[marcis]

Great work! Now you can pinch your. time card out.
Or send in your daily report and invoice

And chill

[Risk vs Reward]

Be warned.... this trip stock has ran its pre loaded pump course and any future expected rise in PPS is not backed by a single credible piece of evidence except pipe dream ties to other companies. 

[na na]

I asked BNIX CEO right before the 4th of july weekend for a contact email of GTCH, I'll ask for a followup by tuesday. I planned on doing that anyways.

[Risk vs Reward]

This board is full of delusions and half truths made to look like genius DD

[investisseur101]

I made a TA this morning from the last resistance which coincides exactly with the date of the news with extension..I report this resistance as support where the 1st candle exploded the 1st time (as I do every time) It turns out that we would have made the 2nd higher low last week (and as I had spoken on Friday there is a reversal signal in 1-3 hours and even daily with a long green hammer..the If anyone is interested, I could share it with you


My question at chatGPT
How many toxic lenders are there from GTCH (GBT technology) and are there still some that have to pass and are delaying the rise of the title?


Conclusion
• GBT did have significant toxic lenders, especially the IGOR Note.
• Today, there is no recent public evidence that more large toxic conversions will happen soon; the big wave of dilution is already done.
• There may still be some convertible debt left, but in much smaller amounts, without the same huge dilutive effect.

[price_and_volume]

Are you still referring to the COO?

SO it seems like this toxic note holder has a lot of shares but he doesn't want to file a substantial amount of duplicate paper work with the SEC...

The relevant question isn't "is he trying to avoid paperwork".

The relevant question is,

"What does the COO know or believe that leads him to dumping billions of $GTCH shares into the O/S, rather than holding onto them into the $BNIX / $VWAV merger?"

And a corollary question is,

"If everything's hunky-dory, why isn't PPS responding in ANY WAY that indicates $GTCH shareholders are onto a good thing?"

This isn't FUD or bashing, these are questions you should ALWAYS ask when taking and/or holding on to positions.

Looking forward to a moon-shot, but until there are worthwhile indications something's happening, what's the rush?

[price_and_volume]

?? There's essentially NO short-interest in $GTCH

A serious MOASS potential here...

You need to step away from the bong (ChatGTP).

Accurate reading of FINRA shorts:

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/GTCH/quote#short-interest

Don't confuse daily MM reports w/ actual short-interest.

GLTA

[Dynk]

has anybody found anymore about Evie Autonmomous...is that deal still a go, cause that would tie in the whole A.I. drone/mobile platform capabilities ready to go now scenario, and the Nexus combination would be the location of the assembly plant I would say. any thoughts/insight there guys!? Happy 4th July weekend!!

[Risk vs Reward]

It can't even get to .0002 

[Risk vs Reward]

You gotta stop please... there's people here that will actually believe that BS MOASS bologna!! 

[lutescens]

Agree unfortunately. I dont think this stock can run without the bannix merger saving it from itself. A great catalyst I just dont need another 3 months of .0001's.

[na na]

They have a bunch of toxic loans they need to pay off, so once it's paid off the price stops being suppressed. What's happening now according to chat gpt is that it's a steady stream being dumped to avoid paper work.


----------------

No, it's not a one-time deal. Once you've crossed a reporting threshold (like 5% or 10%), you're required to continue reporting any material changes to your holdings.

Here’s how it typically works in the U.S.:

📝 After the Initial Filing:
If you filed Schedule 13D (for active investors):
You must amend the filing "promptly" whenever there's a material change in your position.

Example: If your ownership increases or decreases by 1% or more, or if your intentions regarding the company change (e.g., planning a takeover or selling your stake), you must file an amended 13D.

If you filed Schedule 13G (for passive investors):
You must amend if:

You increase or decrease your ownership by more than 5% (relative to your previously reported stake).

You cross the 10% threshold (which may require switching to 13D, depending on your intent).

Deadlines vary based on the filer type (qualified institutional investor, passive investor, etc.).

📈 For 10%+ Owners (Insiders under Section 16(a)):
Must file Form 4 within 2 business days of any change in ownership (buy, sell, grant of stock options, etc.).

Form 5 is an annual summary of certain transactions not reported earlier, due 45 days after the fiscal year-end.

