Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc. (HLXH)

[bman]

Do you have any recent knowledge on HLXH?

[bman]

We've had HLXH trades each of the last two days!!!

[mick]

thank you for input
re;
Mick read this http://www.sportingnews.com/nascar-news/4687975-nascar-arca-truck-series-bobby-dale-earnhardt-junior-jr-kerry-senior-sr-racing-reality-series
Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Last Read Post New Msg Next 10 | Previous | Next

[mick]

thank you for all you do for us.

[stockseekerok]

Hey Mick :) yeah once upon a time I kinda liked this potential but I need to relook at it, it has changed course since I first saw it back when ?

[mick]

hi my friend, interesting/ 'Hampton's Luxury Homes, Inc. (HLXH)'

[stockseekerok]

I had seen that I think yesterday but had not read it, thanks I will now

[Willy4]

Bman I am telling you buy MMEG it at $1 but they have some major contracts that should generate large revenue streams. I do believe it will be a good return that is way I have 2.25 million shares

[bman]

Thanks. Hedge fund will want to make money and impose pressure where needed to do so, IMO. Maybe HLXH shareholders will benefit.

[Willy4]

Your welcome take a look at MMEG a watchlist report went out today to the 120,000 members of the Stock Vest Online Investment Club. The company has some great contracts and I think you will see some good movement in the stock over the next week or so

[moniluv]

Thanks for the update.

[Willy4]

I have offer them everything to get this stock trading and settle our disputed but they keep lying so I am going to sell my stock to a hedge fund that goes after frauds. The deal is set to close on Monday. This fund has deep pockets and a big time law firm so I hope they can settle and help ever one out. Buy MMEG I believe it will move fast after the first of the year. I have 2.25 million shares and believe in this company.

[FergusVI]

What is your plan with the Dalene's?

[Willy4]

There have been at least 3 people who have wanted to put other companies into HLXH by swaping out operating companies but Dalene has back off all 3 times by demanding they pay his attorney fees and leave him with stock after he takes all of the operating companies including the one I had in the HLXH before we purchased Telemark. I do not see this working with just me going after Dalene it will take all shareholders. But take a look at this stock MMEG. This is an entertainment company with a contract to produces a realty show about Bobby Earnhardt, Dale Earnhardt's grandson on his rise through stockcar racing. This is only one of serveral direct marketing products the company has. I have about 2,250,000 shares

[moniluv]

Any updates here?

[bman]

Congrats. Does look hopeful.

[Willy4]

This message was receive by letter today, so there may be hope.

Mr. Wilson
This message is to inform you that Judge Whelan has been reassigned due to the finding of impropriety in the handling of cases that were assigned to him. If you wish, you may refill your complainant against the Judge and seek reinstatement of your case against Dependents Frank Dalene et al.

[FergusVI]

Any updates bud?

[moniluv]

Thank you.

[bman]

Ask hit at .02. 40,000 now sitting on the bid at .02. Ask now at .04.
HLXH!

[Willy4]

Your welcome

[bman]

Sounds good. May be worth adding some HLXH at this pps. I'll be watching closely. Good luck in your efforts and thank you.

[Willy4]

That we may get a business in the company that reports what it's financial and progress are to the shareholders and the prospective shareholders.

[Willy4]

No that is the way I see it

[moniluv]

What does this mean for us shareholders?

[bman]

Thanks Willy. This looks like the verbage that a party utilizes when they are considering settling with a plantiff without admitting guilt on their part. I think you may be making some positive headway towards a settlement that will benefit HLXH shareholders. Is this the way you see it, or am I off base?

[Willy4]

From: Lee J. Mendelson
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 10:36 AM
To: 'Gary B Wolff'
Subject: RE:

Gary:

Receipt of your letter dated July 8, 2014 is hereby acknowledged. Notwithstanding the fact that we dispute the existence of any claims by Mr. Wilson against either Frank or Roy Dalene or Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (“Hamptons”), please be advised that I have been authorized by Hamptons to review any specific proposal that you may have which would benefit the shareholders. Please provide all documents that you would like us to review together with a detailed outline of the proposed transaction. We note that any proposed transaction must contain details inclusive of a plan detailing how your client intends to provide both pre and post-transaction indemnities for the involved parties, their companies and professionals.

