Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Less than 1500 shares trading and $93.00 dollars moved the share price 0.0648 up
0.0068 (11.7%).
Good grief! :)
Thanks you very much for your kind words and sincere comments. All of which are very much deeply appreciated.
Researchfyi.
Good luck to you.
You say what you have said becasue either you have no understanding of a pioneering process or you are past of the basher boys brigade ........ The hionest people here and here in hopes of a super big home run if things materialize as the providers and early adopters would like things to turn out .... Again if you want to see a baseball game then go to a stadium where a baseball game is being played instead of going to a baseball game and staying in the stadium for 10 years demanding that somebody get real and put the fricken goalposts up ... It is simple logic and anybody that buys into others who stay here for 10+ to bash the stock is just as disengenious as those doing the 24/7 bashing .... It is really just very basic logic and if you don't have just simple logic then you definitely should not be investing in a company like LQMT nor should those others that bash the company 24/7 for 10+ years and stay here night and day doing so..... Simple logic proves that they are definitely here for the wrong reason and anybody who touts their genious reporting is also here for the wrong reason....... and is nothing but a cheerleader for the basher boys.
Your questions and observations over the years have been focused and insightful. I appreciate your weekly summary for the truth telling that it is. I can sprinkle my own cheerful glitter on top of whatever news there is, but starting with the facts is always best. It is neither disparagement or puffery if it’s true.
I wish the best for LQMT and my present stake in it, but I also expect fair and transparent dealing by its leadership in accordance with regulations and standard practice. I am not making allegations of impropriety, but the current lack of reporting by TC et al with regard to Movano/Evie is disconcerting and deserves to be called out. You’re doing a good job of it.
In the end, we all (must!) realize this is a high risk - high reward proposition and we need to invest accordingly. That said, your sober, fact based commentary is a welcome balance to the frenetic cheerleading supplied by others in the room. And if those others resort to ad-hominem attacks in reaction to the facts you provide, then you know you’re on the right track.
Let’s hope we can all celebrate LQMT’s ultimate success at some point in the (near) future, but for now, know that your efforts are truly appreciated.
What is LQMT hiding? Were the first sales with Liquidmetal a freebie just to help out a startup company with no cash revenues also like LQMT living off of accumulated debt.
Even if movano ordered 10 thousand rings or 2000 rings they had to be ordered manufactured and delivered. Not even asking when payment is due.
What’s the big deal? Contract or no contract!
Revenues or no revenues! What’s up?
The longer this charade continues, not that it means much with present daily liquidity trading, the quicker it will be for LQMT to slide back down.
What is LQMT hiding? Once again imo, LQMT is playing the three card monte street game using the Evie ring on their website as the card or the cup and the LQMT shareholders as the spectators.
Very sad but a legitimate concern affecting all shareholders as the pps seems to be slipping more and more into the nickels.
There is no way I can separate the stocks declining share price from management’s disrespectful silence on this one.
By the way…Liquidmetal, update your website’s copyright. The year is no longer 2023. Even China understands that.
And are you ever going to activate your new main page where it means $$$$. It’s been around over a year now.
Done, I always press the 6 and 8. I am in on the snake eyes 👀
Now you’re talking or should I say… it’s what everyone has been saying for a long, long, time. Too long.
By the way if you are at the crap table; press the eight and bet on snake eyes/aces on the fourth roll.
Need some communication from our local leader. We need sales from our local leader. We need some contracts from our local leader. There is no way this stock should be at this price with the evie ring just getting started, should have moved to .13-.17 just on rumors and speculation alone. I guess rumors are no longer applicable to this stock after the Apple hype for 15 years.
Come on Tony, tell us something good!!
Going to Vegas this weekend, need my account to load up so I can fire away at a few tables.
Hang tight! That’s it, hang tight. After two decades that is all I have been doing with or without China.
We don’t need elections to do it. We need contracts.
I hope everyone’s theories come through. But my only theory is we need contracts. :) and not another theory to get us one. But if it works, I’m all for it.
They should have commented already.
Communications from LQMT since LL rules is not when, but if ever.
Without a contract there are no comments about sales. And with one the same applies.
Don’t believe it? How are those golf club sales doing?
Thought so.
Just the way they do business.
We might see it as being disrespectful.
Yes, that would be in line to do. I understand silence but with Evie it would not make sense to remain silent for that product.
With Evie ring now shipping when should we expect the powers that be at the LQMT would comment on the contract? Or whatever they have in place that should be revenue generating w Movano.
Certain strategic moves will not be made by China until after the elections in November. After that hang on tight.