Summary:
Action Trigger Filing Deadline
First time over 5% Acquire more than 5% of voting shares 13D or 13G 10 days
Material change (13D) +/- 1% or intent change Amended 13D Promptly
Material change (13G) +/- 5% or over 10% Amended 13G or switch to 13D Depends on filer type
Over 10% (insider) Hit 10% or become officer/director Form 3 Within 10 days
Ownership change Buy/sell shares Form 4 2 business days

[lutescens]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/ukraine-s-war-effort-is-now-deteriorating-against-russia/ar-AA1I1yf1

Ever since 2023, there were hints that the U.S. and NATO would not be able to keep up with Ukraine’s defensive needs, and now it seems that reality has reached the top decision-makers at the DoD.

[chuck4345]

01? This can’t even get to .0005

[na na]

https://kyivindependent.com/trump-says-putin-wants-to-keep-killing-people-signals-us-may-send-patriots-to-ukraine-06-2025/

Trump says Putin 'wants to keep killing people,' signals US may send Patriots to Ukraine
July 5, 2025 11:09 am
• 2 min read

[na na]

A serious MOASS potential here, more so than GME. GME as a MOASS is dead as the whale skeleton hanging from a ceiling at a museum.


They just need to lock up the convertibles, lock up the 18 billion shares, announce no R/S which is kryptonite for any spring action. Probably 10 - 25 cents, but the higher the denomination of coin the more difficult it gets because people see quarter,Nickle, dime, penny, dollar in their mind.

So if they do ram through penny then the next wall will be a nickle coin per share, if they can get past 10 cents and keep it there, then we uplist to OTCQB.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/files/OTCID_Webinar_Slides.pdf

They need a good,warm fuzzy feel good story to drive momentum hard. A R/S is an antithesis, colder than cold, ice cold.

They have a lot of money coming in soon, so it wouldn't be that difficult to get their ducks lined up.

[chuck4345]

Man yall even work weekends

[investisseur101]

the US is not the world, all other countries continue their support..And the investment I'm talking about which has no connection with the US is between an unknown investor and Us..It's already done and sealed in the shares of 42.5 million in preferred shares from an unknown source..

[misterfishman]

March 28. its old news and you know it.

[na na]

I guess there's a reason why he keeps on talking about geo-poltical stuff.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mansour-khatib-0230282/

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mansour-khatib-0230282/recent-activity/all/

[lutescens]

Trump is suspending weapons shipments to Ukraine, all but signaling an end to the US's support of Ukraine. So this connection might not be very relevant soon. Maybe some other countries in NATO will dramatically step up, but I doubt it.

[marcis]

Interesting post. Thank you

[investisseur101]

very interesting

Oversold:
When the Stochastic indicator is at or below a certain level (often 20 or 30), it suggests that the price has moved down too far, too fast, and may be due for a bounce or reversal.

Now the Sto is at 14.88 very lower than the "normal threshold" between 20 and 80. It went down too fast without reason.... the last time under 20 was 2 years ago

as my chart suggests a possible squeeze (handle) from a post last week. I think possible a news this week to push to vote positively and in addition to some (including me) who were talking about a possible squeeze to come..This indicator adds to this possibility

[breynolds]

Dig deeper.. Ive seen somewhere in past filings $267 Million in loans.. 

[investisseur101]

I read that there was a $42.5 million loan in the form of Preferred Shares for Apollo Tech, but it's unclear who the loan came from. I'm thinking it could be military-related if the secret and the technology must be kept secret, or if the news must come out at the right time to have an impact. There seems to be some secrecy. I also noticed a possible connection between the CEO of GTCH and a Ukrainian with a lot of influence.

What are the links between Roman Sheremeta, the Ukrainian who aims to defend Ukraine, and Mansour Khatib, who develops military technologies, drones, and other things?

you touch on an interesting point: Roman Sheremeta (the well-known Ukrainian economist, professor of experimental economics, promoter of the Ukrainian economy in times of war) and Mansour Khatib (CEO of GTCH, VisionWave, radar technologies, AI, drones) seem to interact on LinkedIn — but does this prove a concrete partnership?

Who is Roman Sheremeta?
• Professor of experimental economics, co-founder of the American University Kyiv.
• Spokesperson and analyst for Ukraine's economic reconstruction.
• Very active in fundraising, defending the Ukrainian cause, and promoting Ukrainian-made technology.
• Not an engineer or military man, but with a huge network of think tanks, the AU government, and international finance.
📌 Who is Mansour Khatib?
• CEO of GTCH Technologies.
• Leads AI, radar, and cybersecurity projects.
• Pushes VisionWave (see-through-wall technology, tactical radars).
• Guides GTCH toward defense, autonomous drones, and cybersecurity.


