Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
The judge's order. This includes the kids also
A New York judge has found Trump, his sons, et al liable for fraud under the state’s Executive Law 63(12) in the case brought by Tish James’s office. He’s also sanctioned Trump’s lawyers. pic.twitter.com/qciIu6Ilzu
— southpaw (@nycsouthpaw) September 26, 2023
Follow up on the judgement
Andrew Feinberg
@AndrewFeinberg
NEW: If I am reading this right, Judge Engoron has found that Donald Trump committed fraud and has ordered the cancellation of all of his New York business certificates and the dissolution of the Trump Organization.
Order here:
NEW: If I am reading this right, Judge Engoron has found that Donald Trump committed fraud and has ordered the cancellation of all of his New York business certificates and the dissolution of the Trump Organization. pic.twitter.com/k2nRcK3L37
— Andrew Feinberg (@AndrewFeinberg) September 26, 2023
So wouldn’t it be better to invade Venezuela rather that having Venezuela invading the USA?
Their RW credentials and idiotic behavior were widely reported. She could have Wiki'd each of them before signing on.
And I doubt that as an intern she had much contact with Cruz or Scalise.
I'll withhold further judgment until I've seen any of her coming interviews.
Yes- he may have known what it is, but the GOP see no reason to apply laws to themselves.
Meanwhile, I'm sure Trumpty gets another mad about this.
NEW YORK (AP) — A judge has ruled that Donald Trump committed fraud for years while building the real estate empire that catapulted him to fame and the White House.
Judge Arthur Engoron, ruling Tuesday in a civil lawsuit brought by New York’s attorney general, found that the former president and his company deceived banks, insurers and others by massively overvaluing his assets and exaggerating his net worth on paperwork used in making deals and securing financing.
The decision, days before the start of a non-jury trial in Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit, is the strongest repudiation yet of Trump’s carefully coiffed image as a wealthy and shrewd real estate mogul turned political powerhouse.
Beyond mere bragging about his riches, Trump, his company and key executives repeatedly lied about them on his annual financial statements, reaping rewards such as favorable loan terms and lower insurance premiums, Engoron found.
Those tactics crossed a line and violated the law, the judge said, rejecting Trump’s contention that a disclaimer on the financial statements absolved him of any wrongdoing.
Manhattan prosecutors had looked into bringing a criminal case over the same conduct but declined to do so, leaving James to sue Trump and seek penalties that could disrupt his and his family’s ability to do business in the state.
Engoron’s ruling, in a phase of the case known as summary judgment, resolves the key claim in James’ lawsuit, but six others remain.
Engoron is slated to hold a non-jury trial starting Oct. 2 before deciding on those claims and any punishments he may impose. James is seeking $250 million in penalties and a ban on Trump doing business in New York, his home state. The trial could last into December, Engoron has said.
Trump’s lawyers had asked the judge to throw out the case, which he denied. They contend that James wasn’t legally allowed to file the lawsuit because there isn’t any evidence that the public was harmed by Trump’s actions. They also argued that many of the allegations in the lawsuit were barred by the statute of limitations.
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-letitia-james-fraud-lawsuit-1569245a9284427117b8d3ba5da74249?taid=65133e935c9b8c000140df4d
Judge rules Donald Trump defrauded banks, insurers as he built real estate empire
https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-letitia-james-fraud-lawsuit-1569245a9284427117b8d3ba5da74249
He certainly should have known what the law is.
But by 7 January 2021, she already had concerns, obviously. And I doubt that as an intern she had much contact with Cruz or Scalise.
I don't give him any extra credit..........
One would think that exposure to both Cruz and Scalise would have stimulated her 'WTF?! lobe'.
Counting Trump and Meadows she's 0 for 4 on judging her employers' commitment to free and fair elections, the counting of electoral votes in the Congress and the rule of law.
The 147 Republicans Who Voted to Overturn Election Results
By Karen Yourish, Larry Buchanan and Denise LuUpdated January 7, 2021
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/01/07/us/elections/electoral-college-biden-objectors.html
Ted Cruz, Texas
Steve Scalise, La.
Marc E. Elias
@marceelias
BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court DENIES Alabama's effort to use its illegal congressional map. This guarantees a new map with two Black opportunity districts will be in place for 2024. Congrats to @RedistrictFdn, ELG team and voters of Alabama!