Type in Liquidmetal in the search bar.
https://www.globalspec.com/learnmore/motion_controls/power_transmission/gears/rack_pinion_gears
Still in infancy.
The ownership might be fuzzy not the loyalty of party. It’s the same here. You don’t want to piss off who is elected. Corruption is all over the place and I don’t care at this point who is in control.
I just want fricken contracts, PERIOD!
Haven’t seen one for 25 months now! That’s who controls LQMT!
My point…exactly but we are tiny compared to $288 billion and CCP ownership is “fuzzy”.
The price dropped from 17 to 12 cents in a matter of days with over 20 million traded. You can believe what you want, any rational person could see what happened. As the other poster noted, he never discloses his actual position. So continuing to parrot the 16 M share lie is disingenuous at best.
“JB would never disclose his ACTUAL POSITION”
At least you got that part right.
One could make the argument that LQMT Valencia is a Chinese asset being held abroad. 46% certainly, with effective control under a Hong Kong holding company which was ultimately financed by the State. At least the Chinese State and the CCP could make that argument to LL and win it. Probably would not need to make an argument. Would be an incentive to improve the financial performance and even get back the whole $64 million. Nothing else has worked to inspire this company.
Well maybe at the time their plant was in China. Then there’s the argument of who is doing the manufacturing? China or LQMT? I don’t like to speculate. All I know is LQMT’s bottom line doesn’t reflect any $$$ from sales in China no matter where the parts wind up.
I do know LQMT needs contracts to survive beyond their liquid assets. Or one big contract.
That being the case, why aren't they contracting with LQMT in the states for the same proven products/services? Probably better examples, but there does not seem to be any crossover from our 'partners' in China.
Changing the subject to something important…Did you see yesterday that China wants to invigorate its economy by repatriating $288 billion of Chinese assets being held abroad? They are talking about assets of state controlled companies. At this point, it just a proposal but it is sort of “pulling your wagons in a circle”. Their growth rate is falling and panic is spreading.
Start with Tesla.
Obviously the need to hire him and dump the 21 non productive sales reps
Just wondering out loud, does the maze have any US customers in China? Anybody know?
It’s obvious that no one at LQMT has attended the Mark Cuban School of Business. “‘No business has ever succeeded without sales,’ Cuban says. (Maybe that's why Cuban says sales skills are what made him wealthy.) ‘Period. End of story.’”
The impact of an outsider claiming to be a market guru owning whatever shares is meaningless. Unless that person was from Berkshire Hathaway or fidelity or Goldman Sachs etc.
You are just not getting the bigger picture here of why shareholders focused on an insider purchase. Anyone owning shares of that hypothetical number with the liquidity trading can’t do a dam thing but hold on until it pops to get out.
This is from a person claiming that LQMT was the opportunity of a lifetime. And purportedly bought more shares to average down to sell out on a pop. Not exactly a market guru. More like a Svengali. And I’m sure those who bought in on this one have other thoughts about the opportunity of a lifetime and more like an opportunity of a life sentence.
I’ll say it again. In this case, TC’s purchase has more meaning going forward, then an outsider with a questionable past event owning whatever shares are being bantered about.
He’s not buying he’s looking to sell.
TC is looking to score.
Or 0.1% verses 1.7% of outstanding shares. I think 16 million shares is our second largest shareholder unless someone is hiding in the weeds.
I’m sure this jr guy is BOND’s mom or his lawyer and not the usual suspects here. He says JB doesn’t own but a “fraction “ of 16 million LQMT shares so he should know. Since he’s calling JB a straight up liar as I read it. This clown must know. JB would never disclose his ACTUAL POSITION IN LQMT because…. because why clown? Because you say so….. same guy …same clown.
I’m sure this jr guy is BOND’s mom or his lawyer and not the usual suspects here. He says JB doesn’t own but a “fraction “ of 16 million LQMT shares so he should know. Since he’s calling JB a straight up liar as I read it. This clown must know. JB would never disclose his ACTUAL POSITION IN LQMT because…. because why clown? Because you say so….. same guy …same clown.
It’s very easy to understand the point of view about someone who hypothetically owns 16 million shares vs someone who recently purchased 989 thousand shares. The reason for the focus on TC’s position is that he happens to be an insider who occupies the title of CEO and the other person is not. When an insider buys it is considered a bullish sign. When an outsider buys it is generally not a bullish sign.