✅ LinkedIn Interaction:
• Khatib has reposted/liked several of Sheremeta's posts (e.g., pro-Ukraine posts, fundraising, military support).
• Sheremeta has mentioned in his lectures that surveillance and autonomous technology are vital to defend Ukraine (not GTCH specifically, but the general concept).
• ✅ Ideological Alignment:
• Sheremeta wants Ukraine to adopt more advanced technologies, particularly AI and drones.
• Khatib promotes military-grade technology adaptable to autonomous drones ? compatible narrative.

Why is this connection intriguing?
• Sheremeta has the ear of Ukrainian decision-makers.
• If he coaches GTCH on how to pitch to Ukraine, it could lead to a deal.
• This is one of the possible avenues for GTCH's radar-AI technology to be tested for Ukrainian defense.
• It could remain informal or exploratory (network sharing, recommendations, matchmaking).
✅ In summary:
Element Fact LinkedIn Interaction ✔️ Public Proof of contract ❌ None Common goal ✔️ Strengthen military technology for Ukraine Likely next step 🤝 Lobbying, matchmaking, MOU, or pilot project
🎯 My honest conclusion
➡️ Yes, there is an intellectual and network bridge between Sheremeta (Ukraine) and Khatib (radar/drone technology). ➡️ No, not yet a formal partnership—but it's a sign they may explore a pilot project (drone, radar, cybersecurity) for UA.
➡️ If Sheremeta ever raises funds for a UA drone with VisionWave/Apollo, that would be key to GTCH/Bannix's efforts.

[investisseur101]

yes i am agree


I think you're right about who owns the billions. I did a lot of research trying to understand the float calculation (since it's never up to date). And from what I understand, the "Held at DTC" part would be "big" who takes the time to record the DTC, which most small guys like us don't take the time to do.

"DTC is a subsidiary of DTCC (Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation) and is a central securities depository. It provides custody of securities for its participants, which are primarily large banks, brokers, mutual funds, and other financial institutions."

Here it's 16.4 / 18.4 billion, so that leaves only 11% which is rather tradable from my understanding.

and If i am right (and chatGPT seem confirm it) we have a CH the handle is the part that forms before the squeeze allowing shorts to exit, but it is also an expectation of important news (the exit of the neckline) which is linked to the whole cup. I explained it in a post last week.

[breynolds]

Old news::: March 28, 2024👇

[SolarNebula37]

NEWS IS OUT!!!!!!!!🚀🚀🚀
https://gbtti.com/bannix-and-gbt-partner-to-bring-revolutionary-imaging-tech-visionwave-to-market-2/

[na na]

I would like to appologize to Price & Volume, he came off as super hostile, and snarky. Since after reading it a few times it seemed like he had a genuine question, so I did some digging for him.

Sounds like he was curious, so I copied the relevant data into chat GPT.

SO it seems like this toxic note holder has a lot of shares but he doesn't want to file a substantial amount of duplicate paper work with the SEC, it might cost him fees to do so each time, I don't know.

If I were a toxic note holder I would take a reduced profit, with a lump cash payment rather than to drag out conversions for potentially years followed by reverse splits leading to eventually no conversion sales because nobody wants to be fish that bites.

[canthelpit]

GTCH NA NA you dont sleep much do you ? I have been there, GLTA

[na na]

I split it up with three posts.

[na na]

So he might be avoiding to do paper work?



ChatGPT said:
Yes — that’s very likely.

Here’s why:

🗂️ Converting a note into stock ? “automatic”
Even with a fixed price like $0.00001, Yossi (Stanley Hills) must:

Submit a conversion notice (usually via email or form).

Wait for the company’s transfer agent to issue shares.

Deal with Rule 144 opinion letters if selling through a broker.

Monitor the 4.99% ownership cap — which forces him to stay below ~840 million shares at any given time (if there are ~17B shares outstanding).

That’s a lot of repetitive paperwork for what may be a few thousand dollars per tranche in a sub-penny stock.

📉 If volume is thin, and price is low…
Dumping shares at $0.0001 after conversion may yield small, illiquid exits — especially if:

The market can’t absorb more than a few million shares/day

Price keeps dipping, making the effort less worthwhile

The 4.99% cap bottlenecks how much he can convert/sell at once

So not converting could just be Yossi thinking:

“Why burn time managing legal forms, broker clearances, and TAs to drip out stock into a dead market?”

