Just a few thousand more shares, and then i take it they the flip shit traders and market makers will have a wall up at $1... Some of the worst traders trade the OTC.... kill every momentum with their selfish flip trading trying to get ahead of everyone else.... imagine no one sold for days... this would move to $10 within the week, and that FOMO would force this up past 20s... and then that fomo might launch this...
But i believe Alpine and the other fraudsters wouldn't cover unless ordered to do so by the court... like whose really going to buy back 400 million shares...
A lot of politicians and big names are involved indirectly and directly within this nefarious activity....
Just like Pedophilia... Too many big names involved that they squash the chatter before it gets attention.
That is the way of the devil
That in particular is someone flip trading and Market Makers putting up temporarily walls and removing them to force someone to sell cheaper... happens all day everyday.
That would be a "no need to" I'll say again...there are only so many real shares available to trade...period
So that would be a "NO"...
CDEL? ROTFL...that would be the LAST place anyone should contact. Maybe you could call them and have them teach you about derivatives and equity strategies to get around rule 203(b)(3)? Or you could simply understand as stated before. The..math..doesn't..add up compared to available shares..Those you speak at do
Did you contact CDEL for an explanation of the numbers?
IT will get there sooner than we expected as I said few days ago the storm just began .
This said it all to every one who doubt that, this is a winner days are coming very soon,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, well said . .
Calm before the storm going to be heavy storm.
Ahhh so you didn't listen to that video or read her book because it blows your "ideas" on how things work in real life out of the water...I'll take a PhD who worked at DTC and understands the fraud along with hearing with my own ears from real traders who have seen naked shorting in real time over anyone who disputes it...and everyone knows who runs and owns the DTC therein lies one of the problems LMFAO
You claim to have all this knowledge about the market, why aren't you out there moving real money? Why post on a stock forum? lol.
A kid in a closet and Janet Yellen's twin in a seedy office?... Yup. again, do your own work and go to DTC/NSCC and pull down their annual financial reports. Can't do anymore teaching but here is a little teaser for you. Look up who is on all their boards and what firms they are at. While your at it, in 25 days, ALL small clearing firms must have a minimum of $10 million in deposits at DTC. That's gonna shake some apples from the trees.
Do you people read:
Publicly available Financial Statement.... if they were short 30 million at $2.50 or more " like Ham claims here is what would have to happen:
1) be able to have margin accounts ( they do not offer margin nor RVP/DVP) and have a clearing bank that would fund them
2) the supposed 30 million short at that amount would have to be reflected in this financial statement...do you see it?
3) DTC would require how much capital for them to hold a approximately $60 million or more short? it states. "deposits with Clearing $ 5,171,000
Do you really and truly believe DTC would allow them to carry this fictitious short with $5.1 million? if you do... i have ocean front property in Arizona to sell you... Ok, Im out. I can't convince common sense. Wish you luck but instead of killing the messenger, why now ASK company why Alpine is not named in this lawsuit?
That poster is one hundred percent one of the Kramer's or someone very close to them.
IF you and STOCK BARBER smart in the market as you claim I will buy some here and triple my money in a very short time in stead of bashing a money making stock at this bad market and mark my word it will happen soon and you will be left behind as always but it seems that u have a marriage license with GTII that you cant brake rest my case dukes .
It's a horrible post as it does not cover this specific situation lol wow...all one needs to do to erase this "ideal" of how it works is the fact that Alpine was caught providing one sided bids and not acting as a bona fide market maker during the wells notice investigation by FINRA in the case documents(thats just ONE ISSUE). If anyone crawls out of the dark and actually listens to the attorneys and others who have FOUND the naked shorts in other stocks(including cases revolving around debentures and found front running the sales of unregistered shares) they would know this is just ONE way to naked short. Lastly we are to believe that a company who has averaged a violation a year since existence(40 in 39 years) to be doing anything on the up and up?...absolutely hilarious there are those who think most investors are blind and not educated now like 15 years ago ROTFL.
First you said you didn't say "wire money" now you assume we need a lesson lol...that is not what we asked so I'll ask again very simply..How do you know the DTC after 90 days returned the 2.3 million for sure? Also let's not forget there was a 1% charge per day on that 2.3 million so did the DTC just decide to not collect that? Also how many times a stock is NAMED in any public documents like these? Another question would be why then have this case not terminated if all is hunky dory and this money returned? Alpine had already tried to challenge the new net capital rules once and failed. Why out of 230 OTC stocks(source Scottsdale vs FINRA case and FINRA Wells notice investigation findings) was GTII the main driver of this issue? Why is a broker like this shorting a stock? For whom and why so large? Also understand that Naked shorts will not show up on their books...willingly anyway...and thats what everyone who says they don't exist hides behind. When the SEC busts people for Naked shorting they rarely if ever name the stocks or why didn't this get caught right away with current systems in place? You cannot answer the question about how you figured the DTC sent the money back to Alpine but i know the group who was saying it and makes sense itsbspread here too lol. End of story and the questions asked are not intended for you to answer they are intended to make people think who aren't paid not to. Way bigger things in play here if you stop...look and listen
Great post! Stickied!
They won't understand it anyway! Kool-Aid impairment!