Could be a valid reason why everyone focused on TC and not the other person regardless of anyone’s like or dislike of either one.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Good research…In the March 21, 2020 to April 5,2020 timeframe approximately 25 million shares changed hands with a price of $0.12 on 3/21 and a price of $0.12 on 4/5. These are FACTS….but assuming that it was JB dumping doesn’t compute. If someone was to try and sell 16 million shares in 2 calendar weeks, the price would plummet. There was obviously considerable coincident demand to soak up all that volume. Do you have anything like a “Raging Bull” recommendation that coincides with this time period to explain the demand…I doubt it since he was under severe scrutiny in this time period.
It just doesn’t work for me.
Are you aware of when he had to pay the $2.4M fine? Did you ever look at the historical share prices and trades? And compare that to when he paid the fine?
https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/LQMT/history?period1=1548115200&period2=1705881600&interval=1d&filter=history&frequency=1d&includeAdjustedClose=true
Take a look at March 27, 2022 to April 5, 2022. Prices was spiked up to 16 cents then someone sold off big time. When do you think he was required to pay the fine? Same exact timeframe. He has screwed so many investors, including the fools here who still think he owns 16M shares! Not even close. He owns a small fraction of this at best.
Should be enough to keep the stake away when the sun comes out.
Don’t think it will impact the Q4 results but may get us toward cash flow neutral in 2024.
Hopefully LQMT gets a few bucks per Evie ring to put in the coffers. Which is in a rectangular box 6 feet in the ground but the lid is still barely cracked open.
LQMT now into 25 months without a new contract announcement.
Looks like that streak might be ending soon.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
I’m aware of all of this. Guilty of “aggressive marketing” paid a fine and is still in business. It doesn’t change the fact he has invested $1.6 million to purchase 16 million shares in LQMT. There are many other places to park your money.
Please learn who "Jason Bond" is and the crimes he has committed.
https://www.nhpr.org/nh-news/2021-12-22/ragingbull-settles-state-securities-regulators-lee
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2022/03/online-investment-site-pay-more-24-million-bogus-stock-earnings-claims-hard-cancel-subscription
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/294-1_-_proposed_stipulated_final_order_as_to_rb_defendants.pdf
https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cases/1_-_complaint_1.pdf
It is called Adoption and the pecking order takes its course one way or another ..... and do you think just a few companies will 'feed' the whole world once the global adoption kicks into gear ?.... Again LQMT could be 20 spots down in the lineup and still be at 2 to 5 dollars a share down the road (and possibly in the not too distant future).... And once the Global Adoption starts rolling out they will get a drastic increase in price because they have found ways to remain relevant in the space in spite of their stock price and the delays in Global Adoption ...... Just like a high rising tide lifts all boats big or small..... once validation of the technology and benefits takes place by a whale or two .... the waves of innovation will be huge and will grow across many thousands of different applications ... and once validated, generally speaking the earliest participants will be the biggest winners ... If this is not your type of invetment profile .. why do you and others stay and bitch constanly or degrade those who are doing their best to introduce new innovations... These are people who takes lots and lots of risk and you constantly bash them ..... sort of insane to spend your time that way....
Apple did not buy LQMT for it's technology, it bought the key technology (rights to) from a starving company and left the remainder for us. Then along came the Chinese and did acquire effective control of the company, along with (lopsided) contracted rights for the IP and brand. Absquatulated with all of that, left LQMT Valencia Circle on the sidelines, for us to enjoy. I was just wondering, amongst the 'us', is there anyone that really does not understand what has happened....to us? Think corncob level punishment. We are in nickel range after all these years. Whilst Apple and the Chinese are having a fine time. working the technology.
Apple has more money than most countries. China has more money than Apple. None of which is on the way to LQMT outside shareholders' pockets. It seems to be.
Everybody seems to focus on TC’s purchase of something like a million shares and putting up $50k+ of his own money to do it. I would rather consider why Jason Bond has accumulated something like 16 million shares at $0.10 for $1.6 million. The naysayers like to call him a “crook” or “not too smart” but nevertheless he has put his money on the line. Personally, I think he is very knowledgeable and has developed insight into the potential for the technology. It’s a big commitment and he is waiting patiently.
So you bash LQMT 100% of the time and yet you stay here 24 / 7 / 365 .... and so what would be your 'Another Week Asses' Theory on why Apple Attorney's instantly got involved in the LQMT TradeMark issues several years ago ?... Were they just trying to trick everyone and make it seem like they had an interest or ulterior motive for protecting the LQMT Trademark ?? ...... Do companies like Apple react so instantly to circumstances like that when there is nothing to talk about or no reason to react ?? or was Apple just doing that because they knew they needed to trick everybody on this board and across the globe .... Do you recall if the Apple activity ever made it into the 'Another Week Asses series' ?
Excellent assessment. They were in debt before the sellouts and headed in the same direction post sellouts. Nothing has changed fundamentally. Now living off of cash burn. Otherwise the company might have evaporated by now.