The United Farm Workers has endorsed President @JoeBiden and Vice President @KamalaHarris for reelection because their administration has been a champion for workers and their families since day one. https://t.co/oSuJqktzdQ
— The Democrats (@TheDemocrats) September 26, 2023
How does an ostensibly intelligent well educated person become an 'earnest believer in Trump' other then by abandoning reason and principles? Why wasn't the Access Hollywood 'bus tape' NOT a deal breaker for her, much less the events of the ensuing 4 Trump years? And seriously, working for Mark Meadows?
She worked in the Trump White House for a little more than a year. While in college, she'd interned during the summer, first for Ted Cruz, and then for Steve Scalise. She then moved on to the White House Office Affairs, also as an intern. Subsequently, she was hired by them, and attracted Meadows's eye. He hired her as his assistant in March 2020.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cassidy_Hutchinson
So it seems she grew up among Republicans and saw no reason change her political views, which at that age must still have been fluid. Don't forget: Hillary Clinton was active in the Young Republicans for her first year or two at Wellesley.
lawrence as well.
I would assume none of those with him would realize that he would be unable to buy one.
One of the people with him was the South Carolina Attorney General, so...
A map of U.S. states showing the percentage change in hospital admissions with COVID-19 in the week ending September 16, 2023, compared to the week prior. Dark orange denotes states where hospitalizations have increased in excess of 20 percent; light orange where they have increased more than 10 percent; yellow were hospitalizations are "stable"; light green where there has been a 10 percent decrease; and dark green where there has been more than a 20 percent decrease.
CDC
https://www.newsweek.com/covid-map-12-states-new-hospital-admissions-cdc-1829781
Off-duty Texas police officer shoots Black neighbor through closed door
There have been several recent incidents in the US in which people have been shot after approaching the wrong residence
Edwin Rios
@edwin_d_rios
Tue 26 Sep 2023 09.22 EDT
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/26/texas-police-officer-shoots-black-neighbor
Early on Monday, an off-duty Texas highway patrol officer thought someone was trying to break into his apartment in Houston, according to authorities. He pulled his gun out, shot the person behind his shuttered door – and realized it was his neighbor, officials said.
The latest case of an off-duty law enforcement officer encountering and shooting a member of the public took place after midnight at an apartment complex just outside Minute Maid Park, where Houston’s professional baseball team, the Astros, plays.
Yasar Bashir, assistant Houston police chief, told reporters that it was unclear why the man who was shot had gone to the apartment. But the highway patrol officer feared the neighbor was trying to gain entry.
The trooper reportedly gave “several commands” for the man to step away from the door before the trooper fired his gun.
The neighbor, a 35-year-old Black man who also lived in the building, was hit in his right shoulder but survived.
No charges had been immediately filed in the shooting. The case echoed other similar encounters in which people shot others who went near their residences without understanding why those who were shot had approached.
Those cases have often sparked debate over race and gun policies in the US, especially off-duty police officers’ use of force.
Perhaps most notably, in 2018, a Dallas police officer, Amber Guyger, mistakenly entered Botham Jean’s apartment after a work shift when Jean, 26, was eating a bowl of ice-cream. Guyger, who was white, believed Jean, a Black accountant from St Lucia who lived a floor above her, was a burglar and shot and killed him.
Guyger, who was fired from her job, argued that she feared for her life. She was convicted of murder and is serving a 10-year prison sentence.
The killing led the Texas legislature to pass the Botham Jean Act, which prohibits police officers from turning off body cameras during investigations they are a part of.
In her appeal to a state court, Guyger’s attorneys argued that her mistake in entering Jean’s apartment instead of her own and her subsequently shooting him were reasonable and therefore she should be acquitted of murder or have her sentence reduced to criminally negligent homicide. The US supreme court upheld her conviction in 2022.
Meanwhile, in April, 84-year-old Andrew Lester shot the Black teenager Ralph Yarl in the head at Lester’s Missouri home after Yarl mistakenly knocked on Lester’s door.
Yarl was trying to pick up his younger brothers from a friend’s house, which was nearby. Lester claimed self-defense, arguing that – at his old age – he was startled by the evening door knock. Lester stands trial on first-degree assault charges and armed criminal action.
Here's my dilemma....
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/26/cassidy-hutchinson-trump-republicans-rachel-maddow#:~:text=Despite%20the%20prominence%20of%20men,more%20moderate%20conservatives%20in%20retrospect.
'Enough' plots out the 27-year-old Hutchinson’s trek from being an earnest believer in Trump to disenchantment with him. She was working for Mark Meadows, Trump’s chief of staff, at the time of the January 6 attack.