Please be advised that our consent to review your proposal is not an agreement to enter into any transaction and that no agreement exists between the parties until such time as the terms of a definitive agreement are fully agreed upon and executed by all parties to the transaction as well as any and all regulatory disclosures and approvals are obtained.

Lee J. Mendelson
Partner

[bman]

Our bidder is back trying to get shares at .0145. Whoever this is, is a hit and run artist. They don't want to drive the price up, at least til they get all they want. They come in, get a few thousand shares, then hide for a while. We don't need to sell to them til they bring the bid on up. All, my opinion.

[Willy4]

I would think the merging company would want it as low as possible as they would want the Dalene's to traded their stock for Telemark. The higher the trading price the more stock the Dalene’s would get paid for or be able to keep.

[bman]

If that theory is true, the possible merging company could drive HLXH up significantly in order to gain as much clout in the potential merger as possible and get shares dirt cheap. Just my thinking out loud.

[Willy4]

Yes i do. I know that that Roy Dalene's son Tim now works for a venture capital firm. It is possible that firm is doing reverse merger with HLXH, again this is speculation on my part I have no knowledge. I am just trying to put pieces together.

[bman]

Do you, in your opinion, think it plausible that a potential merger company may be buying up shares of HLXH at these low prices ahead of a possible merger?

[Willy4]

I will tell you this I was contacted by a person who deals and in shells and asked if I would cooperate and drop my law suites and complaints if he were to merge a new business into HLXH. I told him that I need some guarantees and information on the company. That was in early March I have not heard back from him.
I also ask a Federal Court to make the SEC answer these questions for me:
1. Why when a company agrees to maintain the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for ever as part of a share exchange agreement and willfully violates that commitment within 2 years by filing a Form 15 with the Commission way is it that the Commission has not charge that company and its management with securities fraud?

2. Way does a law firm include a clause in a share exchange agreement to file a Form S-8 within 30 days of the signing of the agreement to pay themselves in common stock when it’s illegal? Way does that same law firm not hold the Company to the obligations it agreed to under the share exchange agreement and if the Company refuse not report such events to the Commission as is required by Part 205 of 17 CFR? Why does the said law firm continue to sell stock when they are aware the Company has violated its commitments under the share exchange agreement? Was the law firms plan part of a plan to defraud the public? The law firm sold 55,000 shares at an average price of $2 per share and high price of $2.50 per share, through Michael Pellman of Morgan Stanley. Yet the law firm never said one word to the Commission as the Company violated ever agreement they ever made to investors. Why has the Commission not held the law firm liable under Part 205 of 17 CFR and the Exchange Acts anti-fraud provision of Section 10B and Rule 10b-5(1)? This is truly trading on inside information.

3. Way does a law firm advise its client to alter the 302 certification statements when it is forbidden by Item 601(b) (31) of the Exchange Act Rules? And event after catching the Company and the Law Firm way does the Commission do nothing, not event Red Flag the Companies filing for special review?

4. Way does an accounting firm with 20+ years of experiences not provided complete discloser as required by Articles 11-01 and 11-02 of Regulation S-X in form 8-K? Way after the Commission cought this accounting firm and prosecuted this accounting firm for other violation of the anti-fraud provision in November of 2013 not Red Flagged the Company? Again way has this not cause a senses of urgency for the Commission after the invoker and others have continually complained about this Company and its accounting firms since April of 2008?

5. Way does a Company claim for 2 years that it is going to conduct a roll-up of its subcontracts, acquire other companies by the end of a current year, and open in 12 new markets by a certain time period all the time their attorney is selling stock, and turning down opportunities to complete such transaction, and admit all of the above was a lie in a filing to Federal Court for the Eastern District of NY and an email to the evoker way has the Commission taken no action?

6. Way when a Company claims to the public that a project they are part owner of has receive renew interest and investor have taken the statement as truthful and purchased stock, but the statement is totally false and known to the Company and its management does the Commission take no action? A five minute Google search and information provided by the invoker reveals the project has defaulted on its mortgage, the mortgage granter (Agape World & Nick Cosmos) was arrested and is currently serving a 25 years prison term for running a $450 million Ponzi scheme, and the property was auction off by the United States Bankruptcy Trusty.