Harsh words, but reality of it’s history before the cash came in for ip use.
Low oxygen levels are indicators of COVID or RSV and I see that as very useful.
To your last question. Absolutely.
My point was Apple had to do a software update to remove the functionality from the watch. The Evie ring is going to ship with the feature active. Perhaps the easy button for Apple would be to acquire Movano if Movano built their sensor in a way that doesn’t violate whatever patent Apple is accused of violating. Could low
oxygen levels detected while sleeping be an indicator of sleep apnea?
Have zero idea about Apple licensing their technology. Have a good idea that there is no violation from modifying existing technology to be used in a similar manner. The oximeter used for oxygen levels has been around longer than any of the Apple Watch products used in health support.
More curious about why the blood oxygen levels are so important, unless someone has a history of high Co2 retention in their bloodstream that would indicate possible pulmonary or kidney problems and need further testing.
These Co2 levels if excessive can be detected by looking at one’s nails or lips if they do not wear any nail polish or lipstick. The pink would fade to a shade of blue.
It’s always good to have more data available imo, male or female. I think a big seller and lock up of a product to beat out any competition would be the patent on blood sugar and blood pressure.
You throw those two in and hundreds of millions are buying! No matter what gender they believe they are in. Could save the lives too of young people entering sports competition and those in professional sports too.
The Evie ring I bought my wife will be shipping soon. They start shipping Monday. One item that may only be interesting to me is it has a blood oxygen sensor. Like the Apple Watch. Are they licensing the tech? Or better yet did they create the capability in a way that doesn’t violate the patent that got Apple’s wrist slapped, so to speak.
I leave that up to the few positive bullish purportedly invested who are into the mocking and bashing etc., and offer not one clue of past or present evidence of what has fundamentally changed for the better to reflect positive bullish quarterly and consistent annual growth year over year.
When they remember to include realistic facts on LQMT, instead of mocking and bashing those with opposing views. Then I will include those frustrated investors who openly are mocking LQMT with 100% horseshit.
As far as better behavior goes…the bottom lines of their assets and liabilities of every financial 10Q and 10K statement reflects their behavior. There is nothing to brag about, when the charts and long term interest point in a direction of south of the border consistently.
Sometimes, when a company has nothing good to say it is considered good manners to say nothing.
I give the executives an A+ in etiquette. :)
Followers
|
884
|
Posters
|
|
Posts (Today)
|
3
|
Posts (Total)
|
233312
|
Created
|
04/30/05
|
Type
|
Free
|
Moderators PatentGuy1 Almosthere |
Liquidmetal® Technologies (ISO 9001:2008 certified) is a leading force in the research, development and commercialization of amorphous metals. Our revolutionary class of patented alloys and processes form the basis of high performance materials in a broad range of medical, military, consumer, industrial, and sporting goods products.
Discovered by researchers at the California Institute of Technology, Liquidmetal alloys’ unique atomic structure enables applications to achieve performance and accuracy levels that have not been possible before. The revolutionary class of patented materials technology redefine performance and design paradigms institutionalized by traditional materials.
As Liquidmetal Technologies controls the intellectual property rights with more than 70 U.S. patents, these high performance materials are dramatically changing the way companies develop new products.
LINKS
Featured: Automotive Pressure Sensors, 9.36 billion market by 2020
1. LiquidMetal Website
2. LiquidMetal Manufacturing Facility
3. OTC Market Report
4. Engel Liquidmetal Forum (Nov 2015)
5. ENGEL Symposium 2015
6. ENGEL Interview on Liquidmetal
PATENTS (USPTO)
1. Search Crucible Intellectual (Apple and LiquidMetal R&D)
2. Search Apple and LiquidMetal
3. Search Cross-license Patents w/Eontec
4. Search Vitreloy
5. Search Pre-grant Patents
VIDEOS
1. OMEGA Liquidmetal Bezel
2. ENGEL e-motion 110T
3. Liquidmetal Bouncing Ball
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Professor Lugee Li, Chairman
Professor Li was appointed as a member of our board of directors in March 2016 and became Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Professor Li is the founder, Chairman, and majority stockholder of DongGuan Eontec Co. Ltd., a Hong Kong company listed on the Shenzen Stock Exchange engaged in the production of precision die-cast products and the research and development of new materials. Professor Li founded Eontec in 1993 and has served as Chairman since that date. At Eontec, Professor Li is responsible for strategic development and research and development. Professor Li is also the founder and sole shareholder of Leader Biomedical Limited, a Hong Kong company engaged in the supply of biomaterials and surgical implants. Professor Li serves as an analyst for the Institute of Metal Research at the Chinese Academy of Sciences and serves part-time as a professor at several universities in China.