How does an ostensibly intelligent well educated person become an 'earnest believer in Trump' other then by abandoning reason and principles? Why wasn't the Access Hollywood 'bus tape' NOT a deal breaker for her, much less the events of the ensuing 4 Trump years? And seriously, working for Mark Meadows?
Even as I admiringly watched her testimony to the 1/6 committee, and her interview last night, I thought the questions above.
On the one hand too late the hero. On the other hand better late than never.
I'll be interested in seeing if any of the coming interviews broach any of my questions.
Soft Corruption and the Limits of Populism
Sept. 25, 2023
House republicans stand on the steps of Congress, Speaker Kevin McCarthy is in front at microphones, out of focus.
Credit...Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images
By Paul Krugman
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/25/opinion/columnists/republicans-populism-soft-corruption.html
There are currently two clown shows — sorry, but let’s be honest — going on in the Republican Party. One is the intraparty fighting that seems extremely likely to cause a government shutdown a few days from now. The other is the fight over who will come a distant second to Donald Trump in the presidential primaries.
There are many strange aspects to both shows. But here’s the one that has long puzzled me: Everyone says that with the rise of MAGA, the G.O.P. has been taken over by populists. So why is the Republican Party’s economic ideology so elitist and antipopulist?
Listen to the rhetoric of the people making Kevin McCarthy look like a fool or of the presidential candidates, and it’s full of attacks on elites — but also of promises to cut taxes for the rich and slash government spending that benefits the working class. For example, Nikki Haley — who is making a credible bid to be Trump’s also-ran, given Ron DeSantis’s implosion — is calling for big cuts to Social Security and Medicare.
As I write this, McCarthy is reportedly trying to appease MAGA dissidents with a temporary funding bill that would cut nonmilitary discretionary spending outside of Veterans Affairs by 27 percent — meaning savage cuts to things like the administration of Social Security (as opposed to the benefits themselves).
The thing is, such proposals are deeply unpopular. It’s true that Americans tell pollsters that the government spends too much, but if you ask them about specific types of spending, the only area on which they say we spend too much is foreign aid, which is a trivial part of the budget. Oh, and most Americans still support aid to Ukraine.
So there would seem to be an opening for politicians who are right wing on social issues like immigration and wokeness but are also genuinely populist in their spending priorities. Such politicians exist in other countries. For example, Giorgia Meloni, the Italian prime minister, whose party has deep links to the nation’s fascist past, ran last year on a platform calling for earlier retirement for some workers and increases in minimum pensions and child benefits.
So why aren’t there such figures in the G.O.P.? To be fair, during the 2016 campaign Trump sometimes sounded as if he might turn his back on Republican economic orthodoxy, but once in office he pursued the usual agenda of tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy combined with benefit cuts for the rest.
Part of the answer may lie in the American right’s general mind-set, which valorizes harshness, not empathy. People who are drawn to MAGA tend to imagine that solving society’s problems should involve punishing people, not helping them.
Also, we shouldn’t underestimate the power of ignorance: MAGA politicians, who generally disdain any kind of expertise, may not have any clear idea of what the federal government does and where tax dollars go.
Finally, there’s the Clarence Thomas factor.
What I mean is that part of the explanation for the absence of genuine Republican populists may involve the gravitational pull of big money, which is both broader and subtler than the way it’s often portrayed.
If the accusations against Senator Robert Menendez are true — and it’s not looking good — old-fashioned bribery, payments to politicians in exchange for favors, hasn’t gone away. But it’s probably not shaping party ideology.
Campaign contributions, on the other hand, definitely do shape ideology; DeSantis was touted as a rival to Trump because he got a lot of support from big donors who believed he would serve their interests and had real political skills. (Being rich doesn’t necessarily come with good judgment.)
But there’s a sort of gray area that doesn’t involve outright bribes in the sense of money given in return for specific actions but nonetheless involves a form of soft corruption. For the fact is that public figures whom the very rich see as being on their side can reap considerable personal rewards from their positions.
Recent revelations about Justice Thomas show how this works. ProPublica reports that he has received many favors from ultrawealthy conservatives, notably lavish free vacations. These reports are shocking because we don’t expect such behavior from a Supreme Court justice, and Thomas may have violated the law by failing to disclose these gifts. But does anyone doubt that many politicians who favor tax cuts for the rich and reduced benefits for the working class, even as they rail against elites, receive similar favors?
And the hermetic information space of the American right surely facilitates this soft corruption. Suggestions of improper influence on right-wing officials and politicians won’t get much coverage on Fox News, except possibly for claims that they’re the victims of a liberal smear campaign.