Let me try to explain this one more time. It's obvious that none of you have experience or knowledge of how DTC works. To be a DTC member you have to fill out a form and get approval. You have requirements on your capital set by the SEC AND DTC for your membership. What this does is allow a clearing DTC member to sell stock for one if its correspondents (FINRA B/Ds) who also have a distinguished identity. At the end of the trading day, the stock sold by FINRA firm 'A' is processed and matched with the buying firm "B". How do these trades settle the cash and shifting of stock? The Clearing firms of A/B also have distinguished identifiers and they submit to DTC and both recognize the trade and the stock is taken out in the back office out of one firm and put into the account of the other clearing firm on behalf of A/B... with me still? Ok. Now if you are a DTC member the size of Goldman or JP Morgan, you have extraordinary amounts of capital at your disposal. For smaller clearing firms, not so much. But during turbulent amounts of time, DTC can require members to 'wire into' your DTC clearing account significant capital to cover a series of trades or market volatility. Usually, they will hold it for 3 days and then you have two choices 1) leave it at DTC (which most big boys do) or 2) Have it wired back to you. When trading OTC/Volatile stocks, DTC has a market volatility scale and capital limits on stocks depending on the price, 30 day ADV, size of trade. They also set limits on the smaller firms on the TOTAL capital they can use for trading for that day WITHOUT having to send more $$ into their DTC account. If you go over that amount you will get a demand notice and must immediately (usually by start of trading next day) wire in that amount and it stays at DTC for 3-5 days and once again, you can leave it there or have it sent back out. With this stock, an enormous amount (for a small firm) was traded and they went over their daily capital by about $2.3 million. However DTC decided that instead of wiring the money back in a few days , they wanted to keep this as additional capital long term in the DTC account. Alpine appealed this, they sent to SEC, they both filed their legal briefs and your hero HAM posts the October notice about twice a week to keep your tails wagging. While waiting for the SEC to make a judgement on whether DTC should keep that extra $2.3 million (that BTW still counts as your net capital) as a safe guard, DTC decided 90 days later to just wire the money back ( i am not privy to the wire thus i can't provide a link nor wire instructions). However this is exactly what has happened and an automated Venessa Countrymen letter comes out the same way month aft month for over a year...wouldn't it be better for somebody to get a status update from Pacer on this case? its over, the point is moot unless it happens again to Alpine. That will be your last free lesson from me. Enjoy labor day and do your due Dillie!
They really are something special aren't they.
Whenever a bs claim is thrown out there we always have a deflection tactic 🤣🤣
"90 days later DTC wired it back to them" is exactly what you said re- read your post and we are still waiting for a link to prove your claim
About AI Commerce Holding, LLC. AI Commerce group is the next generation of e-commerce using technology and artificial intelligence to improve efficiencies in all stages in direct to retail brands. We provide brands and companies that need expertise, technology, and capital to help reach their full potential. The team is comprised of seasoned veterans in e-commerce, sourcing, logistics, digital marketing, and banking.
Please visit https://aicommercegroup.com to learn more.
This is directly from GTII press release on OTC Markets,,,go ahead...try it
What do you mean "wired money back"? i never said that ...try this:
Call and try name directory...NADA... Call and press Zero when they ask you if you want to speak with an "Operator"...it says 'Not Valid"
Contact online the AI Commerce Group through their web site...do it... then get back to me.
He is full of it we know that he never quiet ???????????
Oh please share where you saw that where they were wired back money? I'd love to hear who told you this lol give us a link
I actually have called them (no answer and phone doesn't list a directory...go ahead and try it for yourself).I also called there HUGE acquisition "800-LAW-FIRM"... it was an Indian cold call room... notice how that deal imploded? I also looked up and contacted this latest/greatest acquisition on A.I. Group...(try it) i can't get anyone and submitted and e-mail and received no reply...from 3 weeks ago. Which might make sense since the company was started weeks prior to the LOI...https://aicommercegroup.com/contact/ please do your due dillie. seriously this is there contact link for an A.I. company? it looks like the early days of the internet.
Oy vey... you people don't read do you? there was never a 'FINE" from DTC... it was a 'CHARGE"... Alpine rejected the basis of the extra charge and filed a complaint with SEC, but was forced to put up additional capital per DTC member rules. 90 days later DTC wired it back to them. The claim became moot and SEC has nothing to decide anymore.
You know a better question to ask is why on earth would Seeking Alpha put out a hit piece on a .60 stock thats going nowhere? Is it because they know in middle of October shares have to be actually delivered and not just a placeholder for the dividend? Do they think big news is coming???? Also why would anyone want to keep trashing GTII daily here and everywhere else? Those are all rhetorical because we all know why.
Highly doubtful that's your mission and I'm neither. But let's address your questions even though you choose to never actually study anything posted here or comment when proven wrong(like when you said nobody went to congress)
#1 My guess is someone caught wind of Alpine’s impending doom and so why waste time and money when they were done for? Let FINRA do it duh
#2 I can't recall posting the DTC October info as you claim but perhaps Intially when it came out. #2A Why if it was resolved is it still not ended then? You need to think really hard as to why on that one. It's been pushed down the road several times. And from where do you assume that anything was paid or settled by Alpine’s that came from the NSCC? Are we supposed to believe Alpine who over 40 times has been subject to enforcement actions? That's close to once a year since inception.
#3 Mistakes happen, Lawyers catch it and want to be safe. When you misspeak or misspell, should we assume you're up to nefarious acts?
#4 The math on the very common stock compensation plan thats was PR'd about back in October of 2022 is so miniscule it meas zero. All one has to do is look at the SP on or around those dates...means zilch,zero,Nada even IF GTII were a fundamental play which at present it is not and everyone in it understands that. And they understand the lame playbook talking about that and the other old tired tactics