Abdi Mahamedi, Vice Chairman
Abdi Mahamedi has served on our board of directors since May 2009 and became Vice-Chairman of our board of directors in October 2016. Since 1987, Mr. Mahamedi has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Carlyle Development Group of Companies (“CDG”), which develops and manages residential and commercial properties in the United States on behalf of investors worldwide. At CDG, Mr. Mahamedi evaluates and supervises all of the investment activities and management personnel. Prior to joining CDG, Mr. Mahamedi founded Emanuel Land Company, a subsidiary of Emanuel & Company, a Wall Street investment banking firm, and served as a managing director for Emanuel Land Company from 1986 to 1987. In 1983, Mr. Mahamedi received his B.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania, and in 1984 he received his M.S.E. degree in Civil and Structural Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania.
Isaac Bresnick
Currently serves as Legal and Regulatory Affairs Director for the Leader Biomedical Group, a private company based in Hong Kong and operating from Amsterdam, the Netherlands, and has served in that role since October 2014. At Leader Biomedical, Mr. Bresnick is responsible for the direction and management of legal affairs, regulatory affairs, quality control, and quality assurance, as well as for advising executive management of Group companies. Mr. Bresnick also currently serves as Director of AAP Joints GmbH, a private company in Berlin, Germany, and has served in that role since July 2013. Mr. Bresnick received his J.D. from the University of Connecticut School of Law in 2013, and his B.S. in Industrial Design from the University of Bridgeport in 2008. After completion of his undergraduate studies and continuing through his enrollment at UCONN Law, Mr. Bresnick worked as Senior Arrangements Designer for Electric Boat Corporation, a subsidiary of General Dynamics, from June 2008 to December 2012.
Vincent Carrubba
An experienced corporate leader and serial entrepreneur with extensive senior executive, technical and manufacturing experience. Mr. Carrubba has created and guided new products to success in the consumer goods, electronics, automotive and construction industries and has conceptualized, financed and built factories and developed new manufacturing technologies throughout Asia. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Admiral Composite Technologies Inc. (“Admiral”), where he has developed new technologies for environmentally responsible and innovative building materials which represent Admiral’s product lines. Mr. Carrubba has also served as Admiral’s Chairman since its inception in 2009. From September 2014 through the present, Mr. Carrubba has served as the CEO of Asia Sourcing & Communications USA Inc. and he has served as its Chairman since its inception in 2013. From 2002 through August 2014, Mr. Carrubba served as the Director of R&D for Interdynamics Inc., IDQ Holdings, where he was responsible for all R&D and QC matters, including the management of engineering, legal, patenting, regulatory, insurance and consumer relations matters. From 1989 through 1992, Mr. Carrubba designed and installed the New York Stock Exchange telecommunications and information technology systems. Mr. Carrubba has held engineering and executive positions with Xerox, General Electric, Bristol-Meyers Squibb and AT&T and he is the inventor of several patents related to telecommunications, professional tools and consumer products. Mr. Carrubba received a Bachelor of Arts degree in Engineering Science and a Bachelor of Science Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Columbia University SEAS in 1982.
Tony Chung
Mr. Chung was appointed to our board of directors in August 2017. Mr. Chung had previously served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer from December 2008. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Chung served as CFO at BETEK Corporation, a real estate and investment subsidiary of SK Engineering and Construction, and as CFO of Solarcity, a company providing advanced solar technology and installation services. Mr. Chung is a Certified Public Accountant and served eight years at KPMG as an Audit and Consulting Manager for several large multinational companies. He received his B.S. degree in Business Administration from the University of California, Berkeley. Mr. Chung is also an Attorney at Law and received his J.D. degree from Pacific Coast University School of Law.
Reporting Status | U.S. Reporting: SEC Reporting |
Audited Financials | Audited |
Latest Report | August 4, 2020 10Q |
CIK | 0001141240 |
Fiscal Year End | 12/31 |
OTC Marketplace | OTCQB |
Market Value1 | $129,851,894 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
Authorized Shares | 1,100,000,000 | a/o Dec 31, 2016 | |
Outstanding Shares | 914,449,957 | a/o Sep 24, 2020 | |
-Restricted | Not Available | ||
-Unrestricted | Not Available | ||
Held at DTC | Not Available | ||
Float | 487,690,350 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 | |
Par Value | No Par Value |
Shareholders of Record | 217 | a/o Dec 31, 2017 |
Volume | |
Day Range: | |
Bid Price | |
Ask Price | |
Last Trade Time: |