Now, I don’t know how important these different factors are to the fact that America’s “populists” are anything but populist in practice. But we do need to ask why people who denounce elites somehow always manage to avoid targeting corporations not named Disney and billionaires not named George Soros.
JohnV
Falmouth, MA
1h ago
When the GOP isn't lying, it isn't telling the whole truth. The GOP says they hate taxes. They actually just hate progressive taxes. They love regressive taxes. See which states have the most regressive taxes - ruby red Republican states. Of course the GOP hates progressive taxes, the taxes where the rich pay a higher percent of their income. The GOP much prefers regressive taxes (and fees) where the people with less money pay a higher percent of their income in taxes. The GOP wants you to be poor so you'll pay more!
These regressive tax states like to brag that they have no state income tax. People flock there to find poor education, poor healthcare, and poor safety nets. But, these states attract more people with less money to pay for the people with more money - through regressive taxation - clever, just not in good way.
Make no mistake, the GOP loves taxes - if it's their kind of taxes.
michael sullivan
Massachusetts
1h ago
Clown shows, indeed, but clown shows that precisely articulate the sad state of affairs in this country. The derailing of the government to the detriment of the country is a Republican modus operandi i.e. also know as blackmail. If they were kidnappers they would say 'Do what we tell you or your loved one is dead." The race for the Republican nomination is a perfect example of the depths to which the GOP has plummeted. The eight or nine candidates knw they need to stay as far right as possible and still, they are reluctant to criticize Trump with most saying they would support him as nominee. The fact they are willing to put a conman criminal back in the oval office makes them all unfit for office--any office.
I know there is such a thing as a sad clown. Maybe Emmitt Kelley was one. This Republican Party is well beyond that comparison. What they're doing isn't a bit funny.
Pretty bad, the poor kid.
https://twitter.com/mhdksafa/status/1706294998356861419
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/gymnastics-ireland-racism-simone-biles-b2418058.html
https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/family-of-girl-snubbed-at-medal-ceremony-want-public-apology-from-gymnastics-ireland/a726462541.html
Planned for Wednesday with Nicolle
I think it did start out as a PR photo opp. I would assume none of those with him would realize that he would be unable to buy one. They know now, though. Amazingly stupid MAGAs.
It doesn't matter who purchased it though. It's a felony to possess a firearm while under criminal indictment, even if he found it laying on the street. I'm sure someone has warned him by now though and it is no longer in his possession. Assuming it all wasn't just a publicity stunt in the first place.
She seems to be a nice person. Gaetz had better stay away.
Don't worry. She's going to be on Lawrence's show tomorrow and with Nicole on Wednesday. All I know is I ordered the book, sounds really juicy. The stories about the classified documents could be a whole new case to itself. Meadows is as shady as the rest of them.
We all knew Gaetz is a creep but geez, what was he going to do to her at Camp David?
Cassidy has more integrity than any of these criminals. She could be the whole key to unlocking the Jan 6 debacle. I wonder if Smith will put her on the stand at trial?
That's good news. I think he'll do a good job with an interview.
I thought Lawrence also said she'd be on his show tomorrow.
I think it could have been done better. Maybe it's just me. But she should have kept Cassidy talking for as long as possible.
Nicolle suggested on her show today that she'd be having Cassidy ons soon. We'll see how that one goes.
I thought Rachel did a good job with the interview and Cassidy got plenty of time to explain her side.
It was okay. But it could have been better if Rachel had just SHUT UP and not talked for three quarters of the show.
The interview was NOT about HER.
I found the interview compelling. It was worth the wait.
We're 38 minutes into the hour, and Rachel is STILL READING. It's one of the things about her that drives me crazy.
WHERE's Cassidy?? FINALLY...
So Mark Meadows, like Trump, doesn't drink. And did't keep a corkscrew in his office.
But Pence evidently DID have one!
WHY is Rachel READING the whole first chapter of Cassidy's book??
You saw in the NY deposition case where TFG threw his kids under the bus for the shady accounting that went on.
He would sink Jr. and Eric in a heartbeat in order to save himself.
Why on earth Eric? He's not very bright, and he's not very appealing. You can't just exchange one Trump for another. That won't fly.
You watch. "Donald" will be scratched out and "Eric" written in its place.
Nancy just said "it would be better" if Menendez were to resign.
That is true. But unloading on a bunch of shoppers at a gun store would be more... relatable to his followers.
Trump et al is already a mass murderer and it wasn't any accident.
LOLOL!! He'd probably turn into an accidental mass murderer. It'd be kinda fun to see how the authorities would handle that.