officials now girding themselves for a new rise in transatlantic tensions have their own examples to draw on.
In July 2018, facing a potentially devastating Trump threat of tariffs on European cars, Jean-Claude Juncker, who was then president of the European Commission, flew to Washington to try to work out a deal.
The night before a scheduled Oval Office meeting, two senior aides to the respective presidents hashed out a compromise under which the EU would buy American soybeans and natural gas. But whether Trump would embrace the deal was unclear, people close to the talks said.
Until the next day: Juncker marched into Trump’s office for the meeting and planted a healthy kiss on Trump as a greeting that not only charmed Trump but caused him to order up a Rose Garden press conference to quickly unveil the unfinished deal.
“Obviously the European Union,” as represented by Juncker, “and the United States, as represented by yours truly, love each other!” Trump later tweeted, attaching a photo of the kiss.
<<<
---
>>> Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq tumble as traders trim rate-cut bets
Yahoo Finance
by Karen Friar and Hamza Shaban
November 15, 2024
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/live/stock-market-today-dow-sp-500-nasdaq-tumble-as-traders-trim-rate-cut-bets-143057059.html
US stocks sank on Friday, on track for weekly losses as investors absorbed Chair Jerome Powell's signal that the Federal Reserve won't hurry to make interest-rate cuts.
The S&P 500 (^GSPC) dropped 1.2%, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (^DJI) slid roughly 0.7%. The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite (^IXIC) led declines, falling nearly 2%.
Powell's hawkish comments are casting a pall on markets as the initial optimism for President-elect Donald Trump's policies starts to wear off. The S&P has already reversed one-third of its post-election rally, and the Nasdaq is poised for a weekly loss of around 1%.
Retail sales data released on Friday morning reflected continued resilience in the American consumer, a sign of the economic strength Powell suggested would allow the Fed to take its time. October sales rose 0.4% month on month, versus 0.3% expected, including a revision higher for September's reading to 0.8% from 0.4%.
Wall Street is back to puzzling over the Fed's path next year, a question already muddied by this week's inflation prints. As of Friday morning, traders are pricing in 55% odds of a rate cut at its December policy meeting, compared with 72% the day before, per CME FedWatch tool. Bets on a January easing stand at 69%, versus the previous 81%.
At the same time, investors kept a watchful eye on Trump's preparations for power, after vaccine stocks fell amid reports Robert F. Kennedy Jr will be named top health official. JPMorgan Chase (JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon made it clear Thursday he won’t be joining the new president's team.
<<<
---
>>> A surging U.S. dollar is hammering emerging-market stocks and metals. Watch out.
Overbought dollar could lead to trend change, with knock-on effects for other assets, analyst says
Market Watch
By William Watts
Nov. 14, 2024
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/a-surging-u-s-dollar-is-hammering-emerging-market-stocks-and-metals-watch-out-e9be2759
The dollar is on a tear.
The U.S. dollar remains an unabashed beneficiary of Donald Trump’s presidential-election win — and its relentless rise is causing significant pain for some emerging-market assets and commodities.
It also sets the stage for further volatility if traders decide the dollar rally has gone too far, too fast.
“The dollar is overbought and challenging resistance while several metals and emerging markets (EM) are oversold and trying to hold above key support,” said Kevin Dempter, analyst at Renaissance Macro Research, in a Thursday note.
“We’ll be watching how they respond to their overbought and oversold conditions closely. A strong response to the overbought condition in the dollar will likely lead to a bullish trend change and vice versa for the metals and EM,” he said.
The ICE U.S. Dollar Index DXY, a measure of the currency against a basket of six major rivals, jumped 2.1% from election day through Wednesday’s close, trading at its highest in a year. The index, heavily weighted toward the euro and Japanese yen, has rallied more than 6% since late September, when Treasury yields began rising in response to both strong economic data and expectations for a Trump victory that could lead to larger fiscal deficits, more inflationary pressure and fewer rate cuts by the Federal Reserve.
The dollar rally has continued, in a move partly attributed to those factors and to expectations that wide-ranging tariffs on imports would boost demand for the U.S. currency relative to its peers.
See: Another Trump presidency could be a boon for the dollar — but some expect a bumpy ride
Broadly speaking, a rapidly strengthening dollar can cause pain for emerging markets, sucking away foreign investment and capital. It also makes it more difficult for emerging-market borrowers to pay dollar-denominated debts. The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets exchange-traded fund fell 4.7% from Election Day through Wednesday’s close and is down 8.8% from its recent peak on Oct. 7.
U.S. stocks have soared, outpacing developed and emerging markets alike. The S&P 500 on Monday closed above the 6,000 milestone for the first time, after it, along with the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the Nasdaq Composite, last week saw their biggest weekly gains of 2024. The S&P 500 remains up more than 25% in the year to date.
A stronger dollar can also be a weight on commodities priced in the unit, making them more expensive to users of other currencies. Copper futures have dropped 8.7% since Election Day and are down more than 21% from a record high set earlier this year, having suffered a retreat on disappointment in growth in China and the country’s stimulus efforts.
Other industrial metals have also suffered, while gold has pulled back after setting a series of records this year.
Commodities Corner: Why gold prices are now dropping on the heels of Trump’s win
Gold miners, tracked by the Van Eck Gold Miners ETF GDX, have retreated sharply, turning deeply oversold and approaching support at the 200-day moving average, Dempter said. A break below that support level, which stood at $35.19 Thursday, according to FactSet, would be a signal to start rotating out, he said.
The rising dollar has battered oil futures, which have also been contending with weak China demand and rising production outside of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies.
Meanwhile, Asia stands to suffer the most if the dollar continues its upside tear, said Stephen Innes, managing partner at SPI Asset Management. A surging dollar has battered the region before, slamming local-currency debt, which he described as the backbone of Asia’s emerging markets.
Some relief may be in store, however, if the dollar sticks to its pattern of seasonal weakness in December — a scenario that Mark Newton, head of technical strategy at Fundstrat, sees as likely. He noted that December has been the worst month of the year for the ICE U.S. Dollar Index over the last 10 years, with an average decline of 0.95%.
“Overall, the key takeaway is that despite this ongoing downtrend over the last month, EEM is likely to stabilize in December as [the] U.S. dollar begins a month-long retreat,” he said. The two key areas to watch for the emerging-markets ETF, he said, are support at $42.50 and, below that, $41.
<<<
---