💼 Strategic Waiting
He may also be waiting for:

A merger or hype event to push volume up

A reverse split to reset conversion math

An opportunity to restructure again on better terms

✅ Summary
Yes — avoiding the paperwork (and the hassle of managing fractional conversions and restricted stock) is a very plausible reason Yossi hasn’t converted yet.

In these microcap OTC setups, "just letting it sit" is often the default until something breaks the inertia.

[na na]

Thought for 28 seconds
Short answer up-front

Nothing in the publicly-filed Stanley Hills convertible-note documents says Yossi must convert before a merger.

If he does convert, he is not required to dump the stock at $0.0001; he can hold it. What drives the rapid “convert ? sell” rhythm is the 4.99 % ownership cap plus ordinary Rule 144 resale mechanics—not a covenant that forces an immediate sale.

Below is the reasoning, with the specific clauses that matter.

1 Is pre-merger conversion obligatory?
What to look for in a note What we actually see in Stanley Hills’ note
“Fundamental-transaction” or “change-of-control” clause – sometimes forces automatic conversion or cash payout at closing. None is disclosed. The amendments dated 31 Dec 2024 only (a) fixed the price at $0.00001/sh, (b) pushed maturity to 31 Dec 2025, and (c) capped total issuance at 60 B shares.
publicnow.com
Spring-mandatory conversion tied to a merger or uplisting Not present. Conversion remains at the holder’s option.
Redemption right in favor of the company (company can force pay-off) Not mentioned.

Conclusion: Unless a separate side letter exists, Yossi/Stanley Hills can simply let the note roll into the surviving entity. A buyer might insist on clearing all convertibles as a closing condition, but that is a matter of negotiation, not a covenant baked into the note.

2 Why insiders often choose to convert before a deal
Price protection: The fixed conversion price ($0.00001) may disappear if the note is assumed on different terms or paid off in cash.

Liquidity window: OTC-traded micro-caps sometimes run on merger rumors, giving a better exit spread than waiting for post-deal lock-ups.

Removal of derivative accounting noise: Companies like to clean up derivative liabilities before presenting a pro-forma balance sheet to acquirers.

So Yossi might want to convert, but he is not compelled to.

3 Does conversion force an immediate sale at $0.0001?
No. After conversion he simply owns common stock. Two practical limits push insiders to sell promptly, but neither is an outright mandate:

Limit How it works in this case
4.99 % ownership blocker – noteholder cannot own more than 4.99 % of the outstanding common at any moment.
sec.gov
To convert again he must first reduce his position below 4.99 %, which usually means selling shares into the market.
Rule 144 / Section 3(a)(9) resale rules Because the debt is more than six months old and conversion is under §3(a)(9), the converted shares are typically restricted but t-ack the note’s holding period. Yossi may sell immediately, but he is subject to affiliate volume limits (the larger of 1 % of the float or average weekly volume). There is no pricing floor or timetable.

He can therefore hold shares or sell at any price the market offers. Dumping at $0.0001 is a liquidity choice, not a contractual one.

4 Bottom line for your two questions
Question Answer
“Does he need to convert before a merger?” Not under the note’s disclosed terms. A merger agreement could ask for it, but that’s negotiable.
“If he converts, does he need to dump at $0.0001?” No. He can hold, stagger sales to stay under 4.99 %, or dispose at any price permitted by Rule 144. Immediate low-priced selling is a strategy, not an obligation.

I’m not a securities lawyer; for a definitive view you’d need counsel who can read the full note, any side letters, and the draft merger agreement.

[na na]

ChatGPT said:
Here’s a summary of Stanley Hills LLC’s role and related financial developments as outlined in the OTC Markets filing for GBT Technologies Inc.:

📌 Stanley Hills LLC – Summary of Involvement
🏦 Creditor and Financing Partner
Stanley Hills LLC is a significant lender to GBT Technologies.

From May to December 2019, Stanley loaned over $1 million to the company.

On February 26, 2020, the parties agreed that Stanley could convert the debt into common stock at a 15% discount to market price, with a 4.99% ownership cap to avoid majority control.

🔁 Conversions and Restructuring
In 2021, Stanley:

Converted $1.23M of debt (including interest) into 4.42 million shares.

Loaned an additional $325K.

Received SURG shares worth $800K as partial repayment.

Had $126K in interest rolled into principal.

Acquired $424,731 in balances from Pablo Gonzalez via a private transaction (not involving GBT directly).