7. Way does the same law firm that represents the Company and who also represents the foremention project in Federal Bankruptcy Court provide a legal opinion that the statements made to the public about the project are true? Why with this knowledge has the Commission taken no action?

8. Way does a management team create a credit line from a company controlled by them for a public Company controlled by them, secure the credit line with all of the assets of the public Company and then stop reporting any information about the Company’s activities to the public and the Commission take no action when they have been informed by the invoker and others?

9. Way did 2 Long Island Based Law Firm’s representing this Company have access to all of the information above and never meet their obligation to the issuer and the shareholders under The Attorney Conduct Rule of Sarbanes Oxley Section 307 (Part 205 of 17 CFR) and the Commission take no actions?

10. Way has the Commission received all of this information from the invoker and others, and have access to this information through EDGAR and taken no action?

[bman]

Willy posted a couple of possibilities for the rise. A merger was one. That would certainly generate some interest in HLXH.

[hinkydink]

I am stunned by the gain! Will it hold? Will it improve?

As always, time will give the answer.

What would be great, would be news of some form that supports the rise. Apparently, someone wanted in. The question is, why?

[bman]

Next week's action will likely give us some clues on HLXH.

[hinkydink]

What in the world happened here?

Is this going to be a "Flash rise today, gone tomorrow" situation? Or will it actually become a viable stock worth holding???

[Willy4]

I am interested to see. I think it could be 1 or 2 things. I had a call from someone asking if I would work with them if they were to merger another company into HLXH or the SEC is enforcing the share exchange agreement and they will have to become fully reporting again by the reporting dead line on Monday. I have no information this is all speculation on my part.

[bman]

Pretty nice rise today for HLXH. Monday should be interesting.

[Willy4]

I just want everyone to know I had nothing to do with this trading or price movement I do not know what is going on.

[hinkydink]

That is dependent upon the nature of the results, I suppose.

[bman]

I would agree with that.

[Willy4]

An operating company that reports its results and keeps the public informed will increase the interest in the company and thus result in more trading activity

[hinkydink]

I can't say that I understand what effect that this course of action will have on the share price or value of the company.
No matter though. Anything that makes something happen with this company would be of interest to me.

[Willy4]

I think so but have not seen all of the information myself, but I will check that out before any agreement please gey other shareholders you know to reply I need all of the input I can get.

[bman]

I would be for it assuming it will significantly increase the present HLXH shareholders equity. Having the knowledge you have relative to the proposal, do you feel we stand to gain significantly?

[Willy4]

This is an open letter to the shareholders of Hamptons Luxury Homes (HLXH) from Robert Wilson the Company’s 3rd largest shareholder.

I am going to make a proposal to the SEC that Hamptons Luxury Homes, Inc. (HLXH) be return to the Balance Sheet of March 31, 2006 with the Dalene’s assuming all debt of the company and reclaiming their company Telemark. The company would also become fully reporting to the Commission once again and remain so for as long as it exists. The cash assets in my proposal would be $301,567 which would be the total amount of equity of the company less any deduction of claims for deferred compensation and deficits created by the Dalene’s. The Dalene’s would return their stock and the outstanding stock would be 12,971,650. I would than merger a new company into HLXH and create a 5 member board of directors and complete management team. I cannot explain the whole business plan her but I would like input from the shareholder so I can direct the SEC to this Board and they can read your comments.

Thank You
Robert Wilson

[bman]

Good luck willy. Looks like you have found some helpful verbage, there.

[Willy4]

I do not know how I missed this but I found this in the share exchange agreement that was executed when Hampton’s purchased Telemark. I am work on get this enforced and the company back to reporting.

8.6 Rule 144 Reporting. With a view to making available to the Acquirer’s stockholders the benefit of certain rules and regulations of the Commission which may permit the sale of the Acquirer Common Stock to the public without registration, from and after the Closing Date, the Acquirer agrees to:

8.6.1 Make and keep public information available, as those terms are understood and defined in Rule 144; and

8.6.2 File with the Commission, in a timely manner, all reports and other documents required of the Acquirer under the Exchange Act.

[moniluv]

MM's do this all the time