On January 2, 2023, Stanley was issued a new $750,000 convertible note with 10% interest, convertible at an 85% discount to the 20-day low market price.

🔄 2024 Amendments
On Dec 31, 2024, the company:

Extended the note’s maturity to Dec 31, 2025.

Fixed the conversion price to $0.00001/share.

Set the total balance to $600,000.

Capped total potential issuance to 60 billion shares.

GBT recognized a $250,054 gain on the debt modification.

📊 Current Balances (as of Mar 31, 2025 & Dec 31, 2024)
Principal: $491,395

Accrued interest: $120,722 (Mar 2025); $108,605 (Dec 2024)

Note status: All is considered current (due in less than a year).

🔗 Indirect Ownership in VisionWave
Stanley Hills controls 50% of VisionWave Technologies Inc.

Tokenize (the joint venture partner) owns the other 50%.

VisionWave acquired key patents from Tokenize for $30 million, paid in equity.

On June 4, 2024, Tokenize received an additional 222 shares of VisionWave in exchange for 10 million vested AVAI shares.

📌 Key Takeaways:
Stanley Hills LLC is deeply tied to GBT Technologies through debt financing and equity-linked instruments.

Despite previous impairments in the joint venture with GBT Tokenize Corp, Stanley remains involved via VisionWave, which now owns core IP for AI-driven 3D imaging technology.

The company has relied heavily on convertible debt structures with Stanley and others to maintain operations and joint ventures.

Would you like a visual chart of these relationships (GBT ↔ Tokenize ↔ Stanley Hills ↔ VisionWave), or a financial analysis of GBT's debt exposure?

[price_and_volume]

You can make this argument if you like:

Yossi (COO, who also runs Stanley Hills) maybe "needs" to convert prior to any merger due to specific covenants.

Is that true? Beats me.

When he converts, does he also "need" to immediately dump them at .0001 & below?

Again, beats me.

But that appears to be what he's doing, relentlessly.

Anyway, these are worthwhile questions imo.

You may not share that opinion - that's cool.

But your ridiculous attacks & snide comments are unhelpful when somebody is trying to HONESTLY HELP, rather than convince you to keep believing what you ALREADY believe.

[price_and_volume]

Did you read the post?

What is Stanley Hills' relationship to $GTCH?

What is the COO's relationship to Stanley Hills?

You spend a LOT of time on DD, and you've even posted about the above stuff!

Maybe it was copy/paste or ChatGPT that you didn't actually read?

I try not to tell others what to think, and I don't make price predictions.

I've posted my CLEAR THOUGHTS tho:

The stock is responding badly to what others here claim is GREAT NEWS coming.

Something ain't right.

[na na]

Honesty, why the hell are you so coy? I thought you were geneinely currious but you're like

I KNOW the answer.

I was asking that poster if he knew.

Crap like that really irks me. Shit eating grin I bet.

Are you honestly hoping to do anything useful around here, are you just here to play a game show with you as the host?

[price_and_volume]

Possibly you can clear up this mystery:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176393797

[na na]

he has?

[price_and_volume]

You may have missed my post re: COO previously.

Why has he been massively converting/dumping shares?

Doesn't he believe in what's coming?

[na na]

I hope they buy up the notes, and take off the shares off the hands of the loan holders so they won't be burdened with the arduous task of spending years trying to off load shares. I hope our management does that because it would award them with a MOASS by retiring 90 percent the shares & all toxic notes without a R/S which would award our management with millions of dollars of profit, while awarding us all with nice profit.

[Pennyboy20]

Hopefully they sell $10 mill worth and pay off the debt so no more dilution

[na na]

Leadership
Noam Kenig – CEO
Award-winning founder and defense innovator with over 20 years of experience in AI, autonomous systems, and
advanced defense technologies. Brings extensive hands-on experience deploying mission-critical solutions for defense
and homeland security organizations worldwide.

Dr. Danny Rittman – CTO
Experienced inventor with extensive expertise in AI, chip design, and software engineering. Holds a PhD in Computer
Science. Specialized in developing cutting-edge quantum processors and algorithms. Former CTO at multiple tech
companies.

Erik Klinger – CFO
Growth-focused executive with extensive experience in M&A, capital markets, and public company operations. Former

CEO of CIMfinity and CFO of Gopher Protocol, with a strong track record in scaling tech ventures. Holds degrees from
Dartmouth and an MBA from UCLA.

Yossi Attia – COO
Seasoned operational leader and entrepreneur with a strong track record in capital markets, venture growth, and
international investment strategy. Brings extensive experience scaling businesses and driving cross-border execution.


Board and Strategic Advisors

Doug Davis – Executive Chairman
CEO and co-Chairman of Bannix Acquisition Corp. 35+ years in tech and finance. Former CEO of public and private
companies; expert in international business development, M&A, IT, AI, robotics and supply chain. AB Stanford, MBA UCLA.

Ambassador (Ret.) Ned L. Siegel – Advisor
Decades of leadership in real estate, public service, and advisory roles. Former U.S. Ambassador to the Bahamas. Phi Beta
Kappa; J.D. from Dickinson; honorary doctorate from the University of S. Carolina.

Chuck Hansen – Board Member
Chairman & CEO of Electro Scan Inc., a cleantech company. Holder of 19 patents and certified by major global firms,
including Saudi Aramco. Advisor to Crown Electrokinetics (NASDAQ: CRKN) and Moneta Ventures. BS UC Berkeley, MBA
UCLA. FAA-certified pilot and licensed drone operator.

Eric T. Shuss – Board Member
High-tech executive with leadership roles across AI, robotics, ERP, telecom, and manufacturing. Founder and former CEO,
COO, VP, and President of multiple tech ventures. Expert in enterprise systems, cloud computing, blockchain, and
automation. Holds a degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from California State University, Long Beach.

Haggai Ravid – Board Member
Strategist and trusted CEO with 18 years of experience in leading investment banks in Israel. Proven track record in
optimizing financial operations to ignite business growth. Demonstrated ability to drive M&A activities


-----------------------------------------


Yes, a few individuals stand out based on their unique qualifications and relevance depending on the context you're analyzing (e.g., tech, finance, defense, or credibility of leadership). Here's a breakdown:

Standouts (with explanation):
Noam Kenig – CEO
Why he stands out:

His combination of hands-on defense deployment experience and 20+ years in AI and autonomous systems makes him the key technical visionary. For a defense or AI-based firm, this is a serious credibility anchor.

Dr. Danny Rittman – CTO
Why he stands out:

The mention of quantum processor and algorithm development is notable. If this company is claiming cutting-edge AI or quantum capability, Rittman’s academic and technical background (PhD, CTO roles) gives the claim substance.

Doug Davis – Executive Chairman
Why he stands out:

A powerful resume with 35+ years in tech and finance, plus Stanford and UCLA credentials. The range from AI to robotics and M&A shows he’s a hybrid leader—good for a firm navigating both tech and business scaling.

Other Observations:
Erik Klinger – CFO
Strong credentials (Dartmouth + UCLA MBA) and relevant finance experience, especially if the company is navigating public markets or M&A. He’s solid, but not as distinctive unless you’re focused on capital strategy.

Chuck Hansen – Board Member
A standout in cleantech and patents, though not necessarily aligned with defense/AI unless there’s a hidden synergy (e.g., drone tech or environmental sensors). FAA/drone expertise is notable.

Yossi Attia & Haggai Ravid
Both bring valuable financial and operational depth, particularly in international growth and capital markets. However, they are more traditional in function and less standout unless your focus is investment or business scaling.

-------------------------------

Conclusion:
The top 3 standouts for innovation or tech credibility are:

Noam Kenig (CEO) – real-world defense + AI implementation.

Dr. Danny Rittman (CTO) – quantum + AI + strong technical pedigree.

Doug Davis (Executive Chairman) – cross-disciplinary leadership from AI to supply chain.

Let me know if you're assessing them for investment, partnership, credibility analysis, or due diligence—I can tailor the focus accordingly.

[Shrinky Dynk]

you too Porch Honkey you too and to All of you

[Porch Honkey]

Happy 4th of July to ya, hope you have a good one.

[Shrinky Dynk]

Have the old lady hold it thats what shes for

[Shrinky Dynk]

I dont like cigars you got the wrong family member

[Porch Honkey]

I need ya to hold my cigar for me while I open my beer, please.

[Shrinky Dynk]

that excerpt was from chat gbt that was posted on stocktwits

[Porch Honkey]

Bottom line, never forget this one here,
GBT Technologies (GTCH): GBT Technologies has a stake in VisionWave Technologies.
Prior to the merger, GBT Tokenize Corp., a subsidiary of GBT Technologies, entered into a patent purchase agreement with VisionWave Technologies, where VisionWave agreed to acquire certain patents and patent applications related to their imaging technology for a purchase price of $30,000,000 in shares of common stock.